AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM

.  In this essay, I compare the atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche with that of Richard Dawkins. My purpose is to describe certain differences in their respective atheisms with the intent of showing that Nietzsche's atheism contains a richer and fuller affirmation of human life. In Dawkins’s presen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zygon 2012-03, Vol.47 (1), p.140-155
1. Verfasser: Thomas Howe, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 1
container_start_page 140
container_title Zygon
container_volume 47
creator Thomas Howe, J.
description .  In this essay, I compare the atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche with that of Richard Dawkins. My purpose is to describe certain differences in their respective atheisms with the intent of showing that Nietzsche's atheism contains a richer and fuller affirmation of human life. In Dawkins’s presentation of the value of life without God, there is a naïve optimism that purports that human beings, educated in science and purged of religion, will find lives of easy peace and comfortable wonder. Part of my argument is that this optimism regarding the power of objective science is subject to Nietzsche's criticism of Socrates and what he calls the “theoretical man.” As such, it fails in terms of providing a true affirmation of life in the godless world.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01243.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_928005965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2609788901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4753-f17e1dd44415562db88a5de4cb61f8b16f727449c1c83910a2c42c5b55a8097e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNtOwyAAhonRxHl4B2LiZStQKNQLk6ZnD23S1eMNYaxNNuc2i8b59lJndi03EPj_D_gAgBi52I6LuYupz52AU-oShLGLMKGeu9kDo93BPhghFmCHeIIdgiNj5gghn3N_BK7DNC3qu7ApqnIMw7RJaphV8SVM6yKJ6yLKYVkkzcs4yhMYljEctsI6hnH4eFPYSlXCsMmTYnx3Ag46tTDt6d98DO7TpIly57bKiii8dTTlzHM6zFs8nVJKMWM-mU6EUGzaUj3xcScm2O84sW8ONNbCCzBSRFOi2YQxJVDAW-8YnG256371_tmaDzlfffZLe6UMiED2pz6zIbEN6X5lTN92ct3P3lT_LTGSgzg5l4MfOfiRgzj5K05ubPX8j6-MVouuV0s9M7s-YUwgiojNXW1zX7NF-_1vvnx5zqphaQHOFjAzH-1mB1D9q_S5x5l8LDP50DzljDSRjL0f5cGHyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928005965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thomas Howe, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas Howe, J.</creatorcontrib><description>.  In this essay, I compare the atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche with that of Richard Dawkins. My purpose is to describe certain differences in their respective atheisms with the intent of showing that Nietzsche's atheism contains a richer and fuller affirmation of human life. In Dawkins’s presentation of the value of life without God, there is a naïve optimism that purports that human beings, educated in science and purged of religion, will find lives of easy peace and comfortable wonder. Part of my argument is that this optimism regarding the power of objective science is subject to Nietzsche's criticism of Socrates and what he calls the “theoretical man.” As such, it fails in terms of providing a true affirmation of life in the godless world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0591-2385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01243.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ZYGOA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>aesthetics ; argument from design ; Atheism ; beauty ; Darwinism ; Dawkins, Richard ; General points ; History of science and technology ; History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields ; Life ; materialism ; naturalism ; Nietzsche ; Nietzsche, Friedrich (1844-1900) ; Philosophy ; Religion ; Richard Dawkins ; science</subject><ispartof>Zygon, 2012-03, Vol.47 (1), p.140-155</ispartof><rights>2012 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4753-f17e1dd44415562db88a5de4cb61f8b16f727449c1c83910a2c42c5b55a8097e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4753-f17e1dd44415562db88a5de4cb61f8b16f727449c1c83910a2c42c5b55a8097e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9744.2011.01243.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9744.2011.01243.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25580402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas Howe, J.</creatorcontrib><title>AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM</title><title>Zygon</title><description>.  In this essay, I compare the atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche with that of Richard Dawkins. My purpose is to describe certain differences in their respective atheisms with the intent of showing that Nietzsche's atheism contains a richer and fuller affirmation of human life. In Dawkins’s presentation of the value of life without God, there is a naïve optimism that purports that human beings, educated in science and purged of religion, will find lives of easy peace and comfortable wonder. Part of my argument is that this optimism regarding the power of objective science is subject to Nietzsche's criticism of Socrates and what he calls the “theoretical man.” As such, it fails in terms of providing a true affirmation of life in the godless world.</description><subject>aesthetics</subject><subject>argument from design</subject><subject>Atheism</subject><subject>beauty</subject><subject>Darwinism</subject><subject>Dawkins, Richard</subject><subject>General points</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields</subject><subject>Life</subject><subject>materialism</subject><subject>naturalism</subject><subject>Nietzsche</subject><subject>Nietzsche, Friedrich (1844-1900)</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Richard Dawkins</subject><subject>science</subject><issn>0591-2385</issn><issn>1467-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNtOwyAAhonRxHl4B2LiZStQKNQLk6ZnD23S1eMNYaxNNuc2i8b59lJndi03EPj_D_gAgBi52I6LuYupz52AU-oShLGLMKGeu9kDo93BPhghFmCHeIIdgiNj5gghn3N_BK7DNC3qu7ApqnIMw7RJaphV8SVM6yKJ6yLKYVkkzcs4yhMYljEctsI6hnH4eFPYSlXCsMmTYnx3Ag46tTDt6d98DO7TpIly57bKiii8dTTlzHM6zFs8nVJKMWM-mU6EUGzaUj3xcScm2O84sW8ONNbCCzBSRFOi2YQxJVDAW-8YnG256371_tmaDzlfffZLe6UMiED2pz6zIbEN6X5lTN92ct3P3lT_LTGSgzg5l4MfOfiRgzj5K05ubPX8j6-MVouuV0s9M7s-YUwgiojNXW1zX7NF-_1vvnx5zqphaQHOFjAzH-1mB1D9q_S5x5l8LDP50DzljDSRjL0f5cGHyw</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Thomas Howe, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM</title><author>Thomas Howe, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4753-f17e1dd44415562db88a5de4cb61f8b16f727449c1c83910a2c42c5b55a8097e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>aesthetics</topic><topic>argument from design</topic><topic>Atheism</topic><topic>beauty</topic><topic>Darwinism</topic><topic>Dawkins, Richard</topic><topic>General points</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields</topic><topic>Life</topic><topic>materialism</topic><topic>naturalism</topic><topic>Nietzsche</topic><topic>Nietzsche, Friedrich (1844-1900)</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Richard Dawkins</topic><topic>science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas Howe, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zygon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas Howe, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM</atitle><jtitle>Zygon</jtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>140-155</pages><issn>0591-2385</issn><eissn>1467-9744</eissn><coden>ZYGOA7</coden><abstract>.  In this essay, I compare the atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche with that of Richard Dawkins. My purpose is to describe certain differences in their respective atheisms with the intent of showing that Nietzsche's atheism contains a richer and fuller affirmation of human life. In Dawkins’s presentation of the value of life without God, there is a naïve optimism that purports that human beings, educated in science and purged of religion, will find lives of easy peace and comfortable wonder. Part of my argument is that this optimism regarding the power of objective science is subject to Nietzsche's criticism of Socrates and what he calls the “theoretical man.” As such, it fails in terms of providing a true affirmation of life in the godless world.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01243.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0591-2385
ispartof Zygon, 2012-03, Vol.47 (1), p.140-155
issn 0591-2385
1467-9744
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_928005965
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects aesthetics
argument from design
Atheism
beauty
Darwinism
Dawkins, Richard
General points
History of science and technology
History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields
Life
materialism
naturalism
Nietzsche
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1844-1900)
Philosophy
Religion
Richard Dawkins
science
title AFFIRMATIONS AFTER GOD: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND RICHARD DAWKINS ON ATHEISM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A47%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AFFIRMATIONS%20AFTER%20GOD:%20FRIEDRICH%20NIETZSCHE%20AND%20RICHARD%20DAWKINS%20ON%20ATHEISM&rft.jtitle=Zygon&rft.au=Thomas%20Howe,%20J.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=140-155&rft.issn=0591-2385&rft.eissn=1467-9744&rft.coden=ZYGOA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01243.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2609788901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928005965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true