A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS
Issues raised by material adverse change (MAC) provisions fall into two categories: those relating to using MAC provisions and - since MAC is generally used as a defined term - those relating to how MAC is defined. In discussing any given issue, this article considers the preferred approach and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fordham journal of corporate & financial law 2004-10, Vol.10 (1), p.9 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Fordham journal of corporate & financial law |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Adams, Kenneth A |
description | Issues raised by material adverse change (MAC) provisions fall into two categories: those relating to using MAC provisions and - since MAC is generally used as a defined term - those relating to how MAC is defined. In discussing any given issue, this article considers the preferred approach and the more commonly used alternatives. MAC provisions are used in different parts of a contract. They occur most commonly in representations, where they can be used in two different ways. First, a party can make a representation regarding nonoccurrence of a MAC since a given date. Second, a MAC provision can serve to modify a representation as to some aspect of a party's operations so as to indicate the absence of anything leading to a MAC. MACs also occur in closing conditions. Any representation containing a MAC provision could, with a suitable introduction, constitute the basis for a condition. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_89069043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>780200911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_890690433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20jU2MI7gYOAqLs4yMDC0MDYy4GSwc1TwcXV39NENDXZ0d1Vw9HP0iQz2DFbwd1NQ8nUMcQ3ydPRRcHQJcw0KdlVw9nD0c3dVUggI8g_zDPb09wvmYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMim6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4C0sDM0sDE2NjYtQAAFw0MEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>89069043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Adams, Kenneth A</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><description>Issues raised by material adverse change (MAC) provisions fall into two categories: those relating to using MAC provisions and - since MAC is generally used as a defined term - those relating to how MAC is defined. In discussing any given issue, this article considers the preferred approach and the more commonly used alternatives. MAC provisions are used in different parts of a contract. They occur most commonly in representations, where they can be used in two different ways. First, a party can make a representation regarding nonoccurrence of a MAC since a given date. Second, a MAC provision can serve to modify a representation as to some aspect of a party's operations so as to indicate the absence of anything leading to a MAC. MACs also occur in closing conditions. Any representation containing a MAC provision could, with a suitable introduction, constitute the basis for a condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-303X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Changes ; Contract law ; Definitions ; Litigation ; Materiality ; Provisions ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Fordham journal of corporate & financial law, 2004-10, Vol.10 (1), p.9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><title>A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS</title><title>Fordham journal of corporate & financial law</title><description>Issues raised by material adverse change (MAC) provisions fall into two categories: those relating to using MAC provisions and - since MAC is generally used as a defined term - those relating to how MAC is defined. In discussing any given issue, this article considers the preferred approach and the more commonly used alternatives. MAC provisions are used in different parts of a contract. They occur most commonly in representations, where they can be used in two different ways. First, a party can make a representation regarding nonoccurrence of a MAC since a given date. Second, a MAC provision can serve to modify a representation as to some aspect of a party's operations so as to indicate the absence of anything leading to a MAC. MACs also occur in closing conditions. Any representation containing a MAC provision could, with a suitable introduction, constitute the basis for a condition.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Materiality</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1532-303X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20jU2MI7gYOAqLs4yMDC0MDYy4GSwc1TwcXV39NENDXZ0d1Vw9HP0iQz2DFbwd1NQ8nUMcQ3ydPRRcHQJcw0KdlVw9nD0c3dVUggI8g_zDPb09wvmYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMim6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4C0sDM0sDE2NjYtQAAFw0MEw</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Adams, Kenneth A</creator><general>Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS</title><author>Adams, Kenneth A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_890690433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Materiality</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Fordham journal of corporate & financial law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Kenneth A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS</atitle><jtitle>Fordham journal of corporate & financial law</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><issn>1532-303X</issn><abstract>Issues raised by material adverse change (MAC) provisions fall into two categories: those relating to using MAC provisions and - since MAC is generally used as a defined term - those relating to how MAC is defined. In discussing any given issue, this article considers the preferred approach and the more commonly used alternatives. MAC provisions are used in different parts of a contract. They occur most commonly in representations, where they can be used in two different ways. First, a party can make a representation regarding nonoccurrence of a MAC since a given date. Second, a MAC provision can serve to modify a representation as to some aspect of a party's operations so as to indicate the absence of anything leading to a MAC. MACs also occur in closing conditions. Any representation containing a MAC provision could, with a suitable introduction, constitute the basis for a condition.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-303X |
ispartof | Fordham journal of corporate & financial law, 2004-10, Vol.10 (1), p.9 |
issn | 1532-303X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_89069043 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agreements Changes Contract law Definitions Litigation Materiality Provisions Uncertainty |
title | A LEGAL-USAGE ANALYSIS OF "MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE" PROVISIONS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20LEGAL-USAGE%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20%22MATERIAL%20ADVERSE%20CHANGE%22%20PROVISIONS&rft.jtitle=Fordham%20journal%20of%20corporate%20&%20financial%20law&rft.au=Adams,%20Kenneth%20A&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.issn=1532-303X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E780200911%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=89069043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |