Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
Purpose The aim of this study was to elucidate the distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients who underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different types of hospitals. Materials and methods We retrospectively s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of radiology 2012-02, Vol.30 (2), p.116-119 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 119 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 116 |
| container_title | Japanese journal of radiology |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Shimoji, Keigo Aoki, Shigeki Nakanishi, Atsushi Suzuki, Michimasa Hori, Masaaki Sato, Syuji Hoshito, Haruyoshi Kyogoku, Shinsuke Cho, Narisumi Ozaki, Yutaka Suzuki, Masaru Kuwatsuru, Ryohei Sasai, Keisuke |
| description | Purpose
The aim of this study was to elucidate the distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients who underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different types of hospitals.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively studied 2,550 patients who underwent MRI at five institutions. We recorded the date and value of each patient’s eGFR test. The distribution of eGFR values was compared with that in the general Japanese population.
Results
A total of 84.3% of patients had their eGFRs evaluated before GBCA-enhanced MRI. Of these, 84.7% were evaluated within 3 months before the GBCA-enhanced MRI, and 1.3% were evaluated on the day of the GBCA-enhanced MRI. A total of 87.2% of patients tested had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2
; 12.8% had an eGFR of |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_922372802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2590852561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-be6d488fd0c9c8729601bc25cfc90872aa439f5a5236c7b0d11c5e70173c45813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMo3h_AjQRXuqjOpPeleAdBEAV3IU2nNdKTHpNU8AF8b3M8XlauJpn55v-Hn7E9hGMEKE88YgFZAogJANZJscI2sSrKBKF6Wv19l7jBtrx_ASiyNMvW2YYQAqDGfJN9nBsfnGmmYEbLx46TD2amArW8H8YZuWlQjndmCE59IbEQP6Sry_sj_qaGiTw3ls_jkGzw3JEm82Zsz_Vo444PCdlnZXUUnKneUjA6Qn60ix6PVn2Ed9hapwZPu991mz1eXjycXSe3d1c3Z6e3ic5QhKShos2qqmtB17oqRV0ANlrkutM1xL9SWVp3ucpFWuiygRZR51QClqnO8grTbXaw1J278TWeHuTLODkbLWUtRFqKCkSEcAlpN3rvqJNzF-907xJBLnKXy9xlzF0ucpdF3Nn_Fp6aGbW_Gz9BR0AsAR9Htif35_y_6icSDo-k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922372802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shimoji, Keigo ; Aoki, Shigeki ; Nakanishi, Atsushi ; Suzuki, Michimasa ; Hori, Masaaki ; Sato, Syuji ; Hoshito, Haruyoshi ; Kyogoku, Shinsuke ; Cho, Narisumi ; Ozaki, Yutaka ; Suzuki, Masaru ; Kuwatsuru, Ryohei ; Sasai, Keisuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Shimoji, Keigo ; Aoki, Shigeki ; Nakanishi, Atsushi ; Suzuki, Michimasa ; Hori, Masaaki ; Sato, Syuji ; Hoshito, Haruyoshi ; Kyogoku, Shinsuke ; Cho, Narisumi ; Ozaki, Yutaka ; Suzuki, Masaru ; Kuwatsuru, Ryohei ; Sasai, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to elucidate the distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients who underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different types of hospitals.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively studied 2,550 patients who underwent MRI at five institutions. We recorded the date and value of each patient’s eGFR test. The distribution of eGFR values was compared with that in the general Japanese population.
Results
A total of 84.3% of patients had their eGFRs evaluated before GBCA-enhanced MRI. Of these, 84.7% were evaluated within 3 months before the GBCA-enhanced MRI, and 1.3% were evaluated on the day of the GBCA-enhanced MRI. A total of 87.2% of patients tested had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2
; 12.8% had an eGFR of <60 and ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
, and no patients had an eGFR of <30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
.
Conclusion
The rate of renal function evaluation differed among hospitals. The prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center than in the other hospitals, and the prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in patients who underwent GBCA-enhanced MRI than in the general Japanese population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22200915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Aged ; Contrast Media - adverse effects ; Female ; Gadolinium - adverse effects ; Glomerular Filtration Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy - chemically induced ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Renal Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Renal Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of radiology, 2012-02, Vol.30 (2), p.116-119</ispartof><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2011</rights><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-be6d488fd0c9c8729601bc25cfc90872aa439f5a5236c7b0d11c5e70173c45813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22200915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shimoji, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Michimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Syuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshito, Haruyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyogoku, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Narisumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Masaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwatsuru, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Japanese journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to elucidate the distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients who underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different types of hospitals.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively studied 2,550 patients who underwent MRI at five institutions. We recorded the date and value of each patient’s eGFR test. The distribution of eGFR values was compared with that in the general Japanese population.
Results
A total of 84.3% of patients had their eGFRs evaluated before GBCA-enhanced MRI. Of these, 84.7% were evaluated within 3 months before the GBCA-enhanced MRI, and 1.3% were evaluated on the day of the GBCA-enhanced MRI. A total of 87.2% of patients tested had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2
; 12.8% had an eGFR of <60 and ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
, and no patients had an eGFR of <30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
.
Conclusion
The rate of renal function evaluation differed among hospitals. The prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center than in the other hospitals, and the prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in patients who underwent GBCA-enhanced MRI than in the general Japanese population.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium - adverse effects</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy - chemically induced</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><issn>1867-1071</issn><issn>1867-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMo3h_AjQRXuqjOpPeleAdBEAV3IU2nNdKTHpNU8AF8b3M8XlauJpn55v-Hn7E9hGMEKE88YgFZAogJANZJscI2sSrKBKF6Wv19l7jBtrx_ASiyNMvW2YYQAqDGfJN9nBsfnGmmYEbLx46TD2amArW8H8YZuWlQjndmCE59IbEQP6Sry_sj_qaGiTw3ls_jkGzw3JEm82Zsz_Vo444PCdlnZXUUnKneUjA6Qn60ix6PVn2Ed9hapwZPu991mz1eXjycXSe3d1c3Z6e3ic5QhKShos2qqmtB17oqRV0ANlrkutM1xL9SWVp3ucpFWuiygRZR51QClqnO8grTbXaw1J278TWeHuTLODkbLWUtRFqKCkSEcAlpN3rvqJNzF-907xJBLnKXy9xlzF0ucpdF3Nn_Fp6aGbW_Gz9BR0AsAR9Htif35_y_6icSDo-k</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Shimoji, Keigo</creator><creator>Aoki, Shigeki</creator><creator>Nakanishi, Atsushi</creator><creator>Suzuki, Michimasa</creator><creator>Hori, Masaaki</creator><creator>Sato, Syuji</creator><creator>Hoshito, Haruyoshi</creator><creator>Kyogoku, Shinsuke</creator><creator>Cho, Narisumi</creator><creator>Ozaki, Yutaka</creator><creator>Suzuki, Masaru</creator><creator>Kuwatsuru, Ryohei</creator><creator>Sasai, Keisuke</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Shimoji, Keigo ; Aoki, Shigeki ; Nakanishi, Atsushi ; Suzuki, Michimasa ; Hori, Masaaki ; Sato, Syuji ; Hoshito, Haruyoshi ; Kyogoku, Shinsuke ; Cho, Narisumi ; Ozaki, Yutaka ; Suzuki, Masaru ; Kuwatsuru, Ryohei ; Sasai, Keisuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-be6d488fd0c9c8729601bc25cfc90872aa439f5a5236c7b0d11c5e70173c45813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Contrast Media - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium - adverse effects</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy - chemically induced</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimoji, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Michimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Syuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshito, Haruyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyogoku, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Narisumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Masaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwatsuru, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimoji, Keigo</au><au>Aoki, Shigeki</au><au>Nakanishi, Atsushi</au><au>Suzuki, Michimasa</au><au>Hori, Masaaki</au><au>Sato, Syuji</au><au>Hoshito, Haruyoshi</au><au>Kyogoku, Shinsuke</au><au>Cho, Narisumi</au><au>Ozaki, Yutaka</au><au>Suzuki, Masaru</au><au>Kuwatsuru, Ryohei</au><au>Sasai, Keisuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>116-119</pages><issn>1867-1071</issn><eissn>1867-108X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of this study was to elucidate the distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients who underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different types of hospitals.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively studied 2,550 patients who underwent MRI at five institutions. We recorded the date and value of each patient’s eGFR test. The distribution of eGFR values was compared with that in the general Japanese population.
Results
A total of 84.3% of patients had their eGFRs evaluated before GBCA-enhanced MRI. Of these, 84.7% were evaluated within 3 months before the GBCA-enhanced MRI, and 1.3% were evaluated on the day of the GBCA-enhanced MRI. A total of 87.2% of patients tested had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2
; 12.8% had an eGFR of <60 and ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
, and no patients had an eGFR of <30 ml/min/1.73 m
2
.
Conclusion
The rate of renal function evaluation differed among hospitals. The prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center than in the other hospitals, and the prevalence of low eGFR values was greater in patients who underwent GBCA-enhanced MRI than in the general Japanese population.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>22200915</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1867-1071 |
| ispartof | Japanese journal of radiology, 2012-02, Vol.30 (2), p.116-119 |
| issn | 1867-1071 1867-108X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_922372802 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aged Contrast Media - adverse effects Female Gadolinium - adverse effects Glomerular Filtration Rate - drug effects Humans Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy - chemically induced Nuclear Medicine Original Article Radiology Radiotherapy Renal Insufficiency - diagnosis Renal Insufficiency - physiopathology |
| title | Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20estimated%20glomerular%20filtration%20rate%20(eGFR)%20values%20in%20patients%20receiving%20contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Shimoji,%20Keigo&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=116-119&rft.issn=1867-1071&rft.eissn=1867-108X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11604-011-0019-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2590852561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922372802&rft_id=info:pmid/22200915&rfr_iscdi=true |