Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM
Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to "theft from financial institutions". In case of "extremely huge amount", according to China's Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers of law in China 2008-12, Vol.3 (4), p.494-506 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 506 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 494 |
| container_title | Frontiers of law in China |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Fu, Liqing |
| description | Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to "theft from financial institutions". In case of "extremely huge amount", according to China's Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too severe. So far as judiciaries are concerned, reflection should be made with respect to the relevant legislative provisions. In handling individual cases, the wisest practice for judiciaries is to refer to the provision of clause 2 of article 63 of the Criminal Law, hence submitting them to the examination and approval by the Supreme Court for mitigation of penalties. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_881060414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416891631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2317-6c6933cd2423386ad1e31ae4c43843f5e126aa445e7723848cf936a825ace54f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvwXs2XpGl2HEOdMPEyzyGkX9aOrp1Jy9i_N6MTbzuEhO97nxfyEPII7BkYK14igFQiY0ynw0VWXJEJqEJkIpdw_feWXN-Suxi3jOWgcj0hy3lrm2OsI-1a2ldIG9zYhra2HwLSztOdbWpXd0Okh7qvymAPae1Dt6OWlujR9VjS-frzntx420R8ON9T8v32ul4ss9XX-8divsocF1BkyqmZEK7kkguhlS0BBViUTgothc8RuLJWyhyLgqeRdn4mlNU8tw5z6cWUPI29-9D9DBh7s-2GkD4RjdbAFJMgUwjGkAtdjAG92Yd6Z8PRADMnX2b0ZZIvc_JlisTwkYkp224w_BdfgvQIVfWmwoDlPmCMJvlp-xrDJfQX_PF9pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881060414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Fu, Liqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Liqing</creatorcontrib><description>Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to "theft from financial institutions". In case of "extremely huge amount", according to China's Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too severe. So far as judiciaries are concerned, reflection should be made with respect to the relevant legislative provisions. In handling individual cases, the wisest practice for judiciaries is to refer to the provision of clause 2 of article 63 of the Criminal Law, hence submitting them to the examination and approval by the Supreme Court for mitigation of penalties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-3428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1673-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>Criminal law ; financial institution ; Fundamentals of Law ; Law ; Law and Criminology ; malicious withdrawal ; Research Article ; State court decisions ; theft</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of law in China, 2008-12, Vol.3 (4), p.494-506</ispartof><rights>Copyright reserved, 2014, Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters</rights><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Liqing</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM</title><title>Frontiers of law in China</title><addtitle>Front Law Chin</addtitle><addtitle>Front. Law China</addtitle><description>Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to "theft from financial institutions". In case of "extremely huge amount", according to China's Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too severe. So far as judiciaries are concerned, reflection should be made with respect to the relevant legislative provisions. In handling individual cases, the wisest practice for judiciaries is to refer to the provision of clause 2 of article 63 of the Criminal Law, hence submitting them to the examination and approval by the Supreme Court for mitigation of penalties.</description><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>financial institution</subject><subject>Fundamentals of Law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>malicious withdrawal</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>theft</subject><issn>1673-3428</issn><issn>1673-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvwXs2XpGl2HEOdMPEyzyGkX9aOrp1Jy9i_N6MTbzuEhO97nxfyEPII7BkYK14igFQiY0ynw0VWXJEJqEJkIpdw_feWXN-Suxi3jOWgcj0hy3lrm2OsI-1a2ldIG9zYhra2HwLSztOdbWpXd0Okh7qvymAPae1Dt6OWlujR9VjS-frzntx420R8ON9T8v32ul4ss9XX-8divsocF1BkyqmZEK7kkguhlS0BBViUTgothc8RuLJWyhyLgqeRdn4mlNU8tw5z6cWUPI29-9D9DBh7s-2GkD4RjdbAFJMgUwjGkAtdjAG92Yd6Z8PRADMnX2b0ZZIvc_JlisTwkYkp224w_BdfgvQIVfWmwoDlPmCMJvlp-xrDJfQX_PF9pA</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Fu, Liqing</creator><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>SP Higher Education Press</general><general>Higher Education Press Limited Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM</title><author>Fu, Liqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2317-6c6933cd2423386ad1e31ae4c43843f5e126aa445e7723848cf936a825ace54f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>financial institution</topic><topic>Fundamentals of Law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>malicious withdrawal</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>theft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Liqing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of law in China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Liqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of law in China</jtitle><stitle>Front Law Chin</stitle><stitle>Front. Law China</stitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>494-506</pages><issn>1673-3428</issn><eissn>1673-3541</eissn><abstract>Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to "theft from financial institutions". In case of "extremely huge amount", according to China's Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too severe. So far as judiciaries are concerned, reflection should be made with respect to the relevant legislative provisions. In handling individual cases, the wisest practice for judiciaries is to refer to the provision of clause 2 of article 63 of the Criminal Law, hence submitting them to the examination and approval by the Supreme Court for mitigation of penalties.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1673-3428 |
| ispartof | Frontiers of law in China, 2008-12, Vol.3 (4), p.494-506 |
| issn | 1673-3428 1673-3541 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_881060414 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Criminal law financial institution Fundamentals of Law Law Law and Criminology malicious withdrawal Research Article State court decisions theft |
| title | Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A44%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20on%20the%20legal%20nature%20of%20malicious%20withdrawal%20from%20a%20defected%20ATM&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20law%20in%20China&rft.au=Fu,%20Liqing&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=494-506&rft.issn=1673-3428&rft.eissn=1673-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416891631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881060414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |