Finding fault with Ault - why the exclusion of subsequent design change evidence in product liability cases makes sense, even in California
The following is an all too common occurrence in products liability cases alleging a design defect: a plaintiff alleges he or she was injured due to a design defect in a product; the manufacturer of the product, at some point after the accident, alters the very design feature plaintiff alleges was t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Defense counsel journal 2011-07, Vol.78 (3), p.285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!