Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays

A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in ... No significant trend with radiation qu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metrologia 2011-01, Vol.48, p.1
Hauptverfasser: Burns, D T, Kessler, C, Roger, P, Toni, M P, Pinto, M, Bovi, M, Cappadozzi, G, Silvestri, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Comparative analysis
Radiation
Uncertainty
X-rays
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Metrologia
container_volume 48
creator Burns, D T
Kessler, C
Roger, P
Toni, M P
Pinto, M
Bovi, M
Cappadozzi, G
Silvestri, C
description A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in ... No significant trend with radiation quality is observed. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_911196371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539154981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_9111963713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzM0OwUAUhuGJkKifezixIjHSabWjS6RiIhURe5kwKDXDmQq9ez9hb_UtnjdfiTgsHDDKAx6UieO6XkiZH_WrpGbt0XUZ9wLuEJypAjbmfJGYWqNhJBZJbynaokNnHpgd5AcFMkV6UniWYHOptxK39kfxPB5SMU-Wogsil1kBr-Aj7ydINWTmTpVWuC_gQVEWtkEqO5lZ1fxunbQm8Wo8pRc015uy-fpobqhftI4YY1Hoc-b_FT0Be3hH_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911196371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays</title><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Burns, D T ; Kessler, C ; Roger, P ; Toni, M P ; Pinto, M ; Bovi, M ; Cappadozzi, G ; Silvestri, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, D T ; Kessler, C ; Roger, P ; Toni, M P ; Pinto, M ; Bovi, M ; Cappadozzi, G ; Silvestri, C</creatorcontrib><description>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in ... No significant trend with radiation quality is observed. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1681-7575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Radiation ; Uncertainty ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Metrologia, 2011-01, Vol.48, p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Bureau International des Poids et Mesures 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toni, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bovi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappadozzi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestri, C</creatorcontrib><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays</title><title>Metrologia</title><description>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in ... No significant trend with radiation quality is observed. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0026-1394</issn><issn>1681-7575</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzM0OwUAUhuGJkKifezixIjHSabWjS6RiIhURe5kwKDXDmQq9ez9hb_UtnjdfiTgsHDDKAx6UieO6XkiZH_WrpGbt0XUZ9wLuEJypAjbmfJGYWqNhJBZJbynaokNnHpgd5AcFMkV6UniWYHOptxK39kfxPB5SMU-Wogsil1kBr-Aj7ydINWTmTpVWuC_gQVEWtkEqO5lZ1fxunbQm8Wo8pRc015uy-fpobqhftI4YY1Hoc-b_FT0Be3hH_g</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Burns, D T</creator><creator>Kessler, C</creator><creator>Roger, P</creator><creator>Toni, M P</creator><creator>Pinto, M</creator><creator>Bovi, M</creator><creator>Cappadozzi, G</creator><creator>Silvestri, C</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays</title><author>Burns, D T ; Kessler, C ; Roger, P ; Toni, M P ; Pinto, M ; Bovi, M ; Cappadozzi, G ; Silvestri, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_9111963713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toni, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bovi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappadozzi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestri, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, D T</au><au>Kessler, C</au><au>Roger, P</au><au>Toni, M P</au><au>Pinto, M</au><au>Bovi, M</au><au>Cappadozzi, G</au><au>Silvestri, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays</atitle><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0026-1394</issn><eissn>1681-7575</eissn><abstract>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in ... No significant trend with radiation quality is observed. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1394
ispartof Metrologia, 2011-01, Vol.48, p.1
issn 0026-1394
1681-7575
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_911196371
source Institute of Physics Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Radiation
Uncertainty
X-rays
title Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A02%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Key%20comparison%20BIPM.RI(I)-K2%20of%20the%20air-kerma%20standards%20of%20the%20ENEA-INMRI,%20Italy%20and%20the%20BIPM%20in%20low-energy%20x-rays&rft.jtitle=Metrologia&rft.au=Burns,%20D%20T&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0026-1394&rft.eissn=1681-7575&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2539154981%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911196371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true