Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold

The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of legal medicine 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657
Hauptverfasser: Yadava, Monica, Roberts, Graham J., Lucas, Victoria S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 657
container_issue 5
container_start_page 651
container_title International journal of legal medicine
container_volume 125
creator Yadava, Monica
Roberts, Graham J.
Lucas, Victoria S.
description The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_883228294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423904511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p248t-308ce55647ef91c92a425d830e4c1627a73a95229871c89cd5745350de2fcdd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtPQjEQhRujEUR_gBvTuNLF1enrtnWH4CshcaNL09TbuTwCXGwvC_j1loBxNWfmnMxMPkIuGdwxAH2fACSTBTAoQFpWbI9Il0mhC6ZseUy6YLO2husOOUtpBsB0qdUp6XAoDQhmu-RriMvWz6kfI_UpYUqLPKA3w37_9oFGrDHiskIafOtp3UT6GKftNE1oNZnOQ_aob2k7QZp_2KCPRTMPuY-YJlmdk5PazxNeHGqPfD4_fQxei9H7y9ugPypWXJq2EGAqVKqUGmvLKsu95CoYASgrVnLttfBWcW6NZpWxVVBaKqEgIK-rEKTokev93lVsftaYWjdr1nGZTzpjBOeG213o6hBafy8wuFWcLnzcuD8YOcD3gZSt5Rjj_xYGbkfc7Ym7TNztiLut-AVzUG8v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883228294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-9827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-1596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20680319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age ; Age Determination by Teeth - methods ; Archives &amp; records ; Child ; Children &amp; youth ; Data Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Databases, Factual ; Datasets ; Dentition, Mixed ; Female ; Females ; Forensic Medicine ; Hominids ; Human remains ; Humans ; Male ; Males ; Medical Law ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Original Article ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Reference Values ; Teeth ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of legal medicine, 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20680319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Graham J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><title>International journal of legal medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Determination by Teeth - methods</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Data Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dentition, Mixed</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Hominids</subject><subject>Human remains</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0937-9827</issn><issn>1437-1596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtPQjEQhRujEUR_gBvTuNLF1enrtnWH4CshcaNL09TbuTwCXGwvC_j1loBxNWfmnMxMPkIuGdwxAH2fACSTBTAoQFpWbI9Il0mhC6ZseUy6YLO2husOOUtpBsB0qdUp6XAoDQhmu-RriMvWz6kfI_UpYUqLPKA3w37_9oFGrDHiskIafOtp3UT6GKftNE1oNZnOQ_aob2k7QZp_2KCPRTMPuY-YJlmdk5PazxNeHGqPfD4_fQxei9H7y9ugPypWXJq2EGAqVKqUGmvLKsu95CoYASgrVnLttfBWcW6NZpWxVVBaKqEgIK-rEKTokev93lVsftaYWjdr1nGZTzpjBOeG213o6hBafy8wuFWcLnzcuD8YOcD3gZSt5Rjj_xYGbkfc7Ym7TNztiLut-AVzUG8v</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Yadava, Monica</creator><creator>Roberts, Graham J.</creator><creator>Lucas, Victoria S.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</title><author>Yadava, Monica ; Roberts, Graham J. ; Lucas, Victoria S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p248t-308ce55647ef91c92a425d830e4c1627a73a95229871c89cd5745350de2fcdd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Determination by Teeth - methods</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Data Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dentition, Mixed</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Hominids</topic><topic>Human remains</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Graham J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Victoria S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yadava, Monica</au><au>Roberts, Graham J.</au><au>Lucas, Victoria S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold</atitle><jtitle>International journal of legal medicine</jtitle><stitle>Int J Legal Med</stitle><addtitle>Int J Legal Med</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>657</epage><pages>651-657</pages><issn>0937-9827</issn><eissn>1437-1596</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20680319</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-9827
ispartof International journal of legal medicine, 2011-09, Vol.125 (5), p.651-657
issn 0937-9827
1437-1596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_883228294
source MEDLINE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Age Determination by Teeth - methods
Archives & records
Child
Children & youth
Data Collection - statistics & numerical data
Databases, Factual
Datasets
Dentition, Mixed
Female
Females
Forensic Medicine
Hominids
Human remains
Humans
Male
Males
Medical Law
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Original Article
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiography, Panoramic
Reference Values
Teeth
United Kingdom
title Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A43%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dental%20age%20assessment%20(DAA):%20reference%20data%20for%20British%20children%20at%20the%2010-year-old%20threshold&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20legal%20medicine&rft.au=Yadava,%20Monica&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=657&rft.pages=651-657&rft.issn=0937-9827&rft.eissn=1437-1596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2423904511%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883228294&rft_id=info:pmid/20680319&rfr_iscdi=true