New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap

Vaccines-often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions-are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public que...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2011-08, Vol.378 (9790), p.526-535
Hauptverfasser: LARSON, Heidi J, COOPER, Louis Z, ESKOLA, Juhani, KATZ, Samuel L, RATZAN, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 535
container_issue 9790
container_start_page 526
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 378
creator LARSON, Heidi J
COOPER, Louis Z
ESKOLA, Juhani
KATZ, Samuel L
RATZAN, Scott
description Vaccines-often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions-are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public questioning of vaccines, and outline some of the specific determinants of public trust. Public decision making related to vaccine acceptance is neither driven by scientific nor economic evidence alone, but is also driven by a mix of psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, all of which need to be understood and taken into account by policy and other decision makers. Public trust in vaccines is highly variable and building trust depends on understanding perceptions of vaccines and vaccine risks, historical experiences, religious or political affiliations, and socioeconomic status. Although provision of accurate, scientifically based evidence on the risk-benefit ratios of vaccines is crucial, it is not enough to redress the gap between current levels of public confidence in vaccines and levels of trust needed to ensure adequate and sustained vaccine coverage. We call for more research not just on individual determinants of public trust, but on what mix of factors are most likely to sustain public trust. The vaccine community demands rigorous evidence on vaccine efficacy and safety and technical and operational feasibility when introducing a new vaccine, but has been negligent in demanding equally rigorous research to understand the psychological, social, and political factors that affect public trust in vaccines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_882583086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2422106871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p142t-319ce4bac17819ddbbd6f90926ae4bee73914f4746ae11f0c0a2bcf46e835f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jltLxDAQhYMoWFd_ghAEQR-qM02apC_Csl5h0Qcv-FbSZLJ2WdvadBX_vYVdfDqcOR9nDmPHCBcIqC6fASWkSgt1hniuQGmTmh2WoNQyzaV-32XJP7LPDmJcAoBUkCfs6pF--DU564m3gb9Z5-qGIs_51PueYqybBR8-iH9vEu7aJtSeGkd8YbtDthfsKtLRVifs9fbmZXafzp_uHmbTedqhzIZUYOFIVtahNlh4X1VehQKKTNnxTKRFgTKMc0ePGMCBzSoXpCIj8qBQTNjJprfr2681xaFctuu-GV-WxmS5EWDUCJ1uIRudXYXeNq6OZdfXn7b_LTMpIdOqEH8E6Fdd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>882583086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>LARSON, Heidi J ; COOPER, Louis Z ; ESKOLA, Juhani ; KATZ, Samuel L ; RATZAN, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>LARSON, Heidi J ; COOPER, Louis Z ; ESKOLA, Juhani ; KATZ, Samuel L ; RATZAN, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Vaccines-often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions-are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public questioning of vaccines, and outline some of the specific determinants of public trust. Public decision making related to vaccine acceptance is neither driven by scientific nor economic evidence alone, but is also driven by a mix of psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, all of which need to be understood and taken into account by policy and other decision makers. Public trust in vaccines is highly variable and building trust depends on understanding perceptions of vaccines and vaccine risks, historical experiences, religious or political affiliations, and socioeconomic status. Although provision of accurate, scientifically based evidence on the risk-benefit ratios of vaccines is crucial, it is not enough to redress the gap between current levels of public confidence in vaccines and levels of trust needed to ensure adequate and sustained vaccine coverage. We call for more research not just on individual determinants of public trust, but on what mix of factors are most likely to sustain public trust. The vaccine community demands rigorous evidence on vaccine efficacy and safety and technical and operational feasibility when introducing a new vaccine, but has been negligent in demanding equally rigorous research to understand the psychological, social, and political factors that affect public trust in vaccines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Climate change ; Community ; Decision making ; General aspects ; Health promotion ; Health services ; Immunization ; Medical sciences ; Politics ; Prevention and actions ; Public concern ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Socioeconomics ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2011-08, Vol.378 (9790), p.526-535</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 6-Aug 12, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/882583086?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24402769$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LARSON, Heidi J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, Louis Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESKOLA, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATZ, Samuel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATZAN, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Vaccines-often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions-are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public questioning of vaccines, and outline some of the specific determinants of public trust. Public decision making related to vaccine acceptance is neither driven by scientific nor economic evidence alone, but is also driven by a mix of psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, all of which need to be understood and taken into account by policy and other decision makers. Public trust in vaccines is highly variable and building trust depends on understanding perceptions of vaccines and vaccine risks, historical experiences, religious or political affiliations, and socioeconomic status. Although provision of accurate, scientifically based evidence on the risk-benefit ratios of vaccines is crucial, it is not enough to redress the gap between current levels of public confidence in vaccines and levels of trust needed to ensure adequate and sustained vaccine coverage. We call for more research not just on individual determinants of public trust, but on what mix of factors are most likely to sustain public trust. The vaccine community demands rigorous evidence on vaccine efficacy and safety and technical and operational feasibility when introducing a new vaccine, but has been negligent in demanding equally rigorous research to understand the psychological, social, and political factors that affect public trust in vaccines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jltLxDAQhYMoWFd_ghAEQR-qM02apC_Csl5h0Qcv-FbSZLJ2WdvadBX_vYVdfDqcOR9nDmPHCBcIqC6fASWkSgt1hniuQGmTmh2WoNQyzaV-32XJP7LPDmJcAoBUkCfs6pF--DU564m3gb9Z5-qGIs_51PueYqybBR8-iH9vEu7aJtSeGkd8YbtDthfsKtLRVifs9fbmZXafzp_uHmbTedqhzIZUYOFIVtahNlh4X1VehQKKTNnxTKRFgTKMc0ePGMCBzSoXpCIj8qBQTNjJprfr2681xaFctuu-GV-WxmS5EWDUCJ1uIRudXYXeNq6OZdfXn7b_LTMpIdOqEH8E6Fdd</recordid><startdate>20110806</startdate><enddate>20110806</enddate><creator>LARSON, Heidi J</creator><creator>COOPER, Louis Z</creator><creator>ESKOLA, Juhani</creator><creator>KATZ, Samuel L</creator><creator>RATZAN, Scott</creator><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110806</creationdate><title>New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap</title><author>LARSON, Heidi J ; COOPER, Louis Z ; ESKOLA, Juhani ; KATZ, Samuel L ; RATZAN, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p142t-319ce4bac17819ddbbd6f90926ae4bee73914f4746ae11f0c0a2bcf46e835f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LARSON, Heidi J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, Louis Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESKOLA, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATZ, Samuel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATZAN, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LARSON, Heidi J</au><au>COOPER, Louis Z</au><au>ESKOLA, Juhani</au><au>KATZ, Samuel L</au><au>RATZAN, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2011-08-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>378</volume><issue>9790</issue><spage>526</spage><epage>535</epage><pages>526-535</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Vaccines-often lauded as one of the greatest public health interventions-are losing public confidence. Some vaccine experts have referred to this decline in confidence as a crisis. We discuss some of the characteristics of the changing global environment that are contributing to increased public questioning of vaccines, and outline some of the specific determinants of public trust. Public decision making related to vaccine acceptance is neither driven by scientific nor economic evidence alone, but is also driven by a mix of psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, all of which need to be understood and taken into account by policy and other decision makers. Public trust in vaccines is highly variable and building trust depends on understanding perceptions of vaccines and vaccine risks, historical experiences, religious or political affiliations, and socioeconomic status. Although provision of accurate, scientifically based evidence on the risk-benefit ratios of vaccines is crucial, it is not enough to redress the gap between current levels of public confidence in vaccines and levels of trust needed to ensure adequate and sustained vaccine coverage. We call for more research not just on individual determinants of public trust, but on what mix of factors are most likely to sustain public trust. The vaccine community demands rigorous evidence on vaccine efficacy and safety and technical and operational feasibility when introducing a new vaccine, but has been negligent in demanding equally rigorous research to understand the psychological, social, and political factors that affect public trust in vaccines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2011-08, Vol.378 (9790), p.526-535
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_882583086
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Climate change
Community
Decision making
General aspects
Health promotion
Health services
Immunization
Medical sciences
Politics
Prevention and actions
Public concern
Public health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Socioeconomics
Vaccines
title New Decade of Vaccines 5 Addressing the vaccine confidence gap
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A17%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Decade%20of%20Vaccines%205%20Addressing%20the%20vaccine%20confidence%20gap&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=LARSON,%20Heidi%20J&rft.date=2011-08-06&rft.volume=378&rft.issue=9790&rft.spage=526&rft.epage=535&rft.pages=526-535&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2422106871%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=882583086&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true