Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management
Because forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other forages, high dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield are essential. To optimize forage rice production, it is important to maximize nutritional value in the leaf and stem rather than in the panicle because t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2011-05, Vol.103 (3), p.593-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 593 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Nakano, H Hattori, I Sato, K Morita, S |
description | Because forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other forages, high dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield are essential. To optimize forage rice production, it is important to maximize nutritional value in the leaf and stem rather than in the panicle because the hull restricts cattle's (Bos taurus) ability to digest rice grain. In particular, it is important to maximize TDN concentration and yield in the leaf sheath plus stem (stem) due to the high proportion of this component in the crop rather than in the leaf blade (leaf). The objective in this study was to evaluate the effects of timing of first harvest [95 or 116 days after transplanting (DAT) (booting or full heading stage, respectively)], N application rate (150 or 300 kg N ha−1), and N application method (100–0N method, applying N at 100 and 0% in the first and second crops, respectively; 67–33N method, applying N at 67 and 33%, respectively; 33–67N method, applying N at 33 and 67%, respectively) on TDN concentration and yield in double-harvest of forage rice systems in southwestern Japan. With the 100–0N method, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 39 g m−2 lower when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT. However, with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 163 g m−2 higher when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT, respectively. When the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 161 g m−2 higher with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods than with the 33–67N method, respectively. In contrast, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 115 and 142 g m−2 higher with the 67–33N and 33–67N methods than with the 100–0N method, respectively. To obtain high stem TDN yield in total of the first and second crops, harvesting the first crop at full heading and applying 300 kg N ha−1 at 67 and 33% in the first crop and second crops, respectively, is effective. Management practices that increase forage quality will help southwestern Japan to be more sufficient in forage production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2010.0323 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_867910652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353979081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-fdf8f9a3acaf7d2e1afdf5f89806f0548c20fda5719d3f14e0cf27e297dd1c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctPGzEQxi1UJNLAmSNWJY4L48e-TihCJBTxTNMDp9XIa0eONnZqb1rlv8fbROXY02jGv_m-0WdCzhlccSbkNS6DdysOqQfBxREZMSnyDAqZfyEjAOAZqwt-Qr7GuAJgrJZsRF6nPuBS07lVmr5b3bUUXUvfttjZfkfnOm68i5r2nt5j-K1jTxd2bd3yL_Zs--CX2tEndEllrV1_So4NdlGfHeqYLKZ3i9v77PFl9v128pgpKaXITGsqU6NAhaZsuWaYJrmp6goKA7msFAfTYl6yuhWGSQ3K8FLzumxbpkoxJt_2spvgf23TWc3Kb4NLjk1VlDWDIucJut5DKvgYgzbNJtg1hl3DoBlCaz5Da4bQ0sblQRajws4EdMrGf2tcshqkYIm72XN_bKd3_5NtJrMHPpnNX54fhtnB6WKvYNAPfHL5-SO95umncs5BiA8hHonp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867910652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Nakano, H ; Hattori, I ; Sato, K ; Morita, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakano, H ; Hattori, I ; Sato, K ; Morita, S</creatorcontrib><description>Because forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other forages, high dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield are essential. To optimize forage rice production, it is important to maximize nutritional value in the leaf and stem rather than in the panicle because the hull restricts cattle's (Bos taurus) ability to digest rice grain. In particular, it is important to maximize TDN concentration and yield in the leaf sheath plus stem (stem) due to the high proportion of this component in the crop rather than in the leaf blade (leaf). The objective in this study was to evaluate the effects of timing of first harvest [95 or 116 days after transplanting (DAT) (booting or full heading stage, respectively)], N application rate (150 or 300 kg N ha−1), and N application method (100–0N method, applying N at 100 and 0% in the first and second crops, respectively; 67–33N method, applying N at 67 and 33%, respectively; 33–67N method, applying N at 33 and 67%, respectively) on TDN concentration and yield in double-harvest of forage rice systems in southwestern Japan. With the 100–0N method, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 39 g m−2 lower when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT. However, with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 163 g m−2 higher when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT, respectively. When the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 161 g m−2 higher with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods than with the 33–67N method, respectively. In contrast, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 115 and 142 g m−2 higher with the 67–33N and 33–67N methods than with the 100–0N method, respectively. To obtain high stem TDN yield in total of the first and second crops, harvesting the first crop at full heading and applying 300 kg N ha−1 at 67 and 33% in the first crop and second crops, respectively, is effective. Management practices that increase forage quality will help southwestern Japan to be more sufficient in forage production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; cattle ; crops ; fertilizer rates ; forage production ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grain yield ; harvesting ; heading ; hulls ; inflorescences ; leaf blade ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen fertilization ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutritive value ; Oryza sativa ; rice ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2011-05, Vol.103 (3), p.593-603</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-fdf8f9a3acaf7d2e1afdf5f89806f0548c20fda5719d3f14e0cf27e297dd1c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-fdf8f9a3acaf7d2e1afdf5f89806f0548c20fda5719d3f14e0cf27e297dd1c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0323$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24190431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakano, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, S</creatorcontrib><title>Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Because forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other forages, high dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield are essential. To optimize forage rice production, it is important to maximize nutritional value in the leaf and stem rather than in the panicle because the hull restricts cattle's (Bos taurus) ability to digest rice grain. In particular, it is important to maximize TDN concentration and yield in the leaf sheath plus stem (stem) due to the high proportion of this component in the crop rather than in the leaf blade (leaf). The objective in this study was to evaluate the effects of timing of first harvest [95 or 116 days after transplanting (DAT) (booting or full heading stage, respectively)], N application rate (150 or 300 kg N ha−1), and N application method (100–0N method, applying N at 100 and 0% in the first and second crops, respectively; 67–33N method, applying N at 67 and 33%, respectively; 33–67N method, applying N at 33 and 67%, respectively) on TDN concentration and yield in double-harvest of forage rice systems in southwestern Japan. With the 100–0N method, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 39 g m−2 lower when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT. However, with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 163 g m−2 higher when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT, respectively. When the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 161 g m−2 higher with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods than with the 33–67N method, respectively. In contrast, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 115 and 142 g m−2 higher with the 67–33N and 33–67N methods than with the 100–0N method, respectively. To obtain high stem TDN yield in total of the first and second crops, harvesting the first crop at full heading and applying 300 kg N ha−1 at 67 and 33% in the first crop and second crops, respectively, is effective. Management practices that increase forage quality will help southwestern Japan to be more sufficient in forage production.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>forage production</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>harvesting</subject><subject>heading</subject><subject>hulls</subject><subject>inflorescences</subject><subject>leaf blade</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutritive value</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>rice</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctPGzEQxi1UJNLAmSNWJY4L48e-TihCJBTxTNMDp9XIa0eONnZqb1rlv8fbROXY02jGv_m-0WdCzhlccSbkNS6DdysOqQfBxREZMSnyDAqZfyEjAOAZqwt-Qr7GuAJgrJZsRF6nPuBS07lVmr5b3bUUXUvfttjZfkfnOm68i5r2nt5j-K1jTxd2bd3yL_Zs--CX2tEndEllrV1_So4NdlGfHeqYLKZ3i9v77PFl9v128pgpKaXITGsqU6NAhaZsuWaYJrmp6goKA7msFAfTYl6yuhWGSQ3K8FLzumxbpkoxJt_2spvgf23TWc3Kb4NLjk1VlDWDIucJut5DKvgYgzbNJtg1hl3DoBlCaz5Da4bQ0sblQRajws4EdMrGf2tcshqkYIm72XN_bKd3_5NtJrMHPpnNX54fhtnB6WKvYNAPfHL5-SO95umncs5BiA8hHonp</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Nakano, H</creator><creator>Hattori, I</creator><creator>Sato, K</creator><creator>Morita, S</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management</title><author>Nakano, H ; Hattori, I ; Sato, K ; Morita, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-fdf8f9a3acaf7d2e1afdf5f89806f0548c20fda5719d3f14e0cf27e297dd1c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>forage production</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>harvesting</topic><topic>heading</topic><topic>hulls</topic><topic>inflorescences</topic><topic>leaf blade</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutritive value</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>rice</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakano, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakano, H</au><au>Hattori, I</au><au>Sato, K</au><au>Morita, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>593-603</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Because forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other forages, high dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield are essential. To optimize forage rice production, it is important to maximize nutritional value in the leaf and stem rather than in the panicle because the hull restricts cattle's (Bos taurus) ability to digest rice grain. In particular, it is important to maximize TDN concentration and yield in the leaf sheath plus stem (stem) due to the high proportion of this component in the crop rather than in the leaf blade (leaf). The objective in this study was to evaluate the effects of timing of first harvest [95 or 116 days after transplanting (DAT) (booting or full heading stage, respectively)], N application rate (150 or 300 kg N ha−1), and N application method (100–0N method, applying N at 100 and 0% in the first and second crops, respectively; 67–33N method, applying N at 67 and 33%, respectively; 33–67N method, applying N at 33 and 67%, respectively) on TDN concentration and yield in double-harvest of forage rice systems in southwestern Japan. With the 100–0N method, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 39 g m−2 lower when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT. However, with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 163 g m−2 higher when the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT than at 95 DAT, respectively. When the first crop was harvested at 116 DAT, stem TDN yield in the first crop was 152 and 161 g m−2 higher with the 100–0N and 67–33N methods than with the 33–67N method, respectively. In contrast, stem TDN yield in the second crop was 115 and 142 g m−2 higher with the 67–33N and 33–67N methods than with the 100–0N method, respectively. To obtain high stem TDN yield in total of the first and second crops, harvesting the first crop at full heading and applying 300 kg N ha−1 at 67 and 33% in the first crop and second crops, respectively, is effective. Management practices that increase forage quality will help southwestern Japan to be more sufficient in forage production.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2010.0323</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2011-05, Vol.103 (3), p.593-603 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_867910652 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences cattle crops fertilizer rates forage production Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production grain yield harvesting heading hulls inflorescences leaf blade nitrogen Nitrogen fertilization Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations nutritive value Oryza sativa rice Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments |
title | Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forage%20Rice%20Yield%20and%20Quality%20Response%20to%20Harvest%20Timing%20and%20Nitrogen%20Management&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Nakano,%20H&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=593-603&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2010.0323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353979081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867910652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |