Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons
Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intensive care medicine 1998-04, Vol.24 (4), p.372-377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 372 |
container_title | Intensive care medicine |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | BION, J. F RAMSAY, G ROUSSOS, C BURCHARDI, H |
description | Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire and direct discussion, of council members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national specialist societies with involvement in intensive care, and national experts, representing four geographical regions and 47 countries.Results: For the purposes of analysis, countries with common training structures have been grouped together; the denominator therefore includes both countries and regions. Formal training programmes in intensive care medicine (ICM) are available in 18 (85 %) of the 21 countries or regions surveyed. Twelve (57 %) offer multidisciplinary access to intensive care training with a common core curriculum. In six (28 %) training in ICM is available solely through anaesthesia. The duration of intensive care training required for recognition as a specialist in the 18 countries or regions with a formal programme ranges from 18 to 30 months, with a median of 24 months. All countries assess competence in intensive care, but methods for doing so vary widely. Eighteen countries or regions offer specialist registration (accreditation) in ICM; in 12 this is provided as dual accreditation in a base speciality and in ICM.Conclusions: There is substantial support for multidisciplinary training in ICM, as demonstrated by collaborative interspeciality developments in many countries. We propose that these national developments should be strengthened within Europe by the recognition of ‘supra-speciality’ status for ICM by the European Commission, and by the establishment of a multidisciplinary Board for training in ICM, with international agreement on core competencies and duration of training programmes, and a common approach to the assessment of competence through formal examination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s001340050584 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_995515482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632908141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-49247e203172c2cae3d194f780bf95756b150123fecee05fe7fc76d6237cd7043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LAzEQBfAgCtbq0XtQr6uTr82uNylVCwUP6nlJ00RSttk1kxX637vSInjwNJffezyGkEsGtwxA3yEAExJAgarkEZkwKXjBuKiOyQSE5IUsJT8lZ4ibUepSsQl5XcTsIoYvR61JjuZkQgzxg5q4ptg7G0wb8o5iNnlAGiKdD6nrHb2nP8kUTQ5dNC213bY3KWAX8ZyceNOiuzjcKXl_nL_Nnovly9Ni9rAsrKhULmTNpXYcBNPccmucWLNael3BytdKq3LFFIzzvbPOgfJOe6vLdcmFtmsNUkzJ1b63T93n4DA3m24YF7XY1LVSTMmKj-j6P8R1pSXXZS1GVeyVTR1icr7pU9iatGsYND_Pbf48d_Q3h1aD1rQ-mWgD_oY458BAiG8lYneh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787427693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons</title><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>BION, J. F ; RAMSAY, G ; ROUSSOS, C ; BURCHARDI, H</creator><creatorcontrib>BION, J. F ; RAMSAY, G ; ROUSSOS, C ; BURCHARDI, H ; the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine ; the Task Force</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire and direct discussion, of council members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national specialist societies with involvement in intensive care, and national experts, representing four geographical regions and 47 countries.Results: For the purposes of analysis, countries with common training structures have been grouped together; the denominator therefore includes both countries and regions. Formal training programmes in intensive care medicine (ICM) are available in 18 (85 %) of the 21 countries or regions surveyed. Twelve (57 %) offer multidisciplinary access to intensive care training with a common core curriculum. In six (28 %) training in ICM is available solely through anaesthesia. The duration of intensive care training required for recognition as a specialist in the 18 countries or regions with a formal programme ranges from 18 to 30 months, with a median of 24 months. All countries assess competence in intensive care, but methods for doing so vary widely. Eighteen countries or regions offer specialist registration (accreditation) in ICM; in 12 this is provided as dual accreditation in a base speciality and in ICM.Conclusions: There is substantial support for multidisciplinary training in ICM, as demonstrated by collaborative interspeciality developments in many countries. We propose that these national developments should be strengthened within Europe by the recognition of ‘supra-speciality’ status for ICM by the European Commission, and by the establishment of a multidisciplinary Board for training in ICM, with international agreement on core competencies and duration of training programmes, and a common approach to the assessment of competence through formal examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s001340050584</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICMED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Core curriculum ; Intensive care ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Miscellaneous ; Recognition ; Training</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 1998-04, Vol.24 (4), p.372-377</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 1998.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-49247e203172c2cae3d194f780bf95756b150123fecee05fe7fc76d6237cd7043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-49247e203172c2cae3d194f780bf95756b150123fecee05fe7fc76d6237cd7043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2220103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BION, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMSAY, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUSSOS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURCHARDI, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Task Force</creatorcontrib><title>Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><description>Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire and direct discussion, of council members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national specialist societies with involvement in intensive care, and national experts, representing four geographical regions and 47 countries.Results: For the purposes of analysis, countries with common training structures have been grouped together; the denominator therefore includes both countries and regions. Formal training programmes in intensive care medicine (ICM) are available in 18 (85 %) of the 21 countries or regions surveyed. Twelve (57 %) offer multidisciplinary access to intensive care training with a common core curriculum. In six (28 %) training in ICM is available solely through anaesthesia. The duration of intensive care training required for recognition as a specialist in the 18 countries or regions with a formal programme ranges from 18 to 30 months, with a median of 24 months. All countries assess competence in intensive care, but methods for doing so vary widely. Eighteen countries or regions offer specialist registration (accreditation) in ICM; in 12 this is provided as dual accreditation in a base speciality and in ICM.Conclusions: There is substantial support for multidisciplinary training in ICM, as demonstrated by collaborative interspeciality developments in many countries. We propose that these national developments should be strengthened within Europe by the recognition of ‘supra-speciality’ status for ICM by the European Commission, and by the establishment of a multidisciplinary Board for training in ICM, with international agreement on core competencies and duration of training programmes, and a common approach to the assessment of competence through formal examination.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1LAzEQBfAgCtbq0XtQr6uTr82uNylVCwUP6nlJ00RSttk1kxX637vSInjwNJffezyGkEsGtwxA3yEAExJAgarkEZkwKXjBuKiOyQSE5IUsJT8lZ4ibUepSsQl5XcTsIoYvR61JjuZkQgzxg5q4ptg7G0wb8o5iNnlAGiKdD6nrHb2nP8kUTQ5dNC213bY3KWAX8ZyceNOiuzjcKXl_nL_Nnovly9Ni9rAsrKhULmTNpXYcBNPccmucWLNael3BytdKq3LFFIzzvbPOgfJOe6vLdcmFtmsNUkzJ1b63T93n4DA3m24YF7XY1LVSTMmKj-j6P8R1pSXXZS1GVeyVTR1icr7pU9iatGsYND_Pbf48d_Q3h1aD1rQ-mWgD_oY458BAiG8lYneh</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>BION, J. F</creator><creator>RAMSAY, G</creator><creator>ROUSSOS, C</creator><creator>BURCHARDI, H</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons</title><author>BION, J. F ; RAMSAY, G ; ROUSSOS, C ; BURCHARDI, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-49247e203172c2cae3d194f780bf95756b150123fecee05fe7fc76d6237cd7043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BION, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMSAY, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUSSOS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURCHARDI, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Task Force</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BION, J. F</au><au>RAMSAY, G</au><au>ROUSSOS, C</au><au>BURCHARDI, H</au><aucorp>the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>the Task Force</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>372-377</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><coden>ICMED9</coden><abstract>Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire and direct discussion, of council members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national specialist societies with involvement in intensive care, and national experts, representing four geographical regions and 47 countries.Results: For the purposes of analysis, countries with common training structures have been grouped together; the denominator therefore includes both countries and regions. Formal training programmes in intensive care medicine (ICM) are available in 18 (85 %) of the 21 countries or regions surveyed. Twelve (57 %) offer multidisciplinary access to intensive care training with a common core curriculum. In six (28 %) training in ICM is available solely through anaesthesia. The duration of intensive care training required for recognition as a specialist in the 18 countries or regions with a formal programme ranges from 18 to 30 months, with a median of 24 months. All countries assess competence in intensive care, but methods for doing so vary widely. Eighteen countries or regions offer specialist registration (accreditation) in ICM; in 12 this is provided as dual accreditation in a base speciality and in ICM.Conclusions: There is substantial support for multidisciplinary training in ICM, as demonstrated by collaborative interspeciality developments in many countries. We propose that these national developments should be strengthened within Europe by the recognition of ‘supra-speciality’ status for ICM by the European Commission, and by the establishment of a multidisciplinary Board for training in ICM, with international agreement on core competencies and duration of training programmes, and a common approach to the assessment of competence through formal examination.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s001340050584</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-4642 |
ispartof | Intensive care medicine, 1998-04, Vol.24 (4), p.372-377 |
issn | 0342-4642 1432-1238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_995515482 |
source | Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Accreditation Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Core curriculum Intensive care Intensive care medicine Medical sciences Medicine Miscellaneous Recognition Training |
title | Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe : International comparisons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intensive%20care%20training%20and%20speciality%20status%20in%20Europe%20:%20International%20comparisons&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=BION,%20J.%20F&rft.aucorp=the%20European%20Society%20of%20Intensive%20Care%20Medicine&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=372-377&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft.coden=ICMED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s001340050584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632908141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787427693&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |