Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis
Over the last decades, methods for the economic evaluation of health care technologies were increasingly used to inform reimbursement decisions. For a short time, the German Statutory Health Insurance makes use of these methods to support reimbursement decisions on patented drugs. In this context, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European journal of health economics 2012-04, Vol.13 (2), p.127-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | The European journal of health economics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Schad, Mareike John, Jürgen |
description | Over the last decades, methods for the economic evaluation of health care technologies were increasingly used to inform reimbursement decisions. For a short time, the German Statutory Health Insurance makes use of these methods to support reimbursement decisions on patented drugs. In this context, the discounting procedure emerges as a critical component of these methods, as discount rates can strongly affect the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The aim of this paper is to identify the appropriate value of a social discount rate to be used by the German Statutory Health Insurance for the economic evaluation of health technologies. On theoretical grounds, we build on the widespread view of contemporary economists that the social rate of time preference (SRTP) is the adequate social discount rate. For quantifying the SRTP, we first apply the market behaviour approach, which assumes that the SRTP is reflected in observable market interest rates. As a second approach, we derive the SRTP from optimal growth theory by using the Ramsey equation. A major part of the paper is devoted to specify the parameters of this equation. Depending on various assumptions, our empirical findings result in the range of 1.75-4.2% for the SRTP. A reasonable base case discount rate for Germany, thus, would be about 3%. Furthermore, we deal with the much debated question whether a common discount rate for costs and health benefits or a lower rate for health should be applied in health economic evaluations. In the German social health insurance system, no exogenously fixed budget constraint does exist. When evaluating a new health technology, the health care decision maker is obliged to conduct an economic evaluation in order to examine whether there is an economically appropriate relation between the value of the health gains and the additional costs which are given by the value of the consumption losses due to the additional health care expenditures. Therefore, a discount rate lower than the SRTP for consumption should be applied if an increase in the consumption value of health is expected. However, given the limited empirical evidence on the relationship between consumption and the value of health, it is hardly possible to make reliable forecasts of this value. Regarding the practice of the German evaluation authority, it is not recommended to use differential discounting in the base case. Instead, the issue of differential discounting should be addressed in sensi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10198-010-0292-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_923437647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41408309</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41408309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-42f880bc6acb69aca65f77d0181b17c6e45fc1a306232c94ffc11910484254633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReBl9ABca4r56DlAo7ozxlpi4GdeEYajTSaeM0Krz9mLqZecKTvj_75CPkGOEcwRQFwkBdVUAQgFMs0JvkX2UWBVKAm7_3Etd7ZGDlJYAjCnGd8keQ1SgOO6TYRrebZwnamkKrrEtnTfJhaHrabS9p3WItF946l3owqpx1L_ZdrB9Ezoaarrwtu0XtPdu0YU2vDQ-0aajdz6ubLe5pLaj_mPdhswKcZNH225Skw7JTm3b5I--zwl5vr2ZXt8Xj093D9dXj4UTZdkXgtVVBTMnrZtJbZ2VZa3UHLDCGSonvShrh5aDZJw5Leo8oUYQlWClkJxPyNnIXcfwOvjUm2UYYv5EMppxwZUUKodwDLkYUoq-NuvYrGzcGATz5dmMnk32bL48G507p9_gYbby89_Gj9gcYGMg5afuxce_zf9RT8bSMmVdv1CBAioOmn8CwA2SuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923437647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Schad, Mareike ; John, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Schad, Mareike ; John, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decades, methods for the economic evaluation of health care technologies were increasingly used to inform reimbursement decisions. For a short time, the German Statutory Health Insurance makes use of these methods to support reimbursement decisions on patented drugs. In this context, the discounting procedure emerges as a critical component of these methods, as discount rates can strongly affect the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The aim of this paper is to identify the appropriate value of a social discount rate to be used by the German Statutory Health Insurance for the economic evaluation of health technologies. On theoretical grounds, we build on the widespread view of contemporary economists that the social rate of time preference (SRTP) is the adequate social discount rate. For quantifying the SRTP, we first apply the market behaviour approach, which assumes that the SRTP is reflected in observable market interest rates. As a second approach, we derive the SRTP from optimal growth theory by using the Ramsey equation. A major part of the paper is devoted to specify the parameters of this equation. Depending on various assumptions, our empirical findings result in the range of 1.75-4.2% for the SRTP. A reasonable base case discount rate for Germany, thus, would be about 3%. Furthermore, we deal with the much debated question whether a common discount rate for costs and health benefits or a lower rate for health should be applied in health economic evaluations. In the German social health insurance system, no exogenously fixed budget constraint does exist. When evaluating a new health technology, the health care decision maker is obliged to conduct an economic evaluation in order to examine whether there is an economically appropriate relation between the value of the health gains and the additional costs which are given by the value of the consumption losses due to the additional health care expenditures. Therefore, a discount rate lower than the SRTP for consumption should be applied if an increase in the consumption value of health is expected. However, given the limited empirical evidence on the relationship between consumption and the value of health, it is hardly possible to make reliable forecasts of this value. Regarding the practice of the German evaluation authority, it is not recommended to use differential discounting in the base case. Instead, the issue of differential discounting should be addressed in sensitivity analyses. Reducing the discount rate for health compared to the rate for costs by a figure in the range between near 0% and 3% may be considered to be appropriate for Germany.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-010-0292-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21170731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics ; Consumption ; Cost analysis ; Cost efficiency ; Debates ; Decision Making ; Decision Making, Organizational ; Discount rates ; Discounting ; Economic growth rate ; Economic models ; Economic Policy ; Economic theory ; Economic value ; Economics ; Economists ; Elasticity ; Germany ; Health benefits ; Health care ; Health Care Management ; Health care policy ; Health Economics ; Health insurance ; Health Services - economics ; Health Services Needs and Demand - economics ; Humans ; Income ; Income elasticity of demand ; Income Tax - economics ; Income taxes ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Interest rates ; Investment return rates ; Marginal utility ; Medical technology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Models, Econometric ; National Health Programs - economics ; Needs Assessment ; Opportunity costs ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Present value ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Public investments ; Reimbursement ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shadow prices ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2012-04, Vol.13 (2), p.127-144</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-42f880bc6acb69aca65f77d0181b17c6e45fc1a306232c94ffc11910484254633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-42f880bc6acb69aca65f77d0181b17c6e45fc1a306232c94ffc11910484254633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41408309$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41408309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schad, Mareike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>Over the last decades, methods for the economic evaluation of health care technologies were increasingly used to inform reimbursement decisions. For a short time, the German Statutory Health Insurance makes use of these methods to support reimbursement decisions on patented drugs. In this context, the discounting procedure emerges as a critical component of these methods, as discount rates can strongly affect the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The aim of this paper is to identify the appropriate value of a social discount rate to be used by the German Statutory Health Insurance for the economic evaluation of health technologies. On theoretical grounds, we build on the widespread view of contemporary economists that the social rate of time preference (SRTP) is the adequate social discount rate. For quantifying the SRTP, we first apply the market behaviour approach, which assumes that the SRTP is reflected in observable market interest rates. As a second approach, we derive the SRTP from optimal growth theory by using the Ramsey equation. A major part of the paper is devoted to specify the parameters of this equation. Depending on various assumptions, our empirical findings result in the range of 1.75-4.2% for the SRTP. A reasonable base case discount rate for Germany, thus, would be about 3%. Furthermore, we deal with the much debated question whether a common discount rate for costs and health benefits or a lower rate for health should be applied in health economic evaluations. In the German social health insurance system, no exogenously fixed budget constraint does exist. When evaluating a new health technology, the health care decision maker is obliged to conduct an economic evaluation in order to examine whether there is an economically appropriate relation between the value of the health gains and the additional costs which are given by the value of the consumption losses due to the additional health care expenditures. Therefore, a discount rate lower than the SRTP for consumption should be applied if an increase in the consumption value of health is expected. However, given the limited empirical evidence on the relationship between consumption and the value of health, it is hardly possible to make reliable forecasts of this value. Regarding the practice of the German evaluation authority, it is not recommended to use differential discounting in the base case. Instead, the issue of differential discounting should be addressed in sensitivity analyses. Reducing the discount rate for health compared to the rate for costs by a figure in the range between near 0% and 3% may be considered to be appropriate for Germany.</description><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Making, Organizational</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Discounting</subject><subject>Economic growth rate</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health benefits</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Income Tax - economics</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Investment return rates</subject><subject>Marginal utility</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Models, Econometric</subject><subject>National Health Programs - economics</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Present value</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public investments</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shadow prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReBl9ABca4r56DlAo7ozxlpi4GdeEYajTSaeM0Krz9mLqZecKTvj_75CPkGOEcwRQFwkBdVUAQgFMs0JvkX2UWBVKAm7_3Etd7ZGDlJYAjCnGd8keQ1SgOO6TYRrebZwnamkKrrEtnTfJhaHrabS9p3WItF946l3owqpx1L_ZdrB9Ezoaarrwtu0XtPdu0YU2vDQ-0aajdz6ubLe5pLaj_mPdhswKcZNH225Skw7JTm3b5I--zwl5vr2ZXt8Xj093D9dXj4UTZdkXgtVVBTMnrZtJbZ2VZa3UHLDCGSonvShrh5aDZJw5Leo8oUYQlWClkJxPyNnIXcfwOvjUm2UYYv5EMppxwZUUKodwDLkYUoq-NuvYrGzcGATz5dmMnk32bL48G507p9_gYbby89_Gj9gcYGMg5afuxce_zf9RT8bSMmVdv1CBAioOmn8CwA2SuQ</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Schad, Mareike</creator><creator>John, Jürgen</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis</title><author>Schad, Mareike ; John, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-42f880bc6acb69aca65f77d0181b17c6e45fc1a306232c94ffc11910484254633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Technology - economics</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Making, Organizational</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Discounting</topic><topic>Economic growth rate</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health benefits</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Income Tax - economics</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Investment return rates</topic><topic>Marginal utility</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Models, Econometric</topic><topic>National Health Programs - economics</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Present value</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public investments</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shadow prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schad, Mareike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schad, Mareike</au><au>John, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>127-144</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>Over the last decades, methods for the economic evaluation of health care technologies were increasingly used to inform reimbursement decisions. For a short time, the German Statutory Health Insurance makes use of these methods to support reimbursement decisions on patented drugs. In this context, the discounting procedure emerges as a critical component of these methods, as discount rates can strongly affect the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The aim of this paper is to identify the appropriate value of a social discount rate to be used by the German Statutory Health Insurance for the economic evaluation of health technologies. On theoretical grounds, we build on the widespread view of contemporary economists that the social rate of time preference (SRTP) is the adequate social discount rate. For quantifying the SRTP, we first apply the market behaviour approach, which assumes that the SRTP is reflected in observable market interest rates. As a second approach, we derive the SRTP from optimal growth theory by using the Ramsey equation. A major part of the paper is devoted to specify the parameters of this equation. Depending on various assumptions, our empirical findings result in the range of 1.75-4.2% for the SRTP. A reasonable base case discount rate for Germany, thus, would be about 3%. Furthermore, we deal with the much debated question whether a common discount rate for costs and health benefits or a lower rate for health should be applied in health economic evaluations. In the German social health insurance system, no exogenously fixed budget constraint does exist. When evaluating a new health technology, the health care decision maker is obliged to conduct an economic evaluation in order to examine whether there is an economically appropriate relation between the value of the health gains and the additional costs which are given by the value of the consumption losses due to the additional health care expenditures. Therefore, a discount rate lower than the SRTP for consumption should be applied if an increase in the consumption value of health is expected. However, given the limited empirical evidence on the relationship between consumption and the value of health, it is hardly possible to make reliable forecasts of this value. Regarding the practice of the German evaluation authority, it is not recommended to use differential discounting in the base case. Instead, the issue of differential discounting should be addressed in sensitivity analyses. Reducing the discount rate for health compared to the rate for costs by a figure in the range between near 0% and 3% may be considered to be appropriate for Germany.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>21170731</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-010-0292-9</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-7598 |
ispartof | The European journal of health economics, 2012-04, Vol.13 (2), p.127-144 |
issn | 1618-7598 1618-7601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_923437647 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Biomedical Technology - economics Consumption Cost analysis Cost efficiency Debates Decision Making Decision Making, Organizational Discount rates Discounting Economic growth rate Economic models Economic Policy Economic theory Economic value Economics Economists Elasticity Germany Health benefits Health care Health Care Management Health care policy Health Economics Health insurance Health Services - economics Health Services Needs and Demand - economics Humans Income Income elasticity of demand Income Tax - economics Income taxes Insurance, Health - economics Interest rates Investment return rates Marginal utility Medical technology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Models, Econometric National Health Programs - economics Needs Assessment Opportunity costs Original Paper Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Present value Public Finance Public Health Public investments Reimbursement Sensitivity analysis Shadow prices Studies |
title | Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20social%20discount%20rate%20for%20the%20economic%20evaluation%20of%20health%20technologies%20in%20Germany:%20an%20exploratory%20analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Schad,%20Mareike&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=127-144&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-010-0292-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41408309%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923437647&rft_id=info:pmid/21170731&rft_jstor_id=41408309&rfr_iscdi=true |