Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release
It has been proposed that crop improvement through directed plant breeding has resulted in decreases in nutrient concentrations of harvested components over time. A few field studies wherein cultivars released over a period of years are evaluated for nutrient content provide the best evidence for nu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2011-11, Vol.51 (6), p.2721-2727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2727 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2721 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Farnham, Mark W Keinath, Anthony P Grusak, Michael A |
description | It has been proposed that crop improvement through directed plant breeding has resulted in decreases in nutrient concentrations of harvested components over time. A few field studies wherein cultivars released over a period of years are evaluated for nutrient content provide the best evidence for nutrient changes over time; however, no such studies have been conducted with vegetable crops. To accomplish this with broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.), we grew 14 cultivars released over 50 yr in two field trials, and harvested florets were assayed for mineral concentration by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy. Results indicated significant cultivar differences in floret concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Zn, but not of K, Mn, Mo, or S. With most minerals, there was no clear relationship between concentration and release year. Although the oldest cultivar exhibited some of the higher mineral concentrations, from 1975 to the present no significant changes appear to have occurred. Head mass was negatively correlated with concentrations of most minerals, but head mass was not correlated with year of release. We propose it most relevant to examine mineral nutrient changes for cultivars grown since 1975 when broccoli phenotypes changed dramatically and the vegetable grew in prominence as a component in the U.S. diet. Results provide a guide for mineral levels in broccoli that should be maintained as other characteristics are manipulated in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0556 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_900604372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2495551231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-94cbee7d98f15a833afd83b96d6b29e4edebb44f733b34a24032d50c08f3e2013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctO5DAQjNAiwQJfwIEIieOwHbedjI8QMSwSiMfAgZPlOG1kFOLBzoD4exxltOK4p251VVfZ1Vl2WMApK1D8McGvonEM0gDkKQhRbmW7BUcxg1Lgrx_9TvY7xlcAqGQldrP7G9dT0F1e-95QPwQ9ON_n3ubnwRvjO5cvOh9oiLnr8wfqJnzw-TPpMPLqdTe4j9QnkHSk_Wzb6i7SwabuZU-Li8f67-z69vKqPrueGZRYziQ3DVHVyrkthJ4jatvOsZFlWzZMEqeWmoZzWyE2yDXjgKwVYGBukdJHcS87nnRXwb-vKQ7q1a9DnyyVBCiBY8USCSdSSijGQFatgnvT4UsVoMbo1I_oFEg1Rpe2TjbSOhrd2aB74-K_VcZLrKpifMJi4n26jr7-R1rVy5rVD7d3y_pqnIPcGB5NQlZ7pV9CMntaJlykOwlkZYXfIf2OaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900604372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Farnham, Mark W ; Keinath, Anthony P ; Grusak, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Farnham, Mark W ; Keinath, Anthony P ; Grusak, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>It has been proposed that crop improvement through directed plant breeding has resulted in decreases in nutrient concentrations of harvested components over time. A few field studies wherein cultivars released over a period of years are evaluated for nutrient content provide the best evidence for nutrient changes over time; however, no such studies have been conducted with vegetable crops. To accomplish this with broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.), we grew 14 cultivars released over 50 yr in two field trials, and harvested florets were assayed for mineral concentration by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy. Results indicated significant cultivar differences in floret concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Zn, but not of K, Mn, Mo, or S. With most minerals, there was no clear relationship between concentration and release year. Although the oldest cultivar exhibited some of the higher mineral concentrations, from 1975 to the present no significant changes appear to have occurred. Head mass was negatively correlated with concentrations of most minerals, but head mass was not correlated with year of release. We propose it most relevant to examine mineral nutrient changes for cultivars grown since 1975 when broccoli phenotypes changed dramatically and the vegetable grew in prominence as a component in the U.S. diet. Results provide a guide for mineral levels in broccoli that should be maintained as other characteristics are manipulated in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0556</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brassica oleracea ; broccoli ; calcium ; copper ; correlation ; Crop improvement ; Crops ; Cultivars ; diet ; Emission spectroscopy ; Environmental Quality Incentives Program ; field experimentation ; Field study ; florets ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Harvesting ; iron ; magnesium ; manganese ; mineral content ; Minerals ; molybdenum ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrient content ; Nutrient release ; phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Plant breeding ; sodium ; spectroscopy ; vegetable crops ; Vegetables ; zinc</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2011-11, Vol.51 (6), p.2721-2727</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-94cbee7d98f15a833afd83b96d6b29e4edebb44f733b34a24032d50c08f3e2013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-94cbee7d98f15a833afd83b96d6b29e4edebb44f733b34a24032d50c08f3e2013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2010.09.0556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2010.09.0556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24637711$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farnham, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinath, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grusak, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release</title><title>Crop science</title><description>It has been proposed that crop improvement through directed plant breeding has resulted in decreases in nutrient concentrations of harvested components over time. A few field studies wherein cultivars released over a period of years are evaluated for nutrient content provide the best evidence for nutrient changes over time; however, no such studies have been conducted with vegetable crops. To accomplish this with broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.), we grew 14 cultivars released over 50 yr in two field trials, and harvested florets were assayed for mineral concentration by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy. Results indicated significant cultivar differences in floret concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Zn, but not of K, Mn, Mo, or S. With most minerals, there was no clear relationship between concentration and release year. Although the oldest cultivar exhibited some of the higher mineral concentrations, from 1975 to the present no significant changes appear to have occurred. Head mass was negatively correlated with concentrations of most minerals, but head mass was not correlated with year of release. We propose it most relevant to examine mineral nutrient changes for cultivars grown since 1975 when broccoli phenotypes changed dramatically and the vegetable grew in prominence as a component in the U.S. diet. Results provide a guide for mineral levels in broccoli that should be maintained as other characteristics are manipulated in the future.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brassica oleracea</subject><subject>broccoli</subject><subject>calcium</subject><subject>copper</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>Crop improvement</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Emission spectroscopy</subject><subject>Environmental Quality Incentives Program</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>florets</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>iron</subject><subject>magnesium</subject><subject>manganese</subject><subject>mineral content</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>molybdenum</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrient release</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>spectroscopy</subject><subject>vegetable crops</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>zinc</subject><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUctO5DAQjNAiwQJfwIEIieOwHbedjI8QMSwSiMfAgZPlOG1kFOLBzoD4exxltOK4p251VVfZ1Vl2WMApK1D8McGvonEM0gDkKQhRbmW7BUcxg1Lgrx_9TvY7xlcAqGQldrP7G9dT0F1e-95QPwQ9ON_n3ubnwRvjO5cvOh9oiLnr8wfqJnzw-TPpMPLqdTe4j9QnkHSk_Wzb6i7SwabuZU-Li8f67-z69vKqPrueGZRYziQ3DVHVyrkthJ4jatvOsZFlWzZMEqeWmoZzWyE2yDXjgKwVYGBukdJHcS87nnRXwb-vKQ7q1a9DnyyVBCiBY8USCSdSSijGQFatgnvT4UsVoMbo1I_oFEg1Rpe2TjbSOhrd2aB74-K_VcZLrKpifMJi4n26jr7-R1rVy5rVD7d3y_pqnIPcGB5NQlZ7pV9CMntaJlykOwlkZYXfIf2OaA</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Farnham, Mark W</creator><creator>Keinath, Anthony P</creator><creator>Grusak, Michael A</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release</title><author>Farnham, Mark W ; Keinath, Anthony P ; Grusak, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-94cbee7d98f15a833afd83b96d6b29e4edebb44f733b34a24032d50c08f3e2013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brassica oleracea</topic><topic>broccoli</topic><topic>calcium</topic><topic>copper</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>Crop improvement</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Emission spectroscopy</topic><topic>Environmental Quality Incentives Program</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>florets</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>iron</topic><topic>magnesium</topic><topic>manganese</topic><topic>mineral content</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>molybdenum</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrient release</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>spectroscopy</topic><topic>vegetable crops</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farnham, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinath, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grusak, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farnham, Mark W</au><au>Keinath, Anthony P</au><au>Grusak, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2721</spage><epage>2727</epage><pages>2721-2727</pages><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>It has been proposed that crop improvement through directed plant breeding has resulted in decreases in nutrient concentrations of harvested components over time. A few field studies wherein cultivars released over a period of years are evaluated for nutrient content provide the best evidence for nutrient changes over time; however, no such studies have been conducted with vegetable crops. To accomplish this with broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.), we grew 14 cultivars released over 50 yr in two field trials, and harvested florets were assayed for mineral concentration by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy. Results indicated significant cultivar differences in floret concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Zn, but not of K, Mn, Mo, or S. With most minerals, there was no clear relationship between concentration and release year. Although the oldest cultivar exhibited some of the higher mineral concentrations, from 1975 to the present no significant changes appear to have occurred. Head mass was negatively correlated with concentrations of most minerals, but head mass was not correlated with year of release. We propose it most relevant to examine mineral nutrient changes for cultivars grown since 1975 when broccoli phenotypes changed dramatically and the vegetable grew in prominence as a component in the U.S. diet. Results provide a guide for mineral levels in broccoli that should be maintained as other characteristics are manipulated in the future.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0556</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-0653 |
ispartof | Crop science, 2011-11, Vol.51 (6), p.2721-2727 |
issn | 1435-0653 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_900604372 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Brassica oleracea broccoli calcium copper correlation Crop improvement Crops Cultivars diet Emission spectroscopy Environmental Quality Incentives Program field experimentation Field study florets Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Harvesting iron magnesium manganese mineral content Minerals molybdenum Nutrient concentrations Nutrient content Nutrient release phenotype Phenotypes Plant breeding sodium spectroscopy vegetable crops Vegetables zinc |
title | Mineral Concentration of Broccoli Florets in Relation to Year of Cultivar Release |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mineral%20Concentration%20of%20Broccoli%20Florets%20in%20Relation%20to%20Year%20of%20Cultivar%20Release&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Farnham,%20Mark%20W&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2721&rft.epage=2727&rft.pages=2721-2727&rft.issn=1435-0653&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2495551231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900604372&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |