Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation

We examined empirical and simulated estimates of canopy light attenuation at SETRES (Southeast Tree Research and Education Site), a 2×2 factorial study of water and nutrients. Fertilized plots had significantly lower under-canopy PAR transmittance (T^sub C^) when compared to non-fertilized plots. Li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trees (Berlin, West) West), 1998-11, Vol.13 (2), p.80-87
Hauptverfasser: SAMPSON, D. A, ALLEN, H. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 2
container_start_page 80
container_title Trees (Berlin, West)
container_volume 13
creator SAMPSON, D. A
ALLEN, H. L
description We examined empirical and simulated estimates of canopy light attenuation at SETRES (Southeast Tree Research and Education Site), a 2×2 factorial study of water and nutrients. Fertilized plots had significantly lower under-canopy PAR transmittance (T^sub C^) when compared to non-fertilized plots. Light interception efficiency, as measured by the canopy cosine-corrected light extinction coefficient, G, was significantly lower in irrigated plots for all dates examined. Estimates of G ranged from a low of 0.36 in irrigated plots in September to a high of 0.64 in March for control plots. Study-wide analyses indicate that a G of 0.50 and a k (uncorrected light extinction coefficient) of 0.69 may be reasonable parameter estimates of canopy light extinction in intermediate-aged loblolly pine plantations across a range of stand conditions and seasons when site-specific data are unavailable. Simulated T^sub C^ from our version of the BIOMASS model corresponded well to the empirical estimates. Varying the vertical distribution of foliage in simulations (from 10:60:30 to 40:40:10% in the upper, middle, and lower canopy positions, respectively) resulted in only a ±7% change in total PAR intercepted, whereas varying G from 0.3 to 0.7 resulted in a 67% and 31% increase in light intercepted for control and fertilized plots, respectively. Decreased G resulted in an increased proportion of beam radiation intercepted - 63-67% of total PAR intercepted - by the middle canopy where 55-60% of the foliage was found. We hypothesize that proportionally increased productivity observed in irrigated treatments may be attributed to increased beam radiation intercepted deeper into the canopy by a greater foliage area.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s004680050190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_884111389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2428124981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-5362d5ecea43bb36f4ea5d11b623e1ef48b91682662fe65033b5b4423a58d7733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOD6W7oO4rebm1XQpgy8YcKPrkrTJmCGmY5Iu6q-34wyIq8OF734HDkJXQG6BkPouE8KlIkQQaMgRWgBntKJUiWO0IA2DClRDTtFZzhtCCJNAF6hf-fVHwboUG0dd_BCxj1hj4NVkdaqG0OMwmDCEMOGtjxbnomOPdZ45F0YbO9tjM2FnU_HBf-8dO8Sn5Ne_5wU6cTpke3nIc_T--PC2fK5Wr08vy_tV1dEGSiWYpL2wndWcGcOk41aLHsBIyixYx5VpQCoqJXVWCsKYEYZzyrRQfV0zdo6u995tGr5Gm0u7GcYU58pWKQ4ATDUzVO2hLg05J-vabfKfOk0tkHa3Y_tvx5m_OUh17nRwScfO578n0YhaUfYDG0xxlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884111389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SAMPSON, D. A ; ALLEN, H. L</creator><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, D. A ; ALLEN, H. L</creatorcontrib><description>We examined empirical and simulated estimates of canopy light attenuation at SETRES (Southeast Tree Research and Education Site), a 2×2 factorial study of water and nutrients. Fertilized plots had significantly lower under-canopy PAR transmittance (T^sub C^) when compared to non-fertilized plots. Light interception efficiency, as measured by the canopy cosine-corrected light extinction coefficient, G, was significantly lower in irrigated plots for all dates examined. Estimates of G ranged from a low of 0.36 in irrigated plots in September to a high of 0.64 in March for control plots. Study-wide analyses indicate that a G of 0.50 and a k (uncorrected light extinction coefficient) of 0.69 may be reasonable parameter estimates of canopy light extinction in intermediate-aged loblolly pine plantations across a range of stand conditions and seasons when site-specific data are unavailable. Simulated T^sub C^ from our version of the BIOMASS model corresponded well to the empirical estimates. Varying the vertical distribution of foliage in simulations (from 10:60:30 to 40:40:10% in the upper, middle, and lower canopy positions, respectively) resulted in only a ±7% change in total PAR intercepted, whereas varying G from 0.3 to 0.7 resulted in a 67% and 31% increase in light intercepted for control and fertilized plots, respectively. Decreased G resulted in an increased proportion of beam radiation intercepted - 63-67% of total PAR intercepted - by the middle canopy where 55-60% of the foliage was found. We hypothesize that proportionally increased productivity observed in irrigated treatments may be attributed to increased beam radiation intercepted deeper into the canopy by a greater foliage area.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004680050190</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRESEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Canopies ; Dendrometry. Forest inventory ; Foliage ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Interception ; Light ; Pine trees ; Vertical distribution</subject><ispartof>Trees (Berlin, West), 1998-11, Vol.13 (2), p.80-87</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-5362d5ecea43bb36f4ea5d11b623e1ef48b91682662fe65033b5b4423a58d7733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1595782$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, H. L</creatorcontrib><title>Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation</title><title>Trees (Berlin, West)</title><description>We examined empirical and simulated estimates of canopy light attenuation at SETRES (Southeast Tree Research and Education Site), a 2×2 factorial study of water and nutrients. Fertilized plots had significantly lower under-canopy PAR transmittance (T^sub C^) when compared to non-fertilized plots. Light interception efficiency, as measured by the canopy cosine-corrected light extinction coefficient, G, was significantly lower in irrigated plots for all dates examined. Estimates of G ranged from a low of 0.36 in irrigated plots in September to a high of 0.64 in March for control plots. Study-wide analyses indicate that a G of 0.50 and a k (uncorrected light extinction coefficient) of 0.69 may be reasonable parameter estimates of canopy light extinction in intermediate-aged loblolly pine plantations across a range of stand conditions and seasons when site-specific data are unavailable. Simulated T^sub C^ from our version of the BIOMASS model corresponded well to the empirical estimates. Varying the vertical distribution of foliage in simulations (from 10:60:30 to 40:40:10% in the upper, middle, and lower canopy positions, respectively) resulted in only a ±7% change in total PAR intercepted, whereas varying G from 0.3 to 0.7 resulted in a 67% and 31% increase in light intercepted for control and fertilized plots, respectively. Decreased G resulted in an increased proportion of beam radiation intercepted - 63-67% of total PAR intercepted - by the middle canopy where 55-60% of the foliage was found. We hypothesize that proportionally increased productivity observed in irrigated treatments may be attributed to increased beam radiation intercepted deeper into the canopy by a greater foliage area.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Dendrometry. Forest inventory</subject><subject>Foliage</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Vertical distribution</subject><issn>0931-1890</issn><issn>1432-2285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOD6W7oO4rebm1XQpgy8YcKPrkrTJmCGmY5Iu6q-34wyIq8OF734HDkJXQG6BkPouE8KlIkQQaMgRWgBntKJUiWO0IA2DClRDTtFZzhtCCJNAF6hf-fVHwboUG0dd_BCxj1hj4NVkdaqG0OMwmDCEMOGtjxbnomOPdZ45F0YbO9tjM2FnU_HBf-8dO8Sn5Ne_5wU6cTpke3nIc_T--PC2fK5Wr08vy_tV1dEGSiWYpL2wndWcGcOk41aLHsBIyixYx5VpQCoqJXVWCsKYEYZzyrRQfV0zdo6u995tGr5Gm0u7GcYU58pWKQ4ATDUzVO2hLg05J-vabfKfOk0tkHa3Y_tvx5m_OUh17nRwScfO578n0YhaUfYDG0xxlw</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>SAMPSON, D. A</creator><creator>ALLEN, H. L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation</title><author>SAMPSON, D. A ; ALLEN, H. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-5362d5ecea43bb36f4ea5d11b623e1ef48b91682662fe65033b5b4423a58d7733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Dendrometry. Forest inventory</topic><topic>Foliage</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Vertical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, H. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAMPSON, D. A</au><au>ALLEN, H. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation</atitle><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>80-87</pages><issn>0931-1890</issn><eissn>1432-2285</eissn><coden>TRESEY</coden><abstract>We examined empirical and simulated estimates of canopy light attenuation at SETRES (Southeast Tree Research and Education Site), a 2×2 factorial study of water and nutrients. Fertilized plots had significantly lower under-canopy PAR transmittance (T^sub C^) when compared to non-fertilized plots. Light interception efficiency, as measured by the canopy cosine-corrected light extinction coefficient, G, was significantly lower in irrigated plots for all dates examined. Estimates of G ranged from a low of 0.36 in irrigated plots in September to a high of 0.64 in March for control plots. Study-wide analyses indicate that a G of 0.50 and a k (uncorrected light extinction coefficient) of 0.69 may be reasonable parameter estimates of canopy light extinction in intermediate-aged loblolly pine plantations across a range of stand conditions and seasons when site-specific data are unavailable. Simulated T^sub C^ from our version of the BIOMASS model corresponded well to the empirical estimates. Varying the vertical distribution of foliage in simulations (from 10:60:30 to 40:40:10% in the upper, middle, and lower canopy positions, respectively) resulted in only a ±7% change in total PAR intercepted, whereas varying G from 0.3 to 0.7 resulted in a 67% and 31% increase in light intercepted for control and fertilized plots, respectively. Decreased G resulted in an increased proportion of beam radiation intercepted - 63-67% of total PAR intercepted - by the middle canopy where 55-60% of the foliage was found. We hypothesize that proportionally increased productivity observed in irrigated treatments may be attributed to increased beam radiation intercepted deeper into the canopy by a greater foliage area.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s004680050190</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-1890
ispartof Trees (Berlin, West), 1998-11, Vol.13 (2), p.80-87
issn 0931-1890
1432-2285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_884111389
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Canopies
Dendrometry. Forest inventory
Foliage
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Interception
Light
Pine trees
Vertical distribution
title Light attenuation in a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand as influenced by fertilization and irrigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20attenuation%20in%20a%2014-year-old%20loblolly%20pine%20stand%20as%20influenced%20by%20fertilization%20and%20irrigation&rft.jtitle=Trees%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=SAMPSON,%20D.%20A&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=80-87&rft.issn=0931-1890&rft.eissn=1432-2285&rft.coden=TRESEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004680050190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2428124981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884111389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true