Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START
Passed by the US House of Representatives as part of the annual defense authorization bill in May 2011, provisions of the New START Implementation Act (NSIA) represented an attempt by Congress to exercise more robust involvement in US nuclear policy, an area historically subject to a great deal of d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2012-04, Vol.45 (2), p.346-353 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Karako, Thomas |
description | Passed by the US House of Representatives as part of the annual defense authorization bill in May 2011, provisions of the New START Implementation Act (NSIA) represented an attempt by Congress to exercise more robust involvement in US nuclear policy, an area historically subject to a great deal of deference to the executive branch. The bill sought to implement the “grand bargain” that preceded the ratification of the New START treaty—namely, that the treaty's seven-year window of reductions to US nuclear forces should be made in tandem with a 10-year modernization program of both the weapons themselves and their aging delivery systems. The context of this arrangement was growing concern about the ability of the United States to retain a sustainable nuclear deterrent for the indefinite future. Although the NSIA provisions were abandoned during conference with the Senate in December 2011, their underlying concerns remain unresolved, and the sustainability of the nuclear enterprise is certain to reappear as a future point of controversy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S104909651200008X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_952700280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S104909651200008X</cupid><jstor_id>41433720</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41433720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1811ace57b6345fcc180c4a00d93df1f21f9ccf5ab5f6c901a06e5413999d8753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AD0Lwvjqz2exuvJXik1LFVvS2pNmk3dJuapJF-u_dPtCDOJeZ4XvBR8g5whUCZtcjhESASDnG0E7-cUA6yFkWccH4YXu3cLTBj8mJ9_Mth0OHPA0btdDS0XctV7b2tKppmGmKGIcZ7dt66rT3N_TFLqpQKU9lXW4ftabSBO3oUH_R0bj3Oj4lR0YuvD7b7y55u7sd9x-iwfP9Y783iBRjLESYI0qleTZJWcKNUpiDSiRAKVhp0MRohFKGywk3qRKAElLNE2RCiDLPOOuSy53vytnPRvtQzG3j6jayEDzOAOIcWhLuSMpZ7502xcpVS-nWBUKxaaz401irudhp5j5Y9yNIMGEsizeebO8plxNXlVP9m_y_6zekUXSW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>952700280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Karako, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Karako, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Passed by the US House of Representatives as part of the annual defense authorization bill in May 2011, provisions of the New START Implementation Act (NSIA) represented an attempt by Congress to exercise more robust involvement in US nuclear policy, an area historically subject to a great deal of deference to the executive branch. The bill sought to implement the “grand bargain” that preceded the ratification of the New START treaty—namely, that the treaty's seven-year window of reductions to US nuclear forces should be made in tandem with a 10-year modernization program of both the weapons themselves and their aging delivery systems. The context of this arrangement was growing concern about the ability of the United States to retain a sustainable nuclear deterrent for the indefinite future. Although the NSIA provisions were abandoned during conference with the Senate in December 2011, their underlying concerns remain unresolved, and the sustainability of the nuclear enterprise is certain to reappear as a future point of controversy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S104909651200008X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Arms control agreements ; Association News ; Bills ; Delivery Systems ; Environment ; Military policy ; National security ; Nuclear deterrence ; Nuclear warheads ; Nuclear weapons ; Office Occupations ; Political science ; Treaties ; United States environmental policy ; United States Senate ; War ; Warheads ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2012-04, Vol.45 (2), p.346-353</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1811ace57b6345fcc180c4a00d93df1f21f9ccf5ab5f6c901a06e5413999d8753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41433720$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S104909651200008X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karako, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><description>Passed by the US House of Representatives as part of the annual defense authorization bill in May 2011, provisions of the New START Implementation Act (NSIA) represented an attempt by Congress to exercise more robust involvement in US nuclear policy, an area historically subject to a great deal of deference to the executive branch. The bill sought to implement the “grand bargain” that preceded the ratification of the New START treaty—namely, that the treaty's seven-year window of reductions to US nuclear forces should be made in tandem with a 10-year modernization program of both the weapons themselves and their aging delivery systems. The context of this arrangement was growing concern about the ability of the United States to retain a sustainable nuclear deterrent for the indefinite future. Although the NSIA provisions were abandoned during conference with the Senate in December 2011, their underlying concerns remain unresolved, and the sustainability of the nuclear enterprise is certain to reappear as a future point of controversy.</description><subject>Arms control agreements</subject><subject>Association News</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Nuclear deterrence</subject><subject>Nuclear warheads</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Office Occupations</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>United States environmental policy</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Warheads</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AD0Lwvjqz2exuvJXik1LFVvS2pNmk3dJuapJF-u_dPtCDOJeZ4XvBR8g5whUCZtcjhESASDnG0E7-cUA6yFkWccH4YXu3cLTBj8mJ9_Mth0OHPA0btdDS0XctV7b2tKppmGmKGIcZ7dt66rT3N_TFLqpQKU9lXW4ftabSBO3oUH_R0bj3Oj4lR0YuvD7b7y55u7sd9x-iwfP9Y783iBRjLESYI0qleTZJWcKNUpiDSiRAKVhp0MRohFKGywk3qRKAElLNE2RCiDLPOOuSy53vytnPRvtQzG3j6jayEDzOAOIcWhLuSMpZ7502xcpVS-nWBUKxaaz401irudhp5j5Y9yNIMGEsizeebO8plxNXlVP9m_y_6zekUXSW</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Karako, Thomas</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START</title><author>Karako, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-1811ace57b6345fcc180c4a00d93df1f21f9ccf5ab5f6c901a06e5413999d8753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arms control agreements</topic><topic>Association News</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Nuclear deterrence</topic><topic>Nuclear warheads</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Office Occupations</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>United States environmental policy</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Warheads</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karako, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karako, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>346-353</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>Passed by the US House of Representatives as part of the annual defense authorization bill in May 2011, provisions of the New START Implementation Act (NSIA) represented an attempt by Congress to exercise more robust involvement in US nuclear policy, an area historically subject to a great deal of deference to the executive branch. The bill sought to implement the “grand bargain” that preceded the ratification of the New START treaty—namely, that the treaty's seven-year window of reductions to US nuclear forces should be made in tandem with a 10-year modernization program of both the weapons themselves and their aging delivery systems. The context of this arrangement was growing concern about the ability of the United States to retain a sustainable nuclear deterrent for the indefinite future. Although the NSIA provisions were abandoned during conference with the Senate in December 2011, their underlying concerns remain unresolved, and the sustainability of the nuclear enterprise is certain to reappear as a future point of controversy.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S104909651200008X</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2012-04, Vol.45 (2), p.346-353 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_952700280 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Arms control agreements Association News Bills Delivery Systems Environment Military policy National security Nuclear deterrence Nuclear warheads Nuclear weapons Office Occupations Political science Treaties United States environmental policy United States Senate War Warheads Weapons |
title | Nuclear Weapons in the 112th Congress: Politics and Policy after New START |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A08%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%20Weapons%20in%20the%20112th%20Congress:%20Politics%20and%20Policy%20after%20New%20START&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Karako,%20Thomas&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=346-353&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S104909651200008X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41433720%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=952700280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S104909651200008X&rft_jstor_id=41433720&rfr_iscdi=true |