Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought
Delayed wilting is observed in a few unusual soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, but the reasons and importance of this trait for conferring agronomic drought tolerance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that soybean genotypes with delayed wilting conserve soil moisture by restricting tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2012, Vol.52 (1), p.272-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 272 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Ries, Landon L Purcell, Larry C Carter, Thomas E Edwards, Jeffery T King, C. Andy |
description | Delayed wilting is observed in a few unusual soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, but the reasons and importance of this trait for conferring agronomic drought tolerance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that soybean genotypes with delayed wilting conserve soil moisture by restricting transpiration and that this would be reflected in decreased radiation use efficiency (RUE) and/or improved water use efficiency (WUE). Water conserved when soil moisture was plentiful would be available later in the season when drought is usually more severe. Irrigated field experiments in eight environments compared RUE of genotypes known to wilt differently during drought. In addition, we measured stomatal conductance, carbon isotope discrimination (CID), volumetric soil-moisture content, stomatal density, and canopy temperature depression. In six of the eight environments, slow-wilting genotypes generally had lower RUE than fast-wilting genotypes, which is consistent with our hypothesis. Three of four slow-wilting genotypes had higher soil moisture immediately before irrigation than fast-wilting genotypes, which is also consistent with the hypothesis. Genotypic differences in CID (a proxy for WUE) were present but were not consistently related with slow wilting. No genotypic differences were detected in stomatal conductance or canopy temperature. These results suggest that multiple mechanisms involving RUE and WUE could result in soil-water conservation in these diverse genotypes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_911933106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2542515041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-45ddc81c26accb05892eb33f0ec7a7a177bb0b7a86656b83cb658e67a414e17c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LwzAYh4soOKefwINF8NiZP03THqVzOhhsuA3xFJIs3TJqMpMW6bc3c0N29JSQ93l_P3gSRbcQDBDE5FE6u_NSIwDhAJABQDQ_i3owxSQBGcHnJ_fL6Mr7LQCAFpT0oo_ZpvPa1natJa_jheO68XFpTeO0aBtt1nFj46GuKuWUaXRgSm7srovfdf071iae204obuLWrJSLh862601zHV1UvPbq5nj2o-XoeVG-JpPpy7h8miQSFzhPUrJayRxKlHEpBSB5gZTAuAJKUk45pFQIICjPs4xkIsdSZCRXGeUpTBWkEvej-0PuztmvVvmGbW3rTKhkBYQFxhBkAcIHKJjy3qmK7Zz-5K5jELC9QnaikAHC9grD1sMxmvtgp3LcSO3_VhFJKSJ4z40O3LeuVfefaFbOS1S-TWfzcrx_B-RYeHcIqrhlfO1C2XIe5iT8F0khQvgH4OiSQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911933106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ries, Landon L ; Purcell, Larry C ; Carter, Thomas E ; Edwards, Jeffery T ; King, C. Andy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ries, Landon L ; Purcell, Larry C ; Carter, Thomas E ; Edwards, Jeffery T ; King, C. Andy</creatorcontrib><description>Delayed wilting is observed in a few unusual soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, but the reasons and importance of this trait for conferring agronomic drought tolerance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that soybean genotypes with delayed wilting conserve soil moisture by restricting transpiration and that this would be reflected in decreased radiation use efficiency (RUE) and/or improved water use efficiency (WUE). Water conserved when soil moisture was plentiful would be available later in the season when drought is usually more severe. Irrigated field experiments in eight environments compared RUE of genotypes known to wilt differently during drought. In addition, we measured stomatal conductance, carbon isotope discrimination (CID), volumetric soil-moisture content, stomatal density, and canopy temperature depression. In six of the eight environments, slow-wilting genotypes generally had lower RUE than fast-wilting genotypes, which is consistent with our hypothesis. Three of four slow-wilting genotypes had higher soil moisture immediately before irrigation than fast-wilting genotypes, which is also consistent with the hypothesis. Genotypic differences in CID (a proxy for WUE) were present but were not consistently related with slow wilting. No genotypic differences were detected in stomatal conductance or canopy temperature. These results suggest that multiple mechanisms involving RUE and WUE could result in soil-water conservation in these diverse genotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; canopy ; carbon ; Carbon isotopes ; Drought ; Drought resistance ; drought tolerance ; field experimentation ; Field tests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; Genotypes ; Glycine max ; Irrigated farming ; Irrigation ; isotopes ; Moisture content ; Plant introductions ; radiation use efficiency ; Soil conservation ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Soils ; Soybeans ; Stomatal conductance ; temperature ; Transpiration ; Water conservation ; Water shortages ; Water use ; Water use efficiency ; Wilting</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2012, Vol.52 (1), p.272-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-45ddc81c26accb05892eb33f0ec7a7a177bb0b7a86656b83cb658e67a414e17c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-45ddc81c26accb05892eb33f0ec7a7a177bb0b7a86656b83cb658e67a414e17c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2011.05.0278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2011.05.0278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4009,27902,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25472538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ries, Landon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Larry C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Jeffery T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, C. Andy</creatorcontrib><title>Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought</title><title>Crop science</title><description>Delayed wilting is observed in a few unusual soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, but the reasons and importance of this trait for conferring agronomic drought tolerance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that soybean genotypes with delayed wilting conserve soil moisture by restricting transpiration and that this would be reflected in decreased radiation use efficiency (RUE) and/or improved water use efficiency (WUE). Water conserved when soil moisture was plentiful would be available later in the season when drought is usually more severe. Irrigated field experiments in eight environments compared RUE of genotypes known to wilt differently during drought. In addition, we measured stomatal conductance, carbon isotope discrimination (CID), volumetric soil-moisture content, stomatal density, and canopy temperature depression. In six of the eight environments, slow-wilting genotypes generally had lower RUE than fast-wilting genotypes, which is consistent with our hypothesis. Three of four slow-wilting genotypes had higher soil moisture immediately before irrigation than fast-wilting genotypes, which is also consistent with the hypothesis. Genotypic differences in CID (a proxy for WUE) were present but were not consistently related with slow wilting. No genotypic differences were detected in stomatal conductance or canopy temperature. These results suggest that multiple mechanisms involving RUE and WUE could result in soil-water conservation in these diverse genotypes.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon isotopes</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Irrigated farming</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>isotopes</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Plant introductions</subject><subject>radiation use efficiency</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><subject>Wilting</subject><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LwzAYh4soOKefwINF8NiZP03THqVzOhhsuA3xFJIs3TJqMpMW6bc3c0N29JSQ93l_P3gSRbcQDBDE5FE6u_NSIwDhAJABQDQ_i3owxSQBGcHnJ_fL6Mr7LQCAFpT0oo_ZpvPa1natJa_jheO68XFpTeO0aBtt1nFj46GuKuWUaXRgSm7srovfdf071iae204obuLWrJSLh862601zHV1UvPbq5nj2o-XoeVG-JpPpy7h8miQSFzhPUrJayRxKlHEpBSB5gZTAuAJKUk45pFQIICjPs4xkIsdSZCRXGeUpTBWkEvej-0PuztmvVvmGbW3rTKhkBYQFxhBkAcIHKJjy3qmK7Zz-5K5jELC9QnaikAHC9grD1sMxmvtgp3LcSO3_VhFJKSJ4z40O3LeuVfefaFbOS1S-TWfzcrx_B-RYeHcIqrhlfO1C2XIe5iT8F0khQvgH4OiSQA</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Ries, Landon L</creator><creator>Purcell, Larry C</creator><creator>Carter, Thomas E</creator><creator>Edwards, Jeffery T</creator><creator>King, C. Andy</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought</title><author>Ries, Landon L ; Purcell, Larry C ; Carter, Thomas E ; Edwards, Jeffery T ; King, C. Andy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-45ddc81c26accb05892eb33f0ec7a7a177bb0b7a86656b83cb658e67a414e17c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon isotopes</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Irrigated farming</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>isotopes</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Plant introductions</topic><topic>radiation use efficiency</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><topic>Wilting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ries, Landon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Larry C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Jeffery T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, C. Andy</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ries, Landon L</au><au>Purcell, Larry C</au><au>Carter, Thomas E</au><au>Edwards, Jeffery T</au><au>King, C. Andy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>272-281</pages><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>Delayed wilting is observed in a few unusual soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, but the reasons and importance of this trait for conferring agronomic drought tolerance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that soybean genotypes with delayed wilting conserve soil moisture by restricting transpiration and that this would be reflected in decreased radiation use efficiency (RUE) and/or improved water use efficiency (WUE). Water conserved when soil moisture was plentiful would be available later in the season when drought is usually more severe. Irrigated field experiments in eight environments compared RUE of genotypes known to wilt differently during drought. In addition, we measured stomatal conductance, carbon isotope discrimination (CID), volumetric soil-moisture content, stomatal density, and canopy temperature depression. In six of the eight environments, slow-wilting genotypes generally had lower RUE than fast-wilting genotypes, which is consistent with our hypothesis. Three of four slow-wilting genotypes had higher soil moisture immediately before irrigation than fast-wilting genotypes, which is also consistent with the hypothesis. Genotypic differences in CID (a proxy for WUE) were present but were not consistently related with slow wilting. No genotypic differences were detected in stomatal conductance or canopy temperature. These results suggest that multiple mechanisms involving RUE and WUE could result in soil-water conservation in these diverse genotypes.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0278</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-0653 |
ispartof | Crop science, 2012, Vol.52 (1), p.272-281 |
issn | 1435-0653 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_911933106 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences canopy carbon Carbon isotopes Drought Drought resistance drought tolerance field experimentation Field tests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genotype Genotypes Glycine max Irrigated farming Irrigation isotopes Moisture content Plant introductions radiation use efficiency Soil conservation Soil moisture Soil water Soils Soybeans Stomatal conductance temperature Transpiration Water conservation Water shortages Water use Water use efficiency Wilting |
title | Physiological Traits Contributing to Differential Canopy Wilting in Soybean under Drought |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A14%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiological%20Traits%20Contributing%20to%20Differential%20Canopy%20Wilting%20in%20Soybean%20under%20Drought&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Ries,%20Landon%20L&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=272-281&rft.issn=1435-0653&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2542515041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911933106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |