Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory
Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business and psychology 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 465 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 453 |
container_title | Journal of business and psychology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Devloo, Toon Anseel, Frederik De Beuckelaer, Alain |
description | Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_902679417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41474894</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41474894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVoIdOkD5BFQHTv5uhiy1qVkDQXyJCSC2QnNPbxRBOPNZU0i9llkTfIG_ZJKuPS7ro6HPi__4ePkCMGXxmAOokM6koXwKDQHKBQe2TGSiUKUYqnD2QGda0Lwat6n3yKcQUAJatgRt7OPZ3bwS4xRPoYkV4gtgvbvNB7xBc3LKmN1NL7FGzC5Y4mT-9wue3zR89xbYc2_np9P1243iWHkc5d7Fz6Rh-ekc59ixkbS-58j9R39Hq96V3jEv2R9_wwxnzYHZKPne0jfv5zD8jjxfeHs6vi5vby-uz0pmhEDalgkkNVthaw0zUXDSrJhZasYYuqbQDtwirGweqKsxzTgqFWgAJKJWWlW3FAvky9m-B_bjEms_LbMORJo4FXKnepHGJTqAk-xoCd2QS3tmFnGJjRtZlcm-zajK7NyPCJiTk7ZJf_iv8HHU_QKiYf_q5IJpWstRS_ATmfi60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902679417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</creator><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-353X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Business and Management ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Curvature ; D lines ; Fall lines ; Feedback ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; Job satisfaction ; Legal entities ; Managers ; Modeling ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Polynomials ; Proactive behavior ; Psychology ; Regression analysis ; Slope of a line ; Social psychology ; Social Sciences ; Statistical variance ; Studies ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of business and psychology, 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465</ispartof><rights>2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41474894$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41474894$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anseel, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><title>Journal of business and psychology</title><addtitle>J Bus Psychol</addtitle><description>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>D lines</subject><subject>Fall lines</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Legal entities</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Proactive behavior</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Slope of a line</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0889-3268</issn><issn>1573-353X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVoIdOkD5BFQHTv5uhiy1qVkDQXyJCSC2QnNPbxRBOPNZU0i9llkTfIG_ZJKuPS7ro6HPi__4ePkCMGXxmAOokM6koXwKDQHKBQe2TGSiUKUYqnD2QGda0Lwat6n3yKcQUAJatgRt7OPZ3bwS4xRPoYkV4gtgvbvNB7xBc3LKmN1NL7FGzC5Y4mT-9wue3zR89xbYc2_np9P1243iWHkc5d7Fz6Rh-ekc59ixkbS-58j9R39Hq96V3jEv2R9_wwxnzYHZKPne0jfv5zD8jjxfeHs6vi5vby-uz0pmhEDalgkkNVthaw0zUXDSrJhZasYYuqbQDtwirGweqKsxzTgqFWgAJKJWWlW3FAvky9m-B_bjEms_LbMORJo4FXKnepHGJTqAk-xoCd2QS3tmFnGJjRtZlcm-zajK7NyPCJiTk7ZJf_iv8HHU_QKiYf_q5IJpWstRS_ATmfi60</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Devloo, Toon</creator><creator>Anseel, Frederik</creator><creator>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</title><author>Devloo, Toon ; Anseel, Frederik ; De Beuckelaer, Alain</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-142065da0ef9823ce7423941c1b6dc0eaba7120a96215da931e970e30574469d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>D lines</topic><topic>Fall lines</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Legal entities</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Proactive behavior</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Slope of a line</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devloo, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anseel, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Beuckelaer, Alain</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devloo, Toon</au><au>Anseel, Frederik</au><au>De Beuckelaer, Alain</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business and psychology</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Psychol</stitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>453-465</pages><issn>0889-3268</issn><eissn>1573-353X</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This study examined to what extent managers who hold an incremental implicit person theory (i.e., believe that personal attributes are relatively malleable) rely on proactive strategies to address imbalances between demands and abilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Data were collected from a convenient sample of managers in 12 organizations in Spain and Belgium (N = 303). Given the well-known shortcomings of traditional congruence measures, we conducted polynomial regression. Findings: Results indicated that implicit person theory was a significant moderator of the relationship between demands-abilities (D-A) fit and feedback seeking for two out of three task dimensions. Specifically, incremental theorists sought feedback to a great extent when misfit occurred between low to moderate demands and abilities. Implications: The current study found preliminary evidence for a proactive framework of person-job misfit which could be used to guide future research. The results of this study suggest the use of self-persuasion techniques to influence managers' incremental person theory (Heslin et al, J Appl Psychol 90: 842-856, 2005). Originality/Value: Research on person-environment fit is often guided by the assumption that individuals react negatively to misfit leading to maladaptive outcomes. However, this study tested a different perspective on P–E misfit by extending initial work (i.e., Simmering et al., J Appl Psychol 88:954-963, 2003) on the positive relationship between P–E misfit and proactive behavior.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-3268 |
ispartof | Journal of business and psychology, 2011-12, Vol.26 (4), p.453-465 |
issn | 0889-3268 1573-353X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_902679417 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Business and Management Community and Environmental Psychology Curvature D lines Fall lines Feedback Industrial and Organizational Psychology Job satisfaction Legal entities Managers Modeling Personality and Social Psychology Polynomials Proactive behavior Psychology Regression analysis Slope of a line Social psychology Social Sciences Statistical variance Studies Work environment |
title | Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A22%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Managers%20Use%20Feedback%20Seeking%20as%20a%20Strategy%20to%20Regulate%20Demands%E2%80%93Abilities%20Misfit?%20The%20Moderating%20Role%20of%20Implicit%20Person%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Devloo,%20Toon&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=453-465&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41474894%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902679417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41474894&rfr_iscdi=true |