Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases: Research on 100 judgments of well-known trademark cases
Chinese trademark law has established the cross-category protection system of well-known trademarks based on the confusion theory. The system, however, has many problems in practice and does not fulfill completely the needs for protecting well-known trademarks. Consequently, when hearing trademark c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers of law in China 2010-03, Vol.5 (1), p.27-55 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Frontiers of law in China |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Li, Yougen |
description | Chinese trademark law has established the cross-category protection system of well-known trademarks based on the confusion theory. The system, however, has many problems in practice and does not fulfill completely the needs for protecting well-known trademarks. Consequently, when hearing trademark cases, some judges have abandoned the confusion theory instead of using the dilution theory in judging well-known trademarks. Through analysis on 100 judgments concerning well-known trademark cases, it can be seen that the influence of the dilution theory on the ruling of trademark cases is increasing. Certain conditions should first be satisfied when introducing the dilution theory to rule trademark cases: Firstly, the contents of the dilution theory shall be grasped as correctly as possible to avoid plausible understanding; secondly, the application of the dilution theory shall adopt the existing institutional criteria as much as possible by full use of the leeway of interpretation provided by the existing system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11463-010-0002-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_871769192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2374672701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1127-5e79a358443832bc67921420c1da9b22882ee1c66a44bd90c4d09907497c2a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHYRe8OM7djxsiq_UiVYlLXlOm6bkibFThbd9SBwuZ6ElIBYsZoZzfeeZh4hlwjXCKBuIqKQnAICBQBG1REZoFSc8lTg8W8vWHZKzmJcAaQo02xAXkaVLbexiEldJc3SJ8V6Y12T1PPvab_7uC3Ktim67XTp67Dd7z4PaGjLolp8Y8Hmfm3DW-Js9PGcnMxtGf3FTx2S1_u76fiRTp4fnsajCXWITNHUK215mgnBM85mTirNUDBwmFs9YyzLmPfopLRCzHINTuSgNSihlWNW5nxIrnrfTajfWx8bs6rb0D0TTaZQSY2adRD2kAt1jMHPzSYU3a1bg2AOuZk-N9PlZg65GdVpWK-JHVstfPgz_l_0Be3ecBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871769192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases: Research on 100 judgments of well-known trademark cases</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Li, Yougen</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yougen</creatorcontrib><description>Chinese trademark law has established the cross-category protection system of well-known trademarks based on the confusion theory. The system, however, has many problems in practice and does not fulfill completely the needs for protecting well-known trademarks. Consequently, when hearing trademark cases, some judges have abandoned the confusion theory instead of using the dilution theory in judging well-known trademarks. Through analysis on 100 judgments concerning well-known trademark cases, it can be seen that the influence of the dilution theory on the ruling of trademark cases is increasing. Certain conditions should first be satisfied when introducing the dilution theory to rule trademark cases: Firstly, the contents of the dilution theory shall be grasped as correctly as possible to avoid plausible understanding; secondly, the application of the dilution theory shall adopt the existing institutional criteria as much as possible by full use of the leeway of interpretation provided by the existing system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-3428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1673-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11463-010-0002-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: SP Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Commodities ; Consumers ; Fundamentals of Law ; Impact analysis ; Infringement ; Law ; Law and Criminology ; Provisions ; Research Article ; Trademarks</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of law in China, 2010-03, Vol.5 (1), p.27-55</ispartof><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yougen</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases: Research on 100 judgments of well-known trademark cases</title><title>Frontiers of law in China</title><addtitle>Front. Law China</addtitle><description>Chinese trademark law has established the cross-category protection system of well-known trademarks based on the confusion theory. The system, however, has many problems in practice and does not fulfill completely the needs for protecting well-known trademarks. Consequently, when hearing trademark cases, some judges have abandoned the confusion theory instead of using the dilution theory in judging well-known trademarks. Through analysis on 100 judgments concerning well-known trademark cases, it can be seen that the influence of the dilution theory on the ruling of trademark cases is increasing. Certain conditions should first be satisfied when introducing the dilution theory to rule trademark cases: Firstly, the contents of the dilution theory shall be grasped as correctly as possible to avoid plausible understanding; secondly, the application of the dilution theory shall adopt the existing institutional criteria as much as possible by full use of the leeway of interpretation provided by the existing system.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Fundamentals of Law</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Trademarks</subject><issn>1673-3428</issn><issn>1673-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHYRe8OM7djxsiq_UiVYlLXlOm6bkibFThbd9SBwuZ6ElIBYsZoZzfeeZh4hlwjXCKBuIqKQnAICBQBG1REZoFSc8lTg8W8vWHZKzmJcAaQo02xAXkaVLbexiEldJc3SJ8V6Y12T1PPvab_7uC3Ktim67XTp67Dd7z4PaGjLolp8Y8Hmfm3DW-Js9PGcnMxtGf3FTx2S1_u76fiRTp4fnsajCXWITNHUK215mgnBM85mTirNUDBwmFs9YyzLmPfopLRCzHINTuSgNSihlWNW5nxIrnrfTajfWx8bs6rb0D0TTaZQSY2adRD2kAt1jMHPzSYU3a1bg2AOuZk-N9PlZg65GdVpWK-JHVstfPgz_l_0Be3ecBE</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Li, Yougen</creator><general>SP Higher Education Press</general><general>Higher Education Press Limited Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases</title><author>Li, Yougen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1127-5e79a358443832bc67921420c1da9b22882ee1c66a44bd90c4d09907497c2a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Fundamentals of Law</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Trademarks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yougen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of law in China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yougen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases: Research on 100 judgments of well-known trademark cases</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of law in China</jtitle><stitle>Front. Law China</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>27-55</pages><issn>1673-3428</issn><eissn>1673-3541</eissn><abstract>Chinese trademark law has established the cross-category protection system of well-known trademarks based on the confusion theory. The system, however, has many problems in practice and does not fulfill completely the needs for protecting well-known trademarks. Consequently, when hearing trademark cases, some judges have abandoned the confusion theory instead of using the dilution theory in judging well-known trademarks. Through analysis on 100 judgments concerning well-known trademark cases, it can be seen that the influence of the dilution theory on the ruling of trademark cases is increasing. Certain conditions should first be satisfied when introducing the dilution theory to rule trademark cases: Firstly, the contents of the dilution theory shall be grasped as correctly as possible to avoid plausible understanding; secondly, the application of the dilution theory shall adopt the existing institutional criteria as much as possible by full use of the leeway of interpretation provided by the existing system.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>SP Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11463-010-0002-7</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1673-3428 |
ispartof | Frontiers of law in China, 2010-03, Vol.5 (1), p.27-55 |
issn | 1673-3428 1673-3541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_871769192 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Agreements Commodities Consumers Fundamentals of Law Impact analysis Infringement Law Law and Criminology Provisions Research Article Trademarks |
title | Analysis on the impact of the “Dilution Theory” on ruling of trademark cases: Research on 100 judgments of well-known trademark cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T05%3A10%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20on%20the%20impact%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9CDilution%20Theory%E2%80%9D%20on%20ruling%20of%20trademark%20cases:%20Research%20on%20100%20judgments%20of%20well-known%20trademark%20cases&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20law%20in%20China&rft.au=Li,%20Yougen&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=27-55&rft.issn=1673-3428&rft.eissn=1673-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11463-010-0002-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2374672701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871769192&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |