Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review
Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rheumatology 2011-11, Vol.30 (11), p.1471-1474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1471 |
container_title | Clinical rheumatology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Gout, Taras Östör, Andrew J. K. Nisar, Muhammad K. |
description | Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index–Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8–1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_900768306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2496626711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-30050c9acc1e54f706a9719afbdab0baad3c1793a3a056dc0247145d48c955853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggi3tgHCdxzK1qyx9pERKCszVxJl1Xu_Eydrotr8EL42oLnLjYkuf7fjOeT4iXCt4oAPM2lbMzFShVqb421e0jsVKNbiprG_tYrMAYqLSy_Yl4ltI1ANS9VU_FSa16rbu-W4lf63gglleYMscwZ0o5zLiVe-IpMuYQZxlmyRtadphjGCVy3nDIIcl9KdOck8xMmGmUh5A30sf5prwWY8FcfD77epFkZJmjD9vws1CGdxJlukuZCjF4uQ2ZSqeFSTLdBDo8F08m3CZ68XCfiu_vL7-df6zWXz58Oj9bV14byJUGaMFb9F5R20wGOrRGWZyGEQcYEEftlbEaNULbjR7qxqimHZve27btW30qXh-5e44_lvJzdx0XLmMnZ8t6u15DV0TqKPIcU2Ka3J7DDvnOKXD3KbhjCq6k4O5TcLfF8-oBvAw7Gv86_qy9COqjIJXSfEX8r_P_qb8B5umXMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900768306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gout, Taras ; Östör, Andrew J. K. ; Nisar, Muhammad K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gout, Taras ; Östör, Andrew J. K. ; Nisar, Muhammad K.</creatorcontrib><description>Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index–Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8–1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21833686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation - chemically induced ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2011-11, Vol.30 (11), p.1471-1474</ispartof><rights>Clinical Rheumatology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-30050c9acc1e54f706a9719afbdab0baad3c1793a3a056dc0247145d48c955853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-30050c9acc1e54f706a9719afbdab0baad3c1793a3a056dc0247145d48c955853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gout, Taras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Östör, Andrew J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisar, Muhammad K.</creatorcontrib><title>Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index–Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8–1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Perforation - chemically induced</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggi3tgHCdxzK1qyx9pERKCszVxJl1Xu_Eydrotr8EL42oLnLjYkuf7fjOeT4iXCt4oAPM2lbMzFShVqb421e0jsVKNbiprG_tYrMAYqLSy_Yl4ltI1ANS9VU_FSa16rbu-W4lf63gglleYMscwZ0o5zLiVe-IpMuYQZxlmyRtadphjGCVy3nDIIcl9KdOck8xMmGmUh5A30sf5prwWY8FcfD77epFkZJmjD9vws1CGdxJlukuZCjF4uQ2ZSqeFSTLdBDo8F08m3CZ68XCfiu_vL7-df6zWXz58Oj9bV14byJUGaMFb9F5R20wGOrRGWZyGEQcYEEftlbEaNULbjR7qxqimHZve27btW30qXh-5e44_lvJzdx0XLmMnZ8t6u15DV0TqKPIcU2Ka3J7DDvnOKXD3KbhjCq6k4O5TcLfF8-oBvAw7Gv86_qy9COqjIJXSfEX8r_P_qb8B5umXMA</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Gout, Taras</creator><creator>Östör, Andrew J. K.</creator><creator>Nisar, Muhammad K.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review</title><author>Gout, Taras ; Östör, Andrew J. K. ; Nisar, Muhammad K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-30050c9acc1e54f706a9719afbdab0baad3c1793a3a056dc0247145d48c955853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Perforation - chemically induced</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gout, Taras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Östör, Andrew J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisar, Muhammad K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gout, Taras</au><au>Östör, Andrew J. K.</au><au>Nisar, Muhammad K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Rheumatol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1471</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1471-1474</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index–Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8–1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21833686</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0770-3198 |
ispartof | Clinical rheumatology, 2011-11, Vol.30 (11), p.1471-1474 |
issn | 0770-3198 1434-9949 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_900768306 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy Humans Intestinal Perforation - chemically induced Literature reviews Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Rheumatology |
title | Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lower%20gastrointestinal%20perforation%20in%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20patients%20treated%20with%20conventional%20DMARDs%20or%20tocilizumab:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Gout,%20Taras&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1471&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1471-1474&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2496626711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900768306&rft_id=info:pmid/21833686&rfr_iscdi=true |