A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics
The primary purpose of this classroom experiment was to examine the effectiveness of concrete (hands‐on) manipulatives as compared with virtual (computer‐based) manipulatives on student review of fraction concepts in third grade and introduction of symmetry concepts in fourth grade. A pretest–postte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | School science and mathematics 2011-10, Vol.111 (6), p.256-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | School science and mathematics |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Burns, Barbara A. Hamm, Ellen M. |
description | The primary purpose of this classroom experiment was to examine the effectiveness of concrete (hands‐on) manipulatives as compared with virtual (computer‐based) manipulatives on student review of fraction concepts in third grade and introduction of symmetry concepts in fourth grade. A pretest–posttest design was employed with a sample of 91 third‐grade students and 54 fourth‐grade students who were randomly assigned to complete a lesson using either concrete or virtual manipulatives. Students used a variety of manipulative materials during the lessons. Results of the posttest suggest that student learning was unchanged by lesson condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_896914636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ944664</ericid><sourcerecordid>2481025061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3976-770f8f707fb53264742c48f971a8bca9c51b56f345b9d54853e0e9b1ad7e6db13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EEqXwByws9gl2PYsVqmiZCohxg2Q5iaO6tEmxUyh_j9OgrvHGsu65z08HAIhRiuM5naVYUZVIpmg6QBinCCHJ0_UO6G2DXdBDiPCES0T2wUEIswghglgPvJ_DYb1YGu9CXcG6jK8q97ax0FQFfHW-WZk5nJjKLVdz07gvC1-Cha6Cz1Pni2SDjeqVb6bJ2JvCRraZ2kVE83AI9kozD_bo7-6Dl9HF8_Ayub0fXw3Pb5OcKMETIVApS4FEmTEy4FTQQU5lqQQ2MsuNyhnOGC8JZZkqGJWMWGRVhk0hLC8yTPrgpJu79PXnyoZGz-JGVfxSS8UVppzwCMkOyn0dgrelXnq3MP5HY6RblXqmW2O6NaZblXqjUq9j9birWu_ybe3iWlHKOY3xWRd_u7n9-fdY_fQ0ke1eSdd2obHrbdv4D80FEUy_3Y31YITpw8PjjX4jv2CHkTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896914636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Burns, Barbara A. ; Hamm, Ellen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, Barbara A. ; Hamm, Ellen M.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary purpose of this classroom experiment was to examine the effectiveness of concrete (hands‐on) manipulatives as compared with virtual (computer‐based) manipulatives on student review of fraction concepts in third grade and introduction of symmetry concepts in fourth grade. A pretest–posttest design was employed with a sample of 91 third‐grade students and 54 fourth‐grade students who were randomly assigned to complete a lesson using either concrete or virtual manipulatives. Students used a variety of manipulative materials during the lessons. Results of the posttest suggest that student learning was unchanged by lesson condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-6803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-8594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Computer Uses in Education ; Concrete ; Educational Technology ; Elementary education ; Elementary School Mathematics ; Elementary school students ; Experiential Learning ; Grade 3 ; Grade 4 ; Learning ; Manipulative Materials ; Mathematical Concepts ; Mathematics ; Mathematics education ; Mathematics Instruction ; New York ; Online instruction ; Pretests Posttests ; Students ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>School science and mathematics, 2011-10, Vol.111 (6), p.256-261</ispartof><rights>2011, School Science and Mathematics Association</rights><rights>Copyright School Science and Mathematics Association, Incorporated Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3976-770f8f707fb53264742c48f971a8bca9c51b56f345b9d54853e0e9b1ad7e6db13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3976-770f8f707fb53264742c48f971a8bca9c51b56f345b9d54853e0e9b1ad7e6db13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1949-8594.2011.00086.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1949-8594.2011.00086.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ944664$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Ellen M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics</title><title>School science and mathematics</title><description>The primary purpose of this classroom experiment was to examine the effectiveness of concrete (hands‐on) manipulatives as compared with virtual (computer‐based) manipulatives on student review of fraction concepts in third grade and introduction of symmetry concepts in fourth grade. A pretest–posttest design was employed with a sample of 91 third‐grade students and 54 fourth‐grade students who were randomly assigned to complete a lesson using either concrete or virtual manipulatives. Students used a variety of manipulative materials during the lessons. Results of the posttest suggest that student learning was unchanged by lesson condition.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Manipulative Materials</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0036-6803</issn><issn>1949-8594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EEqXwByws9gl2PYsVqmiZCohxg2Q5iaO6tEmxUyh_j9OgrvHGsu65z08HAIhRiuM5naVYUZVIpmg6QBinCCHJ0_UO6G2DXdBDiPCES0T2wUEIswghglgPvJ_DYb1YGu9CXcG6jK8q97ax0FQFfHW-WZk5nJjKLVdz07gvC1-Cha6Cz1Pni2SDjeqVb6bJ2JvCRraZ2kVE83AI9kozD_bo7-6Dl9HF8_Ayub0fXw3Pb5OcKMETIVApS4FEmTEy4FTQQU5lqQQ2MsuNyhnOGC8JZZkqGJWMWGRVhk0hLC8yTPrgpJu79PXnyoZGz-JGVfxSS8UVppzwCMkOyn0dgrelXnq3MP5HY6RblXqmW2O6NaZblXqjUq9j9birWu_ybe3iWlHKOY3xWRd_u7n9-fdY_fQ0ke1eSdd2obHrbdv4D80FEUy_3Y31YITpw8PjjX4jv2CHkTg</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Burns, Barbara A.</creator><creator>Hamm, Ellen M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics</title><author>Burns, Barbara A. ; Hamm, Ellen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3976-770f8f707fb53264742c48f971a8bca9c51b56f345b9d54853e0e9b1ad7e6db13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Manipulative Materials</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Ellen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, Barbara A.</au><au>Hamm, Ellen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ944664</ericid><atitle>A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics</atitle><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>256-261</pages><issn>0036-6803</issn><eissn>1949-8594</eissn><abstract>The primary purpose of this classroom experiment was to examine the effectiveness of concrete (hands‐on) manipulatives as compared with virtual (computer‐based) manipulatives on student review of fraction concepts in third grade and introduction of symmetry concepts in fourth grade. A pretest–posttest design was employed with a sample of 91 third‐grade students and 54 fourth‐grade students who were randomly assigned to complete a lesson using either concrete or virtual manipulatives. Students used a variety of manipulative materials during the lessons. Results of the posttest suggest that student learning was unchanged by lesson condition.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-6803 |
ispartof | School science and mathematics, 2011-10, Vol.111 (6), p.256-261 |
issn | 0036-6803 1949-8594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_896914636 |
source | Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Comparative Analysis Computer Uses in Education Concrete Educational Technology Elementary education Elementary School Mathematics Elementary school students Experiential Learning Grade 3 Grade 4 Learning Manipulative Materials Mathematical Concepts Mathematics Mathematics education Mathematics Instruction New York Online instruction Pretests Posttests Students Teaching Methods |
title | A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Concrete%20and%20Virtual%20Manipulative%20Use%20in%20Third-%20and%20Fourth-Grade%20Mathematics&rft.jtitle=School%20science%20and%20mathematics&rft.au=Burns,%20Barbara%20A.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=256-261&rft.issn=0036-6803&rft.eissn=1949-8594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481025061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896914636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ944664&rfr_iscdi=true |