Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems

The range of applicability and accuracy of the major postprocessing methods available today to extract tone-noise information from unsteady aerodynamic source data for the rotor - stator-interaction problem are systematically examined using four numerical examples of increasing geometric and flow co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2011-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1214-1229
Hauptverfasser: Giacche, Davide, Xu, Liping, Coupland, John, Watson, Alexander G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1229
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1214
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 49
creator Giacche, Davide
Xu, Liping
Coupland, John
Watson, Alexander G
description The range of applicability and accuracy of the major postprocessing methods available today to extract tone-noise information from unsteady aerodynamic source data for the rotor - stator-interaction problem are systematically examined using four numerical examples of increasing geometric and flow complexity. The test cases span from the benchmark problem of a vortical gust impinging on an unloaded cascade of flat plates to a fan stage representative of a modern turbofan engine. A linearized Navier - Stokes computational fluid dynamics method is used to obtain the aerodynamic solutions for the tone-noise postprocessing. The underlying assumptions of each postprocessing method are examined, highlighting the shortcomings and the strengths of each method. In particular, the effects of the duct geometry and mean flow are investigated. An acoustic analogy integral method, and various wave-splitting techniques are considered. Furthermore, the influence of the nonuniformity and swirl that characterize the mean flow in a real fan stage on the sound power conservation is examined using a modal expression of the sound power for nonuniform swirling flows in the high-frequency limit. A comparison with the widely used expression of the sound power for a uniform flow is also carried out. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J050523
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_871799530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375143221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-cb057ae5ab4631efe5ee09bdb16555ec58fafdf47a27f523ffa9343e45c741143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1LAzEQxYMoWKsH_4NFUPCwNdkkzfZYix8VP4pW8LbM7k40ZbtZkxTxvzelRQ-eHgO_eW_mEXLM6CCTTFywwR2VVGZ8h_SY5DzluXzbJT1KKUuZkNk-OfB-EadM5axHYGKXHTjjbZtcYvhCbJOZ9aFztkLvTfuePGD4sLVPxl3XGKyTYJNnG6xLXwKsZdoGdFAFEy3mtsX00RqPyczZssGlPyR7GhqPR1vtk9frq_nkNr1_uplOxvcpcKZCWpVUKkAJpRhyhholIh2VdcmGUkqsZK5B11ooyJSO_2kNIy44ClkpwZjgfXKy8Y2nf67Qh2JhV66NkUWumBqNJKcROt9AlbPeO9RF58wS3HfBaLEusGDFtsDInm4NwVfQaAdtZfzvQiYyKrIhi9zZhgMD8Bf63_AHr958eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871799530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Giacche, Davide ; Xu, Liping ; Coupland, John ; Watson, Alexander G</creator><creatorcontrib>Giacche, Davide ; Xu, Liping ; Coupland, John ; Watson, Alexander G</creatorcontrib><description>The range of applicability and accuracy of the major postprocessing methods available today to extract tone-noise information from unsteady aerodynamic source data for the rotor - stator-interaction problem are systematically examined using four numerical examples of increasing geometric and flow complexity. The test cases span from the benchmark problem of a vortical gust impinging on an unloaded cascade of flat plates to a fan stage representative of a modern turbofan engine. A linearized Navier - Stokes computational fluid dynamics method is used to obtain the aerodynamic solutions for the tone-noise postprocessing. The underlying assumptions of each postprocessing method are examined, highlighting the shortcomings and the strengths of each method. In particular, the effects of the duct geometry and mean flow are investigated. An acoustic analogy integral method, and various wave-splitting techniques are considered. Furthermore, the influence of the nonuniformity and swirl that characterize the mean flow in a real fan stage on the sound power conservation is examined using a modal expression of the sound power for nonuniform swirling flows in the high-frequency limit. A comparison with the widely used expression of the sound power for a uniform flow is also carried out. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J050523</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIAJAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustics ; Aeroacoustics, atmospheric sound ; Aerodynamics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; General theory ; Linear acoustics ; Noise ; Physics ; Rotational flow and vorticity ; Turbofan engines</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2011-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1214-1229</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-cb057ae5ab4631efe5ee09bdb16555ec58fafdf47a27f523ffa9343e45c741143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-cb057ae5ab4631efe5ee09bdb16555ec58fafdf47a27f523ffa9343e45c741143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24204261$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giacche, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alexander G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>The range of applicability and accuracy of the major postprocessing methods available today to extract tone-noise information from unsteady aerodynamic source data for the rotor - stator-interaction problem are systematically examined using four numerical examples of increasing geometric and flow complexity. The test cases span from the benchmark problem of a vortical gust impinging on an unloaded cascade of flat plates to a fan stage representative of a modern turbofan engine. A linearized Navier - Stokes computational fluid dynamics method is used to obtain the aerodynamic solutions for the tone-noise postprocessing. The underlying assumptions of each postprocessing method are examined, highlighting the shortcomings and the strengths of each method. In particular, the effects of the duct geometry and mean flow are investigated. An acoustic analogy integral method, and various wave-splitting techniques are considered. Furthermore, the influence of the nonuniformity and swirl that characterize the mean flow in a real fan stage on the sound power conservation is examined using a modal expression of the sound power for nonuniform swirling flows in the high-frequency limit. A comparison with the widely used expression of the sound power for a uniform flow is also carried out. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aeroacoustics, atmospheric sound</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>General theory</subject><subject>Linear acoustics</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Rotational flow and vorticity</subject><subject>Turbofan engines</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkM1LAzEQxYMoWKsH_4NFUPCwNdkkzfZYix8VP4pW8LbM7k40ZbtZkxTxvzelRQ-eHgO_eW_mEXLM6CCTTFywwR2VVGZ8h_SY5DzluXzbJT1KKUuZkNk-OfB-EadM5axHYGKXHTjjbZtcYvhCbJOZ9aFztkLvTfuePGD4sLVPxl3XGKyTYJNnG6xLXwKsZdoGdFAFEy3mtsX00RqPyczZssGlPyR7GhqPR1vtk9frq_nkNr1_uplOxvcpcKZCWpVUKkAJpRhyhholIh2VdcmGUkqsZK5B11ooyJSO_2kNIy44ClkpwZjgfXKy8Y2nf67Qh2JhV66NkUWumBqNJKcROt9AlbPeO9RF58wS3HfBaLEusGDFtsDInm4NwVfQaAdtZfzvQiYyKrIhi9zZhgMD8Bf63_AHr958eA</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Giacche, Davide</creator><creator>Xu, Liping</creator><creator>Coupland, John</creator><creator>Watson, Alexander G</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems</title><author>Giacche, Davide ; Xu, Liping ; Coupland, John ; Watson, Alexander G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-cb057ae5ab4631efe5ee09bdb16555ec58fafdf47a27f523ffa9343e45c741143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aeroacoustics, atmospheric sound</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>General theory</topic><topic>Linear acoustics</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Rotational flow and vorticity</topic><topic>Turbofan engines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giacche, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alexander G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giacche, Davide</au><au>Xu, Liping</au><au>Coupland, John</au><au>Watson, Alexander G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1214</spage><epage>1229</epage><pages>1214-1229</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><coden>AIAJAH</coden><abstract>The range of applicability and accuracy of the major postprocessing methods available today to extract tone-noise information from unsteady aerodynamic source data for the rotor - stator-interaction problem are systematically examined using four numerical examples of increasing geometric and flow complexity. The test cases span from the benchmark problem of a vortical gust impinging on an unloaded cascade of flat plates to a fan stage representative of a modern turbofan engine. A linearized Navier - Stokes computational fluid dynamics method is used to obtain the aerodynamic solutions for the tone-noise postprocessing. The underlying assumptions of each postprocessing method are examined, highlighting the shortcomings and the strengths of each method. In particular, the effects of the duct geometry and mean flow are investigated. An acoustic analogy integral method, and various wave-splitting techniques are considered. Furthermore, the influence of the nonuniformity and swirl that characterize the mean flow in a real fan stage on the sound power conservation is examined using a modal expression of the sound power for nonuniform swirling flows in the high-frequency limit. A comparison with the widely used expression of the sound power for a uniform flow is also carried out. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J050523</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2011-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1214-1229
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_871799530
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Acoustics
Aeroacoustics, atmospheric sound
Aerodynamics
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
General theory
Linear acoustics
Noise
Physics
Rotational flow and vorticity
Turbofan engines
title Comparison Between Postprocessing Methods Applied to Rotor-Stator-Interaction Tone-Noise Problems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20Postprocessing%20Methods%20Applied%20to%20Rotor-Stator-Interaction%20Tone-Noise%20Problems&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Giacche,%20Davide&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1214&rft.epage=1229&rft.pages=1214-1229&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft.coden=AIAJAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J050523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375143221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871799530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true