A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm

A modified Cholesky factorization algorithm introduced originally by Gill and Murray and refined by Gill, Murray, and Wright is used extensively in optimization algorithms. Since its introduction in 1990, a different modified Cholesky factorization of Schnabel and Eskow has also gained widespread us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SIAM journal on optimization 1999-01, Vol.9 (4), p.1135-1148
Hauptverfasser: Schnabel, Robert B., Eskow, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1148
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1135
container_title SIAM journal on optimization
container_volume 9
creator Schnabel, Robert B.
Eskow, Elizabeth
description A modified Cholesky factorization algorithm introduced originally by Gill and Murray and refined by Gill, Murray, and Wright is used extensively in optimization algorithms. Since its introduction in 1990, a different modified Cholesky factorization of Schnabel and Eskow has also gained widespread usage. Compared with the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm has a smaller a priori bound on the perturbation, added to ensure positive definiteness, and some computational advantages, especially for large problems. Users of the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm, however, have reported cases from two different contexts where it makes a far larger modification to the original matrix than is necessary and than is made by the Gill--Murray--Wright method. This paper reports on a simple modification to the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm that appears to correct all the known computational difficulties with the method, without harming its theoretical properties or its computational behavior in any other cases. In new computational tests, the modifications to the original matrix made by the new algorithm appear virtually always to be smaller than those made by the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, sometimes by significant amounts. The perturbed matrix is allowed to be more ill-conditioned with the new algorithm, but this seems to be appropriate in the known contexts where the underlying problem is ill-conditioned.
doi_str_mv 10.1137/S105262349833266X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_920026427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579528341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-cf648d19d832ae34706df393779c4aef927824b9d63c605ac0140c05d11f84473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUEtLw0AYXETBWv0B3oL36LeP7OMYgrVCRfAB3pZ1HzY17dbdVKi_3oR68zQzzDADg9AlhmuMqbh5xlARTihTklLC-dsRmmBQVSmwVMcjr0g5-qfoLOcVAEjF5QTRunjy3232rniIrg3tQJpl7Hz-3BczY_uY2h_Tt3FT1N3HIPrl-hydBNNlf_GHU_Q6u31p5uXi8e6-qRelJQL60gbOpMPKSUqMp0wAd4EqKoSyzPigiJCEvSvHqeVQGQuYgYXKYRwkY4JO0dWhd5vi187nXq_iLm2GSa0IAOGMjCF8CNkUc04-6G1q1ybtNQY9XqP_XUN_ASCVVHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920026427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm</title><source>SIAM Journals</source><creator>Schnabel, Robert B. ; Eskow, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Schnabel, Robert B. ; Eskow, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>A modified Cholesky factorization algorithm introduced originally by Gill and Murray and refined by Gill, Murray, and Wright is used extensively in optimization algorithms. Since its introduction in 1990, a different modified Cholesky factorization of Schnabel and Eskow has also gained widespread usage. Compared with the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm has a smaller a priori bound on the perturbation, added to ensure positive definiteness, and some computational advantages, especially for large problems. Users of the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm, however, have reported cases from two different contexts where it makes a far larger modification to the original matrix than is necessary and than is made by the Gill--Murray--Wright method. This paper reports on a simple modification to the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm that appears to correct all the known computational difficulties with the method, without harming its theoretical properties or its computational behavior in any other cases. In new computational tests, the modifications to the original matrix made by the new algorithm appear virtually always to be smaller than those made by the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, sometimes by significant amounts. The perturbed matrix is allowed to be more ill-conditioned with the new algorithm, but this seems to be appropriate in the known contexts where the underlying problem is ill-conditioned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-6234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-7189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1137/S105262349833266X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</publisher><subject>Eigenvalues ; Methods ; Optimization algorithms</subject><ispartof>SIAM journal on optimization, 1999-01, Vol.9 (4), p.1135-1148</ispartof><rights>[Copyright] © 1999 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-cf648d19d832ae34706df393779c4aef927824b9d63c605ac0140c05d11f84473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-cf648d19d832ae34706df393779c4aef927824b9d63c605ac0140c05d11f84473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3184,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schnabel, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskow, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm</title><title>SIAM journal on optimization</title><description>A modified Cholesky factorization algorithm introduced originally by Gill and Murray and refined by Gill, Murray, and Wright is used extensively in optimization algorithms. Since its introduction in 1990, a different modified Cholesky factorization of Schnabel and Eskow has also gained widespread usage. Compared with the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm has a smaller a priori bound on the perturbation, added to ensure positive definiteness, and some computational advantages, especially for large problems. Users of the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm, however, have reported cases from two different contexts where it makes a far larger modification to the original matrix than is necessary and than is made by the Gill--Murray--Wright method. This paper reports on a simple modification to the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm that appears to correct all the known computational difficulties with the method, without harming its theoretical properties or its computational behavior in any other cases. In new computational tests, the modifications to the original matrix made by the new algorithm appear virtually always to be smaller than those made by the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, sometimes by significant amounts. The perturbed matrix is allowed to be more ill-conditioned with the new algorithm, but this seems to be appropriate in the known contexts where the underlying problem is ill-conditioned.</description><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><issn>1052-6234</issn><issn>1095-7189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUEtLw0AYXETBWv0B3oL36LeP7OMYgrVCRfAB3pZ1HzY17dbdVKi_3oR68zQzzDADg9AlhmuMqbh5xlARTihTklLC-dsRmmBQVSmwVMcjr0g5-qfoLOcVAEjF5QTRunjy3232rniIrg3tQJpl7Hz-3BczY_uY2h_Tt3FT1N3HIPrl-hydBNNlf_GHU_Q6u31p5uXi8e6-qRelJQL60gbOpMPKSUqMp0wAd4EqKoSyzPigiJCEvSvHqeVQGQuYgYXKYRwkY4JO0dWhd5vi187nXq_iLm2GSa0IAOGMjCF8CNkUc04-6G1q1ybtNQY9XqP_XUN_ASCVVHM</recordid><startdate>199901</startdate><enddate>199901</enddate><creator>Schnabel, Robert B.</creator><creator>Eskow, Elizabeth</creator><general>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199901</creationdate><title>A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm</title><author>Schnabel, Robert B. ; Eskow, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-cf648d19d832ae34706df393779c4aef927824b9d63c605ac0140c05d11f84473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schnabel, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskow, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>SIAM journal on optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schnabel, Robert B.</au><au>Eskow, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>SIAM journal on optimization</jtitle><date>1999-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1135</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1135-1148</pages><issn>1052-6234</issn><eissn>1095-7189</eissn><abstract>A modified Cholesky factorization algorithm introduced originally by Gill and Murray and refined by Gill, Murray, and Wright is used extensively in optimization algorithms. Since its introduction in 1990, a different modified Cholesky factorization of Schnabel and Eskow has also gained widespread usage. Compared with the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm has a smaller a priori bound on the perturbation, added to ensure positive definiteness, and some computational advantages, especially for large problems. Users of the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm, however, have reported cases from two different contexts where it makes a far larger modification to the original matrix than is necessary and than is made by the Gill--Murray--Wright method. This paper reports on a simple modification to the Schnabel--Eskow algorithm that appears to correct all the known computational difficulties with the method, without harming its theoretical properties or its computational behavior in any other cases. In new computational tests, the modifications to the original matrix made by the new algorithm appear virtually always to be smaller than those made by the Gill--Murray--Wright algorithm, sometimes by significant amounts. The perturbed matrix is allowed to be more ill-conditioned with the new algorithm, but this seems to be appropriate in the known contexts where the underlying problem is ill-conditioned.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</pub><doi>10.1137/S105262349833266X</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-6234
ispartof SIAM journal on optimization, 1999-01, Vol.9 (4), p.1135-1148
issn 1052-6234
1095-7189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_920026427
source SIAM Journals
subjects Eigenvalues
Methods
Optimization algorithms
title A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Revised%20Modified%20Cholesky%20Factorization%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=SIAM%20journal%20on%20optimization&rft.au=Schnabel,%20Robert%20B.&rft.date=1999-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1135&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1135-1148&rft.issn=1052-6234&rft.eissn=1095-7189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1137/S105262349833266X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579528341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920026427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true