An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation
As a result of prior research into the estimating and planning skills of experienced engineers, a number of observable goal-directed expert practices were identified. A computer assisted learning package was developed to teach these to less experienced, practicing engineers. The primary teaching mec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on education 2000-02, Vol.43 (1), p.30-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on education |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Busby, J.S. Payne, K. Scamans, J. Hibberd, R.E. |
description | As a result of prior research into the estimating and planning skills of experienced engineers, a number of observable goal-directed expert practices were identified. A computer assisted learning package was developed to teach these to less experienced, practicing engineers. The primary teaching mechanism required the learner to infer how alternative practices differed. This was reinforced both by demonstrating practices in analogous domains, and by showing learners how different practices make different assumptions about the task environment. An evaluation program was conducted with 35 participants in nine organizations, with a number of findings. Individual differences occurred in a variety of ways and proved problematic both for the design of the interface and that of the learning mechanisms. Learners' preconceptions were also problematic in some instances, but seem to be unavoidable in teaching empirical practices to experienced learners. Nonetheless the learning mechanisms worked well, except in isolated instances, particularly the use of analogies. Analogies appeared to be effective both in helping learners transfer practices between everyday tasks and engineering estimation tasks, and in helping them reflect on their current practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/13.825737 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_923073082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>825737</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28460053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8e44c5f2f02310c702cc07b9693fc0bdd616e93dec909d2e1aefc59fec8f2cd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0bFOwzAQAFALgUQpDKxMFgOIIcX2xU48VhVQpEosMEepc65SUqfYCVL_HpdUDAwwWed7dyfdEXLJ2YRzpu85THIhM8iOyIhLmSVaQX5MRozxPNEg9Sk5C2Edw1QKOSLzqaP4WTZ92dWto62lpaO1C53vzf6nbGjYhQ431LaeolvVDtHXbkW7MrxTDF29-S49Jye2bAJeHN4xeXt8eJ3Nk8XL0_NsukgMqKxLckxTI62wTABnJmPCGJYttdJgDVtWleIKNVRoNNOVQF6iNVJbNLkVplIwJrdD361vP_o4v9jUwWDTlA7bPhSapwpkCjrKmz-lyFPFmIT_oVICQLEIr3_Bddv7uKM4VgDLgOUiorsBGd-G4NEWWx935HcFZ8X-RgWHYrhRtFeDrRHxxx2SXxOTi8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923073082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Busby, J.S. ; Payne, K. ; Scamans, J. ; Hibberd, R.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S. ; Payne, K. ; Scamans, J. ; Hibberd, R.E.</creatorcontrib><description>As a result of prior research into the estimating and planning skills of experienced engineers, a number of observable goal-directed expert practices were identified. A computer assisted learning package was developed to teach these to less experienced, practicing engineers. The primary teaching mechanism required the learner to infer how alternative practices differed. This was reinforced both by demonstrating practices in analogous domains, and by showing learners how different practices make different assumptions about the task environment. An evaluation program was conducted with 35 participants in nine organizations, with a number of findings. Individual differences occurred in a variety of ways and proved problematic both for the design of the interface and that of the learning mechanisms. Learners' preconceptions were also problematic in some instances, but seem to be unavoidable in teaching empirical practices to experienced learners. Nonetheless the learning mechanisms worked well, except in isolated instances, particularly the use of analogies. Analogies appeared to be effective both in helping learners transfer practices between everyday tasks and engineering estimation tasks, and in helping them reflect on their current practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/13.825737</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEDAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analogies ; Design engineering ; Education ; Engineering profession ; Learning ; Packages ; Skills ; Tasks ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on education, 2000-02, Vol.43 (1), p.30-35</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8e44c5f2f02310c702cc07b9693fc0bdd616e93dec909d2e1aefc59fec8f2cd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8e44c5f2f02310c702cc07b9693fc0bdd616e93dec909d2e1aefc59fec8f2cd63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/825737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/825737$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scamans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, R.E.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation</title><title>IEEE transactions on education</title><addtitle>TE</addtitle><description>As a result of prior research into the estimating and planning skills of experienced engineers, a number of observable goal-directed expert practices were identified. A computer assisted learning package was developed to teach these to less experienced, practicing engineers. The primary teaching mechanism required the learner to infer how alternative practices differed. This was reinforced both by demonstrating practices in analogous domains, and by showing learners how different practices make different assumptions about the task environment. An evaluation program was conducted with 35 participants in nine organizations, with a number of findings. Individual differences occurred in a variety of ways and proved problematic both for the design of the interface and that of the learning mechanisms. Learners' preconceptions were also problematic in some instances, but seem to be unavoidable in teaching empirical practices to experienced learners. Nonetheless the learning mechanisms worked well, except in isolated instances, particularly the use of analogies. Analogies appeared to be effective both in helping learners transfer practices between everyday tasks and engineering estimation tasks, and in helping them reflect on their current practices.</description><subject>Analogies</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering profession</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Packages</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>0018-9359</issn><issn>1557-9638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0bFOwzAQAFALgUQpDKxMFgOIIcX2xU48VhVQpEosMEepc65SUqfYCVL_HpdUDAwwWed7dyfdEXLJ2YRzpu85THIhM8iOyIhLmSVaQX5MRozxPNEg9Sk5C2Edw1QKOSLzqaP4WTZ92dWto62lpaO1C53vzf6nbGjYhQ431LaeolvVDtHXbkW7MrxTDF29-S49Jye2bAJeHN4xeXt8eJ3Nk8XL0_NsukgMqKxLckxTI62wTABnJmPCGJYttdJgDVtWleIKNVRoNNOVQF6iNVJbNLkVplIwJrdD361vP_o4v9jUwWDTlA7bPhSapwpkCjrKmz-lyFPFmIT_oVICQLEIr3_Bddv7uKM4VgDLgOUiorsBGd-G4NEWWx935HcFZ8X-RgWHYrhRtFeDrRHxxx2SXxOTi8Y</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>Busby, J.S.</creator><creator>Payne, K.</creator><creator>Scamans, J.</creator><creator>Hibberd, R.E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation</title><author>Busby, J.S. ; Payne, K. ; Scamans, J. ; Hibberd, R.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8e44c5f2f02310c702cc07b9693fc0bdd616e93dec909d2e1aefc59fec8f2cd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analogies</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering profession</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Packages</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busby, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scamans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, R.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busby, J.S.</au><au>Payne, K.</au><au>Scamans, J.</au><au>Hibberd, R.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on education</jtitle><stitle>TE</stitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>30-35</pages><issn>0018-9359</issn><eissn>1557-9638</eissn><coden>IEEDAB</coden><abstract>As a result of prior research into the estimating and planning skills of experienced engineers, a number of observable goal-directed expert practices were identified. A computer assisted learning package was developed to teach these to less experienced, practicing engineers. The primary teaching mechanism required the learner to infer how alternative practices differed. This was reinforced both by demonstrating practices in analogous domains, and by showing learners how different practices make different assumptions about the task environment. An evaluation program was conducted with 35 participants in nine organizations, with a number of findings. Individual differences occurred in a variety of ways and proved problematic both for the design of the interface and that of the learning mechanisms. Learners' preconceptions were also problematic in some instances, but seem to be unavoidable in teaching empirical practices to experienced learners. Nonetheless the learning mechanisms worked well, except in isolated instances, particularly the use of analogies. Analogies appeared to be effective both in helping learners transfer practices between everyday tasks and engineering estimation tasks, and in helping them reflect on their current practices.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/13.825737</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9359 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on education, 2000-02, Vol.43 (1), p.30-35 |
issn | 0018-9359 1557-9638 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_923073082 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Analogies Design engineering Education Engineering profession Learning Packages Skills Tasks Teaching |
title | An evaluation of an instructional system for engineering task estimation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20an%20instructional%20system%20for%20engineering%20task%20estimation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20education&rft.au=Busby,%20J.S.&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=30-35&rft.issn=0018-9359&rft.eissn=1557-9638&rft.coden=IEEDAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/13.825737&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28460053%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923073082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=825737&rfr_iscdi=true |