Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics
Gathering sensed information in an energy efficient manner is critical to operating the sensor network for a long period of time. The LEACH protocol presented by Heinzelman et al. (2000) is an elegant solution where clusters are formed to fuse data before transmitting to the base station. In this pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems 2002-09, Vol.13 (9), p.924-935 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 935 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 924 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Lindsey, S. Raghavendra, C. Sivalingam, K.M. |
description | Gathering sensed information in an energy efficient manner is critical to operating the sensor network for a long period of time. The LEACH protocol presented by Heinzelman et al. (2000) is an elegant solution where clusters are formed to fuse data before transmitting to the base station. In this paper, we present an improved scheme, called PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems), which is a near-optimal chain-based protocol that minimizes energy. In PEGASIS, each node communicates only with a close neighbor and takes turns transmitting to the base station, thus reducing the amount of energy spent per round. Simulation results show that PEGASIS performs better than LEACH. For many applications, in addition to minimizing energy, it is also important to consider the delay incurred in gathering sensed data. We capture this with the energy /spl times/ delay metric and present schemes that attempt to balance the energy and delay cost for data gathering from sensor networks. We present two new schemes to minimize energy /spl times/ delay using CDMA and non-CDMA sensor nodes. We compared the performance of direct, LEACH, and our schemes with respect to energy /spl times/ delay using extensive simulations for different network sizes. Results show that our schemes perform 80 or more times better than the direct scheme and also outperform the LEACH protocol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPDS.2002.1036066 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_992869907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1036066</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28245621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1093c061a9b3b951bfb0d3f75653567479f651cf655f4374c94aec9ebe11a8ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQgIMoWKs_QLwED-IldWdfyR5L6wsKCtbzsomzaWoedTdB-u9NSA_iwcvMwHwzzHxBcAlkBkDU3fp1-TajhNAZECaJlEfBBIRIIgoJO-5rwkWkKKjT4Mz7LSHABeGTYL40rQlz027QFXUemjJvXNFuKh8Wdeix9o0La2y_G_fpw84PDNbo8n1YYeuKzJ8HJ9aUHi8OeRq8P9yvF0_R6uXxeTFfRRlTcRv1R7KMSDAqZakSkNqUfDAbCymYkDGPlZUCsj4Iy1nMM8UNZgpTBDCJtWwa3Ix7d6756tC3uip8hmVpamw6r2lCuZAUevD2XxBkDDTmjA3o9R9023Su7t_QStFEKkXiHoIRylzjvUOrd66ojNtrIHqQrwf5epCvD_L7matxpkDEX_zY_QFgqX86</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>992869907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Lindsey, S. ; Raghavendra, C. ; Sivalingam, K.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, S. ; Raghavendra, C. ; Sivalingam, K.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Gathering sensed information in an energy efficient manner is critical to operating the sensor network for a long period of time. The LEACH protocol presented by Heinzelman et al. (2000) is an elegant solution where clusters are formed to fuse data before transmitting to the base station. In this paper, we present an improved scheme, called PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems), which is a near-optimal chain-based protocol that minimizes energy. In PEGASIS, each node communicates only with a close neighbor and takes turns transmitting to the base station, thus reducing the amount of energy spent per round. Simulation results show that PEGASIS performs better than LEACH. For many applications, in addition to minimizing energy, it is also important to consider the delay incurred in gathering sensed data. We capture this with the energy /spl times/ delay metric and present schemes that attempt to balance the energy and delay cost for data gathering from sensor networks. We present two new schemes to minimize energy /spl times/ delay using CDMA and non-CDMA sensor nodes. We compared the performance of direct, LEACH, and our schemes with respect to energy /spl times/ delay using extensive simulations for different network sizes. Results show that our schemes perform 80 or more times better than the direct scheme and also outperform the LEACH protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-9219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2002.1036066</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITDSEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Base stations ; Clustering algorithms ; Computer simulation ; Costs ; Delay ; Energy capture ; Energy conservation ; Energy efficiency ; Energy use ; Fuses ; Information systems ; Networks ; Protocols ; Sensor systems ; Sensors ; Stations ; Transmission</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 2002-09, Vol.13 (9), p.924-935</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1093c061a9b3b951bfb0d3f75653567479f651cf655f4374c94aec9ebe11a8ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1093c061a9b3b951bfb0d3f75653567479f651cf655f4374c94aec9ebe11a8ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1036066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1036066$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghavendra, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivalingam, K.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics</title><title>IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems</title><addtitle>TPDS</addtitle><description>Gathering sensed information in an energy efficient manner is critical to operating the sensor network for a long period of time. The LEACH protocol presented by Heinzelman et al. (2000) is an elegant solution where clusters are formed to fuse data before transmitting to the base station. In this paper, we present an improved scheme, called PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems), which is a near-optimal chain-based protocol that minimizes energy. In PEGASIS, each node communicates only with a close neighbor and takes turns transmitting to the base station, thus reducing the amount of energy spent per round. Simulation results show that PEGASIS performs better than LEACH. For many applications, in addition to minimizing energy, it is also important to consider the delay incurred in gathering sensed data. We capture this with the energy /spl times/ delay metric and present schemes that attempt to balance the energy and delay cost for data gathering from sensor networks. We present two new schemes to minimize energy /spl times/ delay using CDMA and non-CDMA sensor nodes. We compared the performance of direct, LEACH, and our schemes with respect to energy /spl times/ delay using extensive simulations for different network sizes. Results show that our schemes perform 80 or more times better than the direct scheme and also outperform the LEACH protocol.</description><subject>Base stations</subject><subject>Clustering algorithms</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Energy capture</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Fuses</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Sensor systems</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Transmission</subject><issn>1045-9219</issn><issn>1558-2183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQgIMoWKs_QLwED-IldWdfyR5L6wsKCtbzsomzaWoedTdB-u9NSA_iwcvMwHwzzHxBcAlkBkDU3fp1-TajhNAZECaJlEfBBIRIIgoJO-5rwkWkKKjT4Mz7LSHABeGTYL40rQlz027QFXUemjJvXNFuKh8Wdeix9o0La2y_G_fpw84PDNbo8n1YYeuKzJ8HJ9aUHi8OeRq8P9yvF0_R6uXxeTFfRRlTcRv1R7KMSDAqZakSkNqUfDAbCymYkDGPlZUCsj4Iy1nMM8UNZgpTBDCJtWwa3Ix7d6756tC3uip8hmVpamw6r2lCuZAUevD2XxBkDDTmjA3o9R9023Su7t_QStFEKkXiHoIRylzjvUOrd66ojNtrIHqQrwf5epCvD_L7matxpkDEX_zY_QFgqX86</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Lindsey, S.</creator><creator>Raghavendra, C.</creator><creator>Sivalingam, K.M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics</title><author>Lindsey, S. ; Raghavendra, C. ; Sivalingam, K.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1093c061a9b3b951bfb0d3f75653567479f651cf655f4374c94aec9ebe11a8ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Base stations</topic><topic>Clustering algorithms</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Energy capture</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Fuses</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Sensor systems</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghavendra, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivalingam, K.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindsey, S.</au><au>Raghavendra, C.</au><au>Sivalingam, K.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems</jtitle><stitle>TPDS</stitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>924</spage><epage>935</epage><pages>924-935</pages><issn>1045-9219</issn><eissn>1558-2183</eissn><coden>ITDSEO</coden><abstract>Gathering sensed information in an energy efficient manner is critical to operating the sensor network for a long period of time. The LEACH protocol presented by Heinzelman et al. (2000) is an elegant solution where clusters are formed to fuse data before transmitting to the base station. In this paper, we present an improved scheme, called PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems), which is a near-optimal chain-based protocol that minimizes energy. In PEGASIS, each node communicates only with a close neighbor and takes turns transmitting to the base station, thus reducing the amount of energy spent per round. Simulation results show that PEGASIS performs better than LEACH. For many applications, in addition to minimizing energy, it is also important to consider the delay incurred in gathering sensed data. We capture this with the energy /spl times/ delay metric and present schemes that attempt to balance the energy and delay cost for data gathering from sensor networks. We present two new schemes to minimize energy /spl times/ delay using CDMA and non-CDMA sensor nodes. We compared the performance of direct, LEACH, and our schemes with respect to energy /spl times/ delay using extensive simulations for different network sizes. Results show that our schemes perform 80 or more times better than the direct scheme and also outperform the LEACH protocol.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPDS.2002.1036066</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-9219 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 2002-09, Vol.13 (9), p.924-935 |
issn | 1045-9219 1558-2183 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_992869907 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Base stations Clustering algorithms Computer simulation Costs Delay Energy capture Energy conservation Energy efficiency Energy use Fuses Information systems Networks Protocols Sensor systems Sensors Stations Transmission |
title | Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A45%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20gathering%20algorithms%20in%20sensor%20networks%20using%20energy%20metrics&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20parallel%20and%20distributed%20systems&rft.au=Lindsey,%20S.&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=924&rft.epage=935&rft.pages=924-935&rft.issn=1045-9219&rft.eissn=1558-2183&rft.coden=ITDSEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPDS.2002.1036066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28245621%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=992869907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1036066&rfr_iscdi=true |