The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector
Background Patients continue to enter home health care (HHC) “sicker and quicker,” often with complex health problems that require extensive intervention. This higher level of acuity may increase the risk of percutaneous injury (PI), yet information on the risk and risk factors for PI and other type...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2009-09, Vol.37 (7), p.525-533 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 533 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 525 |
container_title | American journal of infection control |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH Pearson, Julie M., BA Sherman, Martin F., PhD Samar, Stephanie M., BA Canton, Allison N., BA Stone, Patricia W., PhD |
description | Background Patients continue to enter home health care (HHC) “sicker and quicker,” often with complex health problems that require extensive intervention. This higher level of acuity may increase the risk of percutaneous injury (PI), yet information on the risk and risk factors for PI and other types of exposures in this setting is exceptionally sparse. To address this gap, a large cross-sectional study of self-reported exposures in HHC registered nurses (RNs) was conducted. Methods A convenience sample of HHC RNs (N = 738) completed a survey addressing 5 major constructs: (1) worker-centered characteristics, (2) patient-related characteristics, (3) household characteristics, (4) organizational factors, and (5) prevalence of PIs and other blood and body fluid exposures. Analyses were directed at determining significant risk factors for exposure. Results Fourteen percent of RNs reported one or more PIs in the past 3 years (7.6 per 100 person-years). Nearly half (45.8%) of all PIs were not formally reported. PIs were significantly correlated with a number of factors, including lack of compliance with Standard Precautions (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; P = .019; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.71); recapping of needles (OR, 1.78; P = .016; 95% CI: 1.11-2.86); exposure to household stressors (OR, 1.99; P = .005; 95% CI: 1.22-3.25); exposure to violence (OR, 3.47; P = .001; 95% CI: 1.67-7.20); mandatory overtime (OR, 2.44; P = .006; 95% CI: 1.27-4.67); and safety climate (OR, 1.88; P = .004; 95% CI: 1.21-2.91) among others. Conclusion The prevalence of PI was substantial. Underreporting rates and risk factors for exposure were similar to those identified in other RN work populations, although factors uniquely associated with home care were also identified. Risk mitigation strategies tailored to home care are needed to reduce risk of exposure in this setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_872586204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655308008699</els_id><sourcerecordid>1973760471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-870a4f25ef38fd60c2e404f8dcc43951e29954bcd39ce50b2ab8a5ff4668090a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-LFDEQxYMo7rj6BTxIEDz2WEl30h0QYVn8BwseXM8hk6446e3pHivdC_vtTZhhBQ9eklC8ei_5pRh7LWArQOj3w9YN0W8lQJcLW5DyCdsIJduqlkY_ZRsQRldaqfqCvUhpAABTa_WcXQgjhQbQG3a43SM_Et67ESeP3E09p5jueHB-mSnxMBM_Ivl1cRPOa-JxGlaKWA6c8FdMCxL2fFopnYpLdtzPh7ygG5c9946QJyx2L9mz4MaEr877Jfv5-dPt9dfq5vuXb9dXN5VXtVyqrgXXBKkw1F3oNXiJDTSh671vaqMESmNUs_N9bTwq2Em365wKodG6AwOuvmRvT75Hmn-vmBY7zCtNOdJ2rVSdltBkkTyJPM0pEQZ7pHhw9GAF2ALYDrYAtgVwqWXAuenN2XndHbD_23ImmgXvzgKXvBsDucnH9KiTwpi2FSX9w0mHmcN9RLLJx_IFfaTMyvZz_P89Pv7T7sc4xZx4hw-YHp8rbJIW7I8yCmUSoMsm2pj6D6IUrvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872586204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH ; Pearson, Julie M., BA ; Sherman, Martin F., PhD ; Samar, Stephanie M., BA ; Canton, Allison N., BA ; Stone, Patricia W., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH ; Pearson, Julie M., BA ; Sherman, Martin F., PhD ; Samar, Stephanie M., BA ; Canton, Allison N., BA ; Stone, Patricia W., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Patients continue to enter home health care (HHC) “sicker and quicker,” often with complex health problems that require extensive intervention. This higher level of acuity may increase the risk of percutaneous injury (PI), yet information on the risk and risk factors for PI and other types of exposures in this setting is exceptionally sparse. To address this gap, a large cross-sectional study of self-reported exposures in HHC registered nurses (RNs) was conducted. Methods A convenience sample of HHC RNs (N = 738) completed a survey addressing 5 major constructs: (1) worker-centered characteristics, (2) patient-related characteristics, (3) household characteristics, (4) organizational factors, and (5) prevalence of PIs and other blood and body fluid exposures. Analyses were directed at determining significant risk factors for exposure. Results Fourteen percent of RNs reported one or more PIs in the past 3 years (7.6 per 100 person-years). Nearly half (45.8%) of all PIs were not formally reported. PIs were significantly correlated with a number of factors, including lack of compliance with Standard Precautions (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; P = .019; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.71); recapping of needles (OR, 1.78; P = .016; 95% CI: 1.11-2.86); exposure to household stressors (OR, 1.99; P = .005; 95% CI: 1.22-3.25); exposure to violence (OR, 3.47; P = .001; 95% CI: 1.67-7.20); mandatory overtime (OR, 2.44; P = .006; 95% CI: 1.27-4.67); and safety climate (OR, 1.88; P = .004; 95% CI: 1.21-2.91) among others. Conclusion The prevalence of PI was substantial. Underreporting rates and risk factors for exposure were similar to those identified in other RN work populations, although factors uniquely associated with home care were also identified. Risk mitigation strategies tailored to home care are needed to reduce risk of exposure in this setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19216006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Accidents, Occupational - statistics & numerical data ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Family Characteristics ; Family Nursing - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; General aspects ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data ; Home health care ; Human exposure ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Injuries ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Needlestick Injuries - epidemiology ; Needlestick Injuries - etiology ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data ; Odds Ratio ; percutaneous injuries ; Prevalence ; registered nurses ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Self Disclosure ; Skin ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Universal Precautions ; Violence ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries - etiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2009-09, Vol.37 (7), p.525-533</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-870a4f25ef38fd60c2e404f8dcc43951e29954bcd39ce50b2ab8a5ff4668090a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-870a4f25ef38fd60c2e404f8dcc43951e29954bcd39ce50b2ab8a5ff4668090a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655308008699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21997714$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Julie M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Martin F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samar, Stephanie M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canton, Allison N., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Patricia W., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Background Patients continue to enter home health care (HHC) “sicker and quicker,” often with complex health problems that require extensive intervention. This higher level of acuity may increase the risk of percutaneous injury (PI), yet information on the risk and risk factors for PI and other types of exposures in this setting is exceptionally sparse. To address this gap, a large cross-sectional study of self-reported exposures in HHC registered nurses (RNs) was conducted. Methods A convenience sample of HHC RNs (N = 738) completed a survey addressing 5 major constructs: (1) worker-centered characteristics, (2) patient-related characteristics, (3) household characteristics, (4) organizational factors, and (5) prevalence of PIs and other blood and body fluid exposures. Analyses were directed at determining significant risk factors for exposure. Results Fourteen percent of RNs reported one or more PIs in the past 3 years (7.6 per 100 person-years). Nearly half (45.8%) of all PIs were not formally reported. PIs were significantly correlated with a number of factors, including lack of compliance with Standard Precautions (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; P = .019; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.71); recapping of needles (OR, 1.78; P = .016; 95% CI: 1.11-2.86); exposure to household stressors (OR, 1.99; P = .005; 95% CI: 1.22-3.25); exposure to violence (OR, 3.47; P = .001; 95% CI: 1.67-7.20); mandatory overtime (OR, 2.44; P = .006; 95% CI: 1.27-4.67); and safety climate (OR, 1.88; P = .004; 95% CI: 1.21-2.91) among others. Conclusion The prevalence of PI was substantial. Underreporting rates and risk factors for exposure were similar to those identified in other RN work populations, although factors uniquely associated with home care were also identified. Risk mitigation strategies tailored to home care are needed to reduce risk of exposure in this setting.</description><subject>Accidents, Occupational - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Family Nursing - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Human exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>percutaneous injuries</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>registered nurses</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Self Disclosure</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Universal Precautions</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - etiology</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-LFDEQxYMo7rj6BTxIEDz2WEl30h0QYVn8BwseXM8hk6446e3pHivdC_vtTZhhBQ9eklC8ei_5pRh7LWArQOj3w9YN0W8lQJcLW5DyCdsIJduqlkY_ZRsQRldaqfqCvUhpAABTa_WcXQgjhQbQG3a43SM_Et67ESeP3E09p5jueHB-mSnxMBM_Ivl1cRPOa-JxGlaKWA6c8FdMCxL2fFopnYpLdtzPh7ygG5c9946QJyx2L9mz4MaEr877Jfv5-dPt9dfq5vuXb9dXN5VXtVyqrgXXBKkw1F3oNXiJDTSh671vaqMESmNUs_N9bTwq2Em365wKodG6AwOuvmRvT75Hmn-vmBY7zCtNOdJ2rVSdltBkkTyJPM0pEQZ7pHhw9GAF2ALYDrYAtgVwqWXAuenN2XndHbD_23ImmgXvzgKXvBsDucnH9KiTwpi2FSX9w0mHmcN9RLLJx_IFfaTMyvZz_P89Pv7T7sc4xZx4hw-YHp8rbJIW7I8yCmUSoMsm2pj6D6IUrvQ</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH</creator><creator>Pearson, Julie M., BA</creator><creator>Sherman, Martin F., PhD</creator><creator>Samar, Stephanie M., BA</creator><creator>Canton, Allison N., BA</creator><creator>Stone, Patricia W., PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector</title><author>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH ; Pearson, Julie M., BA ; Sherman, Martin F., PhD ; Samar, Stephanie M., BA ; Canton, Allison N., BA ; Stone, Patricia W., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-870a4f25ef38fd60c2e404f8dcc43951e29954bcd39ce50b2ab8a5ff4668090a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Occupational - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Family Nursing - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Human exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>percutaneous injuries</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>registered nurses</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Self Disclosure</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Universal Precautions</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Julie M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Martin F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samar, Stephanie M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canton, Allison N., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Patricia W., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gershon, Robyn R.M., MT, MHS, DrPH</au><au>Pearson, Julie M., BA</au><au>Sherman, Martin F., PhD</au><au>Samar, Stephanie M., BA</au><au>Canton, Allison N., BA</au><au>Stone, Patricia W., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>525-533</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Background Patients continue to enter home health care (HHC) “sicker and quicker,” often with complex health problems that require extensive intervention. This higher level of acuity may increase the risk of percutaneous injury (PI), yet information on the risk and risk factors for PI and other types of exposures in this setting is exceptionally sparse. To address this gap, a large cross-sectional study of self-reported exposures in HHC registered nurses (RNs) was conducted. Methods A convenience sample of HHC RNs (N = 738) completed a survey addressing 5 major constructs: (1) worker-centered characteristics, (2) patient-related characteristics, (3) household characteristics, (4) organizational factors, and (5) prevalence of PIs and other blood and body fluid exposures. Analyses were directed at determining significant risk factors for exposure. Results Fourteen percent of RNs reported one or more PIs in the past 3 years (7.6 per 100 person-years). Nearly half (45.8%) of all PIs were not formally reported. PIs were significantly correlated with a number of factors, including lack of compliance with Standard Precautions (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; P = .019; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.71); recapping of needles (OR, 1.78; P = .016; 95% CI: 1.11-2.86); exposure to household stressors (OR, 1.99; P = .005; 95% CI: 1.22-3.25); exposure to violence (OR, 3.47; P = .001; 95% CI: 1.67-7.20); mandatory overtime (OR, 2.44; P = .006; 95% CI: 1.27-4.67); and safety climate (OR, 1.88; P = .004; 95% CI: 1.21-2.91) among others. Conclusion The prevalence of PI was substantial. Underreporting rates and risk factors for exposure were similar to those identified in other RN work populations, although factors uniquely associated with home care were also identified. Risk mitigation strategies tailored to home care are needed to reduce risk of exposure in this setting.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19216006</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-6553 |
ispartof | American journal of infection control, 2009-09, Vol.37 (7), p.525-533 |
issn | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_872586204 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accidents, Occupational - statistics & numerical data Biological and medical sciences Blood-Borne Pathogens Cross-Sectional Studies Epidemiology. Vaccinations Family Characteristics Family Nursing - statistics & numerical data Female General aspects Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration & dosage Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data Home health care Human exposure Humans Infection Control Infectious Disease Infectious diseases Injuries Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Needlestick Injuries - epidemiology Needlestick Injuries - etiology Nurses Nurses - psychology Occupational Exposure - adverse effects Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data Odds Ratio percutaneous injuries Prevalence registered nurses Risk Assessment Risk Factors Self Disclosure Skin Surveys and Questionnaires Universal Precautions Violence Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology Wounds and Injuries - etiology |
title | The prevalence and risk factors for percutaneous injuries in registered nurses in the home health care sector |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20and%20risk%20factors%20for%20percutaneous%20injuries%20in%20registered%20nurses%20in%20the%20home%20health%20care%20sector&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Gershon,%20Robyn%20R.M.,%20MT,%20MHS,%20DrPH&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=525-533&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973760471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872586204&rft_id=info:pmid/19216006&rft_els_id=S0196655308008699&rfr_iscdi=true |