Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold
The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of legal medicine 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 657 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 651 |
container_title | International journal of legal medicine |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Yadava, Monica Roberts, Graham J. Lucas, Victoria S. |
description | The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_883228294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423904511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p248t-308ce55647ef91c92a425d830e4c1627a73a95229871c89cd5745350de2fcdd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtPQjEQhRujEUR_gBvTuNLF1enrtnWH4CshcaNL09TbuTwCXGwvC_j1loBxNWfmnMxMPkIuGdwxAH2fACSTBTAoQFpWbI9Il0mhC6ZseUy6YLO2husOOUtpBsB0qdUp6XAoDQhmu-RriMvWz6kfI_UpYUqLPKA3w37_9oFGrDHiskIafOtp3UT6GKftNE1oNZnOQ_aob2k7QZp_2KCPRTMPuY-YJlmdk5PazxNeHGqPfD4_fQxei9H7y9ugPypWXJq2EGAqVKqUGmvLKsu95CoYASgrVnLttfBWcW6NZpWxVVBaKqEgIK-rEKTokev93lVsftaYWjdr1nGZTzpjBOeG213o6hBafy8wuFWcLnzcuD8YOcD3gZSt5Rjj_xYGbkfc7Ym7TNztiLut-AVzUG8v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883228294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-9827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-1596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20680319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age ; Age Determination by Teeth - methods ; Archives & records ; Child ; Children & youth ; Data Collection - statistics & numerical data ; Databases, Factual ; Datasets ; Dentition, Mixed ; Female ; Females ; Forensic Medicine ; Hominids ; Human remains ; Humans ; Male ; Males ; Medical Law ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Original Article ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Reference Values ; Teeth ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of legal medicine, 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20680319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Graham J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><title>International journal of legal medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Determination by Teeth - methods</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Data Collection - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dentition, Mixed</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Hominids</subject><subject>Human remains</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0937-9827</issn><issn>1437-1596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtPQjEQhRujEUR_gBvTuNLF1enrtnWH4CshcaNL09TbuTwCXGwvC_j1loBxNWfmnMxMPkIuGdwxAH2fACSTBTAoQFpWbI9Il0mhC6ZseUy6YLO2husOOUtpBsB0qdUp6XAoDQhmu-RriMvWz6kfI_UpYUqLPKA3w37_9oFGrDHiskIafOtp3UT6GKftNE1oNZnOQ_aob2k7QZp_2KCPRTMPuY-YJlmdk5PazxNeHGqPfD4_fQxei9H7y9ugPypWXJq2EGAqVKqUGmvLKsu95CoYASgrVnLttfBWcW6NZpWxVVBaKqEgIK-rEKTokev93lVsftaYWjdr1nGZTzpjBOeG213o6hBafy8wuFWcLnzcuD8YOcD3gZSt5Rjj_xYGbkfc7Ym7TNztiLut-AVzUG8v</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Yadava, Monica</creator><creator>Roberts, Graham J.</creator><creator>Lucas, Victoria S.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><author>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p248t-308ce55647ef91c92a425d830e4c1627a73a95229871c89cd5745350de2fcdd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Determination by Teeth - methods</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Data Collection - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dentition, Mixed</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Hominids</topic><topic>Human remains</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Graham J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yadava, Monica</au><au>Roberts, Graham J.</au><au>Lucas, Victoria S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</atitle><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle><stitle>Int J Legal Med</stitle><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>657</epage><pages>651-657</pages><issn>0937-9827</issn><eissn>1437-1596</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20680319</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-9827 |
ispartof | International journal of legal medicine, 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657 |
issn | 0937-9827 1437-1596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_883228294 |
source | MEDLINE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age Age Determination by Teeth - methods Archives & records Child Children & youth Data Collection - statistics & numerical data Databases, Factual Datasets Dentition, Mixed Female Females Forensic Medicine Hominids Human remains Humans Male Males Medical Law Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Original Article Predictive Value of Tests Radiography, Panoramic Reference Values Teeth United Kingdom |
title | Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A43%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dental%20age%20assessment%20(DAA):%20reference%20data%20for%20British%20children%20at%20the%2010-year-old%20threshold&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20legal%20medicine&rft.au=Yadava,%20Monica&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=657&rft.pages=651-657&rft.issn=0937-9827&rft.eissn=1437-1596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2423904511%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883228294&rft_id=info:pmid/20680319&rfr_iscdi=true |