Lawfare or strategic communications?
This essay attempts to trace the evolution of the term "Lawfare." Major General Dunlap inserted lawfare into our legal lexicon over a decade ago as a tool to communicate themes to military commanders. However, since that time it has primarily taken two divergent paths. One as Dunlap intend...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Case Western Reserve journal of international law 2010-03, Vol.43 (1-2), p.73 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | Case Western Reserve journal of international law |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Noone, Gregory P |
| description | This essay attempts to trace the evolution of the term "Lawfare." Major General Dunlap inserted lawfare into our legal lexicon over a decade ago as a tool to communicate themes to military commanders. However, since that time it has primarily taken two divergent paths. One as Dunlap intended -- as a discussion of applying legal pressure on the other side of a conflict, and the other as a derogatory term with an ideological goal. This essay also addresses lawfare and its potential relationship to "Strategic Communications" with an extensive discussion regarding this umbrella term and all it encompasses. Finally, this essay poses the question of whether there is a legitimate versus illegitimate -- or put another way -- a legal versus illegal -- lawfare construct. Ultimately, lawfare provides for the use and understanding of the law and especially the need to emphasize the pragmatic utility of the law to military commanders in an ideologically neutral way. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_867845415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A258439044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A258439044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1695-5ce872325cee5018d57d87e6af0680e652e09c424ea67876c74b85cc703358c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjk1LxDAQhoMoWFf_Q1GPVtImaaYnWRa_oOBFzyWbTmuWNtFOi3_fwHpYYRmYF4bnmZkTluSVyDNRgTplCeccMl0oec4uiHac51yCSNhtbX46M2EappTmyczYO5vaMI6Ld9bMLnh6uGRnnRkIr_5yxT6eHt83L1n99vy6WddZn5eVypRF0IUoYqLiObRKt6CxNB0vgWOpCuSVlYVEU2rQpdVyC8pazYVQYEGs2PV-79cUvhekudmFZfLxZAPRkErmKkI3e6g3AzbOdyG-bUdHtlkXCqSouJSRyo5QPXqczBA8di6O__H3R_hYLY7OHhXuDoTtQs4jxUau_5ypNwvRIf4LZSx1Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867845415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lawfare or strategic communications?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Noone, Gregory P</creator><creatorcontrib>Noone, Gregory P</creatorcontrib><description>This essay attempts to trace the evolution of the term "Lawfare." Major General Dunlap inserted lawfare into our legal lexicon over a decade ago as a tool to communicate themes to military commanders. However, since that time it has primarily taken two divergent paths. One as Dunlap intended -- as a discussion of applying legal pressure on the other side of a conflict, and the other as a derogatory term with an ideological goal. This essay also addresses lawfare and its potential relationship to "Strategic Communications" with an extensive discussion regarding this umbrella term and all it encompasses. Finally, this essay poses the question of whether there is a legitimate versus illegitimate -- or put another way -- a legal versus illegal -- lawfare construct. Ultimately, lawfare provides for the use and understanding of the law and especially the need to emphasize the pragmatic utility of the law to military commanders in an ideologically neutral way. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-7254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3985</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CWILAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University School of Law</publisher><subject>Communication ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Military communications ; War ; War (International law)</subject><ispartof>Case Western Reserve journal of international law, 2010-03, Vol.43 (1-2), p.73</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Case Western Reserve University School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright Case Western Reserve University, School of Law 2010</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noone, Gregory P</creatorcontrib><title>Lawfare or strategic communications?</title><title>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</title><description>This essay attempts to trace the evolution of the term "Lawfare." Major General Dunlap inserted lawfare into our legal lexicon over a decade ago as a tool to communicate themes to military commanders. However, since that time it has primarily taken two divergent paths. One as Dunlap intended -- as a discussion of applying legal pressure on the other side of a conflict, and the other as a derogatory term with an ideological goal. This essay also addresses lawfare and its potential relationship to "Strategic Communications" with an extensive discussion regarding this umbrella term and all it encompasses. Finally, this essay poses the question of whether there is a legitimate versus illegitimate -- or put another way -- a legal versus illegal -- lawfare construct. Ultimately, lawfare provides for the use and understanding of the law and especially the need to emphasize the pragmatic utility of the law to military commanders in an ideologically neutral way. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Military communications</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>War (International law)</subject><issn>0008-7254</issn><issn>1931-3985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjk1LxDAQhoMoWFf_Q1GPVtImaaYnWRa_oOBFzyWbTmuWNtFOi3_fwHpYYRmYF4bnmZkTluSVyDNRgTplCeccMl0oec4uiHac51yCSNhtbX46M2EappTmyczYO5vaMI6Ld9bMLnh6uGRnnRkIr_5yxT6eHt83L1n99vy6WddZn5eVypRF0IUoYqLiObRKt6CxNB0vgWOpCuSVlYVEU2rQpdVyC8pazYVQYEGs2PV-79cUvhekudmFZfLxZAPRkErmKkI3e6g3AzbOdyG-bUdHtlkXCqSouJSRyo5QPXqczBA8di6O__H3R_hYLY7OHhXuDoTtQs4jxUau_5ypNwvRIf4LZSx1Gg</recordid><startdate>20100322</startdate><enddate>20100322</enddate><creator>Noone, Gregory P</creator><general>Case Western Reserve University School of Law</general><general>Case Western Reserve University, School of Law</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100322</creationdate><title>Lawfare or strategic communications?</title><author>Noone, Gregory P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1695-5ce872325cee5018d57d87e6af0680e652e09c424ea67876c74b85cc703358c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Military communications</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>War (International law)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noone, Gregory P</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noone, Gregory P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lawfare or strategic communications?</atitle><jtitle>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</jtitle><date>2010-03-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>73</spage><pages>73-</pages><issn>0008-7254</issn><eissn>1931-3985</eissn><coden>CWILAD</coden><abstract>This essay attempts to trace the evolution of the term "Lawfare." Major General Dunlap inserted lawfare into our legal lexicon over a decade ago as a tool to communicate themes to military commanders. However, since that time it has primarily taken two divergent paths. One as Dunlap intended -- as a discussion of applying legal pressure on the other side of a conflict, and the other as a derogatory term with an ideological goal. This essay also addresses lawfare and its potential relationship to "Strategic Communications" with an extensive discussion regarding this umbrella term and all it encompasses. Finally, this essay poses the question of whether there is a legitimate versus illegitimate -- or put another way -- a legal versus illegal -- lawfare construct. Ultimately, lawfare provides for the use and understanding of the law and especially the need to emphasize the pragmatic utility of the law to military commanders in an ideologically neutral way. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Cleveland</cop><pub>Case Western Reserve University School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-7254 |
| ispartof | Case Western Reserve journal of international law, 2010-03, Vol.43 (1-2), p.73 |
| issn | 0008-7254 1931-3985 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_867845415 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Communication Law Laws, regulations and rules Military communications War War (International law) |
| title | Lawfare or strategic communications? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lawfare%20or%20strategic%20communications?&rft.jtitle=Case%20Western%20Reserve%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Noone,%20Gregory%20P&rft.date=2010-03-22&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=73&rft.pages=73-&rft.issn=0008-7254&rft.eissn=1931-3985&rft.coden=CWILAD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA258439044%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867845415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A258439044&rfr_iscdi=true |