Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods
The convergence of multigrid methods can be analyzed based on a Fourier analysis of the method or by proving certain inequalities that have to be fulfilled by the smoother and by the coarse grid correction separately. Here, we analyze the multigrid method for the constant coefficient Poisson equatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | SIAM journal on scientific computing 2008-01, Vol.31 (1), p.644-666 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 644 |
container_title | SIAM journal on scientific computing |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Huckle, Thomas K. |
description | The convergence of multigrid methods can be analyzed based on a Fourier analysis of the method or by proving certain inequalities that have to be fulfilled by the smoother and by the coarse grid correction separately. Here, we analyze the multigrid method for the constant coefficient Poisson equation with a compact Fourier analysis using the formalism of multilevel Toeplitz matrices and their generating functions or symbols. The Fourier analysis is applied for determining the smoothing factor and the overall error of the combined smoothing and coarse grid correction error reduction of a twogrid step (TGS) by representing the twogrid step explicitly by a symbol. If the effects of the smoothing correction and the coarse grid correction are orthogonal to each other, then, in a twogrid step, the error is removed in one step, and the twogrid method can be considered as a direct solver. If the coarse linear system is identical to the original matrix, then the same projection and smoother again make the twogrid step a direct solver. Hence, the multigrid cycle has to be applied only once with one smoothing step on each level, and therefore the whole multigrid method can be considered as a direct solver. In this paper we want to identify multigrid as a direct solver in one-dimension with a coarse system derived by linear and constant interpolation, and in two-dimensions for a modified projection related to [U. Trottenberg, C.W. Osterlee, and A. Schüller, Multigrid, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, paragraph A.2.3]. By studying not only smoothing and coarse grid correction separately but the symbol of the full twogrid step as well, we are furthermore able to derive better convergence estimates and information on how to find efficient combinations of projection and smoother. As smoothers we consider also approximate inverse smoothers, colored smoothers that take into account the different character of grid points, and rank-reducing smoothers that coincide with the given matrix on a large number of entries. Numerical examples show the effectiveness of the new approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1137/070702564 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_921049163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583989771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-f11b30ff6db2ef101efe8446bbf29a1aec4477974c6f895de91f4ea3fff036f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9ULFOwzAUtBBIlMLAH0RsDAE_27HjsQq0ILVigdlyEr_gKk2CnQz9e1IVoRvudDqdTkfIPdAnAK6eqZrBMikuyAKozlIFWl2etBRpzlR2TW5i3FMKUmi2IHnRHwZbjcm6n4J3IVl1tj1GHxPsQ_Liom863zXJbmpH3wRfJzs3fvd1vCVXaNvo7v54Sb7Wr5_FW7r92LwXq21aMQ1jigAlp4iyLplDoODQ5ULIskSmLVhXCaGUVqKSmOusdhpQOMsRkfLZ4kvycO4dQv8zuTia_bx0HhmNZkCFBsnn0OM5VIU-xuDQDMEfbDgaoOb0i_n_hf8CFHhURg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921049163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods</title><source>SIAM Journals Online</source><creator>Huckle, Thomas K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huckle, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><description>The convergence of multigrid methods can be analyzed based on a Fourier analysis of the method or by proving certain inequalities that have to be fulfilled by the smoother and by the coarse grid correction separately. Here, we analyze the multigrid method for the constant coefficient Poisson equation with a compact Fourier analysis using the formalism of multilevel Toeplitz matrices and their generating functions or symbols. The Fourier analysis is applied for determining the smoothing factor and the overall error of the combined smoothing and coarse grid correction error reduction of a twogrid step (TGS) by representing the twogrid step explicitly by a symbol. If the effects of the smoothing correction and the coarse grid correction are orthogonal to each other, then, in a twogrid step, the error is removed in one step, and the twogrid method can be considered as a direct solver. If the coarse linear system is identical to the original matrix, then the same projection and smoother again make the twogrid step a direct solver. Hence, the multigrid cycle has to be applied only once with one smoothing step on each level, and therefore the whole multigrid method can be considered as a direct solver. In this paper we want to identify multigrid as a direct solver in one-dimension with a coarse system derived by linear and constant interpolation, and in two-dimensions for a modified projection related to [U. Trottenberg, C.W. Osterlee, and A. Schüller, Multigrid, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, paragraph A.2.3]. By studying not only smoothing and coarse grid correction separately but the symbol of the full twogrid step as well, we are furthermore able to derive better convergence estimates and information on how to find efficient combinations of projection and smoother. As smoothers we consider also approximate inverse smoothers, colored smoothers that take into account the different character of grid points, and rank-reducing smoothers that coincide with the given matrix on a large number of entries. Numerical examples show the effectiveness of the new approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-7197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1137/070702564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</publisher><subject>Approximation ; Boundary conditions ; Fourier analysis ; Fourier transforms ; Methods</subject><ispartof>SIAM journal on scientific computing, 2008-01, Vol.31 (1), p.644-666</ispartof><rights>[Copyright] © 2008 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-f11b30ff6db2ef101efe8446bbf29a1aec4477974c6f895de91f4ea3fff036f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-f11b30ff6db2ef101efe8446bbf29a1aec4477974c6f895de91f4ea3fff036f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3171,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huckle, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><title>Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods</title><title>SIAM journal on scientific computing</title><description>The convergence of multigrid methods can be analyzed based on a Fourier analysis of the method or by proving certain inequalities that have to be fulfilled by the smoother and by the coarse grid correction separately. Here, we analyze the multigrid method for the constant coefficient Poisson equation with a compact Fourier analysis using the formalism of multilevel Toeplitz matrices and their generating functions or symbols. The Fourier analysis is applied for determining the smoothing factor and the overall error of the combined smoothing and coarse grid correction error reduction of a twogrid step (TGS) by representing the twogrid step explicitly by a symbol. If the effects of the smoothing correction and the coarse grid correction are orthogonal to each other, then, in a twogrid step, the error is removed in one step, and the twogrid method can be considered as a direct solver. If the coarse linear system is identical to the original matrix, then the same projection and smoother again make the twogrid step a direct solver. Hence, the multigrid cycle has to be applied only once with one smoothing step on each level, and therefore the whole multigrid method can be considered as a direct solver. In this paper we want to identify multigrid as a direct solver in one-dimension with a coarse system derived by linear and constant interpolation, and in two-dimensions for a modified projection related to [U. Trottenberg, C.W. Osterlee, and A. Schüller, Multigrid, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, paragraph A.2.3]. By studying not only smoothing and coarse grid correction separately but the symbol of the full twogrid step as well, we are furthermore able to derive better convergence estimates and information on how to find efficient combinations of projection and smoother. As smoothers we consider also approximate inverse smoothers, colored smoothers that take into account the different character of grid points, and rank-reducing smoothers that coincide with the given matrix on a large number of entries. Numerical examples show the effectiveness of the new approach.</description><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Fourier analysis</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Methods</subject><issn>1064-8275</issn><issn>1095-7197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9ULFOwzAUtBBIlMLAH0RsDAE_27HjsQq0ILVigdlyEr_gKk2CnQz9e1IVoRvudDqdTkfIPdAnAK6eqZrBMikuyAKozlIFWl2etBRpzlR2TW5i3FMKUmi2IHnRHwZbjcm6n4J3IVl1tj1GHxPsQ_Liom863zXJbmpH3wRfJzs3fvd1vCVXaNvo7v54Sb7Wr5_FW7r92LwXq21aMQ1jigAlp4iyLplDoODQ5ULIskSmLVhXCaGUVqKSmOusdhpQOMsRkfLZ4kvycO4dQv8zuTia_bx0HhmNZkCFBsnn0OM5VIU-xuDQDMEfbDgaoOb0i_n_hf8CFHhURg</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Huckle, Thomas K.</creator><general>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods</title><author>Huckle, Thomas K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-f11b30ff6db2ef101efe8446bbf29a1aec4477974c6f895de91f4ea3fff036f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Fourier analysis</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huckle, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>SIAM journal on scientific computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huckle, Thomas K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods</atitle><jtitle>SIAM journal on scientific computing</jtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>644</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>644-666</pages><issn>1064-8275</issn><eissn>1095-7197</eissn><abstract>The convergence of multigrid methods can be analyzed based on a Fourier analysis of the method or by proving certain inequalities that have to be fulfilled by the smoother and by the coarse grid correction separately. Here, we analyze the multigrid method for the constant coefficient Poisson equation with a compact Fourier analysis using the formalism of multilevel Toeplitz matrices and their generating functions or symbols. The Fourier analysis is applied for determining the smoothing factor and the overall error of the combined smoothing and coarse grid correction error reduction of a twogrid step (TGS) by representing the twogrid step explicitly by a symbol. If the effects of the smoothing correction and the coarse grid correction are orthogonal to each other, then, in a twogrid step, the error is removed in one step, and the twogrid method can be considered as a direct solver. If the coarse linear system is identical to the original matrix, then the same projection and smoother again make the twogrid step a direct solver. Hence, the multigrid cycle has to be applied only once with one smoothing step on each level, and therefore the whole multigrid method can be considered as a direct solver. In this paper we want to identify multigrid as a direct solver in one-dimension with a coarse system derived by linear and constant interpolation, and in two-dimensions for a modified projection related to [U. Trottenberg, C.W. Osterlee, and A. Schüller, Multigrid, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, paragraph A.2.3]. By studying not only smoothing and coarse grid correction separately but the symbol of the full twogrid step as well, we are furthermore able to derive better convergence estimates and information on how to find efficient combinations of projection and smoother. As smoothers we consider also approximate inverse smoothers, colored smoothers that take into account the different character of grid points, and rank-reducing smoothers that coincide with the given matrix on a large number of entries. Numerical examples show the effectiveness of the new approach.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</pub><doi>10.1137/070702564</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8275 |
ispartof | SIAM journal on scientific computing, 2008-01, Vol.31 (1), p.644-666 |
issn | 1064-8275 1095-7197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_921049163 |
source | SIAM Journals Online |
subjects | Approximation Boundary conditions Fourier analysis Fourier transforms Methods |
title | Compact Fourier Analysis for Designing Multigrid Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compact%20Fourier%20Analysis%20for%20Designing%20Multigrid%20Methods&rft.jtitle=SIAM%20journal%20on%20scientific%20computing&rft.au=Huckle,%20Thomas%20K.&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=644&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=644-666&rft.issn=1064-8275&rft.eissn=1095-7197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1137/070702564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583989771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921049163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |