Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism
In a recent paper in this journal, Mark Balaguer develops and defends a new version of mathematical fictionalism, what he calls 'Hermeneutic non-assertivism', and responds to some recent objections to mathematical fictionalism that were launched by John Burgess and others. In this paper I...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophia mathematica 2011-10, Vol.19 (3), p.335-344, Article 335 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 344 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 335 |
| container_title | Philosophia mathematica |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Armour-Garb, Bradley |
| description | In a recent paper in this journal, Mark Balaguer develops and defends a new version of mathematical fictionalism, what he calls 'Hermeneutic non-assertivism', and responds to some recent objections to mathematical fictionalism that were launched by John Burgess and others.
In this paper I provide some fairly compelling reasons for rejecting Hermeneutic non-assertivism - ones that highlight an important feature of what understanding mathematics involves (or, as we shall see, does not involve). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/philmat/nkr013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_899644711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/philmat/nkr013</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2491062291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-8faeb66dff218b2bb12c1a136cc7e859469fdbbb1928e48f14a5ad22c63bb2a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz8WbyLb5apocpVgVKl7sOUyyiU3d7q5JevC_N2U9CeJpmOH93sw8hK4JnhKs2KzfhmYPedZ-REzYCRqRBeeV4FicohHGjFQSE3WOLlLalVYoKUfobtPWLqYMbR3a90kpkxfIW1eMgoVmsgo2h66FJqT9JTrz0CR39VPHaLN6eFs-VevXx-fl_bqyDONcSQ_OCFF7T4k01BhCLQHChLULJ-eKC-VrU8aKSselJxzmUFNqBTOGAmdjdDP49rH7PLiU9a47xHJD0lIpwfmCkCKaDiIbu5Si87qPYQ_xSxOsj3nonzz0kEcB-C_AhgzH53KE0PyN3Q5Yd-j_W_ENV-J3JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>899644711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Armour-Garb, Bradley</creator><creatorcontrib>Armour-Garb, Bradley</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent paper in this journal, Mark Balaguer develops and defends a new version of mathematical fictionalism, what he calls 'Hermeneutic non-assertivism', and responds to some recent objections to mathematical fictionalism that were launched by John Burgess and others.
In this paper I provide some fairly compelling reasons for rejecting Hermeneutic non-assertivism - ones that highlight an important feature of what understanding mathematics involves (or, as we shall see, does not involve).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/philmat/nkr013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics ; Mathematics</subject><ispartof>Philosophia mathematica, 2011-10, Vol.19 (3), p.335-344, Article 335</ispartof><rights>The Author [2011]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-8faeb66dff218b2bb12c1a136cc7e859469fdbbb1928e48f14a5ad22c63bb2a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-8faeb66dff218b2bb12c1a136cc7e859469fdbbb1928e48f14a5ad22c63bb2a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armour-Garb, Bradley</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism</title><title>Philosophia mathematica</title><description>In a recent paper in this journal, Mark Balaguer develops and defends a new version of mathematical fictionalism, what he calls 'Hermeneutic non-assertivism', and responds to some recent objections to mathematical fictionalism that were launched by John Burgess and others.
In this paper I provide some fairly compelling reasons for rejecting Hermeneutic non-assertivism - ones that highlight an important feature of what understanding mathematics involves (or, as we shall see, does not involve).</description><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><issn>0031-8019</issn><issn>1744-6406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXz8WbyLb5apocpVgVKl7sOUyyiU3d7q5JevC_N2U9CeJpmOH93sw8hK4JnhKs2KzfhmYPedZ-REzYCRqRBeeV4FicohHGjFQSE3WOLlLalVYoKUfobtPWLqYMbR3a90kpkxfIW1eMgoVmsgo2h66FJqT9JTrz0CR39VPHaLN6eFs-VevXx-fl_bqyDONcSQ_OCFF7T4k01BhCLQHChLULJ-eKC-VrU8aKSselJxzmUFNqBTOGAmdjdDP49rH7PLiU9a47xHJD0lIpwfmCkCKaDiIbu5Si87qPYQ_xSxOsj3nonzz0kEcB-C_AhgzH53KE0PyN3Q5Yd-j_W_ENV-J3JQ</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Armour-Garb, Bradley</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism</title><author>Armour-Garb, Bradley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-8faeb66dff218b2bb12c1a136cc7e859469fdbbb1928e48f14a5ad22c63bb2a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Exegesis & hermeneutics</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armour-Garb, Bradley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Philosophia mathematica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armour-Garb, Bradley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism</atitle><jtitle>Philosophia mathematica</jtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>335-344</pages><artnum>335</artnum><issn>0031-8019</issn><eissn>1744-6406</eissn><abstract>In a recent paper in this journal, Mark Balaguer develops and defends a new version of mathematical fictionalism, what he calls 'Hermeneutic non-assertivism', and responds to some recent objections to mathematical fictionalism that were launched by John Burgess and others.
In this paper I provide some fairly compelling reasons for rejecting Hermeneutic non-assertivism - ones that highlight an important feature of what understanding mathematics involves (or, as we shall see, does not involve).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/philmat/nkr013</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-8019 |
| ispartof | Philosophia mathematica, 2011-10, Vol.19 (3), p.335-344, Article 335 |
| issn | 0031-8019 1744-6406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_899644711 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Exegesis & hermeneutics Mathematics |
| title | Understanding and Mathematical Fictionalism |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A34%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20and%20Mathematical%20Fictionalism&rft.jtitle=Philosophia%20mathematica&rft.au=Armour-Garb,%20Bradley&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=335-344&rft.artnum=335&rft.issn=0031-8019&rft.eissn=1744-6406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/philmat/nkr013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491062291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=899644711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/philmat/nkr013&rfr_iscdi=true |