Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness
Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the percep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rehabilitation counseling bulletin 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Rehabilitation counseling bulletin |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Plotner, Anthony J. Trach, John S. Strauser, David R. |
description | Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0034355211427950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_963691963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ959857</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0034355211427950</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2624802551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49eFi8ryab91GKj5aCINXrkk0mmrLdrcn24M2_4d_zl7h1i4LgHGZgvscwH0KnBF8QIuUlxpRRzgtCWCE1x3toRDhVOVOc7qPRFs63-CE6SmmJ-yKajdDsqbWmC21j6uwBXkwV6tB9L7JJu2kS1G1Mn-8f2dRB0wUfwGWLaJoUdpzVGjpobIB0jA68qROc7OYYPd5cLyZ3-fz-djq5mue2UEWXa11JJ7nlQijnC2-d4NyCsRw89dJIxpTTEiQ3mAldVcpRVVlqLLaCF5SO0fngu47t6wZSVy7bTewfSKUWVGjS956EB5KNbUoRfLmOYWXiW0lwuQ2s_BtYLzkbJBCD_aFfzzTXissezgc4mWf4Pfmv3Rc1CnV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>963691963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-3552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4853</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0034355211427950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Career Planning ; Counseling ; Counselors ; Electronic Learning ; Feedback (Response) ; Higher Education ; Identification ; Illinois ; Information Technology ; Masters Degrees ; Ohio ; Perceptions ; Professional Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Improvement ; Rehabilitation Counseling ; Resource Allocation ; Surveys ; Transitional Programs ; Transitions ; Vocational Rehabilitation ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin, 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0034355211427950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0034355211427950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ959857$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</title><title>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</title><addtitle>Rehabil Couns Bull</addtitle><description>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</description><subject>Career Planning</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counselors</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Masters Degrees</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Counseling</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Transitional Programs</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><subject>Vocational Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><issn>0034-3552</issn><issn>1538-4853</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49eFi8ryab91GKj5aCINXrkk0mmrLdrcn24M2_4d_zl7h1i4LgHGZgvscwH0KnBF8QIuUlxpRRzgtCWCE1x3toRDhVOVOc7qPRFs63-CE6SmmJ-yKajdDsqbWmC21j6uwBXkwV6tB9L7JJu2kS1G1Mn-8f2dRB0wUfwGWLaJoUdpzVGjpobIB0jA68qROc7OYYPd5cLyZ3-fz-djq5mue2UEWXa11JJ7nlQijnC2-d4NyCsRw89dJIxpTTEiQ3mAldVcpRVVlqLLaCF5SO0fngu47t6wZSVy7bTewfSKUWVGjS956EB5KNbUoRfLmOYWXiW0lwuQ2s_BtYLzkbJBCD_aFfzzTXissezgc4mWf4Pfmv3Rc1CnV8</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Plotner, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Trach, John S.</creator><creator>Strauser, David R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies</title><author>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Career Planning</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counselors</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Masters Degrees</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Counseling</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Transitional Programs</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><topic>Vocational Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plotner, Anthony J.</au><au>Trach, John S.</au><au>Strauser, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ959857</ericid><atitle>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</atitle><jtitle>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Rehabil Couns Bull</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>135-143</pages><issn>0034-3552</issn><eissn>1538-4853</eissn><abstract>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0034355211427950</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-3552 |
ispartof | Rehabilitation counseling bulletin, 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143 |
issn | 0034-3552 1538-4853 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_963691963 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Career Planning Counseling Counselors Electronic Learning Feedback (Response) Higher Education Identification Illinois Information Technology Masters Degrees Ohio Perceptions Professional Development Program Effectiveness Program Improvement Rehabilitation Counseling Resource Allocation Surveys Transitional Programs Transitions Vocational Rehabilitation Wisconsin |
title | Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vocational%20Rehabilitation%20Counselors%E2%80%99%20Identified%20Transition%20Competencies:%20Perceived%20Importance,%20Frequency,%20and%20Preparedness&rft.jtitle=Rehabilitation%20counseling%20bulletin&rft.au=Plotner,%20Anthony%20J.&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=135-143&rft.issn=0034-3552&rft.eissn=1538-4853&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0034355211427950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624802551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=963691963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ959857&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0034355211427950&rfr_iscdi=true |