VET market experiments rejected

Through the e4obbying campaign, the Federation and AEU had called for the Mid-Term Review of the Productivity Places Program to be released John Ross writing in The Australian (August 30, 201 1) noted that: *the $2.1 billion Productivity Places Program for 711,000 training places over five years was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education (Sydney. 1919) 2011-09, Vol.92 (9), p.19
1. Verfasser: de Graaff, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Through the e4obbying campaign, the Federation and AEU had called for the Mid-Term Review of the Productivity Places Program to be released John Ross writing in The Australian (August 30, 201 1) noted that: *the $2.1 billion Productivity Places Program for 711,000 training places over five years was so badly administered that eváluators couldn't tell who it had trained; *the midterm review of the Productivity Places Program by Allen Consulting found that despite its size it had failed to adequately target its training to skills shortage areas; *it was impossible to estimate how many people had participated; *instead of addressing skills shortages and emerging needs, it was largely used to train special-care workers, security officers and sales representatives; *training funded through the program was skewed to low-level qualifications.
ISSN:0013-1156