Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors
To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of pharmaceutical education 2011-10, Vol.75 (9), p.1 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | American journal of pharmaceutical education |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Kelley, Katherine A Stanke, Luke D Rabi, Suzanne M Kuba, Sarah E Janke, Kristin K |
| description | To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_919439254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576591551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_9194392543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy70KwjAUQOEgCtafdwjuhbRNKlktig6Cg7iWgImmtLl6b-Lz28EHcDrLdyYsK5Sq8lrW2ynLhBBlrqXSc7Yg6oQopJJlxk4NAlF-M72_m-ghcHDcBH4KFDENNkTuAPnZGkrow4NfEJwlGuW40MB39mk-HpBWbOZMT3b965JtDvtrc8xfCO9kKbYdJBwvanWhZaVLJau_0BdFwj3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919439254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kelley, Katherine A ; Stanke, Luke D ; Rabi, Suzanne M ; Kuba, Sarah E ; Janke, Kristin K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Katherine A ; Stanke, Luke D ; Rabi, Suzanne M ; Kuba, Sarah E ; Janke, Kristin K</creatorcontrib><description>To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; Behavior ; Content Validity ; Core curriculum ; Data collection ; Definitions ; Drug stores ; Education ; Educational Change ; Evaluators ; Factor Analysis ; Formative Evaluation ; Internal Medicine ; Lifelong Learning ; Pharmaceutical Education ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacy ; Professionalism ; Rating Scales ; Schools ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Validity ; Values</subject><ispartof>American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2011-10, Vol.75 (9), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanke, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabi, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuba, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janke, Kristin K</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors</title><title>American journal of pharmaceutical education</title><description>To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Content Validity</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Education</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0002-9459</issn><issn>1553-6467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy70KwjAUQOEgCtafdwjuhbRNKlktig6Cg7iWgImmtLl6b-Lz28EHcDrLdyYsK5Sq8lrW2ynLhBBlrqXSc7Yg6oQopJJlxk4NAlF-M72_m-ghcHDcBH4KFDENNkTuAPnZGkrow4NfEJwlGuW40MB39mk-HpBWbOZMT3b965JtDvtrc8xfCO9kKbYdJBwvanWhZaVLJau_0BdFwj3c</recordid><startdate>20111020</startdate><enddate>20111020</enddate><creator>Kelley, Katherine A</creator><creator>Stanke, Luke D</creator><creator>Rabi, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Kuba, Sarah E</creator><creator>Janke, Kristin K</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111020</creationdate><title>Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors</title><author>Kelley, Katherine A ; Stanke, Luke D ; Rabi, Suzanne M ; Kuba, Sarah E ; Janke, Kristin K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_9194392543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Content Validity</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Education</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanke, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabi, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuba, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janke, Kristin K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelley, Katherine A</au><au>Stanke, Luke D</au><au>Rabi, Suzanne M</au><au>Kuba, Sarah E</au><au>Janke, Kristin K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors</atitle><jtitle>American journal of pharmaceutical education</jtitle><date>2011-10-20</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0002-9459</issn><eissn>1553-6467</eissn><abstract>To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9459 |
| ispartof | American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2011-10, Vol.75 (9), p.1 |
| issn | 0002-9459 1553-6467 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_919439254 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Academic Standards Accreditation Accreditation (Institutions) Behavior Content Validity Core curriculum Data collection Definitions Drug stores Education Educational Change Evaluators Factor Analysis Formative Evaluation Internal Medicine Lifelong Learning Pharmaceutical Education Pharmacists Pharmacy Professionalism Rating Scales Schools Student Evaluation Students Studies Teaching Methods Validity Values |
| title | Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A49%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-Validation%20of%20an%20Instrument%20for%20Measuring%20Professionalism%20Behaviors&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20education&rft.au=Kelley,%20Katherine%20A&rft.date=2011-10-20&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0002-9459&rft.eissn=1553-6467&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2576591551%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919439254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |