Water demand management optimization methodology
In contrast to traditional supply augmentation options, demand management options include specifying and/or replacing many small end uses that individually have a minimal effect on overall water use but that collectively can constitute significant aggregate reductions in demand. This article outline...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal - American Water Works Association 2011-09, Vol.103 (9), p.74-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Journal - American Water Works Association |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | FRIEDMAN, KENNETH HEANEY, JAMES P. MORALES, MIGUEL PALENCHAR, JOHN |
description | In contrast to traditional supply augmentation options, demand management options include specifying and/or replacing many small end uses that individually have a minimal effect on overall water use but that collectively can constitute significant aggregate reductions in demand. This article outlines a systematic procedure to quantify savings potential of single‐family residential indoor end‐use devices of a given utility and then select the optimal blend of retrofits to achieve a specified goal. Three steps are used to quantify savings potential of all end‐use devices. First, a utility's current end‐use fixture inventory and associated water use is estimated from parcel‐level data for each singlefamily residence. Second, customers are clustered into relatively homogeneous water use categories based on the age of the dwelling unit and the number of bathrooms. Third, water savings are calculated directly as the difference between current and proposed use after implementation of a management option for each group. This information is used to develop performance functions that estimate total water savings as a function of the number of fixture retrofits for each group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11534.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_889975368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41314658</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41314658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-875ace35fe22ea017af84e67356209d22a71bbfc4c47bf1c6f1ad94681b8102b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_ghC6T5w7r0zcheILCm6UuhsmyaQmNJk6mWLjrzcxpXs398E951z4EFoAjgBjcldHwDmEUlIaEQwQ-QyAUxYdztDsdDpHM4wxDYHjj0t01XX1sAIHNkN4rb1xQWEa3RbBUPTGNKb1gd35qql-tK9sGzTGf9rCbu2mv0YXpd525ubY5-j98eFt-RyuXp9elukqzBkVLJQx17mhvDSEGI0h1qVkRsSUC4KTghAdQ5aVOctZnJWQixJ0kTAhIZOASUbnaDHl7pz92pvOq9ruXTu8VFImScypkIPofhLlznadM6XauarRrleA1QhI1WqkoEYKagSkjoDUYTCnk_m72pr-H06Vrtfp3zxk3E4ZdeetO2UwoMAEl_QX9Hd3ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889975368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water demand management optimization methodology</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH ; HEANEY, JAMES P. ; MORALES, MIGUEL ; PALENCHAR, JOHN</creator><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH ; HEANEY, JAMES P. ; MORALES, MIGUEL ; PALENCHAR, JOHN</creatorcontrib><description>In contrast to traditional supply augmentation options, demand management options include specifying and/or replacing many small end uses that individually have a minimal effect on overall water use but that collectively can constitute significant aggregate reductions in demand. This article outlines a systematic procedure to quantify savings potential of single‐family residential indoor end‐use devices of a given utility and then select the optimal blend of retrofits to achieve a specified goal. Three steps are used to quantify savings potential of all end‐use devices. First, a utility's current end‐use fixture inventory and associated water use is estimated from parcel‐level data for each singlefamily residence. Second, customers are clustered into relatively homogeneous water use categories based on the age of the dwelling unit and the number of bathrooms. Third, water savings are calculated directly as the difference between current and proposed use after implementation of a management option for each group. This information is used to develop performance functions that estimate total water savings as a function of the number of fixture retrofits for each group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11534.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAWWA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denver: American Water Works Association</publisher><subject>Arithmetic mean ; Bathrooms ; Best Management Practices ; Censuses ; Cost control ; Cost Savings ; Customers ; Decision support systems ; Demand ; Geographic information systems ; Information attributes ; Management decisions ; Optimization ; Planning ; Residential Water Use ; resource management ; Software ; Studies ; Toilets ; Utility Management ; Water Conservation ; Water consumption ; Water demand ; Water management ; Water shortages ; Water utilities</subject><ispartof>Journal - American Water Works Association, 2011-09, Vol.103 (9), p.74-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>2011 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Works Association Sep 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-875ace35fe22ea017af84e67356209d22a71bbfc4c47bf1c6f1ad94681b8102b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-875ace35fe22ea017af84e67356209d22a71bbfc4c47bf1c6f1ad94681b8102b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41314658$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41314658$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEANEY, JAMES P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORALES, MIGUEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PALENCHAR, JOHN</creatorcontrib><title>Water demand management optimization methodology</title><title>Journal - American Water Works Association</title><description>In contrast to traditional supply augmentation options, demand management options include specifying and/or replacing many small end uses that individually have a minimal effect on overall water use but that collectively can constitute significant aggregate reductions in demand. This article outlines a systematic procedure to quantify savings potential of single‐family residential indoor end‐use devices of a given utility and then select the optimal blend of retrofits to achieve a specified goal. Three steps are used to quantify savings potential of all end‐use devices. First, a utility's current end‐use fixture inventory and associated water use is estimated from parcel‐level data for each singlefamily residence. Second, customers are clustered into relatively homogeneous water use categories based on the age of the dwelling unit and the number of bathrooms. Third, water savings are calculated directly as the difference between current and proposed use after implementation of a management option for each group. This information is used to develop performance functions that estimate total water savings as a function of the number of fixture retrofits for each group.</description><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Bathrooms</subject><subject>Best Management Practices</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Information attributes</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Residential Water Use</subject><subject>resource management</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toilets</subject><subject>Utility Management</subject><subject>Water Conservation</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water demand</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water utilities</subject><issn>0003-150X</issn><issn>1551-8833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_ghC6T5w7r0zcheILCm6UuhsmyaQmNJk6mWLjrzcxpXs398E951z4EFoAjgBjcldHwDmEUlIaEQwQ-QyAUxYdztDsdDpHM4wxDYHjj0t01XX1sAIHNkN4rb1xQWEa3RbBUPTGNKb1gd35qql-tK9sGzTGf9rCbu2mv0YXpd525ubY5-j98eFt-RyuXp9elukqzBkVLJQx17mhvDSEGI0h1qVkRsSUC4KTghAdQ5aVOctZnJWQixJ0kTAhIZOASUbnaDHl7pz92pvOq9ruXTu8VFImScypkIPofhLlznadM6XauarRrleA1QhI1WqkoEYKagSkjoDUYTCnk_m72pr-H06Vrtfp3zxk3E4ZdeetO2UwoMAEl_QX9Hd3ZA</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH</creator><creator>HEANEY, JAMES P.</creator><creator>MORALES, MIGUEL</creator><creator>PALENCHAR, JOHN</creator><general>American Water Works Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Water demand management optimization methodology</title><author>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH ; HEANEY, JAMES P. ; MORALES, MIGUEL ; PALENCHAR, JOHN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4364-875ace35fe22ea017af84e67356209d22a71bbfc4c47bf1c6f1ad94681b8102b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Bathrooms</topic><topic>Best Management Practices</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Information attributes</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Residential Water Use</topic><topic>resource management</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toilets</topic><topic>Utility Management</topic><topic>Water Conservation</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water demand</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEANEY, JAMES P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORALES, MIGUEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PALENCHAR, JOHN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRIEDMAN, KENNETH</au><au>HEANEY, JAMES P.</au><au>MORALES, MIGUEL</au><au>PALENCHAR, JOHN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water demand management optimization methodology</atitle><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>74-84</pages><issn>0003-150X</issn><eissn>1551-8833</eissn><coden>JAWWA5</coden><abstract>In contrast to traditional supply augmentation options, demand management options include specifying and/or replacing many small end uses that individually have a minimal effect on overall water use but that collectively can constitute significant aggregate reductions in demand. This article outlines a systematic procedure to quantify savings potential of single‐family residential indoor end‐use devices of a given utility and then select the optimal blend of retrofits to achieve a specified goal. Three steps are used to quantify savings potential of all end‐use devices. First, a utility's current end‐use fixture inventory and associated water use is estimated from parcel‐level data for each singlefamily residence. Second, customers are clustered into relatively homogeneous water use categories based on the age of the dwelling unit and the number of bathrooms. Third, water savings are calculated directly as the difference between current and proposed use after implementation of a management option for each group. This information is used to develop performance functions that estimate total water savings as a function of the number of fixture retrofits for each group.</abstract><cop>Denver</cop><pub>American Water Works Association</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11534.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-150X |
ispartof | Journal - American Water Works Association, 2011-09, Vol.103 (9), p.74-84 |
issn | 0003-150X 1551-8833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_889975368 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Arithmetic mean Bathrooms Best Management Practices Censuses Cost control Cost Savings Customers Decision support systems Demand Geographic information systems Information attributes Management decisions Optimization Planning Residential Water Use resource management Software Studies Toilets Utility Management Water Conservation Water consumption Water demand Water management Water shortages Water utilities |
title | Water demand management optimization methodology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A49%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20demand%20management%20optimization%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20American%20Water%20Works%20Association&rft.au=FRIEDMAN,%20KENNETH&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=74-84&rft.issn=0003-150X&rft.eissn=1551-8833&rft.coden=JAWWA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11534.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41314658%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889975368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41314658&rfr_iscdi=true |