Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species
The present study describes the acute toxicity of eight commercial oil dispersants, South Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC. The approach used consistent test methodologies within a single laboratory in assessing the relative acute toxicity of the eight dispersants, inclu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2011-10, Vol.30 (10), p.2244-2252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2244 |
container_title | Environmental toxicology and chemistry |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Hemmer, Michael J. Barron, Mace G. Greene, Richard M. |
description | The present study describes the acute toxicity of eight commercial oil dispersants, South Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC. The approach used consistent test methodologies within a single laboratory in assessing the relative acute toxicity of the eight dispersants, including Corexit 9500A, the predominant dispersant applied during the DeepWater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Static acute toxicity tests were performed using two Gulf of Mexico estuarine test species, the mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and the inland silversides (Menidia beryllina). Dispersant‐only test solutions were prepared with high‐energy mixing, whereas water‐accommodated fractions of LSC and chemically dispersed LSC were prepared with moderate energy followed by settling and testing of the aqueous phase. The median lethal concentration (LC50) values for the dispersant‐only tests were calculated using nominal concentrations, whereas tests conducted with LSC alone and dispersed LSC were based on measured total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations. For all eight dispersants in both test species, the dispersants alone were less toxic (LC50s: 2.9 to >5,600 µl/L) than the dispersant–LSC mixtures (0.4–13 mg TPH/L). Louisiana sweet crude oil alone had generally similar toxicity to A. bahia (LC50: 2.7 mg TPH/L) and M. beryllina (LC50: 3.5 mg TPH/L) as the dispersant–LSC mixtures. The results of the present study indicate that Corexit 9500A had generally similar toxicity to other available dispersants when tested alone but was generally less toxic as a mixture with LSC. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2244–2252. © 2011 SETAC |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/etc.619 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_894052372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2468397701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-7a727883e5d46072f607e421d773c17210f3500003f851773952d4cc27628c373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUha0KRKel4g2QxQYQTeuf-CdLiKCgRrCAlqVlnBvqkhlPbafTeQMeG9O03fUufCWfz-dYB6EXlBxRQtgxZHckabODFlQIVmlJ9RO0IIqTSjGpd9FeSpeEUNk0zTO0y6iSklO9QH_bsFzbaLO_BpzDjXc-b3EYMPjfFxkHP-LepzXEZFc5HeIuTD55u7I4bQAydnHq4RZ7031v3x5iu-qxu4Cld3Yct_ePocdFLgE4bwK2V1MJdDhDyrjozkN6jp4OdkxwcLf30dmnjz_az1X37eRL-76rXF2rplJWMaU1B9HXkig2lANqRnuluKOKUTJwQcrwQQtaLhvB-to5piTTjiu-j17NvusYrqbyAXMZprgqkUY3NRGMK1ag1zPkYkgpwmDW0S9t3BpKzP_CTSnclMIL-fLObvq1hP6Bu2-4AO9mYONH2D7mYwoy21Uz7VOGmwfaxj9GKq6E-fn1xHSnHxreknMj-D8_zJbW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894052372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hemmer, Michael J. ; Barron, Mace G. ; Greene, Richard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemmer, Michael J. ; Barron, Mace G. ; Greene, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study describes the acute toxicity of eight commercial oil dispersants, South Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC. The approach used consistent test methodologies within a single laboratory in assessing the relative acute toxicity of the eight dispersants, including Corexit 9500A, the predominant dispersant applied during the DeepWater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Static acute toxicity tests were performed using two Gulf of Mexico estuarine test species, the mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and the inland silversides (Menidia beryllina). Dispersant‐only test solutions were prepared with high‐energy mixing, whereas water‐accommodated fractions of LSC and chemically dispersed LSC were prepared with moderate energy followed by settling and testing of the aqueous phase. The median lethal concentration (LC50) values for the dispersant‐only tests were calculated using nominal concentrations, whereas tests conducted with LSC alone and dispersed LSC were based on measured total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations. For all eight dispersants in both test species, the dispersants alone were less toxic (LC50s: 2.9 to >5,600 µl/L) than the dispersant–LSC mixtures (0.4–13 mg TPH/L). Louisiana sweet crude oil alone had generally similar toxicity to A. bahia (LC50: 2.7 mg TPH/L) and M. beryllina (LC50: 3.5 mg TPH/L) as the dispersant–LSC mixtures. The results of the present study indicate that Corexit 9500A had generally similar toxicity to other available dispersants when tested alone but was generally less toxic as a mixture with LSC. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2244–2252. © 2011 SETAC</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.619</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21766318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute toxicity ; Animals ; Aquatic life ; Corexit 9500A ; Crude oil ; Crustacea - drug effects ; Dispersants ; Gulf of Mexico ; Lethal Dose 50 ; Lipids - toxicity ; Menidia ; Mysids ; Oil dispersants ; Oil spills ; Petroleum - toxicity ; Petroleum hydrocarbons ; Shellfish ; Smegmamorpha - metabolism ; South Louisiana sweet crude ; Surface-Active Agents - toxicity ; Toxicity ; Toxicity Tests, Acute ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2011-10, Vol.30 (10), p.2244-2252</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 SETAC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 SETAC.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-7a727883e5d46072f607e421d773c17210f3500003f851773952d4cc27628c373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-7a727883e5d46072f607e421d773c17210f3500003f851773952d4cc27628c373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.619$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.619$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21766318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemmer, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Mace G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>The present study describes the acute toxicity of eight commercial oil dispersants, South Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC. The approach used consistent test methodologies within a single laboratory in assessing the relative acute toxicity of the eight dispersants, including Corexit 9500A, the predominant dispersant applied during the DeepWater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Static acute toxicity tests were performed using two Gulf of Mexico estuarine test species, the mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and the inland silversides (Menidia beryllina). Dispersant‐only test solutions were prepared with high‐energy mixing, whereas water‐accommodated fractions of LSC and chemically dispersed LSC were prepared with moderate energy followed by settling and testing of the aqueous phase. The median lethal concentration (LC50) values for the dispersant‐only tests were calculated using nominal concentrations, whereas tests conducted with LSC alone and dispersed LSC were based on measured total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations. For all eight dispersants in both test species, the dispersants alone were less toxic (LC50s: 2.9 to >5,600 µl/L) than the dispersant–LSC mixtures (0.4–13 mg TPH/L). Louisiana sweet crude oil alone had generally similar toxicity to A. bahia (LC50: 2.7 mg TPH/L) and M. beryllina (LC50: 3.5 mg TPH/L) as the dispersant–LSC mixtures. The results of the present study indicate that Corexit 9500A had generally similar toxicity to other available dispersants when tested alone but was generally less toxic as a mixture with LSC. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2244–2252. © 2011 SETAC</description><subject>Acute toxicity</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Corexit 9500A</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Crustacea - drug effects</subject><subject>Dispersants</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Lethal Dose 50</subject><subject>Lipids - toxicity</subject><subject>Menidia</subject><subject>Mysids</subject><subject>Oil dispersants</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Petroleum - toxicity</subject><subject>Petroleum hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Smegmamorpha - metabolism</subject><subject>South Louisiana sweet crude</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests, Acute</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUha0KRKel4g2QxQYQTeuf-CdLiKCgRrCAlqVlnBvqkhlPbafTeQMeG9O03fUufCWfz-dYB6EXlBxRQtgxZHckabODFlQIVmlJ9RO0IIqTSjGpd9FeSpeEUNk0zTO0y6iSklO9QH_bsFzbaLO_BpzDjXc-b3EYMPjfFxkHP-LepzXEZFc5HeIuTD55u7I4bQAydnHq4RZ7031v3x5iu-qxu4Cld3Yct_ePocdFLgE4bwK2V1MJdDhDyrjozkN6jp4OdkxwcLf30dmnjz_az1X37eRL-76rXF2rplJWMaU1B9HXkig2lANqRnuluKOKUTJwQcrwQQtaLhvB-to5piTTjiu-j17NvusYrqbyAXMZprgqkUY3NRGMK1ag1zPkYkgpwmDW0S9t3BpKzP_CTSnclMIL-fLObvq1hP6Bu2-4AO9mYONH2D7mYwoy21Uz7VOGmwfaxj9GKq6E-fn1xHSnHxreknMj-D8_zJbW</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Hemmer, Michael J.</creator><creator>Barron, Mace G.</creator><creator>Greene, Richard M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species</title><author>Hemmer, Michael J. ; Barron, Mace G. ; Greene, Richard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-7a727883e5d46072f607e421d773c17210f3500003f851773952d4cc27628c373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute toxicity</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Corexit 9500A</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Crustacea - drug effects</topic><topic>Dispersants</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Lethal Dose 50</topic><topic>Lipids - toxicity</topic><topic>Menidia</topic><topic>Mysids</topic><topic>Oil dispersants</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Petroleum - toxicity</topic><topic>Petroleum hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Smegmamorpha - metabolism</topic><topic>South Louisiana sweet crude</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests, Acute</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemmer, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Mace G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemmer, Michael J.</au><au>Barron, Mace G.</au><au>Greene, Richard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2244</spage><epage>2252</epage><pages>2244-2252</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>The present study describes the acute toxicity of eight commercial oil dispersants, South Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC. The approach used consistent test methodologies within a single laboratory in assessing the relative acute toxicity of the eight dispersants, including Corexit 9500A, the predominant dispersant applied during the DeepWater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Static acute toxicity tests were performed using two Gulf of Mexico estuarine test species, the mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and the inland silversides (Menidia beryllina). Dispersant‐only test solutions were prepared with high‐energy mixing, whereas water‐accommodated fractions of LSC and chemically dispersed LSC were prepared with moderate energy followed by settling and testing of the aqueous phase. The median lethal concentration (LC50) values for the dispersant‐only tests were calculated using nominal concentrations, whereas tests conducted with LSC alone and dispersed LSC were based on measured total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations. For all eight dispersants in both test species, the dispersants alone were less toxic (LC50s: 2.9 to >5,600 µl/L) than the dispersant–LSC mixtures (0.4–13 mg TPH/L). Louisiana sweet crude oil alone had generally similar toxicity to A. bahia (LC50: 2.7 mg TPH/L) and M. beryllina (LC50: 3.5 mg TPH/L) as the dispersant–LSC mixtures. The results of the present study indicate that Corexit 9500A had generally similar toxicity to other available dispersants when tested alone but was generally less toxic as a mixture with LSC. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:2244–2252. © 2011 SETAC</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>21766318</pmid><doi>10.1002/etc.619</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-7268 |
ispartof | Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2011-10, Vol.30 (10), p.2244-2252 |
issn | 0730-7268 1552-8618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_894052372 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Acute toxicity Animals Aquatic life Corexit 9500A Crude oil Crustacea - drug effects Dispersants Gulf of Mexico Lethal Dose 50 Lipids - toxicity Menidia Mysids Oil dispersants Oil spills Petroleum - toxicity Petroleum hydrocarbons Shellfish Smegmamorpha - metabolism South Louisiana sweet crude Surface-Active Agents - toxicity Toxicity Toxicity Tests, Acute Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity |
title | Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T08%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20toxicity%20of%20eight%20oil%20dispersants,%20Louisiana%20sweet%20crude%20oil%20(LSC),%20and%20chemically%20dispersed%20LSC%20to%20two%20aquatic%20test%20species&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Hemmer,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2244&rft.epage=2252&rft.pages=2244-2252&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.619&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2468397701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894052372&rft_id=info:pmid/21766318&rfr_iscdi=true |