Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response

Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American economic review 2007-05, Vol.97 (2), p.455
Hauptverfasser: Chapman, James T. E, McAdams, David, Paarsch, Harry J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Auctions
Bids
Equilibrium
Hypotheses
Interest rates
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 455
container_title The American economic review
container_volume 97
creator Chapman, James T. E
McAdams, David
Paarsch, Harry J
description
doi_str_mv 10.1257/aer.97.2.455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_872522374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2378901681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_8725223743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFqAjEURUNR6Ni68wNC9xmTzAyZWVapdONG7EqLBH1KhjFvmpf0-5tCP6Cry-WecxlbKFkq3ZilhVB2ptRl3TQPrFBdXQvTtWrCCimlFq1u9SObEfXytytTsOMKk784f-M7-AafgK_xPtrgCD1xew5IxLdpiE58eBf5azpHh55vMNxtJJ5lCPwAI7kB_adYAcV8RWPW4ZlNr3YgmP_lE3vZvO3X72IM-JUyeeoxBZ-nU2t0o3Vl6upf0A_DOElX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872522374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Chapman, James T. E ; McAdams, David ; Paarsch, Harry J</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapman, James T. E ; McAdams, David ; Paarsch, Harry J</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.2.455</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bids ; Equilibrium ; Hypotheses ; Interest rates</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2007-05, Vol.97 (2), p.455</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Economic Association May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapman, James T. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdams, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paarsch, Harry J</creatorcontrib><title>Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response</title><title>The American economic review</title><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMFqAjEURUNR6Ni68wNC9xmTzAyZWVapdONG7EqLBH1KhjFvmpf0-5tCP6Cry-WecxlbKFkq3ZilhVB2ptRl3TQPrFBdXQvTtWrCCimlFq1u9SObEfXytytTsOMKk784f-M7-AafgK_xPtrgCD1xew5IxLdpiE58eBf5azpHh55vMNxtJJ5lCPwAI7kB_adYAcV8RWPW4ZlNr3YgmP_lE3vZvO3X72IM-JUyeeoxBZ-nU2t0o3Vl6upf0A_DOElX</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Chapman, James T. E</creator><creator>McAdams, David</creator><creator>Paarsch, Harry J</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response</title><author>Chapman, James T. E ; McAdams, David ; Paarsch, Harry J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_8725223743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapman, James T. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdams, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paarsch, Harry J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapman, James T. E</au><au>McAdams, David</au><au>Paarsch, Harry J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>455</spage><pages>455-</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.97.2.455</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8282
ispartof The American economic review, 2007-05, Vol.97 (2), p.455
issn 0002-8282
1944-7981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_872522374
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Economic Association Web; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Auctions
Bids
Equilibrium
Hypotheses
Interest rates
title Bounding Revenue Comparisons across Multi-Unit Auction Formats under [epsilon]-Best Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bounding%20Revenue%20Comparisons%20across%20Multi-Unit%20Auction%20Formats%20under%20%5Bepsilon%5D-Best%20Response&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Chapman,%20James%20T.%20E&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.pages=455-&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.97.2.455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2378901681%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872522374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true