Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations

Mercury in fish tissue is a major human health concern. Consumption of mercury-contaminated fish poses risks to the general population, including potentially serious developmental defects and neurological damage in young children. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify areas that have the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2011-09, Vol.45 (18), p.7746-7753
Hauptverfasser: Money, Eric S, Sackett, Dana K, Aday, D. Derek, Serre, Marc L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7753
container_issue 18
container_start_page 7746
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 45
creator Money, Eric S
Sackett, Dana K
Aday, D. Derek
Serre, Marc L
description Mercury in fish tissue is a major human health concern. Consumption of mercury-contaminated fish poses risks to the general population, including potentially serious developmental defects and neurological damage in young children. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify areas that have the potential for high levels of bioaccumulated mercury. However, due to time and resource constraints, it is difficult to adequately assess fish tissue mercury on a basin wide scale. We hypothesized that, given the nature of fish movement along streams, an analytical approach that takes into account distance traveled along these streams would improve the estimation accuracy for fish tissue mercury in unsampled streams. Therefore, we used a river-based Bayesian Maximum Entropy framework (river-BME) for modern space/time geostatistics to estimate fish tissue mercury at unsampled locations in the Cape Fear and Lumber Basins in eastern North Carolina. We also compared the space/time geostatistical estimation using river-BME to the more traditional Euclidean-based BME approach, with and without the inclusion of a secondary variable. Results showed that this river-based approach reduced the estimation error of fish tissue mercury by more than 13% and that the median estimate of fish tissue mercury exceeded the EPA action level of 0.3 ppm in more than 90% of river miles for the study domain.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es2003827
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_897470300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2483017361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-2fd11c03bf826a442a0a771b719c1e6c5deddc0bb28ef003102533e28896529e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkUtP4zAQgK0Vq6WUPfAH0AiJA4ewYztpnCMq5SF1tRKi0t4ix5nQoDYpngTRv8CvxoXykDiNRv7m9VmIA4mnEpX8Q6wQtVHpDzGQicIoMYncEQNEqaNMj_7vij3me0RUGs0vsaukiVWGciCeZ1w3d3BTP5KH85o72zgC25QweQrZ5u1qXfr2ztvVfA3ntrMwtg1cL1e-fSTo5gSX1Ia6boM7u4BJiMuQtg20FVzUPIfbmrkn-Eve9X4NtoNZw3a5WlAJ09a9wrwvflZ2wfR7G4didjG5HV9F03-X1-OzaWRjjLtIVaWUDnVRGTWycaws2jSVRSozJ2nkkpLK0mFRKENV0BIMJVqTMiYbJSojPRRHb33DBQ89cZfft71vwsjcZGmcog5VQ3HyBjnfMnuq8pUPV_l1LjHfSM8_pAf2cNuwL5ZUfpDvlgNwvAUsB0OVD5Jr_uTi8GeJ-cJZx59LfR_4Aj5jlbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897470300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Money, Eric S ; Sackett, Dana K ; Aday, D. Derek ; Serre, Marc L</creator><creatorcontrib>Money, Eric S ; Sackett, Dana K ; Aday, D. Derek ; Serre, Marc L</creatorcontrib><description>Mercury in fish tissue is a major human health concern. Consumption of mercury-contaminated fish poses risks to the general population, including potentially serious developmental defects and neurological damage in young children. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify areas that have the potential for high levels of bioaccumulated mercury. However, due to time and resource constraints, it is difficult to adequately assess fish tissue mercury on a basin wide scale. We hypothesized that, given the nature of fish movement along streams, an analytical approach that takes into account distance traveled along these streams would improve the estimation accuracy for fish tissue mercury in unsampled streams. Therefore, we used a river-based Bayesian Maximum Entropy framework (river-BME) for modern space/time geostatistics to estimate fish tissue mercury at unsampled locations in the Cape Fear and Lumber Basins in eastern North Carolina. We also compared the space/time geostatistical estimation using river-BME to the more traditional Euclidean-based BME approach, with and without the inclusion of a secondary variable. Results showed that this river-based approach reduced the estimation error of fish tissue mercury by more than 13% and that the median estimate of fish tissue mercury exceeded the EPA action level of 0.3 ppm in more than 90% of river miles for the study domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es2003827</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21842901</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contamination ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Environmental Modeling ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Environmental science ; Fish ; Fishes ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mercury ; Mercury - analysis ; Models, Theoretical ; North Carolina ; Rivers ; Synecology ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2011-09, Vol.45 (18), p.7746-7753</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Sep 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-2fd11c03bf826a442a0a771b719c1e6c5deddc0bb28ef003102533e28896529e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-2fd11c03bf826a442a0a771b719c1e6c5deddc0bb28ef003102533e28896529e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es2003827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es2003827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24520581$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21842901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Money, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackett, Dana K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aday, D. Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serre, Marc L</creatorcontrib><title>Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Mercury in fish tissue is a major human health concern. Consumption of mercury-contaminated fish poses risks to the general population, including potentially serious developmental defects and neurological damage in young children. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify areas that have the potential for high levels of bioaccumulated mercury. However, due to time and resource constraints, it is difficult to adequately assess fish tissue mercury on a basin wide scale. We hypothesized that, given the nature of fish movement along streams, an analytical approach that takes into account distance traveled along these streams would improve the estimation accuracy for fish tissue mercury in unsampled streams. Therefore, we used a river-based Bayesian Maximum Entropy framework (river-BME) for modern space/time geostatistics to estimate fish tissue mercury at unsampled locations in the Cape Fear and Lumber Basins in eastern North Carolina. We also compared the space/time geostatistical estimation using river-BME to the more traditional Euclidean-based BME approach, with and without the inclusion of a secondary variable. Results showed that this river-based approach reduced the estimation error of fish tissue mercury by more than 13% and that the median estimate of fish tissue mercury exceeded the EPA action level of 0.3 ppm in more than 90% of river miles for the study domain.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Environmental Modeling</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury - analysis</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkUtP4zAQgK0Vq6WUPfAH0AiJA4ewYztpnCMq5SF1tRKi0t4ix5nQoDYpngTRv8CvxoXykDiNRv7m9VmIA4mnEpX8Q6wQtVHpDzGQicIoMYncEQNEqaNMj_7vij3me0RUGs0vsaukiVWGciCeZ1w3d3BTP5KH85o72zgC25QweQrZ5u1qXfr2ztvVfA3ntrMwtg1cL1e-fSTo5gSX1Ia6boM7u4BJiMuQtg20FVzUPIfbmrkn-Eve9X4NtoNZw3a5WlAJ09a9wrwvflZ2wfR7G4didjG5HV9F03-X1-OzaWRjjLtIVaWUDnVRGTWycaws2jSVRSozJ2nkkpLK0mFRKENV0BIMJVqTMiYbJSojPRRHb33DBQ89cZfft71vwsjcZGmcog5VQ3HyBjnfMnuq8pUPV_l1LjHfSM8_pAf2cNuwL5ZUfpDvlgNwvAUsB0OVD5Jr_uTi8GeJ-cJZx59LfR_4Aj5jlbo</recordid><startdate>20110915</startdate><enddate>20110915</enddate><creator>Money, Eric S</creator><creator>Sackett, Dana K</creator><creator>Aday, D. Derek</creator><creator>Serre, Marc L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110915</creationdate><title>Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations</title><author>Money, Eric S ; Sackett, Dana K ; Aday, D. Derek ; Serre, Marc L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a404t-2fd11c03bf826a442a0a771b719c1e6c5deddc0bb28ef003102533e28896529e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Environmental Modeling</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury - analysis</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Money, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackett, Dana K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aday, D. Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serre, Marc L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Money, Eric S</au><au>Sackett, Dana K</au><au>Aday, D. Derek</au><au>Serre, Marc L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2011-09-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>7746</spage><epage>7753</epage><pages>7746-7753</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Mercury in fish tissue is a major human health concern. Consumption of mercury-contaminated fish poses risks to the general population, including potentially serious developmental defects and neurological damage in young children. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify areas that have the potential for high levels of bioaccumulated mercury. However, due to time and resource constraints, it is difficult to adequately assess fish tissue mercury on a basin wide scale. We hypothesized that, given the nature of fish movement along streams, an analytical approach that takes into account distance traveled along these streams would improve the estimation accuracy for fish tissue mercury in unsampled streams. Therefore, we used a river-based Bayesian Maximum Entropy framework (river-BME) for modern space/time geostatistics to estimate fish tissue mercury at unsampled locations in the Cape Fear and Lumber Basins in eastern North Carolina. We also compared the space/time geostatistical estimation using river-BME to the more traditional Euclidean-based BME approach, with and without the inclusion of a secondary variable. Results showed that this river-based approach reduced the estimation error of fish tissue mercury by more than 13% and that the median estimate of fish tissue mercury exceeded the EPA action level of 0.3 ppm in more than 90% of river miles for the study domain.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21842901</pmid><doi>10.1021/es2003827</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2011-09, Vol.45 (18), p.7746-7753
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_897470300
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Agnatha. Pisces
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Contamination
Creeks & streams
Environmental Modeling
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data
Environmental science
Fish
Fishes
Fresh water ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geography - statistics & numerical data
Mercury
Mercury - analysis
Models, Theoretical
North Carolina
Rivers
Synecology
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
title Using River Distance and Existing Hydrography Data Can Improve the Geostatistical Estimation of Fish Tissue Mercury at Unsampled Locations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20River%20Distance%20and%20Existing%20Hydrography%20Data%20Can%20Improve%20the%20Geostatistical%20Estimation%20of%20Fish%20Tissue%20Mercury%20at%20Unsampled%20Locations&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Money,%20Eric%20S&rft.date=2011-09-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=7746&rft.epage=7753&rft.pages=7746-7753&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es2003827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2483017361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897470300&rft_id=info:pmid/21842901&rfr_iscdi=true