Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution
The effects of two rootstocks on tree growth, fruit set and development, yield, CO2 assimilation, 13C-photoassimilates transport, and carbohydrate distribution were investigated. Cleopatra mandarin (CM) (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka) and Forner-Alcaide 13 (FA-13) [Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka × Po...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2012-03, Vol.52 (2), p.836-848 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 848 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 836 |
| container_title | Crop science |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | Jover, Sara Martínez-Alcántara, Belén Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan Legaz, Francisco Primo-Millo, Eduardo Forner, Juan Forner-Giner, M. Angeles |
| description | The effects of two rootstocks on tree growth, fruit set and development, yield, CO2 assimilation, 13C-photoassimilates transport, and carbohydrate distribution were investigated. Cleopatra mandarin (CM) (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka) and Forner-Alcaide 13 (FA-13) [Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] rootstocks were used for this study. The first experiment was performed with 2-yr-old plants grown under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that leaves from navel orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] grafted onto FA-13 rootstock (navel onto FA-13) had higher net CO2 assimilation (Aco2) rates than those from navel orange grafted onto CM rootstock (navel onto CM). Also, FA-13 rootstock induced an increase in leaf transpiration rate with respect to CM rootstock resulting in similar water use efficiency (WUE) values. The higher of photosynthetic activity in navel onto FA-13 plants resulted in higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to roots compared to navel onto CM plants, causing higher sucrose and starch accumulation in FA-13 roots. The second experiment was performed under field conditions using 7-yr-old trees. Navel orange grafted onto FA-13, which had the highest Aco2 values, displayed higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to developing fruits than those on CM. navel onto FA-13 leaf sucrose content decreased compared to navel onto CM and leaf concentrations of this sugar were inversely correlated with Aco2 values. On the other hand, sucrose and starch concentrations in root bark appeared to be related with fruit sink strength. In conclusion, FA-13 rootstock enhances photosynthetic rate in navel orange leaves compared to CM and differences in this parameter affected growth and increased yield. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2011.02.0100 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_930805077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1663604233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4260-3a0e5bc42de3f4cd95a440873a82591b5e53ba480354f5ccf43ce534235c96ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhlcIJErhF3DAQkLi0IRZf-xmuaGlLZEiUjX0wMnyeseNy9YOtpdq_z0OiVDFiZPH42feGc9bFK9LmNOSiQ86-F3UlkJZzoHOoQR4UpyUnIkZVII9fRQ_L17EeAcAdVOLk2JaOjOM6DQSb8i19ykmr39E4h252vrk4-TSFqONxDryVf3CgayDcrdIVphv8SM5NwZ1-lNxGfxD2p6R7xaH_owo15NWhc5vpz6ohOSzjSnYbkzWu5fFM6OGiK-O52lxc3H-rf0yW60vl-2n1UxzWsGMKUDR5bhHZrjuG6E4h0XN1IKKpuwECtYpvgAmuBFaG850TnHKhG4qVOy0eH_Q3QX_c8SY5L2NGodBOfRjlGVVsQoyzzL69h_0zo_B5elkw2ABAuo6Q-wA5aXHGNDIXbD3KkyyBLl3Qz5yQwKVezdy1bujtIpaDSavUNv4t5QKkQ3iVeYuDtyDHXD6H2nZblraXq-vNu1ynwd6bPjmIGSUl-o25GY3m_wksvWCQ_7tb7_1qks</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>930805077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jover, Sara ; Martínez-Alcántara, Belén ; Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan ; Legaz, Francisco ; Primo-Millo, Eduardo ; Forner, Juan ; Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</creator><creatorcontrib>Jover, Sara ; Martínez-Alcántara, Belén ; Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan ; Legaz, Francisco ; Primo-Millo, Eduardo ; Forner, Juan ; Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of two rootstocks on tree growth, fruit set and development, yield, CO2 assimilation, 13C-photoassimilates transport, and carbohydrate distribution were investigated. Cleopatra mandarin (CM) (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka) and Forner-Alcaide 13 (FA-13) [Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] rootstocks were used for this study. The first experiment was performed with 2-yr-old plants grown under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that leaves from navel orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] grafted onto FA-13 rootstock (navel onto FA-13) had higher net CO2 assimilation (Aco2) rates than those from navel orange grafted onto CM rootstock (navel onto CM). Also, FA-13 rootstock induced an increase in leaf transpiration rate with respect to CM rootstock resulting in similar water use efficiency (WUE) values. The higher of photosynthetic activity in navel onto FA-13 plants resulted in higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to roots compared to navel onto CM plants, causing higher sucrose and starch accumulation in FA-13 roots. The second experiment was performed under field conditions using 7-yr-old trees. Navel orange grafted onto FA-13, which had the highest Aco2 values, displayed higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to developing fruits than those on CM. navel onto FA-13 leaf sucrose content decreased compared to navel onto CM and leaf concentrations of this sugar were inversely correlated with Aco2 values. On the other hand, sucrose and starch concentrations in root bark appeared to be related with fruit sink strength. In conclusion, FA-13 rootstock enhances photosynthetic rate in navel orange leaves compared to CM and differences in this parameter affected growth and increased yield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2011.02.0100</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Assimilation ; Bark ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbohydrates ; Carbon dioxide ; Cell division ; Citrus aurantium var. chrysocarpa ; Citrus reshni ; Citrus sinensis ; Experiments ; Food quality ; fruit set ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; greenhouses ; Leaves ; mandarins ; Photosynthesis ; Plants ; Poncirus trifoliata ; Roots ; rootstocks ; Starch ; Sucrose ; Transpiration ; tree growth ; Trees ; Water use ; Water use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2012-03, Vol.52 (2), p.836-848</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4260-3a0e5bc42de3f4cd95a440873a82591b5e53ba480354f5ccf43ce534235c96ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4260-3a0e5bc42de3f4cd95a440873a82591b5e53ba480354f5ccf43ce534235c96ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2011.02.0100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2011.02.0100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25543546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jover, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Alcántara, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legaz, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primo-Millo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forner, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution</title><title>Crop science</title><description>The effects of two rootstocks on tree growth, fruit set and development, yield, CO2 assimilation, 13C-photoassimilates transport, and carbohydrate distribution were investigated. Cleopatra mandarin (CM) (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka) and Forner-Alcaide 13 (FA-13) [Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] rootstocks were used for this study. The first experiment was performed with 2-yr-old plants grown under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that leaves from navel orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] grafted onto FA-13 rootstock (navel onto FA-13) had higher net CO2 assimilation (Aco2) rates than those from navel orange grafted onto CM rootstock (navel onto CM). Also, FA-13 rootstock induced an increase in leaf transpiration rate with respect to CM rootstock resulting in similar water use efficiency (WUE) values. The higher of photosynthetic activity in navel onto FA-13 plants resulted in higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to roots compared to navel onto CM plants, causing higher sucrose and starch accumulation in FA-13 roots. The second experiment was performed under field conditions using 7-yr-old trees. Navel orange grafted onto FA-13, which had the highest Aco2 values, displayed higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to developing fruits than those on CM. navel onto FA-13 leaf sucrose content decreased compared to navel onto CM and leaf concentrations of this sugar were inversely correlated with Aco2 values. On the other hand, sucrose and starch concentrations in root bark appeared to be related with fruit sink strength. In conclusion, FA-13 rootstock enhances photosynthetic rate in navel orange leaves compared to CM and differences in this parameter affected growth and increased yield.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Cell division</subject><subject>Citrus aurantium var. chrysocarpa</subject><subject>Citrus reshni</subject><subject>Citrus sinensis</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>fruit set</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>greenhouses</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>mandarins</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Poncirus trifoliata</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>rootstocks</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>tree growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhlcIJErhF3DAQkLi0IRZf-xmuaGlLZEiUjX0wMnyeseNy9YOtpdq_z0OiVDFiZPH42feGc9bFK9LmNOSiQ86-F3UlkJZzoHOoQR4UpyUnIkZVII9fRQ_L17EeAcAdVOLk2JaOjOM6DQSb8i19ykmr39E4h252vrk4-TSFqONxDryVf3CgayDcrdIVphv8SM5NwZ1-lNxGfxD2p6R7xaH_owo15NWhc5vpz6ohOSzjSnYbkzWu5fFM6OGiK-O52lxc3H-rf0yW60vl-2n1UxzWsGMKUDR5bhHZrjuG6E4h0XN1IKKpuwECtYpvgAmuBFaG850TnHKhG4qVOy0eH_Q3QX_c8SY5L2NGodBOfRjlGVVsQoyzzL69h_0zo_B5elkw2ABAuo6Q-wA5aXHGNDIXbD3KkyyBLl3Qz5yQwKVezdy1bujtIpaDSavUNv4t5QKkQ3iVeYuDtyDHXD6H2nZblraXq-vNu1ynwd6bPjmIGSUl-o25GY3m_wksvWCQ_7tb7_1qks</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Jover, Sara</creator><creator>Martínez-Alcántara, Belén</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan</creator><creator>Legaz, Francisco</creator><creator>Primo-Millo, Eduardo</creator><creator>Forner, Juan</creator><creator>Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution</title><author>Jover, Sara ; Martínez-Alcántara, Belén ; Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan ; Legaz, Francisco ; Primo-Millo, Eduardo ; Forner, Juan ; Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4260-3a0e5bc42de3f4cd95a440873a82591b5e53ba480354f5ccf43ce534235c96ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Cell division</topic><topic>Citrus aurantium var. chrysocarpa</topic><topic>Citrus reshni</topic><topic>Citrus sinensis</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>fruit set</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>greenhouses</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>mandarins</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Poncirus trifoliata</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>rootstocks</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>tree growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jover, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Alcántara, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legaz, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primo-Millo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forner, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jover, Sara</au><au>Martínez-Alcántara, Belén</au><au>Rodríguez-Gamir, Juan</au><au>Legaz, Francisco</au><au>Primo-Millo, Eduardo</au><au>Forner, Juan</au><au>Forner-Giner, M. Angeles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>848</epage><pages>836-848</pages><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>The effects of two rootstocks on tree growth, fruit set and development, yield, CO2 assimilation, 13C-photoassimilates transport, and carbohydrate distribution were investigated. Cleopatra mandarin (CM) (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka) and Forner-Alcaide 13 (FA-13) [Citrus reshni hort. ex Tanaka × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] rootstocks were used for this study. The first experiment was performed with 2-yr-old plants grown under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that leaves from navel orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] grafted onto FA-13 rootstock (navel onto FA-13) had higher net CO2 assimilation (Aco2) rates than those from navel orange grafted onto CM rootstock (navel onto CM). Also, FA-13 rootstock induced an increase in leaf transpiration rate with respect to CM rootstock resulting in similar water use efficiency (WUE) values. The higher of photosynthetic activity in navel onto FA-13 plants resulted in higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to roots compared to navel onto CM plants, causing higher sucrose and starch accumulation in FA-13 roots. The second experiment was performed under field conditions using 7-yr-old trees. Navel orange grafted onto FA-13, which had the highest Aco2 values, displayed higher photoassimilate transport (13C-labeled) from leaves to developing fruits than those on CM. navel onto FA-13 leaf sucrose content decreased compared to navel onto CM and leaf concentrations of this sugar were inversely correlated with Aco2 values. On the other hand, sucrose and starch concentrations in root bark appeared to be related with fruit sink strength. In conclusion, FA-13 rootstock enhances photosynthetic rate in navel orange leaves compared to CM and differences in this parameter affected growth and increased yield.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2011.02.0100</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1435-0653 |
| ispartof | Crop science, 2012-03, Vol.52 (2), p.836-848 |
| issn | 1435-0653 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_930805077 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Assimilation Bark Biological and medical sciences Carbohydrates Carbon dioxide Cell division Citrus aurantium var. chrysocarpa Citrus reshni Citrus sinensis Experiments Food quality fruit set Fruits Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology greenhouses Leaves mandarins Photosynthesis Plants Poncirus trifoliata Roots rootstocks Starch Sucrose Transpiration tree growth Trees Water use Water use efficiency |
| title | Influence of Rootstocks on Photosynthesis in Navel Orange Leaves: Effects on Growth, Yield, and Carbohydrate Distribution |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A01%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Rootstocks%20on%20Photosynthesis%20in%20Navel%20Orange%20Leaves:%20Effects%20on%20Growth,%20Yield,%20and%20Carbohydrate%20Distribution&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Jover,%20Sara&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=848&rft.pages=836-848&rft.issn=1435-0653&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2011.02.0100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1663604233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=930805077&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |