Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

On 1 July 1997, British Hong Kong--including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories--was formally transferred from British possession to the People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Hong Kong Basic Law, the area of Hong Kong would be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.) U.K.), 2011, Vol.1 (2), p.423
1. Verfasser: CALDWELL, P Ernest
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 423
container_title Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.)
container_volume 1
creator CALDWELL, P Ernest
description On 1 July 1997, British Hong Kong--including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories--was formally transferred from British possession to the People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Hong Kong Basic Law, the area of Hong Kong would be renamed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), it would be granted a considerable amount of autonomy from PRC central government control during a transitional period under the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] principle, and the majority of international conventions applying to Hong Kong prior to 1 July 1997 would remain in force. The terms of the transfer were met with joy by some, trepidation by others. Yet for lawyers, policy-makers, and international organizations these terms engendered confusion, much of which remains today, over the true nature of Hong Kong's autonomy and its status in international law. Wong's book, +Italic Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region -Italic attempts to address this confusion in two ways. First, Wong contextualizes Hong Kong's status vis-à-vis the PRC and the international community within the greater legal and political discourse on concepts of sovereignty and self-determination. Second, by interrogating the nature of the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] policy through an examination of the status of individual rights derived from international and domestic legislation, Wong illustrates the problematic interplay between the PRC central government and the "independentâ[euro] legal system of Hong Kong. Wong's book provides a very useful analysis of the current legal status of Hong Kong in terms of both international law and domestic law. In so doing, Wong illustrates how the conceptual structure and functional dynamics of the Hong Kong SAR both problematizes traditional conceptions of autonomy in international law and offers potentially new categories.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S2044251310000159
format Review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_878299989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2403709201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-10b574329d24262ffdaf287ea361418a53168df5e265c07fc7fd544b58f8793e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9Td9LwzAYDKLgmPsDfAu-V_vlR5M8luHccKBs-iaMrEm6jDWZbSr439ui-D3cHXfHfQjdQn4POYiHLckZIxwo5MMBVxdoMloZ4QQu_zXQazTruuNYYoopXkzQR9mnGGLzjXUw-LWNyVbJx4Cjw4s-GN3YkPQJb3x9SB32AaeDxcsYavw8wvZsKz_kpWl88F1qdfJfFm9sPYzcoCunT52d_fEUvS8e3-bLbP3ytJqX6-wMQFIG-Z4LRokyhJGCOGe0I1JYTQtgIDWnUEjjuCUFr3LhKuEMZ2zPpZNCUUun6O5399zGz952aXeMfRuGlzspJFFKSUV_AEcYVV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>878299989</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>CALDWELL, P Ernest</creator><creatorcontrib>CALDWELL, P Ernest</creatorcontrib><description>On 1 July 1997, British Hong Kong--including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories--was formally transferred from British possession to the People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Hong Kong Basic Law, the area of Hong Kong would be renamed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), it would be granted a considerable amount of autonomy from PRC central government control during a transitional period under the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] principle, and the majority of international conventions applying to Hong Kong prior to 1 July 1997 would remain in force. The terms of the transfer were met with joy by some, trepidation by others. Yet for lawyers, policy-makers, and international organizations these terms engendered confusion, much of which remains today, over the true nature of Hong Kong's autonomy and its status in international law. Wong's book, +Italic Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region -Italic attempts to address this confusion in two ways. First, Wong contextualizes Hong Kong's status vis-à-vis the PRC and the international community within the greater legal and political discourse on concepts of sovereignty and self-determination. Second, by interrogating the nature of the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] policy through an examination of the status of individual rights derived from international and domestic legislation, Wong illustrates the problematic interplay between the PRC central government and the "independentâ[euro] legal system of Hong Kong. Wong's book provides a very useful analysis of the current legal status of Hong Kong in terms of both international law and domestic law. In so doing, Wong illustrates how the conceptual structure and functional dynamics of the Hong Kong SAR both problematizes traditional conceptions of autonomy in international law and offers potentially new categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-2513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-2521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2044251310000159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>International agreements ; International law ; International organizations ; Sovereignty ; Territorial transfers</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.), 2011, Vol.1 (2), p.423</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Asian Journal of International Law 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,776,780,788,27899,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CALDWELL, P Ernest</creatorcontrib><title>Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region</title><title>Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.)</title><description>On 1 July 1997, British Hong Kong--including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories--was formally transferred from British possession to the People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Hong Kong Basic Law, the area of Hong Kong would be renamed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), it would be granted a considerable amount of autonomy from PRC central government control during a transitional period under the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] principle, and the majority of international conventions applying to Hong Kong prior to 1 July 1997 would remain in force. The terms of the transfer were met with joy by some, trepidation by others. Yet for lawyers, policy-makers, and international organizations these terms engendered confusion, much of which remains today, over the true nature of Hong Kong's autonomy and its status in international law. Wong's book, +Italic Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region -Italic attempts to address this confusion in two ways. First, Wong contextualizes Hong Kong's status vis-à-vis the PRC and the international community within the greater legal and political discourse on concepts of sovereignty and self-determination. Second, by interrogating the nature of the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] policy through an examination of the status of individual rights derived from international and domestic legislation, Wong illustrates the problematic interplay between the PRC central government and the "independentâ[euro] legal system of Hong Kong. Wong's book provides a very useful analysis of the current legal status of Hong Kong in terms of both international law and domestic law. In so doing, Wong illustrates how the conceptual structure and functional dynamics of the Hong Kong SAR both problematizes traditional conceptions of autonomy in international law and offers potentially new categories.</description><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Territorial transfers</subject><issn>2044-2513</issn><issn>2044-2521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9Td9LwzAYDKLgmPsDfAu-V_vlR5M8luHccKBs-iaMrEm6jDWZbSr439ui-D3cHXfHfQjdQn4POYiHLckZIxwo5MMBVxdoMloZ4QQu_zXQazTruuNYYoopXkzQR9mnGGLzjXUw-LWNyVbJx4Cjw4s-GN3YkPQJb3x9SB32AaeDxcsYavw8wvZsKz_kpWl88F1qdfJfFm9sPYzcoCunT52d_fEUvS8e3-bLbP3ytJqX6-wMQFIG-Z4LRokyhJGCOGe0I1JYTQtgIDWnUEjjuCUFr3LhKuEMZ2zPpZNCUUun6O5399zGz952aXeMfRuGlzspJFFKSUV_AEcYVV4</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>CALDWELL, P Ernest</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region</title><author>CALDWELL, P Ernest</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-10b574329d24262ffdaf287ea361418a53168df5e265c07fc7fd544b58f8793e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Territorial transfers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CALDWELL, P Ernest</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CALDWELL, P Ernest</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.)</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>423</spage><pages>423-</pages><issn>2044-2513</issn><eissn>2044-2521</eissn><abstract>On 1 July 1997, British Hong Kong--including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories--was formally transferred from British possession to the People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Hong Kong Basic Law, the area of Hong Kong would be renamed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), it would be granted a considerable amount of autonomy from PRC central government control during a transitional period under the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] principle, and the majority of international conventions applying to Hong Kong prior to 1 July 1997 would remain in force. The terms of the transfer were met with joy by some, trepidation by others. Yet for lawyers, policy-makers, and international organizations these terms engendered confusion, much of which remains today, over the true nature of Hong Kong's autonomy and its status in international law. Wong's book, +Italic Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region -Italic attempts to address this confusion in two ways. First, Wong contextualizes Hong Kong's status vis-à-vis the PRC and the international community within the greater legal and political discourse on concepts of sovereignty and self-determination. Second, by interrogating the nature of the "One China, two systemsâ[euro] policy through an examination of the status of individual rights derived from international and domestic legislation, Wong illustrates the problematic interplay between the PRC central government and the "independentâ[euro] legal system of Hong Kong. Wong's book provides a very useful analysis of the current legal status of Hong Kong in terms of both international law and domestic law. In so doing, Wong illustrates how the conceptual structure and functional dynamics of the Hong Kong SAR both problematizes traditional conceptions of autonomy in international law and offers potentially new categories.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S2044251310000159</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-2513
ispartof Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.), 2011, Vol.1 (2), p.423
issn 2044-2513
2044-2521
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_878299989
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects International agreements
International law
International organizations
Sovereignty
Territorial transfers
title Autonomy and Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autonomy%20and%20Protection%20of%20Fundamental%20Rights%20in%20the%20Hong%20Kong%20Special%20Administrative%20Region&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20international%20law%20(Cambridge,%20U.K.)&rft.au=CALDWELL,%20P%20Ernest&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=423&rft.pages=423-&rft.issn=2044-2513&rft.eissn=2044-2521&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2044251310000159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2403709201%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878299989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true