Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri

Integrated water management systems using drainage plus subirrigation (DSI) have reduced nitrate-loading of drainage water flow and may increase soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Shallow drain tile depths and narrow spacings are recommended for claypan soils. Field research (2003–2006) evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2011-07, Vol.103 (4), p.1216-1222
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, K.A, Smoot, R.L, Meinhardt, C.G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1222
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1216
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 103
creator Nelson, K.A
Smoot, R.L
Meinhardt, C.G
description Integrated water management systems using drainage plus subirrigation (DSI) have reduced nitrate-loading of drainage water flow and may increase soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Shallow drain tile depths and narrow spacings are recommended for claypan soils. Field research (2003–2006) evaluated the effects of drainage (DO) and DSI on planting date and the effects of DO and DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings on soybean yield compared to nondrained (ND) and nondrained delayed planting (NDDP) controls on claypan soils. Soybean were planted up to 17 d earlier with DO or DSI systems. Plant populations were reduced 29 to 52% in the nondrained control due to poor drainage in 3 of the 4 yr. Grain yield, water applied through the DSI system, and water level depth were similar at a 6.1 or 12.2 m drain tile spacing. Average yield increase with DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings was 12 to 29% (410–910 kg ha−1) while DO at the same spacings increased yield 9 to 22% (300–710 kg ha−1) compared to ND or NDDP controls. In a dry year (2005), drainage plus subirrigation increased yield up to 1200 kg ha−1 compared to DO. Plant population variability at harvest was lower with the DO or DSI systems compared to ND or NDDP controls. Yield variability over the 4 yr was lower with DSI compared with DO or ND controls, which was affected by the spring–summer precipitation regimes and is important to farmers for a more predictable soybean marketing strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2011.0067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_878683404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2405102991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-e3e6083478a7b7159589ede24b0ef25f216c39099bb11d5bcc414345d56ee5033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAYhYMoOKfXXhoEL7vlsx9XMqZOx9xgdd6WtE1nRk1m0iH996Z06KUQeCE55zzkvABcYzQimLKx2FqjdwRhPEIojE7AADPKAxQyfgoGCCES4CQk5-DCuR3ysoThAXhPTZtLoeFaur3RTsLGwAcrlBZbCYUuYXrIlbVqKxplNPRHwGkt2r33pEbVUGm4NLb5kMI18FU5Zw5WXYKzStROXh3nEGyeHt-mz8FiNXuZThZBQaM4CiSVIYopi2IR5RHmCY8TWUrCciQrwiuCw4ImKEnyHOOS50XB_KcYL3koJUeUDsFtn7u35usgXZPtPF57ZBZHceijEfOicS8qrHHOyirbW_UpbJthlHXdZX_dZV133nF3jBWuEHVlhS6U-7URxhimpMPf97pvVcv2v9hsMpuTyWy9Ws67uyPppk-ohOn0nrJJ_Sv3C-OEs5D-AD3Iixo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878683404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nelson, K.A ; Smoot, R.L ; Meinhardt, C.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, K.A ; Smoot, R.L ; Meinhardt, C.G</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated water management systems using drainage plus subirrigation (DSI) have reduced nitrate-loading of drainage water flow and may increase soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Shallow drain tile depths and narrow spacings are recommended for claypan soils. Field research (2003–2006) evaluated the effects of drainage (DO) and DSI on planting date and the effects of DO and DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings on soybean yield compared to nondrained (ND) and nondrained delayed planting (NDDP) controls on claypan soils. Soybean were planted up to 17 d earlier with DO or DSI systems. Plant populations were reduced 29 to 52% in the nondrained control due to poor drainage in 3 of the 4 yr. Grain yield, water applied through the DSI system, and water level depth were similar at a 6.1 or 12.2 m drain tile spacing. Average yield increase with DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings was 12 to 29% (410–910 kg ha−1) while DO at the same spacings increased yield 9 to 22% (300–710 kg ha−1) compared to ND or NDDP controls. In a dry year (2005), drainage plus subirrigation increased yield up to 1200 kg ha−1 compared to DO. Plant population variability at harvest was lower with the DO or DSI systems compared to ND or NDDP controls. Yield variability over the 4 yr was lower with DSI compared with DO or ND controls, which was affected by the spring–summer precipitation regimes and is important to farmers for a more predictable soybean marketing strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2011.0067</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; claypan soils ; drainage ; drainage water ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Glycine max ; grain yield ; management systems ; marketing ; planting date ; Soybeans ; Subsurface irrigation ; water flow ; water management</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2011-07, Vol.103 (4), p.1216-1222</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-e3e6083478a7b7159589ede24b0ef25f216c39099bb11d5bcc414345d56ee5033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-e3e6083478a7b7159589ede24b0ef25f216c39099bb11d5bcc414345d56ee5033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2011.0067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2011.0067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24441323$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinhardt, C.G</creatorcontrib><title>Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Integrated water management systems using drainage plus subirrigation (DSI) have reduced nitrate-loading of drainage water flow and may increase soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Shallow drain tile depths and narrow spacings are recommended for claypan soils. Field research (2003–2006) evaluated the effects of drainage (DO) and DSI on planting date and the effects of DO and DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings on soybean yield compared to nondrained (ND) and nondrained delayed planting (NDDP) controls on claypan soils. Soybean were planted up to 17 d earlier with DO or DSI systems. Plant populations were reduced 29 to 52% in the nondrained control due to poor drainage in 3 of the 4 yr. Grain yield, water applied through the DSI system, and water level depth were similar at a 6.1 or 12.2 m drain tile spacing. Average yield increase with DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings was 12 to 29% (410–910 kg ha−1) while DO at the same spacings increased yield 9 to 22% (300–710 kg ha−1) compared to ND or NDDP controls. In a dry year (2005), drainage plus subirrigation increased yield up to 1200 kg ha−1 compared to DO. Plant population variability at harvest was lower with the DO or DSI systems compared to ND or NDDP controls. Yield variability over the 4 yr was lower with DSI compared with DO or ND controls, which was affected by the spring–summer precipitation regimes and is important to farmers for a more predictable soybean marketing strategy.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>claypan soils</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>drainage water</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>management systems</subject><subject>marketing</subject><subject>planting date</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Subsurface irrigation</subject><subject>water flow</subject><subject>water management</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAYhYMoOKfXXhoEL7vlsx9XMqZOx9xgdd6WtE1nRk1m0iH996Z06KUQeCE55zzkvABcYzQimLKx2FqjdwRhPEIojE7AADPKAxQyfgoGCCES4CQk5-DCuR3ysoThAXhPTZtLoeFaur3RTsLGwAcrlBZbCYUuYXrIlbVqKxplNPRHwGkt2r33pEbVUGm4NLb5kMI18FU5Zw5WXYKzStROXh3nEGyeHt-mz8FiNXuZThZBQaM4CiSVIYopi2IR5RHmCY8TWUrCciQrwiuCw4ImKEnyHOOS50XB_KcYL3koJUeUDsFtn7u35usgXZPtPF57ZBZHceijEfOicS8qrHHOyirbW_UpbJthlHXdZX_dZV133nF3jBWuEHVlhS6U-7URxhimpMPf97pvVcv2v9hsMpuTyWy9Ws67uyPppk-ohOn0nrJJ_Sv3C-OEs5D-AD3Iixo</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Nelson, K.A</creator><creator>Smoot, R.L</creator><creator>Meinhardt, C.G</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri</title><author>Nelson, K.A ; Smoot, R.L ; Meinhardt, C.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3787-e3e6083478a7b7159589ede24b0ef25f216c39099bb11d5bcc414345d56ee5033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>claypan soils</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>drainage water</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>management systems</topic><topic>marketing</topic><topic>planting date</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Subsurface irrigation</topic><topic>water flow</topic><topic>water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinhardt, C.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, K.A</au><au>Smoot, R.L</au><au>Meinhardt, C.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1216</spage><epage>1222</epage><pages>1216-1222</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Integrated water management systems using drainage plus subirrigation (DSI) have reduced nitrate-loading of drainage water flow and may increase soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Shallow drain tile depths and narrow spacings are recommended for claypan soils. Field research (2003–2006) evaluated the effects of drainage (DO) and DSI on planting date and the effects of DO and DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings on soybean yield compared to nondrained (ND) and nondrained delayed planting (NDDP) controls on claypan soils. Soybean were planted up to 17 d earlier with DO or DSI systems. Plant populations were reduced 29 to 52% in the nondrained control due to poor drainage in 3 of the 4 yr. Grain yield, water applied through the DSI system, and water level depth were similar at a 6.1 or 12.2 m drain tile spacing. Average yield increase with DSI at 6.1 and 12.2 m spacings was 12 to 29% (410–910 kg ha−1) while DO at the same spacings increased yield 9 to 22% (300–710 kg ha−1) compared to ND or NDDP controls. In a dry year (2005), drainage plus subirrigation increased yield up to 1200 kg ha−1 compared to DO. Plant population variability at harvest was lower with the DO or DSI systems compared to ND or NDDP controls. Yield variability over the 4 yr was lower with DSI compared with DO or ND controls, which was affected by the spring–summer precipitation regimes and is important to farmers for a more predictable soybean marketing strategy.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2011.0067</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2011-07, Vol.103 (4), p.1216-1222
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_878683404
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
claypan soils
drainage
drainage water
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Glycine max
grain yield
management systems
marketing
planting date
Soybeans
Subsurface irrigation
water flow
water management
title Soybean Response to Drainage and Subirrigation on a Claypan Soil in Northeast Missouri
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soybean%20Response%20to%20Drainage%20and%20Subirrigation%20on%20a%20Claypan%20Soil%20in%20Northeast%20Missouri&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Nelson,%20K.A&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1216&rft.epage=1222&rft.pages=1216-1222&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2011.0067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2405102991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878683404&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true