Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008

Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008

Background Reporting quality of clinical trials has been addressed by the CONSORT group for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) first in 1996 with updates in 2001 and 2010. Objective We hypothesised that the quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts has increased from 2005 to 2008 a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of sports medicine 2011-04, Vol.45 (4), p.357-357
Hauptverfasser: Knobloch, K, Yoon, U
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Evidence-based medicine
Medical research
Preventive medicine
Quality
Sports injuries
Sports medicine
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 357
container_issue 4
container_start_page 357
container_title British journal of sports medicine
container_volume 45
creator Knobloch, K
Yoon, U
description Background Reporting quality of clinical trials has been addressed by the CONSORT group for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) first in 1996 with updates in 2001 and 2010. Objective We hypothesised that the quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts has increased from 2005 to 2008 as did the amount of RCTs at the 1st versus 2nd World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention in Oslo vesus Tromsø. Design Analysis of the published abstracts of the 2005 and 2008 World Conference on Sports Injury Prevention, two independent analysts. Setting 154 abstracts from the 2005 and 186 abstracts from 2008 World Conferences were analysed. Main outcome measures Evidence-based study design, scores of 17 CONSORT criteria for RCT. Results RCTs were published in 9.1% in 2005 versus 10.2% in 2008 (p=0.727) of all published abstracts. Improvement in reporting was evident for RCTs in the CONSORT score 5.8±0.9 versus 8.6±2.9 (p=0.001, CI −4.29 to −1.43). Detailed description of main outcomes demonstrated the most significant improvement in reporting in the abstracts of RCTs (0% vs 57.9%, p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_865567711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012903231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1781-c9d13c4c89ecec62c2f50a41d69b02a9817cad73b7ce828eaf2873a883f73b493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFO3DAYha0KpA5Db8DCatcZ_NtO7CzpAKUItSC1bC3HcahDJh7sTGF23XEAbtiT1JlU3SFVsuTfT-89y_4QOgKyAGDFcdXG1YISgAWRnDC5AMbfoBlwwTLCJdlDM8JIkbFC8LfoIMaWEKA5kTP0fLPRnRu22Dc42LUPg-vvdgfd137loq2x8f0QfNelcQhOdxH__vWCdZ-W7rbRxdE__LD40YduZ78LNu7UODZG7Pp2E7Z4HexP2w_O90nBlJA8VdTjIA_RfpOa7bu_-xx9Pz_7trzIrr5--rw8ucoqEBIyU9bADDeytMaaghra5ERzqIuyIlSXEoTRtWCVMFZSaXVDpWBaStYkkZdsjt5PvevgHzY2Dqr1m5DeEZUs8rwQIv3oHH14zQRClCAowFjFJ5cJPsZgG7UObqXDVgFRIxc1clEjFzVxUYlLimVTzMXBPv3L6HCvCsFErr7cLlWixm5OP16ry-Q_nvzVqv2_G_4AeHSf5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779172119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Knobloch, K ; Yoon, U</creator><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, K ; Yoon, U</creatorcontrib><description>Background Reporting quality of clinical trials has been addressed by the CONSORT group for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) first in 1996 with updates in 2001 and 2010. Objective We hypothesised that the quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts has increased from 2005 to 2008 as did the amount of RCTs at the 1st versus 2nd World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention in Oslo vesus Tromsø. Design Analysis of the published abstracts of the 2005 and 2008 World Conference on Sports Injury Prevention, two independent analysts. Setting 154 abstracts from the 2005 and 186 abstracts from 2008 World Conferences were analysed. Main outcome measures Evidence-based study design, scores of 17 CONSORT criteria for RCT. Results RCTs were published in 9.1% in 2005 versus 10.2% in 2008 (p=0.727) of all published abstracts. Improvement in reporting was evident for RCTs in the CONSORT score 5.8±0.9 versus 8.6±2.9 (p=0.001, CI −4.29 to −1.43). Detailed description of main outcomes demonstrated the most significant improvement in reporting in the abstracts of RCTs (0% vs 57.9%, p&lt;0.001). Study design mentioned in the title, trial design, participants, blinding, number analysed, outcome and funding tended to but did not improve significantly in the reporting RCTs in conference abstracts. No improvement at all over the 3 years was noted for reporting quality of the title randomised, authors, intervention, objectives/hypothesis, randomisation, numbers randomised, recruitment, and number analysed, harms and trial registration. Conclusion While the percentage of published RCTs in abstracts at the World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention remained mainly unchanged, improvement in reporting of abstracts was evident from 2005 to 2008 determined by CONSORT criteria. Further substantial and comprehensive use of the recently updated CONSORT 2010 criteria might further increase the quality of reporting of sports injury conference RCTs in the future and should be endorsed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</publisher><subject>Evidence-based medicine ; Medical research ; Preventive medicine ; Quality ; Sports injuries ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>British journal of sports medicine, 2011-04, Vol.45 (4), p.357-357</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/45/4/357.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/45/4/357.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, U</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008</title><title>British journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background Reporting quality of clinical trials has been addressed by the CONSORT group for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) first in 1996 with updates in 2001 and 2010. Objective We hypothesised that the quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts has increased from 2005 to 2008 as did the amount of RCTs at the 1st versus 2nd World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention in Oslo vesus Tromsø. Design Analysis of the published abstracts of the 2005 and 2008 World Conference on Sports Injury Prevention, two independent analysts. Setting 154 abstracts from the 2005 and 186 abstracts from 2008 World Conferences were analysed. Main outcome measures Evidence-based study design, scores of 17 CONSORT criteria for RCT. Results RCTs were published in 9.1% in 2005 versus 10.2% in 2008 (p=0.727) of all published abstracts. Improvement in reporting was evident for RCTs in the CONSORT score 5.8±0.9 versus 8.6±2.9 (p=0.001, CI −4.29 to −1.43). Detailed description of main outcomes demonstrated the most significant improvement in reporting in the abstracts of RCTs (0% vs 57.9%, p&lt;0.001). Study design mentioned in the title, trial design, participants, blinding, number analysed, outcome and funding tended to but did not improve significantly in the reporting RCTs in conference abstracts. No improvement at all over the 3 years was noted for reporting quality of the title randomised, authors, intervention, objectives/hypothesis, randomisation, numbers randomised, recruitment, and number analysed, harms and trial registration. Conclusion While the percentage of published RCTs in abstracts at the World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention remained mainly unchanged, improvement in reporting of abstracts was evident from 2005 to 2008 determined by CONSORT criteria. Further substantial and comprehensive use of the recently updated CONSORT 2010 criteria might further increase the quality of reporting of sports injury conference RCTs in the future and should be endorsed.</description><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0306-3674</issn><issn>1473-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFO3DAYha0KpA5Db8DCatcZ_NtO7CzpAKUItSC1bC3HcahDJh7sTGF23XEAbtiT1JlU3SFVsuTfT-89y_4QOgKyAGDFcdXG1YISgAWRnDC5AMbfoBlwwTLCJdlDM8JIkbFC8LfoIMaWEKA5kTP0fLPRnRu22Dc42LUPg-vvdgfd137loq2x8f0QfNelcQhOdxH__vWCdZ-W7rbRxdE__LD40YduZ78LNu7UODZG7Pp2E7Z4HexP2w_O90nBlJA8VdTjIA_RfpOa7bu_-xx9Pz_7trzIrr5--rw8ucoqEBIyU9bADDeytMaaghra5ERzqIuyIlSXEoTRtWCVMFZSaXVDpWBaStYkkZdsjt5PvevgHzY2Dqr1m5DeEZUs8rwQIv3oHH14zQRClCAowFjFJ5cJPsZgG7UObqXDVgFRIxc1clEjFzVxUYlLimVTzMXBPv3L6HCvCsFErr7cLlWixm5OP16ry-Q_nvzVqv2_G_4AeHSf5w</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Knobloch, K</creator><creator>Yoon, U</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008</title><author>Knobloch, K ; Yoon, U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1781-c9d13c4c89ecec62c2f50a41d69b02a9817cad73b7ce828eaf2873a883f73b493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, U</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knobloch, K</au><au>Yoon, U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>357-357</pages><issn>0306-3674</issn><eissn>1473-0480</eissn><abstract>Background Reporting quality of clinical trials has been addressed by the CONSORT group for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) first in 1996 with updates in 2001 and 2010. Objective We hypothesised that the quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts has increased from 2005 to 2008 as did the amount of RCTs at the 1st versus 2nd World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention in Oslo vesus Tromsø. Design Analysis of the published abstracts of the 2005 and 2008 World Conference on Sports Injury Prevention, two independent analysts. Setting 154 abstracts from the 2005 and 186 abstracts from 2008 World Conferences were analysed. Main outcome measures Evidence-based study design, scores of 17 CONSORT criteria for RCT. Results RCTs were published in 9.1% in 2005 versus 10.2% in 2008 (p=0.727) of all published abstracts. Improvement in reporting was evident for RCTs in the CONSORT score 5.8±0.9 versus 8.6±2.9 (p=0.001, CI −4.29 to −1.43). Detailed description of main outcomes demonstrated the most significant improvement in reporting in the abstracts of RCTs (0% vs 57.9%, p&lt;0.001). Study design mentioned in the title, trial design, participants, blinding, number analysed, outcome and funding tended to but did not improve significantly in the reporting RCTs in conference abstracts. No improvement at all over the 3 years was noted for reporting quality of the title randomised, authors, intervention, objectives/hypothesis, randomisation, numbers randomised, recruitment, and number analysed, harms and trial registration. Conclusion While the percentage of published RCTs in abstracts at the World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention remained mainly unchanged, improvement in reporting of abstracts was evident from 2005 to 2008 determined by CONSORT criteria. Further substantial and comprehensive use of the recently updated CONSORT 2010 criteria might further increase the quality of reporting of sports injury conference RCTs in the future and should be endorsed.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</pub><doi>10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.134</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-3674
ispartof British journal of sports medicine, 2011-04, Vol.45 (4), p.357-357
issn 0306-3674
1473-0480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_865567711
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Evidence-based medicine
Medical research
Preventive medicine
Quality
Sports injuries
Sports medicine
title Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials – an analysis of the world congress of sports injury prevention in 2005 and 2008
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A03%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20reporting%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20trials%20%E2%80%93%20an%20analysis%20of%20the%20world%20congress%20of%20sports%20injury%20prevention%20in%202005%20and%202008&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Knobloch,%20K&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=357-357&rft.issn=0306-3674&rft.eissn=1473-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4012903231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779172119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true