Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness

Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the percep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rehabilitation counseling bulletin 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143
Hauptverfasser: Plotner, Anthony J., Trach, John S., Strauser, David R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 3
container_start_page 135
container_title Rehabilitation counseling bulletin
container_volume 55
creator Plotner, Anthony J.
Trach, John S.
Strauser, David R.
description Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0034355211427950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_963691963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ959857</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0034355211427950</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2624802551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49eFi8ryab91GKj5aCINXrkk0mmrLdrcn24M2_4d_zl7h1i4LgHGZgvscwH0KnBF8QIuUlxpRRzgtCWCE1x3toRDhVOVOc7qPRFs63-CE6SmmJ-yKajdDsqbWmC21j6uwBXkwV6tB9L7JJu2kS1G1Mn-8f2dRB0wUfwGWLaJoUdpzVGjpobIB0jA68qROc7OYYPd5cLyZ3-fz-djq5mue2UEWXa11JJ7nlQijnC2-d4NyCsRw89dJIxpTTEiQ3mAldVcpRVVlqLLaCF5SO0fngu47t6wZSVy7bTewfSKUWVGjS956EB5KNbUoRfLmOYWXiW0lwuQ2s_BtYLzkbJBCD_aFfzzTXissezgc4mWf4Pfmv3Rc1CnV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>963691963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-3552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4853</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0034355211427950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Career Planning ; Counseling ; Counselors ; Electronic Learning ; Feedback (Response) ; Higher Education ; Identification ; Illinois ; Information Technology ; Masters Degrees ; Ohio ; Perceptions ; Professional Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Improvement ; Rehabilitation Counseling ; Resource Allocation ; Surveys ; Transitional Programs ; Transitions ; Vocational Rehabilitation ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin, 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0034355211427950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0034355211427950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ959857$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</title><title>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</title><addtitle>Rehabil Couns Bull</addtitle><description>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</description><subject>Career Planning</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counselors</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Masters Degrees</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Counseling</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Transitional Programs</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><subject>Vocational Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><issn>0034-3552</issn><issn>1538-4853</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49eFi8ryab91GKj5aCINXrkk0mmrLdrcn24M2_4d_zl7h1i4LgHGZgvscwH0KnBF8QIuUlxpRRzgtCWCE1x3toRDhVOVOc7qPRFs63-CE6SmmJ-yKajdDsqbWmC21j6uwBXkwV6tB9L7JJu2kS1G1Mn-8f2dRB0wUfwGWLaJoUdpzVGjpobIB0jA68qROc7OYYPd5cLyZ3-fz-djq5mue2UEWXa11JJ7nlQijnC2-d4NyCsRw89dJIxpTTEiQ3mAldVcpRVVlqLLaCF5SO0fngu47t6wZSVy7bTewfSKUWVGjS956EB5KNbUoRfLmOYWXiW0lwuQ2s_BtYLzkbJBCD_aFfzzTXissezgc4mWf4Pfmv3Rc1CnV8</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Plotner, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Trach, John S.</creator><creator>Strauser, David R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies</title><author>Plotner, Anthony J. ; Trach, John S. ; Strauser, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-99b7d75c5668df2fcd655ceac5ef3f7a7448d97e75a0469bb8d38bc3ac0c65233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Career Planning</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counselors</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Masters Degrees</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Counseling</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Transitional Programs</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><topic>Vocational Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plotner, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauser, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plotner, Anthony J.</au><au>Trach, John S.</au><au>Strauser, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ959857</ericid><atitle>Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness</atitle><jtitle>Rehabilitation counseling bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Rehabil Couns Bull</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>135-143</pages><issn>0034-3552</issn><eissn>1538-4853</eissn><abstract>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) professionals are critical partners in the transition process for students with disabilities; therefore, they are required to develop transition service delivery proficiencies. VR professional perceptions of transition competencies are seldom examined due to the perception that transition falls mainly on school-based professionals. In this study, VR professionals from three states were surveyed on their perceptions regarding transition competencies. Specifically, seven transition domain areas (i.e., Providing Career Planning and Counseling, Providing Career Preparation Experiences, Facilitating Allocation of Resources, Promoting Access and Opportunity for Student Success, Conducting Program Improvement Activities, Building and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, and Promoting Nonprofessional Supports and Relationships) were examined and reported across importance, preparedness, and frequency. Results showed that importance rankings were rated very high overall across all competencies (µ = 3.42). Preparedness was the next highest overall rating (µ = 2.77), and frequency in performing transition competencies was the lowest (µ = 2.55). Paired t tests also showed a significant difference between each of the pairs of ratings. In addition, the findings indicated that although all domains were identified as very important, respondents did not indicate they were as prepared or participated as frequently in these transition activities. Individual domain rankings and rationale as well as implications for practice are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0034355211427950</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-3552
ispartof Rehabilitation counseling bulletin, 2012-04, Vol.55 (3), p.135-143
issn 0034-3552
1538-4853
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_963691963
source SAGE Complete
subjects Career Planning
Counseling
Counselors
Electronic Learning
Feedback (Response)
Higher Education
Identification
Illinois
Information Technology
Masters Degrees
Ohio
Perceptions
Professional Development
Program Effectiveness
Program Improvement
Rehabilitation Counseling
Resource Allocation
Surveys
Transitional Programs
Transitions
Vocational Rehabilitation
Wisconsin
title Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors’ Identified Transition Competencies: Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Preparedness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vocational%20Rehabilitation%20Counselors%E2%80%99%20Identified%20Transition%20Competencies:%20Perceived%20Importance,%20Frequency,%20and%20Preparedness&rft.jtitle=Rehabilitation%20counseling%20bulletin&rft.au=Plotner,%20Anthony%20J.&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=135-143&rft.issn=0034-3552&rft.eissn=1538-4853&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0034355211427950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624802551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=963691963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ959857&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0034355211427950&rfr_iscdi=true