Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often promoted as tools for biodiversity conservation as well as for fisheries management. Despite increasing evidence of their usefulness, questions remain regarding the optimal design of MPAs, in particular concerning their function as fisheries management tools,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2011-12, Vol.12 (4), p.412-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 426 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 412 |
container_title | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Vandeperre, Frederic Higgins, Ruth M. Sánchez-Meca, Julio Maynou, Francesc Goñi, Raquel Martín-Sosa, Pablo Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel Afonso, Pedro Bertocci, Iacopo Crec'hriou, Romain D'Anna, Giovanni Dimech, Mark Dorta, Carmelo Esparza, Oscar Falcón, Jesús M. Forcada, Aitor Guala, Ivan Le Direach, Laurence Marcos, Concepción Ojeda-Martínez, Celia Pipitone, Carlo Schembri, Patrick J. Stelzenmüller, Vanessa Stobart, Ben Santos, Ricardo S. |
description | Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often promoted as tools for biodiversity conservation as well as for fisheries management. Despite increasing evidence of their usefulness, questions remain regarding the optimal design of MPAs, in particular concerning their function as fisheries management tools, for which empirical studies are still lacking. Using 28 data sets from seven MPAs in Southern Europe, we developed a meta‐analytical approach to investigate the effects of protection on adjacent fisheries and asking how these effects are influenced by MPA size and age. Southern European MPAs showed clear effects on the surrounding fisheries, on the ‘catch per unit effort’ (CPUE) of target species, but especially on the CPUE of the marketable catch. These effects depended on the time of protection and on the size of the no‐take area. CPUE of both target species and the marketable catch increased gradually by 2–4% per year over a long time period (at least 30 years). The influence of the size of the no‐take area appeared to be more complex. The catch rates of the entire fishery in and around the MPA were higher when the no‐take areas were smaller. Conversely, catch rates of selected fisheries that were expected to benefit most from protection increased when the no‐take area was larger. Our results emphasize the importance of MPA size on its export functions and suggest that an adequate, often extended, time frame be used for the management and the evaluation of effectiveness of MPAs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00401.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_900195538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2492993181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-53b8f0f59a30a38339a43a0d29ebcbb24124e605cfe676409592d9a3072610a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF9PwjAUxRujiYh-h8b34e26btT4QpChhuiL_96ay3YnhTFwHRH89HZg6EtPes-5vffHGBfQE_7czHsiipMg1InuheBfASIQve0J6xwLp0cdwzm7cG4OAHFfRB1WjYqCssbxVcGrVdDggjjWhNzZX6-qnOMXtcUl1rYivq5XjfdTvnf5WMUL62ZUW3J8Z6nM3S1HvqQGA6yw3DU2w5Lj2gcxm12yswJLR1f_d5e9paPX4UMweRk_DgeTIJNJXwRKTvsFFEqjBJR9KTVGEiEPNU2z6TSMRBhRDCorKE7iCLTSYd6akzAWgEJ22fWhr__2e0OuMfPVpvbzOKMBhFbKd-2yu4Ppx5a0M-va-iV3RoBpyZq5aaGZFqBpyZo9WbM16SD1wseDQ9y6hrbHONYLEycyUebjeWzUfaqeos93M5Z_aH583A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900195538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vandeperre, Frederic ; Higgins, Ruth M. ; Sánchez-Meca, Julio ; Maynou, Francesc ; Goñi, Raquel ; Martín-Sosa, Pablo ; Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel ; Afonso, Pedro ; Bertocci, Iacopo ; Crec'hriou, Romain ; D'Anna, Giovanni ; Dimech, Mark ; Dorta, Carmelo ; Esparza, Oscar ; Falcón, Jesús M. ; Forcada, Aitor ; Guala, Ivan ; Le Direach, Laurence ; Marcos, Concepción ; Ojeda-Martínez, Celia ; Pipitone, Carlo ; Schembri, Patrick J. ; Stelzenmüller, Vanessa ; Stobart, Ben ; Santos, Ricardo S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vandeperre, Frederic ; Higgins, Ruth M. ; Sánchez-Meca, Julio ; Maynou, Francesc ; Goñi, Raquel ; Martín-Sosa, Pablo ; Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel ; Afonso, Pedro ; Bertocci, Iacopo ; Crec'hriou, Romain ; D'Anna, Giovanni ; Dimech, Mark ; Dorta, Carmelo ; Esparza, Oscar ; Falcón, Jesús M. ; Forcada, Aitor ; Guala, Ivan ; Le Direach, Laurence ; Marcos, Concepción ; Ojeda-Martínez, Celia ; Pipitone, Carlo ; Schembri, Patrick J. ; Stelzenmüller, Vanessa ; Stobart, Ben ; Santos, Ricardo S.</creatorcontrib><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often promoted as tools for biodiversity conservation as well as for fisheries management. Despite increasing evidence of their usefulness, questions remain regarding the optimal design of MPAs, in particular concerning their function as fisheries management tools, for which empirical studies are still lacking. Using 28 data sets from seven MPAs in Southern Europe, we developed a meta‐analytical approach to investigate the effects of protection on adjacent fisheries and asking how these effects are influenced by MPA size and age. Southern European MPAs showed clear effects on the surrounding fisheries, on the ‘catch per unit effort’ (CPUE) of target species, but especially on the CPUE of the marketable catch. These effects depended on the time of protection and on the size of the no‐take area. CPUE of both target species and the marketable catch increased gradually by 2–4% per year over a long time period (at least 30 years). The influence of the size of the no‐take area appeared to be more complex. The catch rates of the entire fishery in and around the MPA were higher when the no‐take areas were smaller. Conversely, catch rates of selected fisheries that were expected to benefit most from protection increased when the no‐take area was larger. Our results emphasize the importance of MPA size on its export functions and suggest that an adequate, often extended, time frame be used for the management and the evaluation of effectiveness of MPAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00401.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Catch per unit effort ; Fisheries management ; fishery yields ; marine protected area design ; marine reserve ; Meta-analysis ; spillover ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2011-12, Vol.12 (4), p.412-426</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-53b8f0f59a30a38339a43a0d29ebcbb24124e605cfe676409592d9a3072610a13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-2979.2010.00401.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-2979.2010.00401.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vandeperre, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Meca, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynou, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goñi, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Sosa, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertocci, Iacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crec'hriou, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anna, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimech, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorta, Carmelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esparza, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón, Jesús M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcada, Aitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guala, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Direach, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos, Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda-Martínez, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipitone, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schembri, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzenmüller, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stobart, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ricardo S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often promoted as tools for biodiversity conservation as well as for fisheries management. Despite increasing evidence of their usefulness, questions remain regarding the optimal design of MPAs, in particular concerning their function as fisheries management tools, for which empirical studies are still lacking. Using 28 data sets from seven MPAs in Southern Europe, we developed a meta‐analytical approach to investigate the effects of protection on adjacent fisheries and asking how these effects are influenced by MPA size and age. Southern European MPAs showed clear effects on the surrounding fisheries, on the ‘catch per unit effort’ (CPUE) of target species, but especially on the CPUE of the marketable catch. These effects depended on the time of protection and on the size of the no‐take area. CPUE of both target species and the marketable catch increased gradually by 2–4% per year over a long time period (at least 30 years). The influence of the size of the no‐take area appeared to be more complex. The catch rates of the entire fishery in and around the MPA were higher when the no‐take areas were smaller. Conversely, catch rates of selected fisheries that were expected to benefit most from protection increased when the no‐take area was larger. Our results emphasize the importance of MPA size on its export functions and suggest that an adequate, often extended, time frame be used for the management and the evaluation of effectiveness of MPAs.</description><subject>Catch per unit effort</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>fishery yields</subject><subject>marine protected area design</subject><subject>marine reserve</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>spillover</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF9PwjAUxRujiYh-h8b34e26btT4QpChhuiL_96ay3YnhTFwHRH89HZg6EtPes-5vffHGBfQE_7czHsiipMg1InuheBfASIQve0J6xwLp0cdwzm7cG4OAHFfRB1WjYqCssbxVcGrVdDggjjWhNzZX6-qnOMXtcUl1rYivq5XjfdTvnf5WMUL62ZUW3J8Z6nM3S1HvqQGA6yw3DU2w5Lj2gcxm12yswJLR1f_d5e9paPX4UMweRk_DgeTIJNJXwRKTvsFFEqjBJR9KTVGEiEPNU2z6TSMRBhRDCorKE7iCLTSYd6akzAWgEJ22fWhr__2e0OuMfPVpvbzOKMBhFbKd-2yu4Ppx5a0M-va-iV3RoBpyZq5aaGZFqBpyZo9WbM16SD1wseDQ9y6hrbHONYLEycyUebjeWzUfaqeos93M5Z_aH583A</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Vandeperre, Frederic</creator><creator>Higgins, Ruth M.</creator><creator>Sánchez-Meca, Julio</creator><creator>Maynou, Francesc</creator><creator>Goñi, Raquel</creator><creator>Martín-Sosa, Pablo</creator><creator>Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel</creator><creator>Afonso, Pedro</creator><creator>Bertocci, Iacopo</creator><creator>Crec'hriou, Romain</creator><creator>D'Anna, Giovanni</creator><creator>Dimech, Mark</creator><creator>Dorta, Carmelo</creator><creator>Esparza, Oscar</creator><creator>Falcón, Jesús M.</creator><creator>Forcada, Aitor</creator><creator>Guala, Ivan</creator><creator>Le Direach, Laurence</creator><creator>Marcos, Concepción</creator><creator>Ojeda-Martínez, Celia</creator><creator>Pipitone, Carlo</creator><creator>Schembri, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Stelzenmüller, Vanessa</creator><creator>Stobart, Ben</creator><creator>Santos, Ricardo S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach</title><author>Vandeperre, Frederic ; Higgins, Ruth M. ; Sánchez-Meca, Julio ; Maynou, Francesc ; Goñi, Raquel ; Martín-Sosa, Pablo ; Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel ; Afonso, Pedro ; Bertocci, Iacopo ; Crec'hriou, Romain ; D'Anna, Giovanni ; Dimech, Mark ; Dorta, Carmelo ; Esparza, Oscar ; Falcón, Jesús M. ; Forcada, Aitor ; Guala, Ivan ; Le Direach, Laurence ; Marcos, Concepción ; Ojeda-Martínez, Celia ; Pipitone, Carlo ; Schembri, Patrick J. ; Stelzenmüller, Vanessa ; Stobart, Ben ; Santos, Ricardo S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-53b8f0f59a30a38339a43a0d29ebcbb24124e605cfe676409592d9a3072610a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Catch per unit effort</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>fishery yields</topic><topic>marine protected area design</topic><topic>marine reserve</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>spillover</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vandeperre, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Meca, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynou, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goñi, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Sosa, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertocci, Iacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crec'hriou, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anna, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimech, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorta, Carmelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esparza, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón, Jesús M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcada, Aitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guala, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Direach, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos, Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojeda-Martínez, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipitone, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schembri, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzenmüller, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stobart, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ricardo S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vandeperre, Frederic</au><au>Higgins, Ruth M.</au><au>Sánchez-Meca, Julio</au><au>Maynou, Francesc</au><au>Goñi, Raquel</au><au>Martín-Sosa, Pablo</au><au>Pérez-Ruzafa, Angel</au><au>Afonso, Pedro</au><au>Bertocci, Iacopo</au><au>Crec'hriou, Romain</au><au>D'Anna, Giovanni</au><au>Dimech, Mark</au><au>Dorta, Carmelo</au><au>Esparza, Oscar</au><au>Falcón, Jesús M.</au><au>Forcada, Aitor</au><au>Guala, Ivan</au><au>Le Direach, Laurence</au><au>Marcos, Concepción</au><au>Ojeda-Martínez, Celia</au><au>Pipitone, Carlo</au><au>Schembri, Patrick J.</au><au>Stelzenmüller, Vanessa</au><au>Stobart, Ben</au><au>Santos, Ricardo S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>412-426</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often promoted as tools for biodiversity conservation as well as for fisheries management. Despite increasing evidence of their usefulness, questions remain regarding the optimal design of MPAs, in particular concerning their function as fisheries management tools, for which empirical studies are still lacking. Using 28 data sets from seven MPAs in Southern Europe, we developed a meta‐analytical approach to investigate the effects of protection on adjacent fisheries and asking how these effects are influenced by MPA size and age. Southern European MPAs showed clear effects on the surrounding fisheries, on the ‘catch per unit effort’ (CPUE) of target species, but especially on the CPUE of the marketable catch. These effects depended on the time of protection and on the size of the no‐take area. CPUE of both target species and the marketable catch increased gradually by 2–4% per year over a long time period (at least 30 years). The influence of the size of the no‐take area appeared to be more complex. The catch rates of the entire fishery in and around the MPA were higher when the no‐take areas were smaller. Conversely, catch rates of selected fisheries that were expected to benefit most from protection increased when the no‐take area was larger. Our results emphasize the importance of MPA size on its export functions and suggest that an adequate, often extended, time frame be used for the management and the evaluation of effectiveness of MPAs.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00401.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2960 |
ispartof | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2011-12, Vol.12 (4), p.412-426 |
issn | 1467-2960 1467-2979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_900195538 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Catch per unit effort Fisheries management fishery yields marine protected area design marine reserve Meta-analysis spillover Wildlife conservation |
title | Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20no-take%20area%20size%20and%20age%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20on%20fisheries%20yields:%20a%20meta-analytical%20approach&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Vandeperre,%20Frederic&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=412-426&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00401.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2492993181%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900195538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |