Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers
Domestication of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Arg is a high priority for improving rural livelihoods of smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Domestication efforts require knowledge of adaptive traits and intra-specific variation. Morphological traits and amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) mar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New forests 2010-11, Vol.40 (3), p.383-399 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 399 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | New forests |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Mwase, Weston F Akinnifesi, F. K Stedje, B Kwapata, M. B Bjørnstad, Å |
description | Domestication of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Arg is a high priority for improving rural livelihoods of smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Domestication efforts require knowledge of adaptive traits and intra-specific variation. Morphological traits and amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to assess genetic variation in twelve provenances of U. kirkiana collected from southern Africa. Assessment of morphological traits showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between provenances. Provenances from Zimbabwe and Zambia showed faster growth than those from Malawi (except Phalombe) and Tanzania. Morphological traits exhibited strong genetic differentiation between provenances and within provenances. The degree of provenance differentiation of traits (Q ST = 0.03-0.139, Q ST mean = 0.092) was in the same range with that of AFLP loci (F ST mean = 0.089) detected among provenances and within provenances (0.002 < F ST < 0.259). The differentiation for some morphological traits could be attributed to local adaptation and human selection of the U. kirkiana trees at the site of origin. Mean Nei's (H) genetic diversity of AFLP showed high diversity within the provenances (H = 0.181-0.321, H mean = 0.256). An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation (90.8%) within provenances than among provenances (9.2%). There was no geographical pattern of variation in growth and morphological traits among the seed sources. Chipata provenance from Zambia was the most diverse while Mapanzure from Zimbabwe was the least diverse, though it was superior in height and earliest in fruiting. The pattern of genetic diversity indicates low selection in some areas and high gene flow which would be counteracting it. Therefore regional and country collections and conservation strategies should consider differences by focussing on the main range of the species by paying particular attention to unique populations within countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_882115818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421187541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-c9ec40c7164eec840479a48f5b14cb61c0d6f033d020c460753618224efdaa673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1EJZbSH9ATFveUGX8lOa4qWpC2Aonu2XIdJ-tu1l7sbKv2DP-KW_8YboPEjdNc3ueZmZeQU4QzBKg_ZkSQqgKEqmWgqsdXZIGy5pWEVr4mC0DVVoI16g15m_MtlCAwviA_L11wk7e083cuZT890Hs_bXygJnTU7GIYaI6HaeNSoMs-eWsC3ad454IJ1mUae7o2e2MN3fq09SYYevX0243jGX36lQZ6yL4odjHtN3GMQ-HHF_XyYvWN7kzalq3vyFFvxuxO_s5jsr74dH3-uVp9vfxyvlxVlvN2qmzrrABboxLO2UaAqFsjml7eoLA3Ci10qgfOO2BghYJacoUNY8L1nTGq5sfkw-wtD_w4uDzp23hIoazUTcMQZYNNCeEcsinmnFyv98mXQx80gn7uWs9d61Khfu5aPxaGzUwu2TC49E_8P-j9DPUmajMkn_X6OwPkgE3bSpT8D0Kajb8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>882115818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Mwase, Weston F ; Akinnifesi, F. K ; Stedje, B ; Kwapata, M. B ; Bjørnstad, Å</creator><creatorcontrib>Mwase, Weston F ; Akinnifesi, F. K ; Stedje, B ; Kwapata, M. B ; Bjørnstad, Å</creatorcontrib><description>Domestication of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Arg is a high priority for improving rural livelihoods of smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Domestication efforts require knowledge of adaptive traits and intra-specific variation. Morphological traits and amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to assess genetic variation in twelve provenances of U. kirkiana collected from southern Africa. Assessment of morphological traits showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between provenances. Provenances from Zimbabwe and Zambia showed faster growth than those from Malawi (except Phalombe) and Tanzania. Morphological traits exhibited strong genetic differentiation between provenances and within provenances. The degree of provenance differentiation of traits (Q ST = 0.03-0.139, Q ST mean = 0.092) was in the same range with that of AFLP loci (F ST mean = 0.089) detected among provenances and within provenances (0.002 < F ST < 0.259). The differentiation for some morphological traits could be attributed to local adaptation and human selection of the U. kirkiana trees at the site of origin. Mean Nei's (H) genetic diversity of AFLP showed high diversity within the provenances (H = 0.181-0.321, H mean = 0.256). An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation (90.8%) within provenances than among provenances (9.2%). There was no geographical pattern of variation in growth and morphological traits among the seed sources. Chipata provenance from Zambia was the most diverse while Mapanzure from Zimbabwe was the least diverse, though it was superior in height and earliest in fruiting. The pattern of genetic diversity indicates low selection in some areas and high gene flow which would be counteracting it. Therefore regional and country collections and conservation strategies should consider differences by focussing on the main range of the species by paying particular attention to unique populations within countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-4286</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>AFLP ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; Domestication ; Forestry ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic markers ; genetic variation ; Life Sciences ; Plant populations ; Population genetics ; provenance ; Small farms ; Trees ; Uapaca kirkiana ; UPGMA</subject><ispartof>New forests, 2010-11, Vol.40 (3), p.383-399</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-c9ec40c7164eec840479a48f5b14cb61c0d6f033d020c460753618224efdaa673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-c9ec40c7164eec840479a48f5b14cb61c0d6f033d020c460753618224efdaa673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mwase, Weston F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinnifesi, F. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stedje, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapata, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjørnstad, Å</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers</title><title>New forests</title><addtitle>New Forests</addtitle><description>Domestication of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Arg is a high priority for improving rural livelihoods of smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Domestication efforts require knowledge of adaptive traits and intra-specific variation. Morphological traits and amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to assess genetic variation in twelve provenances of U. kirkiana collected from southern Africa. Assessment of morphological traits showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between provenances. Provenances from Zimbabwe and Zambia showed faster growth than those from Malawi (except Phalombe) and Tanzania. Morphological traits exhibited strong genetic differentiation between provenances and within provenances. The degree of provenance differentiation of traits (Q ST = 0.03-0.139, Q ST mean = 0.092) was in the same range with that of AFLP loci (F ST mean = 0.089) detected among provenances and within provenances (0.002 < F ST < 0.259). The differentiation for some morphological traits could be attributed to local adaptation and human selection of the U. kirkiana trees at the site of origin. Mean Nei's (H) genetic diversity of AFLP showed high diversity within the provenances (H = 0.181-0.321, H mean = 0.256). An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation (90.8%) within provenances than among provenances (9.2%). There was no geographical pattern of variation in growth and morphological traits among the seed sources. Chipata provenance from Zambia was the most diverse while Mapanzure from Zimbabwe was the least diverse, though it was superior in height and earliest in fruiting. The pattern of genetic diversity indicates low selection in some areas and high gene flow which would be counteracting it. Therefore regional and country collections and conservation strategies should consider differences by focussing on the main range of the species by paying particular attention to unique populations within countries.</description><subject>AFLP</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Domestication</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Uapaca kirkiana</subject><subject>UPGMA</subject><issn>0169-4286</issn><issn>1573-5095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1EJZbSH9ATFveUGX8lOa4qWpC2Aonu2XIdJ-tu1l7sbKv2DP-KW_8YboPEjdNc3ueZmZeQU4QzBKg_ZkSQqgKEqmWgqsdXZIGy5pWEVr4mC0DVVoI16g15m_MtlCAwviA_L11wk7e083cuZT890Hs_bXygJnTU7GIYaI6HaeNSoMs-eWsC3ad454IJ1mUae7o2e2MN3fq09SYYevX0243jGX36lQZ6yL4odjHtN3GMQ-HHF_XyYvWN7kzalq3vyFFvxuxO_s5jsr74dH3-uVp9vfxyvlxVlvN2qmzrrABboxLO2UaAqFsjml7eoLA3Ci10qgfOO2BghYJacoUNY8L1nTGq5sfkw-wtD_w4uDzp23hIoazUTcMQZYNNCeEcsinmnFyv98mXQx80gn7uWs9d61Khfu5aPxaGzUwu2TC49E_8P-j9DPUmajMkn_X6OwPkgE3bSpT8D0Kajb8</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Mwase, Weston F</creator><creator>Akinnifesi, F. K</creator><creator>Stedje, B</creator><creator>Kwapata, M. B</creator><creator>Bjørnstad, Å</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers</title><author>Mwase, Weston F ; Akinnifesi, F. K ; Stedje, B ; Kwapata, M. B ; Bjørnstad, Å</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-c9ec40c7164eec840479a48f5b14cb61c0d6f033d020c460753618224efdaa673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>AFLP</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Domestication</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Uapaca kirkiana</topic><topic>UPGMA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mwase, Weston F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinnifesi, F. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stedje, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapata, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjørnstad, Å</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>New forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mwase, Weston F</au><au>Akinnifesi, F. K</au><au>Stedje, B</au><au>Kwapata, M. B</au><au>Bjørnstad, Å</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers</atitle><jtitle>New forests</jtitle><stitle>New Forests</stitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>383-399</pages><issn>0169-4286</issn><eissn>1573-5095</eissn><abstract>Domestication of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Arg is a high priority for improving rural livelihoods of smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Domestication efforts require knowledge of adaptive traits and intra-specific variation. Morphological traits and amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to assess genetic variation in twelve provenances of U. kirkiana collected from southern Africa. Assessment of morphological traits showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between provenances. Provenances from Zimbabwe and Zambia showed faster growth than those from Malawi (except Phalombe) and Tanzania. Morphological traits exhibited strong genetic differentiation between provenances and within provenances. The degree of provenance differentiation of traits (Q ST = 0.03-0.139, Q ST mean = 0.092) was in the same range with that of AFLP loci (F ST mean = 0.089) detected among provenances and within provenances (0.002 < F ST < 0.259). The differentiation for some morphological traits could be attributed to local adaptation and human selection of the U. kirkiana trees at the site of origin. Mean Nei's (H) genetic diversity of AFLP showed high diversity within the provenances (H = 0.181-0.321, H mean = 0.256). An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation (90.8%) within provenances than among provenances (9.2%). There was no geographical pattern of variation in growth and morphological traits among the seed sources. Chipata provenance from Zambia was the most diverse while Mapanzure from Zimbabwe was the least diverse, though it was superior in height and earliest in fruiting. The pattern of genetic diversity indicates low selection in some areas and high gene flow which would be counteracting it. Therefore regional and country collections and conservation strategies should consider differences by focussing on the main range of the species by paying particular attention to unique populations within countries.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-4286 |
ispartof | New forests, 2010-11, Vol.40 (3), p.383-399 |
issn | 0169-4286 1573-5095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_882115818 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | AFLP Biomedical and Life Sciences Conservation Domestication Forestry Genetic diversity Genetic markers genetic variation Life Sciences Plant populations Population genetics provenance Small farms Trees Uapaca kirkiana UPGMA |
title | Genetic diversity within and among southern African provenances of Uapaca kirkiana Müell. Årg using morphological and AFLP markers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A42%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20diversity%20within%20and%20among%20southern%20African%20provenances%20of%20Uapaca%20kirkiana%20M%C3%BCell.%20%C3%85rg%20using%20morphological%20and%20AFLP%20markers&rft.jtitle=New%20forests&rft.au=Mwase,%20Weston%20F&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=383-399&rft.issn=0169-4286&rft.eissn=1573-5095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11056-010-9206-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421187541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=882115818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |