Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana
Hyperspectral plant signatures can be used as a short-term, as well as long-term (100-year timescale) monitoring technique to verify that CO 2 sequestration fields have not been compromised. An influx of CO 2 gas into the soil can stress vegetation, which causes changes in the visible to near-infrar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental earth sciences 2010-03, Vol.60 (2), p.251-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Environmental earth sciences |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Male, Erin Jing Pickles, William L. Silver, Eli A. Hoffmann, Gary D. Lewicki, Jennifer Apple, Martha Repasky, Kevin Burton, Elizabeth A. |
description | Hyperspectral plant signatures can be used as a short-term, as well as long-term (100-year timescale) monitoring technique to verify that CO
2
sequestration fields have not been compromised. An influx of CO
2
gas into the soil can stress vegetation, which causes changes in the visible to near-infrared reflectance spectral signature of the vegetation. For 29 days, beginning on July 9, 2008, pure carbon dioxide gas was released through a 100-m long horizontal injection well, at a flow rate of 300 kg day
−1
. Spectral signatures were recorded almost daily from an unmown patch of plants over the injection with a “FieldSpec Pro” spectrometer by Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. Measurements were taken both inside and outside of the CO
2
leak zone to normalize observations for other environmental factors affecting the plants. Four to five days after the injection began, stress was observed in the spectral signatures of plants within 1 m of the well. After approximately 10 days, moderate to high amounts of stress were measured out to 2.5 m from the well. This spatial distribution corresponded to areas of high CO
2
flux from the injection. Airborne hyperspectral imagery, acquired by Resonon, Inc. of Bozeman, MT using their hyperspectral camera, also showed the same pattern of plant stress. Spectral signatures of the plants were also compared to the CO
2
concentrations in the soil, which indicated that the lower limit of soil CO
2
needed to stress vegetation is between 4 and 8% by volume. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_881063539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416939821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd20c168946984ebd7a213428641985e0a507632d48f16b34d285ee307fb32ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhosoOOZ-gHfBa6snSZumlzrmB0wE2W68CVl7unV2aU1acP4B_7bpKnplbhLC877n8ATBOYUrCpBcO8qEiEOANASesJAdBSMqhQgFS9Pj37eE02Di3Bb84ZSnIEbB19KVZk02-watazBrra5IU2nTEleujW47i44UtSXTZ0Yq1G8kx9ZzZW1I3tk-3G6QMABJXmcviwPn8L1D57sOWFFilRP88CPKHfrm0pDb-hN32lySp9q02uiz4KTQlcPJzz0OlnezxfQhnD_fP05v5mHGY9mGec4go0KmkUhlhKs80YzyiEkR0VTGCDqGRHCWR7KgYsWjnPlf5JAUK84w4-PgYuhtbH3YUW3rzho_UklJQfCYpx6iA5TZ2jmLhWr85truFQXVG1eDceWNq964Yj7Dhoxreilo_4r_D30DMY-Czg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881063539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Male, Erin Jing ; Pickles, William L. ; Silver, Eli A. ; Hoffmann, Gary D. ; Lewicki, Jennifer ; Apple, Martha ; Repasky, Kevin ; Burton, Elizabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Male, Erin Jing ; Pickles, William L. ; Silver, Eli A. ; Hoffmann, Gary D. ; Lewicki, Jennifer ; Apple, Martha ; Repasky, Kevin ; Burton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Hyperspectral plant signatures can be used as a short-term, as well as long-term (100-year timescale) monitoring technique to verify that CO
2
sequestration fields have not been compromised. An influx of CO
2
gas into the soil can stress vegetation, which causes changes in the visible to near-infrared reflectance spectral signature of the vegetation. For 29 days, beginning on July 9, 2008, pure carbon dioxide gas was released through a 100-m long horizontal injection well, at a flow rate of 300 kg day
−1
. Spectral signatures were recorded almost daily from an unmown patch of plants over the injection with a “FieldSpec Pro” spectrometer by Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. Measurements were taken both inside and outside of the CO
2
leak zone to normalize observations for other environmental factors affecting the plants. Four to five days after the injection began, stress was observed in the spectral signatures of plants within 1 m of the well. After approximately 10 days, moderate to high amounts of stress were measured out to 2.5 m from the well. This spatial distribution corresponded to areas of high CO
2
flux from the injection. Airborne hyperspectral imagery, acquired by Resonon, Inc. of Bozeman, MT using their hyperspectral camera, also showed the same pattern of plant stress. Spectral signatures of the plants were also compared to the CO
2
concentrations in the soil, which indicated that the lower limit of soil CO
2
needed to stress vegetation is between 4 and 8% by volume.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide fixation ; Carbon sequestration ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental factors ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Flow rates ; Flowers & plants ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Injection ; Leak detection ; Leakage ; Spatial distribution ; Special Issue ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2010-03, Vol.60 (2), p.251-261</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2009</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd20c168946984ebd7a213428641985e0a507632d48f16b34d285ee307fb32ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd20c168946984ebd7a213428641985e0a507632d48f16b34d285ee307fb32ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Male, Erin Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickles, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Eli A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Gary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repasky, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>Hyperspectral plant signatures can be used as a short-term, as well as long-term (100-year timescale) monitoring technique to verify that CO
2
sequestration fields have not been compromised. An influx of CO
2
gas into the soil can stress vegetation, which causes changes in the visible to near-infrared reflectance spectral signature of the vegetation. For 29 days, beginning on July 9, 2008, pure carbon dioxide gas was released through a 100-m long horizontal injection well, at a flow rate of 300 kg day
−1
. Spectral signatures were recorded almost daily from an unmown patch of plants over the injection with a “FieldSpec Pro” spectrometer by Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. Measurements were taken both inside and outside of the CO
2
leak zone to normalize observations for other environmental factors affecting the plants. Four to five days after the injection began, stress was observed in the spectral signatures of plants within 1 m of the well. After approximately 10 days, moderate to high amounts of stress were measured out to 2.5 m from the well. This spatial distribution corresponded to areas of high CO
2
flux from the injection. Airborne hyperspectral imagery, acquired by Resonon, Inc. of Bozeman, MT using their hyperspectral camera, also showed the same pattern of plant stress. Spectral signatures of the plants were also compared to the CO
2
concentrations in the soil, which indicated that the lower limit of soil CO
2
needed to stress vegetation is between 4 and 8% by volume.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Leak detection</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhosoOOZ-gHfBa6snSZumlzrmB0wE2W68CVl7unV2aU1acP4B_7bpKnplbhLC877n8ATBOYUrCpBcO8qEiEOANASesJAdBSMqhQgFS9Pj37eE02Di3Bb84ZSnIEbB19KVZk02-watazBrra5IU2nTEleujW47i44UtSXTZ0Yq1G8kx9ZzZW1I3tk-3G6QMABJXmcviwPn8L1D57sOWFFilRP88CPKHfrm0pDb-hN32lySp9q02uiz4KTQlcPJzz0OlnezxfQhnD_fP05v5mHGY9mGec4go0KmkUhlhKs80YzyiEkR0VTGCDqGRHCWR7KgYsWjnPlf5JAUK84w4-PgYuhtbH3YUW3rzho_UklJQfCYpx6iA5TZ2jmLhWr85truFQXVG1eDceWNq964Yj7Dhoxreilo_4r_D30DMY-Czg</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Male, Erin Jing</creator><creator>Pickles, William L.</creator><creator>Silver, Eli A.</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Gary D.</creator><creator>Lewicki, Jennifer</creator><creator>Apple, Martha</creator><creator>Repasky, Kevin</creator><creator>Burton, Elizabeth A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana</title><author>Male, Erin Jing ; Pickles, William L. ; Silver, Eli A. ; Hoffmann, Gary D. ; Lewicki, Jennifer ; Apple, Martha ; Repasky, Kevin ; Burton, Elizabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-dd20c168946984ebd7a213428641985e0a507632d48f16b34d285ee307fb32ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Leak detection</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Male, Erin Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickles, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Eli A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Gary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repasky, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Male, Erin Jing</au><au>Pickles, William L.</au><au>Silver, Eli A.</au><au>Hoffmann, Gary D.</au><au>Lewicki, Jennifer</au><au>Apple, Martha</au><au>Repasky, Kevin</au><au>Burton, Elizabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>251-261</pages><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>Hyperspectral plant signatures can be used as a short-term, as well as long-term (100-year timescale) monitoring technique to verify that CO
2
sequestration fields have not been compromised. An influx of CO
2
gas into the soil can stress vegetation, which causes changes in the visible to near-infrared reflectance spectral signature of the vegetation. For 29 days, beginning on July 9, 2008, pure carbon dioxide gas was released through a 100-m long horizontal injection well, at a flow rate of 300 kg day
−1
. Spectral signatures were recorded almost daily from an unmown patch of plants over the injection with a “FieldSpec Pro” spectrometer by Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. Measurements were taken both inside and outside of the CO
2
leak zone to normalize observations for other environmental factors affecting the plants. Four to five days after the injection began, stress was observed in the spectral signatures of plants within 1 m of the well. After approximately 10 days, moderate to high amounts of stress were measured out to 2.5 m from the well. This spatial distribution corresponded to areas of high CO
2
flux from the injection. Airborne hyperspectral imagery, acquired by Resonon, Inc. of Bozeman, MT using their hyperspectral camera, also showed the same pattern of plant stress. Spectral signatures of the plants were also compared to the CO
2
concentrations in the soil, which indicated that the lower limit of soil CO
2
needed to stress vegetation is between 4 and 8% by volume.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-6280 |
ispartof | Environmental earth sciences, 2010-03, Vol.60 (2), p.251-261 |
issn | 1866-6280 1866-6299 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_881063539 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Biogeosciences Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide fixation Carbon sequestration Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental factors Environmental Science and Engineering Flow rates Flowers & plants Geochemistry Geology Hydrology/Water Resources Injection Leak detection Leakage Spatial distribution Special Issue Terrestrial Pollution Vegetation |
title | Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A55%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20hyperspectral%20plant%20signatures%20for%20CO2%20leak%20detection%20during%20the%202008%20ZERT%20CO2%20sequestration%20field%20experiment%20in%20Bozeman,%20Montana&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Male,%20Erin%20Jing&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=251-261&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416939821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881063539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |