InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes

Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.2319-2324
1. Verfasser: Dall, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2324
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2319
container_title IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
container_volume 45
creator Dall, J.
description Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSAR) is biased downward. For infinitely deep uniform volumes, the elevation bias is often equated with the penetration depth, but in this paper, it is shown that the two quantities generally differ. The interferometric bias is approximately equal to the two-way power-penetration depth if the latter is small compared to the ambiguity height, but for increasing penetration depth, the bias approaches one quarter of the ambiguity height. Consequently, no phase wrapping results even if the penetration depth exceeds the ambiguity height. The ratio of the InSAR elevation bias to the ambiguity height depends only on the ratio of the penetration depth to the ambiguity height, and the bias can be expressed in terms of the InSAR coherence magnitude, which makes it possible to correct the InSAR surface elevation for the bias. The volume depth can be considered infinite if it exceeds the penetration depth by a factor of two to five and if the surface scattering from the top and the bottom of the volume is negligible.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TGRS.2007.896613
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_864098898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4261044</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>880666235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-fdf37bbf5bd15ce55efdb209c9baa50c0538535b8356aed58d913924e104a6ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvgpcgiKfU3exHd09SS62FgtIPr8tmM4GUdFN3E6H_3oQUBU9zmOd9mXkQuiV4RAhWT5v5aj1KMB6PpBKC0DM0IJzLGAvGztEAEyXiRKrkEl2FsMOYME7GA_S8cOvJKpqV8G3qonLRS2FCNDVNgCxKj9EHOKh9v1q4uoq2rsgrv48-q7LZQ7hGF7kpA9yc5hBtX2eb6Vu8fJ8vppNlbBkjdZxnOR2nac7TjHALnEOepQlWVqXGcGwxp5JTnkrKhYGMy0wRqhIGBDMjwNIheux7D776aiDUel8EC2VpHFRN0FJiIURCeUve_yN3VeNde5yWgmElpZIthHvI-ioED7k--GJv_FETrDufuvOpO5-699lGHk69JlhT5t44W4S_XNcrZdJydz1XAMDvmiWifYXRH14ufQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864098898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Dall, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dall, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSAR) is biased downward. For infinitely deep uniform volumes, the elevation bias is often equated with the penetration depth, but in this paper, it is shown that the two quantities generally differ. The interferometric bias is approximately equal to the two-way power-penetration depth if the latter is small compared to the ambiguity height, but for increasing penetration depth, the bias approaches one quarter of the ambiguity height. Consequently, no phase wrapping results even if the penetration depth exceeds the ambiguity height. The ratio of the InSAR elevation bias to the ambiguity height depends only on the ratio of the penetration depth to the ambiguity height, and the bias can be expressed in terms of the InSAR coherence magnitude, which makes it possible to correct the InSAR surface elevation for the bias. The volume depth can be considered infinite if it exceeds the penetration depth by a factor of two to five and if the surface scattering from the top and the bottom of the volume is negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.896613</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Applied geophysics ; Bias ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Elevation bias ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extinction coefficients ; Ice thickness ; interferometry ; Internal geophysics ; L-band ; Media ; Penetration ; Penetration depth ; Radar measurements ; Radar scattering ; Sand ; Signal mapping ; Surface topography ; Synthetic aperture radar ; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) ; Synthetic aperture radar interferometry ; Vegetation mapping ; volume scattering</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.2319-2324</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-fdf37bbf5bd15ce55efdb209c9baa50c0538535b8356aed58d913924e104a6ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-fdf37bbf5bd15ce55efdb209c9baa50c0538535b8356aed58d913924e104a6ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4261044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27922,27923,54756</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4261044$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18898882$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dall, J.</creatorcontrib><title>InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSAR) is biased downward. For infinitely deep uniform volumes, the elevation bias is often equated with the penetration depth, but in this paper, it is shown that the two quantities generally differ. The interferometric bias is approximately equal to the two-way power-penetration depth if the latter is small compared to the ambiguity height, but for increasing penetration depth, the bias approaches one quarter of the ambiguity height. Consequently, no phase wrapping results even if the penetration depth exceeds the ambiguity height. The ratio of the InSAR elevation bias to the ambiguity height depends only on the ratio of the penetration depth to the ambiguity height, and the bias can be expressed in terms of the InSAR coherence magnitude, which makes it possible to correct the InSAR surface elevation for the bias. The volume depth can be considered infinite if it exceeds the penetration depth by a factor of two to five and if the surface scattering from the top and the bottom of the volume is negligible.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Elevation bias</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extinction coefficients</subject><subject>Ice thickness</subject><subject>interferometry</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>L-band</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Penetration depth</subject><subject>Radar measurements</subject><subject>Radar scattering</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Signal mapping</subject><subject>Surface topography</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><subject>volume scattering</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvgpcgiKfU3exHd09SS62FgtIPr8tmM4GUdFN3E6H_3oQUBU9zmOd9mXkQuiV4RAhWT5v5aj1KMB6PpBKC0DM0IJzLGAvGztEAEyXiRKrkEl2FsMOYME7GA_S8cOvJKpqV8G3qonLRS2FCNDVNgCxKj9EHOKh9v1q4uoq2rsgrv48-q7LZQ7hGF7kpA9yc5hBtX2eb6Vu8fJ8vppNlbBkjdZxnOR2nac7TjHALnEOepQlWVqXGcGwxp5JTnkrKhYGMy0wRqhIGBDMjwNIheux7D776aiDUel8EC2VpHFRN0FJiIURCeUve_yN3VeNde5yWgmElpZIthHvI-ioED7k--GJv_FETrDufuvOpO5-699lGHk69JlhT5t44W4S_XNcrZdJydz1XAMDvmiWifYXRH14ufQ0</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Dall, J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes</title><author>Dall, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-fdf37bbf5bd15ce55efdb209c9baa50c0538535b8356aed58d913924e104a6ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Elevation bias</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extinction coefficients</topic><topic>Ice thickness</topic><topic>interferometry</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>L-band</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Penetration depth</topic><topic>Radar measurements</topic><topic>Radar scattering</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Signal mapping</topic><topic>Surface topography</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><topic>volume scattering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dall, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dall, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2319</spage><epage>2324</epage><pages>2319-2324</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>Natural media like cold-land ice, vegetation, and dry sand are subject to a substantial penetration at microwave frequencies. For such media, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) phase center is located below the surface, and consequently, the surface elevation determined with SAR interferometry (InSAR) is biased downward. For infinitely deep uniform volumes, the elevation bias is often equated with the penetration depth, but in this paper, it is shown that the two quantities generally differ. The interferometric bias is approximately equal to the two-way power-penetration depth if the latter is small compared to the ambiguity height, but for increasing penetration depth, the bias approaches one quarter of the ambiguity height. Consequently, no phase wrapping results even if the penetration depth exceeds the ambiguity height. The ratio of the InSAR elevation bias to the ambiguity height depends only on the ratio of the penetration depth to the ambiguity height, and the bias can be expressed in terms of the InSAR coherence magnitude, which makes it possible to correct the InSAR surface elevation for the bias. The volume depth can be considered infinite if it exceeds the penetration depth by a factor of two to five and if the surface scattering from the top and the bottom of the volume is negligible.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2007.896613</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0196-2892
ispartof IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.2319-2324
issn 0196-2892
1558-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_864098898
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Ambiguity
Applied geophysics
Bias
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Elevation
Elevation bias
Exact sciences and technology
Extinction coefficients
Ice thickness
interferometry
Internal geophysics
L-band
Media
Penetration
Penetration depth
Radar measurements
Radar scattering
Sand
Signal mapping
Surface topography
Synthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
Synthetic aperture radar interferometry
Vegetation mapping
volume scattering
title InSAR Elevation Bias Caused by Penetration Into Uniform Volumes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T14%3A09%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=InSAR%20Elevation%20Bias%20Caused%20by%20Penetration%20Into%20Uniform%20Volumes&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Dall,%20J.&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2319&rft.epage=2324&rft.pages=2319-2324&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2007.896613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E880666235%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864098898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4261044&rfr_iscdi=true