More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases
As a result of a recent federal appellate court decision, the 25 Percent Rule can no longer be used to derive reasonable royalty rates in patent infringement cases. Instead of such generalized rules of thumb, damages experts are now required to rely on information and data specific to the technology...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of legal economics 2011-10, Vol.18 (1), p.91 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Journal of legal economics |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Shapiro, Steven J |
| description | As a result of a recent federal appellate court decision, the 25 Percent Rule can no longer be used to derive reasonable royalty rates in patent infringement cases. Instead of such generalized rules of thumb, damages experts are now required to rely on information and data specific to the technology that is in dispute. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_912868960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548629691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g901-68f3d14af266a80c9e60024c3bca66857969623a80d6c5e3b8e53ac98b6dde803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjc1OwzAQhH0AqaX0HSzukdbZZLGPKPxKRVSo92rjbEqqYEPsHvr2BMFpRppvZi7U0kBdFQglLtRVSkcAAxXapWpe4yR6O-SexzHpIeh7yTJ9DmEIB50_RL8Lpxi4HWcbzzzm8y-15Swh64aTpGt1ObeTrP91pXaPD7vmudi8Pb00d5vi4MAUZHvsTMV9ScQWvBMCKCuPrWciW986clTiHHXka8HWSo3snW2p68QCrtTN3-zXFL9PkvL-GE9TmB_3zpSWrCPAHw_bRCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912868960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Shapiro, Steven J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Steven J</creatorcontrib><description>As a result of a recent federal appellate court decision, the 25 Percent Rule can no longer be used to derive reasonable royalty rates in patent infringement cases. Instead of such generalized rules of thumb, damages experts are now required to rely on information and data specific to the technology that is in dispute. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Florence: American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts</publisher><subject>Federal Rules of Evidence ; Infringement ; Intellectual property ; Plywood ; Royalties ; Settlements & damages ; State court decisions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal economics, 2011-10, Vol.18 (1), p.91</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Steven J</creatorcontrib><title>More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases</title><title>Journal of legal economics</title><description>As a result of a recent federal appellate court decision, the 25 Percent Rule can no longer be used to derive reasonable royalty rates in patent infringement cases. Instead of such generalized rules of thumb, damages experts are now required to rely on information and data specific to the technology that is in dispute. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Federal Rules of Evidence</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Plywood</subject><subject>Royalties</subject><subject>Settlements & damages</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1054-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotjc1OwzAQhH0AqaX0HSzukdbZZLGPKPxKRVSo92rjbEqqYEPsHvr2BMFpRppvZi7U0kBdFQglLtRVSkcAAxXapWpe4yR6O-SexzHpIeh7yTJ9DmEIB50_RL8Lpxi4HWcbzzzm8y-15Swh64aTpGt1ObeTrP91pXaPD7vmudi8Pb00d5vi4MAUZHvsTMV9ScQWvBMCKCuPrWciW986clTiHHXka8HWSo3snW2p68QCrtTN3-zXFL9PkvL-GE9TmB_3zpSWrCPAHw_bRCI</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Steven J</creator><general>American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases</title><author>Shapiro, Steven J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g901-68f3d14af266a80c9e60024c3bca66857969623a80d6c5e3b8e53ac98b6dde803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Federal Rules of Evidence</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Plywood</topic><topic>Royalties</topic><topic>Settlements & damages</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Steven J</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Steven J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal economics</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><pages>91-</pages><issn>1054-3023</issn><abstract>As a result of a recent federal appellate court decision, the 25 Percent Rule can no longer be used to derive reasonable royalty rates in patent infringement cases. Instead of such generalized rules of thumb, damages experts are now required to rely on information and data specific to the technology that is in dispute. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Florence</cop><pub>American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1054-3023 |
| ispartof | Journal of legal economics, 2011-10, Vol.18 (1), p.91 |
| issn | 1054-3023 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_912868960 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Federal Rules of Evidence Infringement Intellectual property Plywood Royalties Settlements & damages State court decisions Studies |
| title | More Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A06%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20Pitfalls%20in%20Determining%20the%20Reasonable%20Royalty%20in%20Patent%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20economics&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Steven%20J&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.pages=91-&rft.issn=1054-3023&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2548629691%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912868960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |