A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005.Design methodology approach - Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by informat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of adult protection 2011-10, Vol.13 (5), p.238-250 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 250 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 238 |
| container_title | The journal of adult protection |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Cambridge, Paul Mansell, Jim Beadle-Brown, Julie Milne, Alisoun Whelton, Beckie |
| description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005.Design methodology approach - Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by information from the local authority databases and from the Care Quality Commission. The analysis also examined associations between adult protection processes and outcomes and looked at how adult protection monitoring data could be improved to better inform safeguarding management and practice at local and national level.Findings - Sexual abuse was most frequently reported for people with intellectual disabilities, who were also at higher risk of abuse when living out of area. Older people were most at risk of financial abuse in community settings and of neglect in residential care.Originality value - The study identifies patterns of risk in the abuse of older people and those with intellectual disabilities and informs preventive interventions. It also indicates priorities for improving the quality and comparability of adult protection monitoring data. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14668201111178157 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_905091965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516267771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f404b24514d6338054501cabba0f3f4c16de158c0acac22845efa01bb3c503bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoJukP6A3kVMOcTqjr7V7CyFtA4FekrOR9ZEqeK2NJG_Yf1-ZLRRSAtVFID3vM8wMIZ8RrhCh_YJCqZYBLmfdolx_ICsGgjWtUt0RWS3_TQX4R3KS8zMAU7LDFdld01xmu6fRU23nsdBtisWZEuJEk_MuJT1mGiZaXiMdo9Ej1XP5FVMoweWvVE807lzaBfe6OHyYbJieMvUx0Y2e9JNLuUK2enW1Lt76ckaOffW6T3_uU_L47fbh5kdz__P73c31fWMEqtJ4AWJgQqKwivMWpJCARg-DBs-9MKisQ9ka0EYbxlohndeAw8CNBD5YfkouDt7a1cvscuk3IRs3jnpycc49csarmKP8H5StUSm-ruj5G_Q5zmmqjfQdSOiwU4sPD5BJMec6yn6bwkanfY_QLzvr_9lZzVweMm7j6tzt38hbtN9aX3F4B3-3wm_ICaVf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905091965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Cambridge, Paul ; Mansell, Jim ; Beadle-Brown, Julie ; Milne, Alisoun ; Whelton, Beckie</creator><creatorcontrib>Cambridge, Paul ; Mansell, Jim ; Beadle-Brown, Julie ; Milne, Alisoun ; Whelton, Beckie</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005.Design methodology approach - Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by information from the local authority databases and from the Care Quality Commission. The analysis also examined associations between adult protection processes and outcomes and looked at how adult protection monitoring data could be improved to better inform safeguarding management and practice at local and national level.Findings - Sexual abuse was most frequently reported for people with intellectual disabilities, who were also at higher risk of abuse when living out of area. Older people were most at risk of financial abuse in community settings and of neglect in residential care.Originality value - The study identifies patterns of risk in the abuse of older people and those with intellectual disabilities and informs preventive interventions. It also indicates priorities for improving the quality and comparability of adult protection monitoring data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-8203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-8669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14668201111178157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brighton: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Adults ; At risk ; Coalition governments ; Disabilities ; Elder Abuse ; Elderly ; Health services ; Intervention ; Local authorities ; Local government ; Mental health ; Older people ; Physically Handicapped ; Protection ; Quality of Health Care ; Referrals ; Risk ; Sexual assault ; Social protection ; Studies ; Values</subject><ispartof>The journal of adult protection, 2011-10, Vol.13 (5), p.238-250</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f404b24514d6338054501cabba0f3f4c16de158c0acac22845efa01bb3c503bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f404b24514d6338054501cabba0f3f4c16de158c0acac22845efa01bb3c503bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14668201111178157/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14668201111178157/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,12846,21695,27344,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cambridge, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beadle-Brown, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Alisoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whelton, Beckie</creatorcontrib><title>A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners</title><title>The journal of adult protection</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005.Design methodology approach - Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by information from the local authority databases and from the Care Quality Commission. The analysis also examined associations between adult protection processes and outcomes and looked at how adult protection monitoring data could be improved to better inform safeguarding management and practice at local and national level.Findings - Sexual abuse was most frequently reported for people with intellectual disabilities, who were also at higher risk of abuse when living out of area. Older people were most at risk of financial abuse in community settings and of neglect in residential care.Originality value - The study identifies patterns of risk in the abuse of older people and those with intellectual disabilities and informs preventive interventions. It also indicates priorities for improving the quality and comparability of adult protection monitoring data.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>At risk</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Elder Abuse</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Local authorities</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physically Handicapped</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sexual assault</subject><subject>Social protection</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1466-8203</issn><issn>2042-8669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoJukP6A3kVMOcTqjr7V7CyFtA4FekrOR9ZEqeK2NJG_Yf1-ZLRRSAtVFID3vM8wMIZ8RrhCh_YJCqZYBLmfdolx_ICsGgjWtUt0RWS3_TQX4R3KS8zMAU7LDFdld01xmu6fRU23nsdBtisWZEuJEk_MuJT1mGiZaXiMdo9Ej1XP5FVMoweWvVE807lzaBfe6OHyYbJieMvUx0Y2e9JNLuUK2enW1Lt76ckaOffW6T3_uU_L47fbh5kdz__P73c31fWMEqtJ4AWJgQqKwivMWpJCARg-DBs-9MKisQ9ka0EYbxlohndeAw8CNBD5YfkouDt7a1cvscuk3IRs3jnpycc49csarmKP8H5StUSm-ruj5G_Q5zmmqjfQdSOiwU4sPD5BJMec6yn6bwkanfY_QLzvr_9lZzVweMm7j6tzt38hbtN9aX3F4B3-3wm_ICaVf</recordid><startdate>20111010</startdate><enddate>20111010</enddate><creator>Cambridge, Paul</creator><creator>Mansell, Jim</creator><creator>Beadle-Brown, Julie</creator><creator>Milne, Alisoun</creator><creator>Whelton, Beckie</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111010</creationdate><title>A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners</title><author>Cambridge, Paul ; Mansell, Jim ; Beadle-Brown, Julie ; Milne, Alisoun ; Whelton, Beckie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f404b24514d6338054501cabba0f3f4c16de158c0acac22845efa01bb3c503bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>At risk</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Elder Abuse</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Local authorities</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physically Handicapped</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sexual assault</topic><topic>Social protection</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cambridge, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beadle-Brown, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Alisoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whelton, Beckie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of adult protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cambridge, Paul</au><au>Mansell, Jim</au><au>Beadle-Brown, Julie</au><au>Milne, Alisoun</au><au>Whelton, Beckie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners</atitle><jtitle>The journal of adult protection</jtitle><date>2011-10-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>238-250</pages><issn>1466-8203</issn><eissn>2042-8669</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005.Design methodology approach - Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by information from the local authority databases and from the Care Quality Commission. The analysis also examined associations between adult protection processes and outcomes and looked at how adult protection monitoring data could be improved to better inform safeguarding management and practice at local and national level.Findings - Sexual abuse was most frequently reported for people with intellectual disabilities, who were also at higher risk of abuse when living out of area. Older people were most at risk of financial abuse in community settings and of neglect in residential care.Originality value - The study identifies patterns of risk in the abuse of older people and those with intellectual disabilities and informs preventive interventions. It also indicates priorities for improving the quality and comparability of adult protection monitoring data.</abstract><cop>Brighton</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14668201111178157</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1466-8203 |
| ispartof | The journal of adult protection, 2011-10, Vol.13 (5), p.238-250 |
| issn | 1466-8203 2042-8669 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_905091965 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
| subjects | Adults At risk Coalition governments Disabilities Elder Abuse Elderly Health services Intervention Local authorities Local government Mental health Older people Physically Handicapped Protection Quality of Health Care Referrals Risk Sexual assault Social protection Studies Values |
| title | A study of adult protection referrals in two local authorities: an overview of findings for managers and practitioners |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20adult%20protection%20referrals%20in%20two%20local%20authorities:%20an%20overview%20of%20findings%20for%20managers%20and%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20adult%20protection&rft.au=Cambridge,%20Paul&rft.date=2011-10-10&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=238-250&rft.issn=1466-8203&rft.eissn=2042-8669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14668201111178157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516267771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905091965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |