Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud
This study is an attempt to find a coherent interpretation of the link between the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud (MC) and its solar source. Most previous studies agree on the orientation of the MC, but the orientation is nearly perpendicular to the axis of the post‐eruption arcade (PEA) or the ori...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 2012-01, Vol.117 (A1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | A1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Marubashi, Katsuhide Cho, Kyung-Suk Kim, Yeon-Han Park, Yong-Deuk Park, Sung-Hong |
description | This study is an attempt to find a coherent interpretation of the link between the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud (MC) and its solar source. Most previous studies agree on the orientation of the MC, but the orientation is nearly perpendicular to the axis of the post‐eruption arcade (PEA) or the orientation of the neutral line in the solar source region. We first determine the geometry of this MC by fitting methods with both torus and cylinder models. Three possible geometries are obtained, which can reproduce the observed magnetic field variations associated with the MC, one from the cylinder fit and two from the torus fit. The cylinder fit gives the MC orientation with a tilt of a large angle (∼60°) from the ecliptic plane and nearly perpendicular to the PEA axis, being similar to those from previous studies. In contrast, two torus fit results give the MC axis with tilt angles less than 20° from the ecliptic plane. The two torus results correspond to the spacecraft encounter with the eastern flank of the flux rope loop (model A) and the western flank of the loop (model B), respectively. In either case, the orientation of the loop around the apex is nearly parallel to the PEA as observed by the SOHO/extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope instrument in the most plausible solar source region of a halo coronal mass ejection (CME), which appeared in the field of view of Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003. The magnetic helicity of the PEA region is positive in agreement with the helicity of the MC. The 3‐D reconstruction from the Solar Mass Ejection Imager data shows that the main part of the ejected plasma expands mainly to the west of the Sun‐Earth line. Thus, we reach the most straightforward interpretation of the link between the MC and its solar source as follows. The MC was created in association with the launch of the CME that was first observed by the LASCO C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003, and propagated through interplanetary space with its orientation almost unchanged. The spacecraft encountered the eastern flank of the loop as described by model A.
Key Points
The first analysis of the 20 November 2003 MC with a torus model
The first result of the MC geometry consistent with posteruption arcade
The most comprehensive analysis of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2011JA016802 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_915083730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557920161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-6fb7712f4ea5d765d2fe649e4821271b040c10cd4a9512eb55c761c8cf5717c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLAkEQx5coSMy3PsBR9NblzNzu7d6jSFkmBlEUvSzruldn6tnuWfntO1Gkl5qXGZjf7z8wjB0jXCBQ1iZA7HcAUwW0xxqEIo2JgPZZA5CrGIjkIWuFMIG6uEg5YIO1e66cucqvojKPqjcXEUTD8tPNRs7XMyTRzLzOXVXYyE7L5fiIHeRmGlxr25vs8eryoXsdD-56N93OILacg4zTfCQlUs6dEWOZijHlLuWZ44qQJI6Ag0WwY24ygeRGQliZolU2FxKl5UmTnWxyF778WLpQ6Um59PP6pM5QgEpkAjV0-heESirgnOOaOt9Q1pcheJfrhS9mxq80gl6_Tv9-XY2fbUNNsGaaezO3Rdg5JDJFiVQ1l2y4r2LqVv9m6n7vvkPIU1lb8cYqQuW-d5bx77reSqGfhj0Nz_RyS6Kv-8kPIraFwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878044410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marubashi, Katsuhide ; Cho, Kyung-Suk ; Kim, Yeon-Han ; Park, Yong-Deuk ; Park, Sung-Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Marubashi, Katsuhide ; Cho, Kyung-Suk ; Kim, Yeon-Han ; Park, Yong-Deuk ; Park, Sung-Hong</creatorcontrib><description>This study is an attempt to find a coherent interpretation of the link between the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud (MC) and its solar source. Most previous studies agree on the orientation of the MC, but the orientation is nearly perpendicular to the axis of the post‐eruption arcade (PEA) or the orientation of the neutral line in the solar source region. We first determine the geometry of this MC by fitting methods with both torus and cylinder models. Three possible geometries are obtained, which can reproduce the observed magnetic field variations associated with the MC, one from the cylinder fit and two from the torus fit. The cylinder fit gives the MC orientation with a tilt of a large angle (∼60°) from the ecliptic plane and nearly perpendicular to the PEA axis, being similar to those from previous studies. In contrast, two torus fit results give the MC axis with tilt angles less than 20° from the ecliptic plane. The two torus results correspond to the spacecraft encounter with the eastern flank of the flux rope loop (model A) and the western flank of the loop (model B), respectively. In either case, the orientation of the loop around the apex is nearly parallel to the PEA as observed by the SOHO/extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope instrument in the most plausible solar source region of a halo coronal mass ejection (CME), which appeared in the field of view of Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003. The magnetic helicity of the PEA region is positive in agreement with the helicity of the MC. The 3‐D reconstruction from the Solar Mass Ejection Imager data shows that the main part of the ejected plasma expands mainly to the west of the Sun‐Earth line. Thus, we reach the most straightforward interpretation of the link between the MC and its solar source as follows. The MC was created in association with the launch of the CME that was first observed by the LASCO C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003, and propagated through interplanetary space with its orientation almost unchanged. The spacecraft encountered the eastern flank of the loop as described by model A.
Key Points
The first analysis of the 20 November 2003 MC with a torus model
The first result of the MC geometry consistent with posteruption arcade
The most comprehensive analysis of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2011JA016802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Astrophysics ; coronal mass ejection ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; magnetic cloud ; Magnetic fields ; Planetology ; solar wind ; Space ; Spacecraft ; Sun</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2012-01, Vol.117 (A1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-6fb7712f4ea5d765d2fe649e4821271b040c10cd4a9512eb55c761c8cf5717c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-6fb7712f4ea5d765d2fe649e4821271b040c10cd4a9512eb55c761c8cf5717c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2011JA016802$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2011JA016802$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,1429,11496,27906,27907,45556,45557,46391,46450,46815,46874</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25982378$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marubashi, Katsuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kyung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeon-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong-Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung-Hong</creatorcontrib><title>Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>This study is an attempt to find a coherent interpretation of the link between the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud (MC) and its solar source. Most previous studies agree on the orientation of the MC, but the orientation is nearly perpendicular to the axis of the post‐eruption arcade (PEA) or the orientation of the neutral line in the solar source region. We first determine the geometry of this MC by fitting methods with both torus and cylinder models. Three possible geometries are obtained, which can reproduce the observed magnetic field variations associated with the MC, one from the cylinder fit and two from the torus fit. The cylinder fit gives the MC orientation with a tilt of a large angle (∼60°) from the ecliptic plane and nearly perpendicular to the PEA axis, being similar to those from previous studies. In contrast, two torus fit results give the MC axis with tilt angles less than 20° from the ecliptic plane. The two torus results correspond to the spacecraft encounter with the eastern flank of the flux rope loop (model A) and the western flank of the loop (model B), respectively. In either case, the orientation of the loop around the apex is nearly parallel to the PEA as observed by the SOHO/extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope instrument in the most plausible solar source region of a halo coronal mass ejection (CME), which appeared in the field of view of Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003. The magnetic helicity of the PEA region is positive in agreement with the helicity of the MC. The 3‐D reconstruction from the Solar Mass Ejection Imager data shows that the main part of the ejected plasma expands mainly to the west of the Sun‐Earth line. Thus, we reach the most straightforward interpretation of the link between the MC and its solar source as follows. The MC was created in association with the launch of the CME that was first observed by the LASCO C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003, and propagated through interplanetary space with its orientation almost unchanged. The spacecraft encountered the eastern flank of the loop as described by model A.
Key Points
The first analysis of the 20 November 2003 MC with a torus model
The first result of the MC geometry consistent with posteruption arcade
The most comprehensive analysis of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>coronal mass ejection</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>magnetic cloud</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Planetology</subject><subject>solar wind</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Sun</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLAkEQx5coSMy3PsBR9NblzNzu7d6jSFkmBlEUvSzruldn6tnuWfntO1Gkl5qXGZjf7z8wjB0jXCBQ1iZA7HcAUwW0xxqEIo2JgPZZA5CrGIjkIWuFMIG6uEg5YIO1e66cucqvojKPqjcXEUTD8tPNRs7XMyTRzLzOXVXYyE7L5fiIHeRmGlxr25vs8eryoXsdD-56N93OILacg4zTfCQlUs6dEWOZijHlLuWZ44qQJI6Ag0WwY24ygeRGQliZolU2FxKl5UmTnWxyF778WLpQ6Um59PP6pM5QgEpkAjV0-heESirgnOOaOt9Q1pcheJfrhS9mxq80gl6_Tv9-XY2fbUNNsGaaezO3Rdg5JDJFiVQ1l2y4r2LqVv9m6n7vvkPIU1lb8cYqQuW-d5bx77reSqGfhj0Nz_RyS6Kv-8kPIraFwg</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Marubashi, Katsuhide</creator><creator>Cho, Kyung-Suk</creator><creator>Kim, Yeon-Han</creator><creator>Park, Yong-Deuk</creator><creator>Park, Sung-Hong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</title><author>Marubashi, Katsuhide ; Cho, Kyung-Suk ; Kim, Yeon-Han ; Park, Yong-Deuk ; Park, Sung-Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-6fb7712f4ea5d765d2fe649e4821271b040c10cd4a9512eb55c761c8cf5717c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>coronal mass ejection</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>magnetic cloud</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Planetology</topic><topic>solar wind</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Sun</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marubashi, Katsuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Kyung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeon-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong-Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung-Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marubashi, Katsuhide</au><au>Cho, Kyung-Suk</au><au>Kim, Yeon-Han</au><au>Park, Yong-Deuk</au><au>Park, Sung-Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>A1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>This study is an attempt to find a coherent interpretation of the link between the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud (MC) and its solar source. Most previous studies agree on the orientation of the MC, but the orientation is nearly perpendicular to the axis of the post‐eruption arcade (PEA) or the orientation of the neutral line in the solar source region. We first determine the geometry of this MC by fitting methods with both torus and cylinder models. Three possible geometries are obtained, which can reproduce the observed magnetic field variations associated with the MC, one from the cylinder fit and two from the torus fit. The cylinder fit gives the MC orientation with a tilt of a large angle (∼60°) from the ecliptic plane and nearly perpendicular to the PEA axis, being similar to those from previous studies. In contrast, two torus fit results give the MC axis with tilt angles less than 20° from the ecliptic plane. The two torus results correspond to the spacecraft encounter with the eastern flank of the flux rope loop (model A) and the western flank of the loop (model B), respectively. In either case, the orientation of the loop around the apex is nearly parallel to the PEA as observed by the SOHO/extreme ultraviolet imaging telescope instrument in the most plausible solar source region of a halo coronal mass ejection (CME), which appeared in the field of view of Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003. The magnetic helicity of the PEA region is positive in agreement with the helicity of the MC. The 3‐D reconstruction from the Solar Mass Ejection Imager data shows that the main part of the ejected plasma expands mainly to the west of the Sun‐Earth line. Thus, we reach the most straightforward interpretation of the link between the MC and its solar source as follows. The MC was created in association with the launch of the CME that was first observed by the LASCO C2 at 08:50 UT, 18 November 2003, and propagated through interplanetary space with its orientation almost unchanged. The spacecraft encountered the eastern flank of the loop as described by model A.
Key Points
The first analysis of the 20 November 2003 MC with a torus model
The first result of the MC geometry consistent with posteruption arcade
The most comprehensive analysis of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2011JA016802</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2012-01, Vol.117 (A1), p.n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2169-9380 2156-2202 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_915083730 |
source | Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Astronomy Astrophysics coronal mass ejection Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology magnetic cloud Magnetic fields Planetology solar wind Space Spacecraft Sun |
title | Geometry of the 20 November 2003 magnetic cloud |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geometry%20of%20the%2020%20November%202003%20magnetic%20cloud&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Space%20Physics&rft.au=Marubashi,%20Katsuhide&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=A1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2011JA016802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557920161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878044410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |