Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias
Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence in Tarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Law and human behavior 1996-10, Vol.20 (5), p.501-516 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 516 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 501 |
container_title | Law and human behavior |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | LaBine, Susan J LaBine, Gary |
description | Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence in Tarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did not become violent, and (3) no outcome was specified. Respondents rated the foreseeability of violence, the reasonableness of therapist actions, and negligence. It was hypothesized that respondents who were informed that the patient became violent would be more likely to find the therapist negligent than respondents in the other two outcome conditions. Findings supported this, and respondents in the violent outcome condition rated the violence as more foreseeable and therapist actions as less reasonable. Implications for mental health and legal professionals are discussed and future research ideas are suggested. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01499038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_914687428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1394149</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1394149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-fea5e530653c22fded92227d8309704be9fa8cb1fd20fe4d756bde87597e15423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHIp6U6kvSNM3RzR8Thl4UvIW0fdkyunYm2WH_vZUKQ_D04H0_vAdfQs4p3FIAeTd5ApopBbw4ICMqJE_znH4eklG_lqnkII_JSQgrAFAFiBHhDxjRr11rouvakHQ2ecVF4xbYVpiYtk7iEpOZa-vgFsuYTJwJp-TImibg2e8ck4-nx_fpLJ2_Pb9M7-ep4QWPqUUjUHDIBa8YszXWijEm64KDkpCVqKwpqpLamoHFrJYiL2sspFASqcgYH5PL4e7Gd19bDFGvuq1v-5da0SwvZMaKHl0PqPJdCB6t3ni3Nn6nKeifTvS-kx5fDHgVYuf3kqusJ318M8RmY_Qm7Crjo6saDNXWe2yjbpalZqCFFkB7ffW__su-ARDsd4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914687428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>LaBine, Susan J ; LaBine, Gary</creator><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>LaBine, Susan J ; LaBine, Gary ; Roesch, Ronald</creatorcontrib><description>Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence in Tarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did not become violent, and (3) no outcome was specified. Respondents rated the foreseeability of violence, the reasonableness of therapist actions, and negligence. It was hypothesized that respondents who were informed that the patient became violent would be more likely to find the therapist negligent than respondents in the other two outcome conditions. Findings supported this, and respondents in the violent outcome condition rated the violence as more foreseeable and therapist actions as less reasonable. Implications for mental health and legal professionals are discussed and future research ideas are suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01499038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Plenum Publishing Corp</publisher><subject>Female ; Health outcomes ; Hindsight Bias ; Human ; Juries ; Jurors ; Male ; Mental health ; Mental health outcomes ; Patient Violence ; Professional Liability ; Reasonable care ; School violence ; Tarasoff Decision ; Therapists ; Victim identification ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 1996-10, Vol.20 (5), p.501-516</ispartof><rights>1996 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1996 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright 1996 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-fea5e530653c22fded92227d8309704be9fa8cb1fd20fe4d756bde87597e15423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-fea5e530653c22fded92227d8309704be9fa8cb1fd20fe4d756bde87597e15423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>LaBine, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBine, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><description>Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence in Tarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did not become violent, and (3) no outcome was specified. Respondents rated the foreseeability of violence, the reasonableness of therapist actions, and negligence. It was hypothesized that respondents who were informed that the patient became violent would be more likely to find the therapist negligent than respondents in the other two outcome conditions. Findings supported this, and respondents in the violent outcome condition rated the violence as more foreseeable and therapist actions as less reasonable. Implications for mental health and legal professionals are discussed and future research ideas are suggested.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Hindsight Bias</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Jurors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health outcomes</subject><subject>Patient Violence</subject><subject>Professional Liability</subject><subject>Reasonable care</subject><subject>School violence</subject><subject>Tarasoff Decision</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Victim identification</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHIp6U6kvSNM3RzR8Thl4UvIW0fdkyunYm2WH_vZUKQ_D04H0_vAdfQs4p3FIAeTd5ApopBbw4ICMqJE_znH4eklG_lqnkII_JSQgrAFAFiBHhDxjRr11rouvakHQ2ecVF4xbYVpiYtk7iEpOZa-vgFsuYTJwJp-TImibg2e8ck4-nx_fpLJ2_Pb9M7-ep4QWPqUUjUHDIBa8YszXWijEm64KDkpCVqKwpqpLamoHFrJYiL2sspFASqcgYH5PL4e7Gd19bDFGvuq1v-5da0SwvZMaKHl0PqPJdCB6t3ni3Nn6nKeifTvS-kx5fDHgVYuf3kqusJ318M8RmY_Qm7Crjo6saDNXWe2yjbpalZqCFFkB7ffW__su-ARDsd4g</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>LaBine, Susan J</creator><creator>LaBine, Gary</creator><general>Plenum Publishing Corp</general><general>Plenum Publishing Corporation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias</title><author>LaBine, Susan J ; LaBine, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-fea5e530653c22fded92227d8309704be9fa8cb1fd20fe4d756bde87597e15423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Hindsight Bias</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Jurors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health outcomes</topic><topic>Patient Violence</topic><topic>Professional Liability</topic><topic>Reasonable care</topic><topic>School violence</topic><topic>Tarasoff Decision</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Victim identification</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaBine, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBine, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaBine, Susan J</au><au>LaBine, Gary</au><au>Roesch, Ronald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>501-516</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence in Tarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did not become violent, and (3) no outcome was specified. Respondents rated the foreseeability of violence, the reasonableness of therapist actions, and negligence. It was hypothesized that respondents who were informed that the patient became violent would be more likely to find the therapist negligent than respondents in the other two outcome conditions. Findings supported this, and respondents in the violent outcome condition rated the violence as more foreseeable and therapist actions as less reasonable. Implications for mental health and legal professionals are discussed and future research ideas are suggested.</abstract><pub>Plenum Publishing Corp</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01499038</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-7307 |
ispartof | Law and human behavior, 1996-10, Vol.20 (5), p.501-516 |
issn | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_914687428 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Female Health outcomes Hindsight Bias Human Juries Jurors Male Mental health Mental health outcomes Patient Violence Professional Liability Reasonable care School violence Tarasoff Decision Therapists Victim identification Violence |
title | Determinations of Negligence and the Hindsight Bias |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinations%20of%20Negligence%20and%20the%20Hindsight%20Bias&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=LaBine,%20Susan%20J&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=501-516&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01499038&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1394149%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914687428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1394149&rfr_iscdi=true |