Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System
Three-dimensional simulations of the daytime thermally induced valley wind system for an idealized valley–plain configuration, obtained from nine nonhydrostatic mesoscale models, are compared with special emphasis on the evolution of the along-valley wind. The models use the same initial and lateral...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2011-05, Vol.139 (5), p.1389-1409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1389 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 139 |
creator | SCHMIDLI, Juerg BILLINGS, Brian VOSPER, Simon WHITEMAN, C. David WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A ZÄNGL, Günther CHOW, Fotini K DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J DOYLE, James GRUBISIC, Vanda HOLT, Teddy JIANG, Qiangfang LUNDQUIST, Katherine A SHERIDAN, Peter |
description | Three-dimensional simulations of the daytime thermally induced valley wind system for an idealized valley–plain configuration, obtained from nine nonhydrostatic mesoscale models, are compared with special emphasis on the evolution of the along-valley wind. The models use the same initial and lateral boundary conditions, and standard parameterizations for turbulence, radiation, and land surface processes. The evolution of the mean along-valley wind (averaged over the valley cross section) is similar for all models, except for a time shift between individual models of up to 2 h and slight differences in the speed of the evolution. The analysis suggests that these differences are primarily due to differences in the simulated surface energy balance such as the dependence of the sensible heat flux on surface wind speed. Additional sensitivity experiments indicate that the evolution of the mean along-valley flow is largely independent of the choice of the dynamical core and of the turbulence parameterization scheme. The latter does, however, have a significant influence on the vertical structure of the boundary layer and of the along-valley wind. Thus, this ideal case may be useful for testing and evaluation of mesoscale numerical models with respect to land surface–atmosphere interactions and turbulence parameterizations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2010MWR3523.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_866747560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348542131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-956bb927a24a564b3586e8d4372d3d098cdbc54859573e36c88e922b44c798d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBmALgUQpjOwWiDHFPn9mROWrUisQBTpGjuOKVElc7HTIvydRK8TCdMM99570InRJyYRSJW6BULJYvTEBbEKP0IgKIAnhKTtGI0JAJURyforOYtwQQqTkMEKvs6Z1wfp6a0IZfYP9Gi9c9NGayuGFL1yFl2W9q0xb-iYO6_bL4XvTtWXt8KepKtfhVdkUeNnF1tXn6GRtquguDnOMPh4f3qfPyfzlaTa9myeWAbRJKmSep6AMcCMkz5nQ0umCMwUFK0iqbZFbwbVIhWKOSau1SwFyzq1KBzdGV_vcbfDfOxfbbON3oelfZlpKxZWQpEfX_yHQoEAKTXSvkr2ywccY3DrbhrI2ocsoyYZmsz_NZrT3N4dUM9S0DqaxZfw9Ak45ANfsB0oudiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827265808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SCHMIDLI, Juerg ; BILLINGS, Brian ; VOSPER, Simon ; WHITEMAN, C. David ; WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A ; ZÄNGL, Günther ; CHOW, Fotini K ; DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J ; DOYLE, James ; GRUBISIC, Vanda ; HOLT, Teddy ; JIANG, Qiangfang ; LUNDQUIST, Katherine A ; SHERIDAN, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDLI, Juerg ; BILLINGS, Brian ; VOSPER, Simon ; WHITEMAN, C. David ; WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A ; ZÄNGL, Günther ; CHOW, Fotini K ; DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J ; DOYLE, James ; GRUBISIC, Vanda ; HOLT, Teddy ; JIANG, Qiangfang ; LUNDQUIST, Katherine A ; SHERIDAN, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Three-dimensional simulations of the daytime thermally induced valley wind system for an idealized valley–plain configuration, obtained from nine nonhydrostatic mesoscale models, are compared with special emphasis on the evolution of the along-valley wind. The models use the same initial and lateral boundary conditions, and standard parameterizations for turbulence, radiation, and land surface processes. The evolution of the mean along-valley wind (averaged over the valley cross section) is similar for all models, except for a time shift between individual models of up to 2 h and slight differences in the speed of the evolution. The analysis suggests that these differences are primarily due to differences in the simulated surface energy balance such as the dependence of the sensible heat flux on surface wind speed. Additional sensitivity experiments indicate that the evolution of the mean along-valley flow is largely independent of the choice of the dynamical core and of the turbulence parameterization scheme. The latter does, however, have a significant influence on the vertical structure of the boundary layer and of the along-valley wind. Thus, this ideal case may be useful for testing and evaluation of mesoscale numerical models with respect to land surface–atmosphere interactions and turbulence parameterizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3523.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Atmospheric turbulence ; Boundary conditions ; Boundary layers ; Daytime ; Earth, ocean, space ; Energy balance ; Enthalpy ; Evolution ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Grants ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Influence ; Intercomparison ; Loam soils ; Mathematical models ; Mesoscale models ; Mesoscale phenomena ; Meteorology ; Modelling ; Numerical models ; Parameterization ; Physics ; Radiation ; Sensible heat ; Sensible heat flux ; Sensible heat transfer ; Simulation ; Studies ; Surface energy ; Surface energy balance ; Surface properties ; Surface wind ; Topography ; Turbulence ; Valley winds ; Valleys ; Vertical profiles ; Wind ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2011-05, Vol.139 (5), p.1389-1409</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2011</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-956bb927a24a564b3586e8d4372d3d098cdbc54859573e36c88e922b44c798d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-956bb927a24a564b3586e8d4372d3d098cdbc54859573e36c88e922b44c798d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24142248$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDLI, Juerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLINGS, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOSPER, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITEMAN, C. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÄNGL, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHOW, Fotini K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOYLE, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUBISIC, Vanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLT, Teddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG, Qiangfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDQUIST, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERIDAN, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Three-dimensional simulations of the daytime thermally induced valley wind system for an idealized valley–plain configuration, obtained from nine nonhydrostatic mesoscale models, are compared with special emphasis on the evolution of the along-valley wind. The models use the same initial and lateral boundary conditions, and standard parameterizations for turbulence, radiation, and land surface processes. The evolution of the mean along-valley wind (averaged over the valley cross section) is similar for all models, except for a time shift between individual models of up to 2 h and slight differences in the speed of the evolution. The analysis suggests that these differences are primarily due to differences in the simulated surface energy balance such as the dependence of the sensible heat flux on surface wind speed. Additional sensitivity experiments indicate that the evolution of the mean along-valley flow is largely independent of the choice of the dynamical core and of the turbulence parameterization scheme. The latter does, however, have a significant influence on the vertical structure of the boundary layer and of the along-valley wind. Thus, this ideal case may be useful for testing and evaluation of mesoscale numerical models with respect to land surface–atmosphere interactions and turbulence parameterizations.</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Atmospheric turbulence</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Enthalpy</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mesoscale models</subject><subject>Mesoscale phenomena</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Sensible heat</subject><subject>Sensible heat flux</subject><subject>Sensible heat transfer</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface energy</subject><subject>Surface energy balance</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Valley winds</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Vertical profiles</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBmALgUQpjOwWiDHFPn9mROWrUisQBTpGjuOKVElc7HTIvydRK8TCdMM99570InRJyYRSJW6BULJYvTEBbEKP0IgKIAnhKTtGI0JAJURyforOYtwQQqTkMEKvs6Z1wfp6a0IZfYP9Gi9c9NGayuGFL1yFl2W9q0xb-iYO6_bL4XvTtWXt8KepKtfhVdkUeNnF1tXn6GRtquguDnOMPh4f3qfPyfzlaTa9myeWAbRJKmSep6AMcCMkz5nQ0umCMwUFK0iqbZFbwbVIhWKOSau1SwFyzq1KBzdGV_vcbfDfOxfbbON3oelfZlpKxZWQpEfX_yHQoEAKTXSvkr2ywccY3DrbhrI2ocsoyYZmsz_NZrT3N4dUM9S0DqaxZfw9Ak45ANfsB0oudiY</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>SCHMIDLI, Juerg</creator><creator>BILLINGS, Brian</creator><creator>VOSPER, Simon</creator><creator>WHITEMAN, C. David</creator><creator>WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A</creator><creator>ZÄNGL, Günther</creator><creator>CHOW, Fotini K</creator><creator>DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J</creator><creator>DOYLE, James</creator><creator>GRUBISIC, Vanda</creator><creator>HOLT, Teddy</creator><creator>JIANG, Qiangfang</creator><creator>LUNDQUIST, Katherine A</creator><creator>SHERIDAN, Peter</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System</title><author>SCHMIDLI, Juerg ; BILLINGS, Brian ; VOSPER, Simon ; WHITEMAN, C. David ; WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A ; ZÄNGL, Günther ; CHOW, Fotini K ; DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J ; DOYLE, James ; GRUBISIC, Vanda ; HOLT, Teddy ; JIANG, Qiangfang ; LUNDQUIST, Katherine A ; SHERIDAN, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-956bb927a24a564b3586e8d4372d3d098cdbc54859573e36c88e922b44c798d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Atmospheric turbulence</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Enthalpy</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mesoscale models</topic><topic>Mesoscale phenomena</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Sensible heat</topic><topic>Sensible heat flux</topic><topic>Sensible heat transfer</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface energy</topic><topic>Surface energy balance</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Valley winds</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Vertical profiles</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHMIDLI, Juerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILLINGS, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOSPER, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITEMAN, C. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZÄNGL, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHOW, Fotini K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOYLE, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUBISIC, Vanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLT, Teddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG, Qiangfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDQUIST, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERIDAN, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHMIDLI, Juerg</au><au>BILLINGS, Brian</au><au>VOSPER, Simon</au><au>WHITEMAN, C. David</au><au>WYSZOGRODZKI, Andrzej A</au><au>ZÄNGL, Günther</au><au>CHOW, Fotini K</au><au>DE WEKKER, Stephan F. J</au><au>DOYLE, James</au><au>GRUBISIC, Vanda</au><au>HOLT, Teddy</au><au>JIANG, Qiangfang</au><au>LUNDQUIST, Katherine A</au><au>SHERIDAN, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1389</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1389-1409</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Three-dimensional simulations of the daytime thermally induced valley wind system for an idealized valley–plain configuration, obtained from nine nonhydrostatic mesoscale models, are compared with special emphasis on the evolution of the along-valley wind. The models use the same initial and lateral boundary conditions, and standard parameterizations for turbulence, radiation, and land surface processes. The evolution of the mean along-valley wind (averaged over the valley cross section) is similar for all models, except for a time shift between individual models of up to 2 h and slight differences in the speed of the evolution. The analysis suggests that these differences are primarily due to differences in the simulated surface energy balance such as the dependence of the sensible heat flux on surface wind speed. Additional sensitivity experiments indicate that the evolution of the mean along-valley flow is largely independent of the choice of the dynamical core and of the turbulence parameterization scheme. The latter does, however, have a significant influence on the vertical structure of the boundary layer and of the along-valley wind. Thus, this ideal case may be useful for testing and evaluation of mesoscale numerical models with respect to land surface–atmosphere interactions and turbulence parameterizations.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2010MWR3523.1</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2011-05, Vol.139 (5), p.1389-1409 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_866747560 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Atmospheric models Atmospheric turbulence Boundary conditions Boundary layers Daytime Earth, ocean, space Energy balance Enthalpy Evolution Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Grants Heat flux Heat transfer Influence Intercomparison Loam soils Mathematical models Mesoscale models Mesoscale phenomena Meteorology Modelling Numerical models Parameterization Physics Radiation Sensible heat Sensible heat flux Sensible heat transfer Simulation Studies Surface energy Surface energy balance Surface properties Surface wind Topography Turbulence Valley winds Valleys Vertical profiles Wind Wind speed |
title | Intercomparison of Mesoscale Model Simulations of the Daytime Valley Wind System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intercomparison%20of%20Mesoscale%20Model%20Simulations%20of%20the%20Daytime%20Valley%20Wind%20System&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=SCHMIDLI,%20Juerg&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1389&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1389-1409&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2010MWR3523.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348542131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827265808&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |