Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory

Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business and psychology 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465
Hauptverfasser: Devloo, Toon, Anseel, Frederik, De Beuckelaer, Alain
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 465
container_issue 4
container_start_page 453
container_title Journal of business and psychology
container_volume 26
creator Devloo, Toon
Anseel, Frederik
De Beuckelaer, Alain
description Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_902679417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41474894</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41474894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVoIdOkD5BFQHTv5uhiy1qVkDQXyJCSC2QnNPbxRBOPNZU0i9llkTfIG_ZJKuPS7ro6HPi__4ePkCMGXxmAOokM6koXwKDQHKBQe2TGSiUKUYqnD2QGda0Lwat6n3yKcQUAJatgRt7OPZ3bwS4xRPoYkV4gtgvbvNB7xBc3LKmN1NL7FGzC5Y4mT-9wue3zR89xbYc2_np9P1243iWHkc5d7Fz6Rh-ekc59ixkbS-58j9R39Hq96V3jEv2R9_wwxnzYHZKPne0jfv5zD8jjxfeHs6vi5vby-uz0pmhEDalgkkNVthaw0zUXDSrJhZasYYuqbQDtwirGweqKsxzTgqFWgAJKJWWlW3FAvky9m-B_bjEms_LbMORJo4FXKnepHGJTqAk-xoCd2QS3tmFnGJjRtZlcm-zajK7NyPCJiTk7ZJf_iv8HHU_QKiYf_q5IJpWstRS_ATmfi60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902679417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</creator><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-353X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Business and Management ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Curvature ; D lines ; Fall lines ; Feedback ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; Job satisfaction ; Legal entities ; Managers ; Modeling ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Polynomials ; Proactive behavior ; Psychology ; Regression analysis ; Slope of a line ; Social psychology ; Social Sciences ; Statistical variance ; Studies ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of business and psychology, 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465</ispartof><rights>2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41474894$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41474894$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anseel, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><title>Journal of business and psychology</title><addtitle>J Bus Psychol</addtitle><description>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>D lines</subject><subject>Fall lines</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Legal entities</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Proactive behavior</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Slope of a line</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0889-3268</issn><issn>1573-353X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVoIdOkD5BFQHTv5uhiy1qVkDQXyJCSC2QnNPbxRBOPNZU0i9llkTfIG_ZJKuPS7ro6HPi__4ePkCMGXxmAOokM6koXwKDQHKBQe2TGSiUKUYqnD2QGda0Lwat6n3yKcQUAJatgRt7OPZ3bwS4xRPoYkV4gtgvbvNB7xBc3LKmN1NL7FGzC5Y4mT-9wue3zR89xbYc2_np9P1243iWHkc5d7Fz6Rh-ekc59ixkbS-58j9R39Hq96V3jEv2R9_wwxnzYHZKPne0jfv5zD8jjxfeHs6vi5vby-uz0pmhEDalgkkNVthaw0zUXDSrJhZasYYuqbQDtwirGweqKsxzTgqFWgAJKJWWlW3FAvky9m-B_bjEms_LbMORJo4FXKnepHGJTqAk-xoCd2QS3tmFnGJjRtZlcm-zajK7NyPCJiTk7ZJf_iv8HHU_QKiYf_q5IJpWstRS_ATmfi60</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Devloo, Toon</creator><creator>Anseel, Frederik</creator><creator>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><author>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>D lines</topic><topic>Fall lines</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Legal entities</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Proactive behavior</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Slope of a line</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anseel, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devloo, Toon</au><au>Anseel, Frederik</au><au>De Beuckelaer, Alain</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Psychol</stitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>453-465</pages><issn>0889-3268</issn><eissn>1573-353X</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-3268
ispartof Journal of business and psychology, 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465
issn 0889-3268
1573-353X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_902679417
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Business and Management
Community and Environmental Psychology
Curvature
D lines
Fall lines
Feedback
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Job satisfaction
Legal entities
Managers
Modeling
Personality and Social Psychology
Polynomials
Proactive behavior
Psychology
Regression analysis
Slope of a line
Social psychology
Social Sciences
Statistical variance
Studies
Work environment
title Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A22%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Managers%20Use%20Feedback%20Seeking%20as%20a%20Strategy%20to%20Regulate%20Demands%E2%80%93Abilities%20Misfit?%20The%20Moderating%20Role%20of%20Implicit%20Person%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Devloo,%20Toon&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=453-465&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41474894%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902679417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41474894&rfr_iscdi=true