Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: The View from the Laboratory
The evidence for differences in recall accuracy for hypnotized vs. nonhypnotized eyewitnesses in forensically relevant settings was examined through a meta-analytic review of 24 research studies. Recall accuracy for nonleading questions after a 1- to 2-day delay favored the hypnotized subjects ( d =...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Law and human behavior 1994-12, Vol.18 (6), p.635-651 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 651 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 635 |
| container_title | Law and human behavior |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens Bothwell, Robert K |
| description | The evidence for differences in recall accuracy for hypnotized vs. nonhypnotized eyewitnesses in forensically relevant settings was examined through a meta-analytic review of 24 research studies. Recall accuracy for nonleading questions after a 1- to 2-day delay favored the hypnotized subjects (
d
= .46); however, less accurate recall was evidenced for hypnotized subjects following a delay of less than 24 hours (
d = −
.29) or a one-week delay (
d
= −.24). The recall of hypnotized subjects also displayed more intrusion of uncued errors and higher levels of pseudomemory. Hypnotized subjects also expressed higher levels of confidence in recall accuracy compared to nonhypnotized subjects. Caution is urged regarding use of hypnotically refreshed memory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01499329 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_914687515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1394178</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1394178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-45c8c88db6f77a92da17a3a90c9959e7285cb7008d955b05571938ba3b959e6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHop6U6kvT_DrOsTlhIMgEbyFNU9bRtTXphP73ZlQYgp4e5Psh7_FF6BLDAwbgj09zwKmUJJFHaIQpJzFj-OMYjcIzjzkBforOvN8AgBRARyiefZW5rY2NisZFi76tm640uqr66M0Wzvq1zaOV9V25ber-HJ0UuvL24meO0ft8tpou4uXr88t0sow14dDFKTXCCJFnrOBcyyTXmGuiJRgpqbQ8EdRkHEDkktIMKOVYEpFpku1jpskYXQ__tq753IXtatPsXB1WKolTJjjFNKCb_xBOJGeCYEiCuhuUcY33zhaqdeVWu15hUPvO1KGzgK8GvPFd4w6SyBRzEeL7IdatVq3vjXahrMp6s3PO1p2q1pnCQjHFyP6-27_1b_YNEEKBEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914687515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: The View from the Laboratory</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens ; Bothwell, Robert K</creator><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens ; Bothwell, Robert K ; Roesch, Ronald</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence for differences in recall accuracy for hypnotized vs. nonhypnotized eyewitnesses in forensically relevant settings was examined through a meta-analytic review of 24 research studies. Recall accuracy for nonleading questions after a 1- to 2-day delay favored the hypnotized subjects (
d
= .46); however, less accurate recall was evidenced for hypnotized subjects following a delay of less than 24 hours (
d = −
.29) or a one-week delay (
d
= −.24). The recall of hypnotized subjects also displayed more intrusion of uncued errors and higher levels of pseudomemory. Hypnotized subjects also expressed higher levels of confidence in recall accuracy compared to nonhypnotized subjects. Caution is urged regarding use of hypnotically refreshed memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01499329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Plenum Publishing Corp</publisher><subject>Control groups ; Criminal investigation ; Estimate reliability ; Forensic laboratories ; Human ; Hypnosis ; Leading questions ; Legal Testimony ; Memory ; Meta Analysis ; Misinformation ; Police ; Recall (Learning)</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 1994-12, Vol.18 (6), p.635-651</ispartof><rights>1994 Plenum Publishing</rights><rights>1994 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-45c8c88db6f77a92da17a3a90c9959e7285cb7008d955b05571938ba3b959e6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-45c8c88db6f77a92da17a3a90c9959e7285cb7008d955b05571938ba3b959e6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bothwell, Robert K</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: The View from the Laboratory</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><description>The evidence for differences in recall accuracy for hypnotized vs. nonhypnotized eyewitnesses in forensically relevant settings was examined through a meta-analytic review of 24 research studies. Recall accuracy for nonleading questions after a 1- to 2-day delay favored the hypnotized subjects (
d
= .46); however, less accurate recall was evidenced for hypnotized subjects following a delay of less than 24 hours (
d = −
.29) or a one-week delay (
d
= −.24). The recall of hypnotized subjects also displayed more intrusion of uncued errors and higher levels of pseudomemory. Hypnotized subjects also expressed higher levels of confidence in recall accuracy compared to nonhypnotized subjects. Caution is urged regarding use of hypnotically refreshed memory.</description><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Criminal investigation</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Forensic laboratories</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hypnosis</subject><subject>Leading questions</subject><subject>Legal Testimony</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Recall (Learning)</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHop6U6kvT_DrOsTlhIMgEbyFNU9bRtTXphP73ZlQYgp4e5Psh7_FF6BLDAwbgj09zwKmUJJFHaIQpJzFj-OMYjcIzjzkBforOvN8AgBRARyiefZW5rY2NisZFi76tm640uqr66M0Wzvq1zaOV9V25ber-HJ0UuvL24meO0ft8tpou4uXr88t0sow14dDFKTXCCJFnrOBcyyTXmGuiJRgpqbQ8EdRkHEDkktIMKOVYEpFpku1jpskYXQ__tq753IXtatPsXB1WKolTJjjFNKCb_xBOJGeCYEiCuhuUcY33zhaqdeVWu15hUPvO1KGzgK8GvPFd4w6SyBRzEeL7IdatVq3vjXahrMp6s3PO1p2q1pnCQjHFyP6-27_1b_YNEEKBEw</recordid><startdate>199412</startdate><enddate>199412</enddate><creator>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens</creator><creator>Bothwell, Robert K</creator><general>Plenum Publishing Corp</general><general>Plenum Publishing Corporation</general><general>Plenum Pub. Corp</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199412</creationdate><title>Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony</title><author>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens ; Bothwell, Robert K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-45c8c88db6f77a92da17a3a90c9959e7285cb7008d955b05571938ba3b959e6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Criminal investigation</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Forensic laboratories</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hypnosis</topic><topic>Leading questions</topic><topic>Legal Testimony</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Recall (Learning)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bothwell, Robert K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens</au><au>Bothwell, Robert K</au><au>Roesch, Ronald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: The View from the Laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><date>1994-12</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>635-651</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>The evidence for differences in recall accuracy for hypnotized vs. nonhypnotized eyewitnesses in forensically relevant settings was examined through a meta-analytic review of 24 research studies. Recall accuracy for nonleading questions after a 1- to 2-day delay favored the hypnotized subjects (
d
= .46); however, less accurate recall was evidenced for hypnotized subjects following a delay of less than 24 hours (
d = −
.29) or a one-week delay (
d
= −.24). The recall of hypnotized subjects also displayed more intrusion of uncued errors and higher levels of pseudomemory. Hypnotized subjects also expressed higher levels of confidence in recall accuracy compared to nonhypnotized subjects. Caution is urged regarding use of hypnotically refreshed memory.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Plenum Publishing Corp</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01499329</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-7307 |
| ispartof | Law and human behavior, 1994-12, Vol.18 (6), p.635-651 |
| issn | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_914687515 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Control groups Criminal investigation Estimate reliability Forensic laboratories Human Hypnosis Leading questions Legal Testimony Memory Meta Analysis Misinformation Police Recall (Learning) |
| title | Evidence for Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: The View from the Laboratory |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20Hypnotically%20Refreshed%20Testimony:%20The%20View%20from%20the%20Laboratory&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Steblay,%20Nancy%20Mehrkens&rft.date=1994-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=635-651&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01499329&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1394178%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914687515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1394178&rfr_iscdi=true |