True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral
Reviews the book, Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust by Daniel Kelly (see record 2011-14856-000). Daniel Kelly, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, covers two topics in his brief book Yuck! The first three chapters characterize the disgust reaction in normal adult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PsycCritiques 2012-01, Vol.57 (3), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | No Pagination Specified |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | No Pagination Specified |
container_title | PsycCritiques |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Adams, William A. |
description | Reviews the book, Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust by Daniel Kelly (see record 2011-14856-000). Daniel Kelly, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, covers two topics in his brief book Yuck! The first three chapters characterize the disgust reaction in normal adults; the last two chapters connect disgust and morality. The difficulties arise immediately with the definition of disgust. Kelly acknowledges rampant, diverse definitions but then just starts calling disgust an emotion and begins his analysis. Emotion is at best an inexplicable mash-up of behavior, physiology, and psychological feelings (e.g., Kagan, 2007). Kelly ignores that issue. Regardless of these difficulties, Kelly’s proposal is that the instinctive disgust reaction has today been co-opted by culture to serve extended functions such as marking ethnic boundaries. This is an intellectually stimulating book, especially if you can suspend your skepticism of several implicit theoretical assumptions. The scientific and phenomenological descriptions of disgust are quite good, and the connection between evolutionary theory and moral philosophy is interesting, if not completely convincing. Yuck! will appeal to students and scholars in evolutionary psychology and in moral philosophy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0026503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_916689001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>916689001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601-bb3253ba9212aec63f89046ff077ee9570285850ce5a88254f538ac2083d01583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUD1PwzAQtRBIlIDET7CYGAicfbHjsKFCIVIlluyWY-ySqqmL3Qz8e1wVJKZ3w7v3Rcg1g3sGWD8YAC4F4AmZMSGqEhiq03_3OblIaQ2ZiqqZEdnFydEQ6cJsknuk7da6tKdtos9DWk1pP2xXd7T7dNH5EB1txzFEs7kkZ_7wcPWLBekWL938rVy-v7bzp2VpJbCy75EL7E3DGTfOSvSqgUp6D3XtXCNq4EooAdYJoxQXlReojOWg8AOYUFiQm6PsLoavKQfT6zDFbXbUDZMyq-VKBbk9kmwMKeWceheH0cRvzUAfNtF_m-AP3iJQGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916689001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, William A.</creator><contributor>Wedding, Danny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adams, William A. ; Wedding, Danny</creatorcontrib><description>Reviews the book, Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust by Daniel Kelly (see record 2011-14856-000). Daniel Kelly, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, covers two topics in his brief book Yuck! The first three chapters characterize the disgust reaction in normal adults; the last two chapters connect disgust and morality. The difficulties arise immediately with the definition of disgust. Kelly acknowledges rampant, diverse definitions but then just starts calling disgust an emotion and begins his analysis. Emotion is at best an inexplicable mash-up of behavior, physiology, and psychological feelings (e.g., Kagan, 2007). Kelly ignores that issue. Regardless of these difficulties, Kelly’s proposal is that the instinctive disgust reaction has today been co-opted by culture to serve extended functions such as marking ethnic boundaries. This is an intellectually stimulating book, especially if you can suspend your skepticism of several implicit theoretical assumptions. The scientific and phenomenological descriptions of disgust are quite good, and the connection between evolutionary theory and moral philosophy is interesting, if not completely convincing. Yuck! will appeal to students and scholars in evolutionary psychology and in moral philosophy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-0138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-0138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0026503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Disgust ; Evolutionary Psychology ; Human ; Incest ; Morality ; Philosophies ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>PsycCritiques, 2012-01, Vol.57 (3), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wedding, Danny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adams, William A.</creatorcontrib><title>True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral</title><title>PsycCritiques</title><description>Reviews the book, Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust by Daniel Kelly (see record 2011-14856-000). Daniel Kelly, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, covers two topics in his brief book Yuck! The first three chapters characterize the disgust reaction in normal adults; the last two chapters connect disgust and morality. The difficulties arise immediately with the definition of disgust. Kelly acknowledges rampant, diverse definitions but then just starts calling disgust an emotion and begins his analysis. Emotion is at best an inexplicable mash-up of behavior, physiology, and psychological feelings (e.g., Kagan, 2007). Kelly ignores that issue. Regardless of these difficulties, Kelly’s proposal is that the instinctive disgust reaction has today been co-opted by culture to serve extended functions such as marking ethnic boundaries. This is an intellectually stimulating book, especially if you can suspend your skepticism of several implicit theoretical assumptions. The scientific and phenomenological descriptions of disgust are quite good, and the connection between evolutionary theory and moral philosophy is interesting, if not completely convincing. Yuck! will appeal to students and scholars in evolutionary psychology and in moral philosophy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Disgust</subject><subject>Evolutionary Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Incest</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Philosophies</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1554-0138</issn><issn>1554-0138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUD1PwzAQtRBIlIDET7CYGAicfbHjsKFCIVIlluyWY-ySqqmL3Qz8e1wVJKZ3w7v3Rcg1g3sGWD8YAC4F4AmZMSGqEhiq03_3OblIaQ2ZiqqZEdnFydEQ6cJsknuk7da6tKdtos9DWk1pP2xXd7T7dNH5EB1txzFEs7kkZ_7wcPWLBekWL938rVy-v7bzp2VpJbCy75EL7E3DGTfOSvSqgUp6D3XtXCNq4EooAdYJoxQXlReojOWg8AOYUFiQm6PsLoavKQfT6zDFbXbUDZMyq-VKBbk9kmwMKeWceheH0cRvzUAfNtF_m-AP3iJQGA</recordid><startdate>20120118</startdate><enddate>20120118</enddate><creator>Adams, William A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120118</creationdate><title>True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral</title><author>Adams, William A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601-bb3253ba9212aec63f89046ff077ee9570285850ce5a88254f538ac2083d01583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Disgust</topic><topic>Evolutionary Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Incest</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Philosophies</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, William A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>PsycCritiques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, William A.</au><au>Wedding, Danny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral</atitle><jtitle>PsycCritiques</jtitle><date>2012-01-18</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>No Pagination Specified</spage><epage>No Pagination Specified</epage><pages>No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</pages><issn>1554-0138</issn><eissn>1554-0138</eissn><abstract>Reviews the book, Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust by Daniel Kelly (see record 2011-14856-000). Daniel Kelly, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, covers two topics in his brief book Yuck! The first three chapters characterize the disgust reaction in normal adults; the last two chapters connect disgust and morality. The difficulties arise immediately with the definition of disgust. Kelly acknowledges rampant, diverse definitions but then just starts calling disgust an emotion and begins his analysis. Emotion is at best an inexplicable mash-up of behavior, physiology, and psychological feelings (e.g., Kagan, 2007). Kelly ignores that issue. Regardless of these difficulties, Kelly’s proposal is that the instinctive disgust reaction has today been co-opted by culture to serve extended functions such as marking ethnic boundaries. This is an intellectually stimulating book, especially if you can suspend your skepticism of several implicit theoretical assumptions. The scientific and phenomenological descriptions of disgust are quite good, and the connection between evolutionary theory and moral philosophy is interesting, if not completely convincing. Yuck! will appeal to students and scholars in evolutionary psychology and in moral philosophy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/a0026503</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1554-0138 |
ispartof | PsycCritiques, 2012-01, Vol.57 (3), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified |
issn | 1554-0138 1554-0138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_916689001 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Disgust Evolutionary Psychology Human Incest Morality Philosophies Sociocultural Factors |
title | True or False: Incest Is Disgusting, Therefore Immoral |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T23%3A22%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=True%20or%20False:%20Incest%20Is%20Disgusting,%20Therefore%20Immoral&rft.jtitle=PsycCritiques&rft.au=Adams,%20William%20A.&rft.date=2012-01-18&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.epage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.pages=No%20Pagination%20Specified-No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.issn=1554-0138&rft.eissn=1554-0138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0026503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916689001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916689001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |