Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing
Businesses and other organizations are relying increasingly on virtual teams to perform a range of business activities. A key challenge in utilizing virtual teams is to support collaboration among team members who are separated by distance and/or time. In this paper we use a research model based on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of information systems education 2011-03, Vol.22 (1), p.43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Journal of information systems education |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Dishaw, Mark Eierman, Michael A Iversen, Jakob H Philip, George C |
description | Businesses and other organizations are relying increasingly on virtual teams to perform a range of business activities. A key challenge in utilizing virtual teams is to support collaboration among team members who are separated by distance and/or time. In this paper we use a research model based on a combination of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Task Technology Fit (TTF) model to examine two approaches to supporting students in collaboratively creating and editing a report for an introductory course in information systems. In our study, one group of students used MS Word with Track Changes turned on combined with emailing the document among students. A second group was provided access to a wiki where they created the report. Results show that students found the Word and email combination more useful and easier to use than the wiki environment in completing the project. Further, there was no perceived difference in the effort of collaboration between the two methods. This study raises questions about the widely held belief that web-based collaboration platforms are superior to emailing documents among collaborators. (Contains 4 tables and 3 figures.) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_867845151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A257434963</galeid><ericid>EJ931449</ericid><sourcerecordid>A257434963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1521-6ad6094c1afe0a53f57b00fc8f3ce8140bea57e514ba8bbe15f5e30b171387c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEPQqytJ87V7klLXLwpeKj0uSTZZU7ebmuwW_PfG1oMFGZgZZp53hpkjMJowQTOSi8kxGGHEWEZQwU_BWYwrhDArOB-B-6X7cNAHuPShvoPlVraD7F3XwIX3bYQ2tWa-baXyIdW3Bi6D2_VlV8Oy3uXn4MTKNpqL3zgGbw_lYvaUzV8fn2fTeWYwm-CMy5qjgmosrUGSEcuEQsjq3BJtckyRMpIJwzBVMlcqiSwzBCkscLpCCzIGV_u5m-A_BxP7auWH0KWVVc5FThlmOEHXe6iRralcZ30fpF67qKvpz0cILThJ1O0_VLLarJ32nbEu1Q8EN38EaoiuMzG56Jr3PjZyiPEQv9zjJjhdbYJby_BVlS8FwZQW5BtXlXsF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867845151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Dishaw, Mark ; Eierman, Michael A ; Iversen, Jakob H ; Philip, George C</creator><creatorcontrib>Dishaw, Mark ; Eierman, Michael A ; Iversen, Jakob H ; Philip, George C</creatorcontrib><description>Businesses and other organizations are relying increasingly on virtual teams to perform a range of business activities. A key challenge in utilizing virtual teams is to support collaboration among team members who are separated by distance and/or time. In this paper we use a research model based on a combination of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Task Technology Fit (TTF) model to examine two approaches to supporting students in collaboratively creating and editing a report for an introductory course in information systems. In our study, one group of students used MS Word with Track Changes turned on combined with emailing the document among students. A second group was provided access to a wiki where they created the report. Results show that students found the Word and email combination more useful and easier to use than the wiki environment in completing the project. Further, there was no perceived difference in the effort of collaboration between the two methods. This study raises questions about the widely held belief that web-based collaboration platforms are superior to emailing documents among collaborators. (Contains 4 tables and 3 figures.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-3096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Lafayette: Journal of Information Systems Education (JISE)</publisher><subject>Adoption (Ideas) ; Attitudes ; Business Administration Education ; Business education ; Collaboration ; Collaborative Writing ; College Instruction ; College Students ; Communication ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Computer Science Education ; Computer Software ; Computer Software Evaluation ; Cooperative Learning ; Course Descriptions ; Curricula ; Editing ; Education ; Educational aspects ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Mail ; Information Systems ; Information technology ; Introductory Courses ; Learner Engagement ; Management ; Perceptions ; Questionnaires ; Student Attitudes ; Student participation ; Student Projects ; Student Surveys ; Study and teaching ; Technical Writing ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Undergraduate Students ; Usability ; Virtual enterprises ; Virtual teams ; Web Sites ; Wikis ; Word processing ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of information systems education, 2011-03, Vol.22 (1), p.43</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Journal of Information Systems Education</rights><rights>Copyright EDSIG Spring 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ931449$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dishaw, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eierman, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Jakob H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, George C</creatorcontrib><title>Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing</title><title>Journal of information systems education</title><description>Businesses and other organizations are relying increasingly on virtual teams to perform a range of business activities. A key challenge in utilizing virtual teams is to support collaboration among team members who are separated by distance and/or time. In this paper we use a research model based on a combination of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Task Technology Fit (TTF) model to examine two approaches to supporting students in collaboratively creating and editing a report for an introductory course in information systems. In our study, one group of students used MS Word with Track Changes turned on combined with emailing the document among students. A second group was provided access to a wiki where they created the report. Results show that students found the Word and email combination more useful and easier to use than the wiki environment in completing the project. Further, there was no perceived difference in the effort of collaboration between the two methods. This study raises questions about the widely held belief that web-based collaboration platforms are superior to emailing documents among collaborators. (Contains 4 tables and 3 figures.)</description><subject>Adoption (Ideas)</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative Writing</subject><subject>College Instruction</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Computer Science Education</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Computer Software Evaluation</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Course Descriptions</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Mail</subject><subject>Information Systems</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Student Projects</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Virtual enterprises</subject><subject>Virtual teams</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><subject>Wikis</subject><subject>Word processing</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1055-3096</issn><issn>2574-3872</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEPQqytJ87V7klLXLwpeKj0uSTZZU7ebmuwW_PfG1oMFGZgZZp53hpkjMJowQTOSi8kxGGHEWEZQwU_BWYwrhDArOB-B-6X7cNAHuPShvoPlVraD7F3XwIX3bYQ2tWa-baXyIdW3Bi6D2_VlV8Oy3uXn4MTKNpqL3zgGbw_lYvaUzV8fn2fTeWYwm-CMy5qjgmosrUGSEcuEQsjq3BJtckyRMpIJwzBVMlcqiSwzBCkscLpCCzIGV_u5m-A_BxP7auWH0KWVVc5FThlmOEHXe6iRralcZ30fpF67qKvpz0cILThJ1O0_VLLarJ32nbEu1Q8EN38EaoiuMzG56Jr3PjZyiPEQv9zjJjhdbYJby_BVlS8FwZQW5BtXlXsF</recordid><startdate>20110322</startdate><enddate>20110322</enddate><creator>Dishaw, Mark</creator><creator>Eierman, Michael A</creator><creator>Iversen, Jakob H</creator><creator>Philip, George C</creator><general>Journal of Information Systems Education (JISE)</general><general>Journal of Information Systems Education</general><general>EDSIG</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110322</creationdate><title>Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing</title><author>Dishaw, Mark ; Eierman, Michael A ; Iversen, Jakob H ; Philip, George C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1521-6ad6094c1afe0a53f57b00fc8f3ce8140bea57e514ba8bbe15f5e30b171387c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adoption (Ideas)</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative Writing</topic><topic>College Instruction</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Computer Science Education</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Computer Software Evaluation</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Course Descriptions</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Mail</topic><topic>Information Systems</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Student Projects</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Virtual enterprises</topic><topic>Virtual teams</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><topic>Wikis</topic><topic>Word processing</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dishaw, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eierman, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Jakob H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, George C</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of information systems education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dishaw, Mark</au><au>Eierman, Michael A</au><au>Iversen, Jakob H</au><au>Philip, George C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ931449</ericid><atitle>Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information systems education</jtitle><date>2011-03-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><pages>43-</pages><issn>1055-3096</issn><eissn>2574-3872</eissn><abstract>Businesses and other organizations are relying increasingly on virtual teams to perform a range of business activities. A key challenge in utilizing virtual teams is to support collaboration among team members who are separated by distance and/or time. In this paper we use a research model based on a combination of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Task Technology Fit (TTF) model to examine two approaches to supporting students in collaboratively creating and editing a report for an introductory course in information systems. In our study, one group of students used MS Word with Track Changes turned on combined with emailing the document among students. A second group was provided access to a wiki where they created the report. Results show that students found the Word and email combination more useful and easier to use than the wiki environment in completing the project. Further, there was no perceived difference in the effort of collaboration between the two methods. This study raises questions about the widely held belief that web-based collaboration platforms are superior to emailing documents among collaborators. (Contains 4 tables and 3 figures.)</abstract><cop>West Lafayette</cop><pub>Journal of Information Systems Education (JISE)</pub><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-3096 |
ispartof | Journal of information systems education, 2011-03, Vol.22 (1), p.43 |
issn | 1055-3096 2574-3872 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_867845151 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adoption (Ideas) Attitudes Business Administration Education Business education Collaboration Collaborative Writing College Instruction College Students Communication Comparative Analysis Computer Mediated Communication Computer Science Education Computer Software Computer Software Evaluation Cooperative Learning Course Descriptions Curricula Editing Education Educational aspects Educational Technology Electronic Mail Information Systems Information technology Introductory Courses Learner Engagement Management Perceptions Questionnaires Student Attitudes Student participation Student Projects Student Surveys Study and teaching Technical Writing Technology Acceptance Model Undergraduate Students Usability Virtual enterprises Virtual teams Web Sites Wikis Word processing Writing |
title | Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A19%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wiki%20or%20Word?%20Evaluating%20Tools%20for%20Collaborative%20Writing%20and%20Editing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information%20systems%20education&rft.au=Dishaw,%20Mark&rft.date=2011-03-22&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.pages=43-&rft.issn=1055-3096&rft.eissn=2574-3872&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA257434963%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867845151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A257434963&rft_ericid=EJ931449&rfr_iscdi=true |